Types of civil procedure This thesis deals with various kinds of civil procedure. It defines its character, the purpose of its legislation, its principles, parties and their position, rights and responsibilities, and the course of the five kinds of civil proceedings in the Czech republic. In the first chapter there is described the procedure, in which disputes are solved. Courts binding decide concrete disputes and declare, what is right and what is not right. Parties have to declare their rights and proof it. Otherwise they fail the process. In the second part of the first chapter there are defined kinds of civil procedure in which there is no dispute but it is required to regulate this legal relations, for example when somebody dies or lose some legal document. The second chapter deals with proceeding which leads to enforcement, when somebody doesn't voluntarily perform what he have to perform according to the final legal decision. The court or the executor can force this person to perform his obligation. In the third chapter there is described the bankruptcy proceeding and its institutes. The bankruptcy proceeding is regulated in the quite new Bankruptcy act. This chapter deals also with the ways of solution when somebody declare a bankruptcy. The fourth chapter deals with arbitration, in that parties...

Submitted by Filipe dos Santos (fsantos@pucsp.br) on 2018-01-22T11:33:17Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Maria Augusta da Matta Rivitti.pdf: 1729238 bytes, checksum: b788eeda56ed84dab2c91d17e2e38fa6 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-01-22T11:33:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Maria Augusta da Matta Rivitti.pdf: 1729238 bytes, checksum: b788eeda56ed84dab2c91d17e2e38fa6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-12-19 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES / Fundação São Paulo - FUNDASP / The scope of this research is to analyze section 792, 3rd paragraph of the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedures, as it deals with the starting point of frauds in execution actions in cases of disregard of legal entities. The disregard of legal entity regulated by substantial law in several dispositions and fraud to execution actions regulated by procedural law were addressed by the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedures (Federal Law no. 13,097 of March 16th, 2015) in an innovative manner. This study enters the most relevant aspects of both doctrines (disregard of legal entity and fraud to execution actions), undertakes the exam of the case law concerning the starting point of fraud to execution actions, and then proceeds to analyze if the solution proposed by the new law insures legal certainty, core subject of the instant research. The study of this matter is justified by the dissent found in scholarly works and in case law and also by the direct impact over business transactions. The deductive method was applied, by means of bibliographical and case law research on the abovementioned doctrines. It was ascertained that the disposition under exam violates legal certainty, leading to its unconstitutionality / O objetivo deste trabalho é analisar o § 3º do art. 792 do CPC, que trata do marco inicial da fraude à execução em caso de desconsideração da personalidade jurídica. A desconsideração da personalidade jurídica regulada pelo direito material em diversas leis e a fraude à execução regida pela legislação processual foram inovadoramente tratadas pelo Código de Processo Civil, Lei nº 13.097, de 16 de março de 2015. Visando à contextualização desses dois institutos, em uma abordagem introdutória apresenta-se um panorama de assuntos básicos, como a personalidade jurídica, a pessoa jurídica, sua natureza, sua autonomia patrimonial, bem como sua responsabilidade civil e patrimonial. Incursiona-se aos aspectos mais relevantes de ambos, perpassa-se sobre a uniformização da jurisprudência relativa ao marco inicial da fraude à execução para analisar na parte nuclear do trabalho, se a solução proposta pela nova legislação assegura a segurança jurídica. Justifica-se a necessidade de estudo pelas divergências doutrinárias e jurisprudenciais suscitadas e a importância prática para as relações negociais. O método utilizado foi o dedutivo, com o emprego de pesquisas bibliográfica e jurisprudencial relacionadas aos institutos, permitindo-se verificar que o dispositivo legal em comento viola a segurança jurídica, conduzindo à sua inconstitucionalidade

I den här uppsatsen beskrivs en ansats till att med hjälp av statistiska metoder förutse utfallet i förmögenhetsrättsliga dispositiva tvistemål. Logistiska- och multilogistiska regressionsmodeller skattades på data för 13299 tvistemål från 5 tingsrätter och användes  till att förutse utfallet för 1522 tvistemål från 3 andra tingsrätter.   Modellerna presterade bättre än slumpen vilket ger stöd för slutsatsen att man kan använda statistiska metoder för att förutse utfallet i denna typ av tvistemål. / BACKROUND: The idea of legal automatization is a controversial topic that's been discussed for hundreds of years, in modern times in the context of Law & Artificial Intelligence. Strangely, real world applications are very rare. Assuming that the judicial system is like any system that transforms inputs into outputs one would think that we should be able measure it and and gain insight into its inner workings and ultimately use these measurements to make predictions about its output. In this thesis, civil procedures on commercial matters amenable to out-of-court settlement (Förmögenhetsrättsliga Dispositiva Tvistemål) was devoted particular interest and the question was posed: Can we predict the outcome of civil procedures using Statistical Methods? METHOD: By analyzing procedural law and legal doctrin, the civil procedure was modeled in terms of a random variable with a discrete observable outcome. Some data for 14821 cases was extracted from eight different courts. Five of these courts (13299 cases) were used to train the models and three courts (1522 cases) were chosen randomly and kept untouched for validation. Most cases seemed to concern monetary claims (66%) and/or damages (12%). Binary- and Multinomial- logistic regression methods were used as classifiers. RESULTS: The models where found to be uncalibrated but they clearly outperformed random score assignment at separating classes and at a preset threshold gave accuracies significantly higher (p<<0.001) than that of random guessing and in identifying settlements or the correct type of verdict performance was significantly better (p<<0.003) than consequently guessing the most common outcome. CONCLUSION: Using data for cases from one set of courts can to some extent predict the outcomes of cases from another set of courts. The results from applying the models to new data concludes that the outcome in civil processes can be predicted using statistical methods.