Northern peatlands are an important carbon store, with carbon dynamics and hydrology intrinsically linked. The riparian zone is the interface between the terrestrial and aquatic systems, situated adjacent to the stream and characterised by periodic flooding, near surface water tables and unique soil and plant species composition. Due to its unique biogeochemical environment, the riparian zone has the potential to modify significantly the production, mobilisation and transport of carbon via the land-atmosphere and aquatic pathways. Two contrasting headwater catchments, an ombrotrophic peatland (Auchencorth Moss, SE Scotland) and a forested, till dominated catchment (Västrabäcken, N Sweden), were investigated. In each carbon concentrations in soil and stream water and hydrological parameters were measured in transects connecting the wider catchment, riparian zone and stream. The overarching aim was to investigate the role of the riparian zone on the hydrological and bio-geochemical functioning of peatland and forested catchments, focusing on carbon export via the aquatic pathway. Specific objectives were to: a) examine the importance of soils, water table and vegetation composition on riparian biogeochemical cycling, b) investigate riparian-stream hydrological connectivity and the transport of carbon across the soil-water interface and c) assess riparian processes in relation to the net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB) across northern latitude ecosystems. Porewater total carbon (TC) concentrations (sum of dissolved organic and inorganic carbon (DOC, DIC), CO2 and CH4) were on average higher in Auchencorth Moss (78.8-140 mg C L-1) than the Västrabäcken (27.7-63.2 mg C L-1) catchment. In both catchments, higher TC concentrations were observed in the riparian zone compared to the wider catchment. The dominant control for differentiating between catchment and riparian biogeochemical processes was the higher average riparian water table with each carbon species displaying a positive relationship with water table height. A range of other factors, including soil temperature and the carbon content of catchment and riparian soils, also contributed to the complexity of riparian carbon biogeochemical cycles. Catchment specific phenomena, including the presence of aerenchymous vegetation and stream sediment deposition onto the riparian zone, modified riparian carbon dynamics in the Auchencorth Moss catchment. Isotopically, porewater DOC, CO2 and CH4 had a 14C content >100 %modern, indicating that the modern plant derived DOC is being transported down the soil profile, providing the source for CO2 and CH4 production at depth. In both catchments the riparian zone represented an important and dynamic source of carbon to stream waters. Total annual CO2 export from the riparian zone of the Västrabäcken catchment to the stream channel over the hydrological year was 2.7 g CO2-C m2 yr-1 with export predominantly from between 40 and 55 cm depth within the soil. Two monthly peaks in CO2 export occurred over the hydrological year related to either storm events or the spring snow melt period which accounted for 19 % of annual export, highlighting the temporal variability in soil-stream linkages, especially during high flow periods. In the generally wetter peatland catchment, riparian-stream linkages were driven by antecedent conditions and variation in riparian water table, with changes in water input, rather than changes in CO2 source concentrations, controlling stream water composition. The negative CO2 concentration-discharge relationship in the stream suggested that event water dominated, with small but important inputs from high concentration soil water during individual events. The importance of event water in transporting carbon was confirmed through the isotope result. CO2, CH4 and DOC exported via the aquatic pathway predominantly contained modern, plant derived carbon from the near surface soil horizons but with a small contribution (5-28 %) from deeper geological sources leading to aged evasion CH4 (310-537 years BP) and CO2 (36 years BP to modern). In both catchments the riparian zone was more important, relative to the wider catchment, in controlling the export of carbon via the aquatic pathway. At Auchencorth Moss, the riparian zone, plus an area of the catchment extending ~20 m from the stream, were hotspots for land-atmosphere fluxes of CH4, with mean flux of 1.08-7.70 mg m2 hr-1 in comparison to the catchment overall (0.05 mg m2 hr-1). In both catchments, combining detailed catchment hydrological models with high temporal resolution carbon concentration measurements, especially in riparian zone soils, has the potential to improve estimates of downstream and evaded carbon export in headwater catchments. Riparian zones should therefore be included more in studies investigating hydrological and biogeochemical processes in northern latitude headwater catchments. The processes within riparian zones suggest that despite the relatively small area that riparian zones represent, in relation to the wider catchment, they may play an important role in the NECB of peatland and forested catchments under future management and climate change scenarios.

