No description available.

The equine breeding industry continues to be somewhat inefficient, even with existing technology. On average, foaling rates are low when compared with that of other livestock. One major contributor is the inability to accurately predict ovulation in mares, which ovulate before the end of estrus, leaving much variability in coordinating insemination. A more efficient, less invasive method that could replace or reduce the need for constant teasing and ultrasonography to evaluate follicular activity is needed. In both dairy cattle and women, a change in body temperature has been shown to occur immediately prior to ovulation. Research on horses has been limited, although one study reported no useable relationship between body temperature and ovulation in mares (Ammons, 1989). The current study utilized thirty-eight mature cycling American Quarter Horse mares, and was conducted from March-August 2004. Each mare was implanted in the nuchal ligament with a microchip that can be used for identification purposes, but is also capable of reporting body temperature. Once an ovulatory follicle (>35mm) was detected using ultrasonography and the mare was exhibiting signs of estrus, the mare's follicle size and temperature were recorded approximately every six hours until ovulation. Not only was the temperature collected using the microchips, but the corresponding rectal temperature was also recorded using a digital thermometer. A significant effect (p<0.05) on body temperature was noted in relation to the presence or absence of an ovulatory follicle (>35mm) under different circumstances. When evaluating the rectal temperatures, no significant difference was found in temperature in relation to the presence or absence of a follicle. However, in the temperatures obtained using the microchip, temperature was higher (p<0.05) with the presence of a follicle of greater than 35mm. This may be due to the extreme sensitivity of the microchip implant and its ability to more closely reflect minute changes in body temperature.

No description available.

The equine breeding industry continues to be somewhat inefficient, even with existing technology. On average, foaling rates are low when compared with that of other livestock. One major contributor is the inability to accurately predict ovulation in mares, which ovulate before the end of estrus, leaving much variability in coordinating insemination. A more efficient, less invasive method that could replace or reduce the need for constant teasing and ultrasonography to evaluate follicular activity is needed. In both dairy cattle and women, a change in body temperature has been shown to occur immediately prior to ovulation. Research on horses has been limited, although one study reported no useable relationship between body temperature and ovulation in mares (Ammons, 1989). The current study utilized thirty-eight mature cycling American Quarter Horse mares, and was conducted from March-August 2004. Each mare was implanted in the nuchal ligament with a microchip that can be used for identification purposes, but is also capable of reporting body temperature. Once an ovulatory follicle (>35mm) was detected using ultrasonography and the mare was exhibiting signs of estrus, the mare's follicle size and temperature were recorded approximately every six hours until ovulation. Not only was the temperature collected using the microchips, but the corresponding rectal temperature was also recorded using a digital thermometer. A significant effect (p<0.05) on body temperature was noted in relation to the presence or absence of an ovulatory follicle (>35mm) under different circumstances. When evaluating the rectal temperatures, no significant difference was found in temperature in relation to the presence or absence of a follicle. However, in the temperatures obtained using the microchip, temperature was higher (p<0.05) with the presence of a follicle of greater than 35mm. This may be due to the extreme sensitivity of the microchip implant and its ability to more closely reflect minute changes in body temperature.

Thesis (D.Min.)--South Florida Center for Theological Studies, 1990. / Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Ohio State University, 2008. / Title from first page of PDF file. Includes bibliographical references (p. 225-235).

Thesis (M.A.)--Catholic Theological Union at Chicago, 1998. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves [57]-59).

Thesis (D. Min.)--McCormick Theological Seminary, 1997. / Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (D. Min.)--Trinity Lutheran Seminary, 1986. / Includes bibliographical references (leaf 271).

Basic research on expectancy effects suggests that investigative interviewers with pre-conceived notions about a crime may negatively influence the interview process in meaningful ways, yet many interviewing protocols recommend that interviewers review all available information prior to conducting their interviews. Previous research suggests that interviewers with no pre-interview knowledge elicit more detailed and accurate accounts than their informed counterparts (Cantlon, et al., 1996; Rivard et al., under review). The current study investigated whether (a) the benefit of blind versus informed interviewing is moderated by cautionary interviewer instructions to avoid suggestive questions and (b) whether any possible effects of pre-interview information extend beyond the immediate context of the forensic interview. Paired participants (N = 584) were assigned randomly either to the role of interviewer or witness. Witnesses viewed a mock crime video and were interviewed one week later by an interviewer who received either correct, incorrect, or no information about the crime event. Half of the interviewers were assigned randomly to receive additional instructions to avoid suggestive questions. All participants returned 1 week after the interview to recall the crime video (for the witness) or the information recalled by the witness during the interview (for the interviewer). All interviews and delayed recall measures were scored for the quantity and accuracy of information reported. Results replicate earlier findings that blind interviewers elicit more information from witnesses, without a decrease in accuracy rate. However instructions to avoid suggestive questions did not moderate the effect of blind versus informed interviewing on witness recall during the interview. Results further demonstrate that the effects of blind versus non-blind interviewing may extend beyond the immediate context of the interview to a later recall attempt. With instructions to avoid suggestive questions, witnesses of blind interviewers were more accurate than witnesses of incorrectly informed interviewers when recalling the event 1 week later. In addition, blind interviewers had more accurate memories for the witnesses’ account of the event during the interview compared to non-blind interviewers.