The significant impact of method of payment on the share price abnormal returns following mergers and acquisitions have been broadly considered and documented in US and UK empirical studies (Agrawal and Jaffe 2000). In the UK, all-cash acquisitions show insignificant negative or small positive abnormal returns, whilst the all-equity acquisitions have significant negative returns. Whilst it is tempting to conclude that it is simply the form of financing that separates the shareholder value destruction of equity-financed takeovers from cash takeovers, such a conclusion tends to ignore the question of where the cash to fund the acquisition comes from in the first place. Theory tells us this should matter. Whilst different theories on firm financing offer competing explanations on both managerial choices and shareholder preferences, it seems reasonable to ask the question whether the source of the cash influences the long run wealth effect of the acquisition. In order to shed light on this issue, this investigation looks at short-term daily abnormal returns as well as long-term abnormal returns including a five-year horizon of post-takeover returns and a three-year horizon of pre-takeover returns. The short-term daily abnormal returns support the signalling information hypothesis to some extent as acquirers financing takeovers using internal cash out-perform those financing takeovers by equity or debt issues. After categorizing the research sample firms into two sub-groups, one being internal funding while the other being external sources including equity or debt, the share price abnormal returns show statistically significant differences between these two sub-groups over 11-day event windows. Further, by using one- and two-dimensional analyses and a univariate test, the results reveal that UK cash acquisitions explored by this investigation contradict the free cash flow (FCF) hypothesis. Regression models show that book-to-market ratio is important in explaining the short-term daily abnormal returns. The long-term post-takeover stock performances show sensitivity to the benchmark adopted as well as the calculation used for the long-term abnormal returns, i.e. cumulated or compounded. Owing to the small sample firms entering the calendar time monthly portfolios, the calendar time approach employs White (1980) corrections and a GLS model to mitigate the effects of heteroskedasticity in the research sample. Generally speaking, long-term abnormal returns show a negative pattern for the whole sample as well as the sub-groups depending on their dominant financing methods. Furthermore, the univariate and multivariate tests demonstrate that the FCF hypothesis cannot explain the 60-month share price abnormal returns of the research sample. According to the coefficient derived from regression model(s), the most significant factor to predict 60-month abnormal returns is relative size (market value of target to that of bidder). The results suggest that the bigger the relative size of the target, the more negative the abnormal return will be (Hansen 1987, Martin 1996, Loughran and Vijh 1997). Besides, the institutional investors contribute a positive effect on long-term share price performance, which is consistent with the findings of Chen, Harford, and Li (2007). The pre-takeover share price abnormal returns over three years intervals prior to the bid announcements clearly show that cash acquirers overall experience a significant positive stock performance. This result is robust to adopting various benchmarks of event time and calendar time regression-based framework. Based on the dominant financing method used for the acquirers, firms issuing debt before the bid announcements do perform extremely well. Those firms subsequently perform badly for post-takeover long-term intervals. Accordingly, this phenomenon demonstrates a mean reversion picture. Regardless of whether an event time or a calendar time approach is used, high q firms always have higher abnormal returns even when allowing for other factors, such as free cash flow or cash stock. However, multinomial logistic tests fail to find any statistically significant link between pre- takeover abnormal returns and the form of financing.

Syfte: Trots striktare redovisningsregler så fortsätter ledningen i ett flertal företag att resultatmanipulera. Forskare har sett att fokus endast skiftat från en metod till en annan. Incitament för målföretag att resultatmanipulera vid fusioner och förvärv kan variera beroende på valet av betalningsmetod vid affären då det kan ses som avgörande om risken att påverka det framtida resultatet delas med förvärvaren eller inte. Syftet med studien är därför att undersöka om målföretag har använt sig av kassaflödesmanipulering eller onormala periodiseringar året innan affären genomfördes och om betalningsmetoden påverkat valet av resultatmanipuleringsmetod. Metod: Studien antar ett positivistiskt perspektiv med en hypotetisk-deduktiv ansats. Vi har använt ett kvantitativt tillvägagångssätt där sekundärdata inhämtats från databasen Thomson Reuters Eikon och Thomson Reuters Datastream. En longitudinell design har använts och urvalet har slutligen analyserats i multipla regressionsanalyser med hjälp av IBM SPSS. Resultat & slutsats: Studien visar att målföretag innan förvärvet använder sig av kassaflödesmanipulering som metod för att påverka resultatet när betalningen sker med kontanter oavsett kontext. Ledningens benägenhet att använda den resultatmanipuleringsmetoden framför onormala periodiseringar ligger i linje med tidigare studier men vi kan också visa att målföretag inte tycks sakna nödvändig tid eller motiv att resultatmanipulera. Förslag till fortsatt forskning: Studier som tittar på hur förvärvsprocessen påverkar möjligheterna för målföretaget att resultatmanipulera, speciellt om målföretag aktivt försöker dra ut på förvärvsprocessen i syfte att manipulera resultatet innan företagsförvärvet. Vi skulle också önska oss studier som visar huruvida resultatet kan generaliseras på andra marknader än den europeiska. Uppsatsens bidrag: Ur ett teoretiskt perspektiv bidrar denna studie till ökad kunskap om resultatmanipulering av målföretag vid företagsförvärv. Ur ett praktiskt perspektiv så kan studien vara av intresse för företag som planerar framtida företagsförvärv då betalningsmetoden visat vara avgörande för förekomsten av resultatmanipulering. Även revisorer och beslutsfattande organ kan ha nytta av studien vid utformning av redovisningsstandarder då studien stärkt tidigare forskning om val av resultatmanipuleringsmetod. / Aim: The management of several companies still apply earnings management despite stricter accounting standards. Research has shown focus is shifting from one method to another. An incentive for target companies to apply to earning management at mergers and acquisitions may depend on the method payments in the takeover. At that time it can be viewed as decisive if the risk to influence the future result is divided between the acquirer firm or not. The aim with this study is therefore to examine if the target companies have used real activity manipulation or accrual manipulation in the year prior to the acquisition - relative to previous years and whether the method payments in the takeover influence the choice or not. Method: The study is based on the philosophy of positivism with a hypothetical deductive approach. The strategy adopted is quantitative, using a longitudinal design and secondary data is collected from Thomson Reuters Eikon and Thomson Reuters Datastream. The sample is processed in IBM SPSS and analyzed in multiple regression analysis. Result & Conclusions: This study shows the target company in the year prior to the acquisition uses real activity manipulation to manage earnings when the payment is in cash regardless of context. Management prefers real activity manipulation over accrual manipulation supported by previous studies, but we can also show that the target company does not seem to lack the necessary time or incentive to manipulate earnings. Suggestions for future research: Suggestions for future research may look at how the acquisition process affects the ability of the target company to manipulate the results, especially if the target companies are actively trying to stall the acquisition process in order to manipulate the outcome before the acquisition. Obtaining other studies showing whether results can be generalized to other markets than Europe would be beneficial to us. Contribution of the thesis: From a theoretical perspective, this study contributes to the knowledge of earnings management of target firm prior to the acquisitions. From a practical perspective, the study can be of interest to companies planning future acquisitions on which payment method proved to be crucial for the existence of the earnings manipulation. Even accountants and decision making bodies can find it useful to have the study into account in the design of accounting standards when the study reinforced previous research on the election earnings management method.