Primary production and carbon export connect biogeochemical cycles in the surface waters to the deep. Quantifying rates of production and carbon export are important to understanding the global carbon cycle. There are multiple productivity rate methods, but each measures a different fraction of production. The first type of method is in vitro methods that involve removing water samples from the environment and incubating with an isotopically labelled tracer, such as a nutrient. At the end of the incubation, the amount of enrichment in either the particulates (phytoplankton) or the dissolved oxygen are measured to determine productivity. The second type of method is in situ methods that measure the natural environmental parameters instead of incubations. In this study, the natural isotopic composition and the ratio of gases in the surface water are measured. Comparing in situ versus in vitro methods in the Arctic on a GEOTRACES cruise (July 2015), we identified five reasons to explain why methods do not agree: time of integration, depth of integration, recently shoaled mixed layer, mixing at the base of the mixed layer, and methodological issues. When comparing in vitro methods to each other, filter handling and some as yet unidentified bias causes differences. Comparing methods along Line P (over three years), we hypothesize that excretion of dissolved organic nitrogen, upwelling, bottle effects, mixing, and time of integration are the most important factors that cause disagreement between methods. End of bloom dynamics created an extreme case where method disagreement was most severe. Applying method comparison in the NE subarctic Pacific (August 2014 – June 2017) helps to understand what drives variability in primary production. Historical data show that chlorophyll-a is low and invariant offshore in the high nutrient low chlorophyll area (HNLC), where iron is limiting. We used satellites and models, which compare well with shipboard data, to expand our spatial and temporal coverage of the offshore HNLC area. Increased chlorophyll a is associated with higher production, higher salinity, and lower temperature. We hypothesize that iron can be supplied to surface waters by offshore fronts, using June 2015 and June 2016 as specific examples. Fronts are locations where temperature, salinity and/or density are rapidly changing, in this particular dissertation a 1°C change over 1/3 degree distance. We identified locations where fronts were located based on Mercator model sea surface temperatures and compared these features to satellite chlorophyll patterns. Our hypothesis is also supported by data from June 2017 where there were no fronts and chlorophyll was uniformly low. Future research should consider fronts as a possible mechanism for increasing productivity in the area. Identifying mechanisms that cause methods to disagree and then applying to biogeochemical regions allows for better understanding of carbon cycling. / Graduate / 2020-09-12

I used a specific inhibitor approach to systematically measure NH4+ oxidation rates through the euphotic zone of three distinct oceanographic regimes. Study sites included Saanich Inlet, a highly productive British Columbia fjord, the Line P oceanographic transect in the NE subarctic pacific, and the Bermuda Atlantic Time-series Study (BATS) station in the oligotrophic, sub-tropical Sargasso Sea. Nitrate uptake rates were also measured at select stations on a number of research cruises. NH4+ oxidation rates were found to proceed throughout the euphotic zone in each of my study regions, and, overall, euphotic zone NH4+ oxidation rates ranged from undetectable to 203 nmol L-1 d-1. A general characterization of the rates observed in each of my study regions shows that euphotic zone NH4+ oxidation rates were typically highest in Saanich Inlet, intermediate along Line P, and lowest at BATS. The observation that NH4+ oxidation occurred throughout the euphotic zone in each of my study regions was in contrast to the traditional assumption of no euphotic zone nitrification, and it should now be considered a ubiquitous process in the euphotic regions of the ocean. Results found that euphotic zone nitrification could have potentially supported, on average, 15, 53 and 79% of the phytoplankton NO3- requirements in Saanich Inlet, and along Line P and at BATS, respectively, and this underscores the need for a major re-evaluation of the new production paradigm. Light, substrate concentrations, and potentially substrate supply rates were all found to play a role in regulating NH4+ oxidation, albeit to varying degrees, and I discuss the influence that each of these variables may have had on controlling NH4+ oxidation rates at regionally specific scales in Chapters 2 (Saanich Inlet), 3 (Line P) and 4 (BATS). Finally, a cross study-region comparison of results showed that the relative degree by which new production estimates were reduced, when euphotic zone nitrification was taken into consideration, decreased exponentially as total NO3- uptake rates increased; the relationship I describe between these two variables may potentially provide a simple and rapid means of estimating the extent to which new production may have been overestimated at regionally specific and global scales. My Line P sampling program also provided me with an opportunity to conduct the first investigation of intermediate depth N2O distributions along the Line P oceanographic transect. My results demonstrated that nitrification is the predominant production pathway for N2O in the NE subarctic Pacific. N2O distributions along Line P were variable, however, and I also consider the role of different transiting water masses and potential far-field denitrification in contributing to this variability. Finally, I estimated sea-to-air fluxes of N2O and based on these results I have demonstrated that the NE subarctic Pacific is a “hotspot” for N2O emissions to the atmosphere. / Graduate

