NDLTD Global ETD Search
  • Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.

Search results

Showing 1 to 1 of 1 (0.135 seconds)

Spelling suggestions: "subject:"base mest""

1

Comparisons of Sculpting Efficiency Between Mudbox and ZBrush

Sarstedt, Isabell January 2012 (has links)
It is difficult to navigate throughout todays existing sculpting and modeling software. Industry drives the development in this area by “time versus quality.” It is difficult to know which software is the most suitable to learn for sculpting details, as well as which one is the most efficient for beginners. There are two software programs, Autodesk Mudbox and Pixologic ZBrush, which will be examined and reviewed for sculpting details, learning curve for beginners, and time efficiency in this research. The overall results displayed that ZBrush seems to be the better choice for more advanced modellers and artists, while Mudbox is a better choice for beginners and more technical modellers.
Sculpting
modeling
3D
2.5D
base mesh
Autodesk Mudbox
Pixologic ZBrush.
Computer Sciences
Datavetenskap (datalogi)

Page generated in 0.1427 seconds