The dissertation is trying to form basic rules for interpretational possibilities of an ancient chorus in the process of the Czech theatre based on the detailed analysis of chosen productions in Sophocles tragedy Oidipus Tyrannus from the end of 19th century to the present day. The analysis follows the transformations of the chorus from the original vision of the old men that prevailed in the first half of the 20th century over the image of ancient people common in the fifties of the last century to metaphorical transformation of the chorus brought up by some stage conceptions in the beginning of 21st century.

Orientador: Maria Celeste Tommasello Ramos / Banca: João Batista Toledo Prado / Banca: Lúcia Granja / Resumo: Este trabalho tem por objetivo analisar as referências à Cultura Clássica na coletânea de contos Papéis avulsos (1882), de Machado de Assis. Adotando a metodologia fenomenológica-hermenêutica, e tendo como base teórica os estudos de Bakhtin, Kristeva, Jenny e Compagnon, buscaremos verificar como o diálogo intertextual coopera para o desenvolvimento do sentido nas narrativas curtas machadianas. Para tanto, em um primeiro momento, extrairemos do texto as citações e desvendaremos seu contexto original; em uma etapa posterior, voltaremos ao texto machadiano para caracterizar e analisar essa tessitura. Nossa hipótese é a de que Machado de Assis, ao lançar mão das referências à Cultura Clássica, faz um "apequenamento" da tradição clássica, promovendo uma reflexão sobre diversos aspectos sociais / Abstract: The aim of this work is to analyze references to the Classical Culture in the anthology of short stories Papéis avulsos (1882) by Machado de Assis. By adopting the phenomenologicalhermeneutic approach and having as theoretical basis the studies of Bakhtin, Kristeva, Jenny and Compagnon, we seek to examine how the intertextual dialogue contributes to develop the meaning in short narratives written by that author. In order to do that, firstly, we extract quotations from the text and present their original context; the next step is to return to Machado's text, so that it can be analyzed. Our hypothesis is that Machado de Assis, by manipulating these references, performs an "apequenamento" (diminishment) of the classical tradition, as well promoting a reflection about several social aspects / Mestre

Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:26:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2010-08-02Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T20:27:13Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 montesini_cf_me_sjrp.pdf: 552849 bytes, checksum: 21c3bcbf620d054985b1bd2efccf02a3 (MD5) / Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) / Este trabalho tem por objetivo analisar as referências à Cultura Clássica na coletânea de contos Papéis avulsos (1882), de Machado de Assis. Adotando a metodologia fenomenológica-hermenêutica, e tendo como base teórica os estudos de Bakhtin, Kristeva, Jenny e Compagnon, buscaremos verificar como o diálogo intertextual coopera para o desenvolvimento do sentido nas narrativas curtas machadianas. Para tanto, em um primeiro momento, extrairemos do texto as citações e desvendaremos seu contexto original; em uma etapa posterior, voltaremos ao texto machadiano para caracterizar e analisar essa tessitura. Nossa hipótese é a de que Machado de Assis, ao lançar mão das referências à Cultura Clássica, faz um “apequenamento” da tradição clássica, promovendo uma reflexão sobre diversos aspectos sociais / The aim of this work is to analyze references to the Classical Culture in the anthology of short stories Papéis avulsos (1882) by Machado de Assis. By adopting the phenomenologicalhermeneutic approach and having as theoretical basis the studies of Bakhtin, Kristeva, Jenny and Compagnon, we seek to examine how the intertextual dialogue contributes to develop the meaning in short narratives written by that author. In order to do that, firstly, we extract quotations from the text and present their original context; the next step is to return to Machado’s text, so that it can be analyzed. Our hypothesis is that Machado de Assis, by manipulating these references, performs an “apequenamento” (diminishment) of the classical tradition, as well promoting a reflection about several social aspects

Dans la floraison d’écrits monastiques produits au IVe siècle, les Ascetica attribués à Basile de Césarée ont tenu une place particulière, qui est bien connue. Pourtant, la formation du corpus asceticum, le processus d’éditions multiples dont il a été l’objet, mais aussi les options doctrinales qu’il diffuse n’ont pas été éclaircis de façon satisfaisante. Sur la base d’éléments textuels jusqu’ici négligés, le présent travail se propose de réécrire l’histoire du texte et d’interroger la paternité basilienne de la collection. Il existe, en effet, depuis le Ve siècle au moins et jusqu’à l’époque moderne, un courant minoritaire qui doute de l’opportunité d’attribuer le « livre ascétique » au grand Basile et préfère lui donner pour auteur un autre évêque du IVe siècle, Eustathe de Sébaste, moins estimé de la tradition ecclésiastique. Si le doute sur la paternité basilienne des Ascetica est permis, alors il convient de réévaluer la place de Basile de Césarée dans l’histoire littéraire du mouvement monastique. C’est ce que nous nous proposons de faire dans cet ouvrage, en relisant de près des pièces littéraires qui, jusqu’à présent, n’étaient présentées que comme des « annexes » au dossier des Ascetica. / The Ascetica transmitted under the name of Basil of Caesarea have a special importance among the numerous monastic writings which emerged in the 4th century. If this point is very well-known, the gathering of the corpus asceticum, the multiple antique editions of the collection, and the doctrinal options which are found in this sum have not been really enlightened. On the basis of neglected textual and paleographic evidence, the present work aims at rewriting the history of the text and questioning the basilian paternity of the collection. From the 5th century to the Modern Times, some readers refused the attribution of the Ascetica to Basil the Great and preferred to ascribe them to another (but problematic) bishop of the 4th century: Eustathius of Sebasteia. If there are good reasons to reject the basilian paternity of the collection, it is necessary to reevaluate the role played by Basil of Caesarea in the literary history of the monastic movement. In the present volume, I try to re-read some literary texts which, until now, were just regarded as appendices to the dossier of the Ascetica.