Les systèmes aquatiques continentaux sont des vecteurs majeurs du cycle global du carbone, recevant une quantité importante de carbone qu’ils émettent vers l’atmosphère et exportent aux océans. Nous caractérisons les concentrations et les transferts de toutes les formes carbonées à l’interface eau souterraine-ruisseau-atmosphère, dans un bassin versant de plaine, tempéré, forestier et sablonneux, où l’hydrologie se produit majoritairement au travers du drainage des eaux souterraines. Nous suivons différentes stations couvrant l’ensemble de la variabilité du bassin, depuis les eaux souterraines jusqu’à l’exutoire, avec des proportions variables d’occupation du sol. Le DOC est exporté majoritairement en périodes de crues alors que la même quantité de DIC est exportée entre périodes de crues et d’étiages. Le carbone terrestre dérivé des sols forestiers est la source principale de carbone dans les eaux superficielles et seulement 3% de la NEE est exportée. L’occupation du sol modifie localement les formes de carbone dans les ruisseaux mais à l’échelle du bassin la forêt prédomine. Nous quantifions le dégazage de CO2 en s’appuyant sur un bilan de masse isotopique. Environ 75% du dégazage total se produit dans les ruisseaux de premiers et de seconds ordres, qui se comportent comme des points chauds pour l’émission de CO2. Ce travail de thèse contribue à une meilleure définition du rôle des ruisseaux et des rivières dans le cycle global du carbone. De manière plus précise, il améliore les connaissances sur la proportion du pompage biologique de CO2 atmosphérique d’un écosystème qui est exportée vers le réseau hydrographique, ainsi que le devenir de ce carbone en aval. / Inland waters are a major component of the global carbon cycle. These systems receive a significant amount of carbon from aquatic and terrestrial sources. A part of this carbon is degassed in the atmosphere while another is exported to the oceans. We characterize the concentrations and transfers of all carbon forms at the groundwater-stream-atmosphere interface, in a temperate, forested and sandy lowland watershed, where hydrology occurs in majority through drainage of groundwater. We monitored contrasting study site representative of the diversity of the ecosystem, from groundwater to river mouth, with different proportion of land use. DOC is exported in majority during high flow periods whereas the same amount of DIC is exported between high and base flow periods.Terrestrial carbon that originates from soils forests is the major source of carbon in surface waters but only 3% of the NEE is exported. Land use modifies locally the different forms of carbon in streams but at the basin scale forests predominate. We quantify the degassing ofCO2 based on fairly well balanced isotopic mass balance. About 75% of the total degassing occurs in first and second order streams, which behave as hotspots for CO2 degassing. This work contributes to a better definition of the role of streams and rivers in the global carboncycle. Specifically, this work enhances understanding on the proportion of CO2 pumped byan ecosystem and then exported to the river system, as well as the fate of this carbon downstream.

No description available.

No description available.

Planktonic ecosystems provide a key mechanism for the transfer of CO2 from the atmosphere to the deep ocean via the so-called "biological pump". Mathematical models of these ecosystems have been used to predict CO2 uptake in surface waters, and more recently have been embedded in global climate models. While the equilibrium properties of these models are well studied, less attention has been paid to their response to external perturbations, despite the fact that as a result of the variability of environmental forcing such ecosystems are rarely, if ever, in equilibrium. Human induced perturbations to these ecosystems, namely the addition of limiting nutrients (e.g. iron) to areas where nitrate is plentiful to accelerate the biological pump, have been proposed as a solution to reduce atmospheric CO2. Linear theory is used to determine the structure of "unit-norm" perturbations (size in mmol N m^-3) to state variables of an ecosystem model in steady state, describing Ocean Station P (50N 145W) in summer, that optimize either instantaneous export flux of organic matter at fixed times or integrated export as the ecosystem relaxes towards equilibrium. For all perturbations, the flux to higher trophic levels is the primary contributor to export flux, the contribution of aggregation is negligible, and (sinking) detritus increases significantly in the transient dynamics. Two perturbations considered optimize instantaneous export flux; both perturbations synchronize P1 and Z1 relative to their predator prey cycle, resulting in a maximum instantaneous export flux of 4.4 mmol N m^-2 d^-1, and also increased integrated export above that at steady state (6 g C m^-2 over 150 days). An increase in larger phytoplankton (P2), representing diatoms, results in the highest integrated export (7 g C m^-2). The perturbations in which P2 persist the longest give the highest integrated export, and these perturbations are primarily increases in P2. The additional integrated export in response to a proportional increase to steady state concentrations of both large and small phytoplankton is positive, but much lower than the optimal perturbations. However, the additional integrated export in response to an increase in only P1 is negligible. The linear and nonlinear ecosystem and export responses to two perturbations are compared; for perturbations of magnitude 0.5 mmol N m^-3, the linearization of the ecosystem dynamics, rather than of the export flux, is the primary cause for differences between the fully linear and fully nonlinear cases.