Hamlet a longtemps été une partie inséparable de l'identité nationale russe. Cependant, les mises en scène d’Hamlet en Union soviétique (surtout en Russie) durant l'époque de Staline présentèrent des problèmes spécifiques liés aux doctrines idéologiques imposées sur les arts et la culture en général ainsi qu’aux idées reçues concernant l’opinion personnelle de Staline envers de la tragédie. Les deux mises en scènes principales d’Hamlet en Russie au cours de cette période ont été celles réalisées par Nikolai Akimov (1932) et Sergei Radlov (1938). Un réexamen approfondi de ces mises en scène, entrepris dans les chapitres centraux de cette thèse, révèle des détails précédemment inconnus au sujet de leurs conceptions, réalisations, réceptions et au-delà. Cela met en évidence l'importance du rôle de la musique de scène composée pour elles par Dimitri Chostakovitch et par Sergei Prokofiev, respectivement, et suggère l'interaction complexe des agendas individuels et institutionnels. Ce travail a été rendu possible grâce à de nombreuses visites aux archives russes, qui contiennent de précieux documents tels que des livrets des mises en scène et les rapports sténographiques de discussions, précédemment non référencées à l'Ouest. Ces chapitres centraux sont précédés d'un aperçu historique d’Hamlet en Russie et de la musique et de Shakespeare en général. Ils sont suivis par une enquête au sujet des adaptations notables d’Hamlet à la fin de l’époque de Staline et après la mort du dictateur, se concentrant sur ceux qui contiennent les contributions musicales les plus importantes. Le résultat est un aperçu plus riche et plus complexe de l'image familière d’Hamlet comme miroir de la société russe / soviétique. / Hamlet has long been an inseparable part of Russian national identity. Staging Hamlet in Russia during the Stalin era, however, presented particular problems connected with the ideological framework imposed on the arts and culture as well as with Stalin’s own negative perceived view of the tragedy. The two major productions of Hamlet in Russia during this period were those directed by Nikolai Akimov (1932) and Sergei Radlov (1938). Thorough re-examination of these productions, as undertaken in the central chapters of this dissertation, reveals much previously unknown detail about their conception, realisation, reception and afterlife. It highlights the importance of the role of music composed for them by Dmitry Shostakovich and Sergei Prokofiev, respectively, and it suggests a complex interaction of individual and institutional agendas. This work has been made possible by numerous visits to Russian archives, which contain invaluable documents such as production books and stenographic reports of discussions, previously unreferenced in Western scholarship. These central chapters are preceded by a historical overview of Hamlet in Russia and of music and Shakespeare in general. They are followed by a survey of major adaptations of Hamlet in the late-Stalin era and beyond, concentrating on those with significant musical contributions. The outcome is a richer and more complex account of the familiar image of Hamlet as a mirror of Russian/Soviet society.

Submitted by Filipe dos Santos (fsantos@pucsp.br) on 2018-08-15T12:20:19Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Pedro Luiz Magalhães Taam.pdf: 3859925 bytes, checksum: 4b41639ab4c48ab9be1f475a5687304b (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-15T12:20:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Pedro Luiz Magalhães Taam.pdf: 3859925 bytes, checksum: 4b41639ab4c48ab9be1f475a5687304b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-06-29 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES / In the preset work, we discuss Dmitry Shostakovich’s Seventh Symphony, henceforth called the Seventh. The Seventh is and was object of political interpretations throughout all of its existence, but our research question is that all of past interpretations fail to acknowledge politics as having both a micro and macropolitical dimensions, the later having to do with party, identity and representational politics and the former with subjectivity and becomings. Historically, all of the Seventh’s reception was marked by identity and representation (“invasion theme”, “proregime”, “anti-communist”, revisionism and anti-revisionism), but the present dissertation is the first work which raises the hypothesis of the Seventh having a revolutionary power (potentia) in the micropolitical field. Since we are dealing with a political question within a musical work, our corpus is a combination of the musical text, Shostakovich’s repercussion in musicology post-1979 (the so-called Shostakovich Wars) and a theoretical framework composed by Suely Rolnik’s micropolitical theory (which unfolds in psychoanalisys, philosophy and semiotics) and Deleuze and Guattari’s philosophy. In A Thousand Plateaus, Deleuze and Guattari deal with two aspects of the State-form: the war machine and the State apparatus. These two aspects work as two poles: in the State apparatus pole there are the identity politics, the representation systems (both political and semiotic), and the signifying semiotics or semiologies. In the war machine pole there are the a-signifying semiotics, the micropolitics, the non-hegemonic ways of life (genres de vie) or non-hegemonic modes of existence, the revolutionary-becomings and all there is that is fresh and has not yet been captured by the State apparatus. By going through this theoretical path, always in dialogue with Shostakovich’s life and work, we arrive at the conclusion that, both in the aesthetic and musical qualities of the Seventh and in its micropolitical dimension, as well as the composer’s mode of being, we find the behavior of a war machine / O objeto do presente trabalho é a Sinfonia em Dó Maior Nº7 Op.60 de Dmitri Shostakovich, chamada doravante de Sétima. Nossa questão de pesquisa é que a Sétima foi alvo de interpretações políticas por toda a sua vida, no entanto, uma falha nessas abordagens: nenhuma delas entende a política como tendo uma dimensão macro e uma micro, aquela se referindo a partidos, representações e identidades e esta a subjetividades e devires. Historicamente, toda a sua recepção foi marcada por representações e identidades (“tema da invasão”, “pró-regime”, “anticomunista”, revisionistas e antirrevisionistas), mas este é o primeiro trabalho que levanta a hipótese da existência de uma potência revolucionária da Sétima no campo micropolítico. Trata-se de uma questão política dentro de uma obra musical. Para desenvolvê-la, temos como corpus o texto musical e a sua repercussão musicológica de Shostakovich pós-1979 (as chamadas “Shostakovich Wars”) e, como referenciais teóricos, a teoria micropolítica de Suely Rolnik (que se desdobra em psicanálise, filosofia e semiótica) e a filosofia de Gilles Deleuze e Félix Guattari. Em Mil Platôs, Deleuze e Guattari tratam de dois aspectos da forma-Estado: a máquina de guerra e o aparelho de estado. No pólo do aparelho de estado encontramos as políticas identitárias e os sistemas de representação, as semióticas significantes ou semiologias. No pólo da máquina de guerra encontram-se as semióticas assignificantes, as micropolíticas, os modos de existência ou de vida não-hegemônicos, os devires-revolucionários, aquilo que há de fresco e que ainda não foi capturado pelo aparelho do estado. Trilhando esse caminho teórico, sempre em diálogo com a obra e o autor, podemos arriscar nossas conclusões. A conclusão a que chegamos é que, tanto nas qualidades estéticas e musicais da Sétima quanto na dimensão micropolítica da obra e do modo de vida de Shostakovich, observa-se o comportamento de uma máquina de guerra

No description available.