This thesis examines how cultural distance affects cross-border M&A performance of emerging market firms. The study adds to the previous literature by using a multi-measurement approach, a broader sample of emerging countries and by comparing the effects to those of developed market firms. Performance is divided into short-term performance, measured as cumulative abnormal return (CAR) and long-term performance, measured as sales growth and change in Return on Sales after the transaction (sales CAGR and change in ROS). Using a sample of transactions conducted by both emerging market firms and developed market firms during the years 1997-2019, this study finds that cultural distance has a negative effect on the long- term cross-border M&A performance of emerging market firms. However, no significant effect is found on the short-term CAR following a cross-border M&A by emerging market firms. Additionally, none of the included performance measures is affected by cultural distance on a statistically significant level following a cross-border M&A by developed market firms. The results hence indicate that the effect of cultural distance is greater for emerging market firms than developed market firms when engaging in cross-border M&As.

As one of the most important means of globalization for companies around the world, mergers and acquisitions (M&As) have been adopted as a core growth and expansion strategy. M&A integration involves combination in various areas, in which cultural integration has an important role. Nevertheless, the potential positive and negative impact of cultural dimensions on the success of M&A activity is somewhat less acknowledged in the business community. The purpose of this paper is to explore problematic cultural issues in order to get an understanding of the characteristics and outcome of cultural integration as influenced by both national culture and organizational culture in M&A. In order to fulfil the purpose a qualitative case study approach was chosen. Semi-structured phone interviews were made with the top managers who were responsible for the deal and employees that worked for both companies during the transition period. In addition, two survey were conducted among KPMG and Andesen members. It could be summarized that KPMG and Andersen deal result in a great loss of ex-Andersen employees, due to the resistence from employees to the new culture after integration.

<p>As one of the most important means of globalization for companies around the world, mergers and acquisitions (M&As) have been adopted as a core growth and expansion strategy. M&A integration involves combination in various areas, in which cultural integration has an important role. Nevertheless, the potential positive and negative impact of cultural dimensions on the success of M&A activity is somewhat less acknowledged in the business community.</p><p>The purpose of this paper is to explore problematic cultural issues in order to get an understanding of the characteristics and outcome of cultural integration as influenced by both national culture and organizational culture in M&A.</p><p>In order to fulfil the purpose a qualitative case study approach was chosen. Semi-structured phone interviews were made with the top managers who were responsible for the deal and employees that worked for both companies during the transition period. In addition, two survey were conducted among KPMG and Andesen members.</p><p>It could be summarized that KPMG and Andersen deal result in a great loss of ex-Andersen employees, due to the resistence from employees to the new culture after integration.</p>

Thesis advisor: Jérôme Taillard / This paper studies the dynamics between levels of M&A activity (average transaction value and number of deals) and crises in seven Latin American countries from the period between 1990 through 2007. Two hypotheses are tested using regression analysis: (1) whether the level of M&A activity increases during crises due to the “bargain hypothesis,” due to the low valuation of target companies, or (2) whether M&A activity decreases due to the financial distress of potential buyers (“financing constraints” hypothesis) or the financial distress of potential targets (“loss of confidence” hypothesis). Analyses at the country and industry level show that the average transaction value of M&A deals decreases with every crisis. Support for the second hypothesis is found within the Manufacturing, Energy and Utilities industry, in which the number of deals increases. / Thesis (BS) — Boston College, 2013. / Submitted to: Boston College. College of Arts and Sciences. / Discipline: Economics Honors Program. / Discipline: Economics.

Cross-border M &amp; A had became a very important method of foreign direct investment for global multinational companies, and it is playing an increasingly important role to the growth of international production. Not only in developed countries but also in developing countries.For most of Chinese large-scale companies, Cross-border M&amp;A had became a very attractive way to expend their business. Thus, Chinese cross-border M&amp;A has developed rapidly. However, Different with the trend of global M&amp;A market, the Chinese cross-border M&amp;A prefer cash payment. Well then, How many payment forms are widely used in Chinese cross-border M&amp;A? What are the determine factors of cash-payment preference in Chinese cross-border M&amp;A? Does cash payment have the best operational performance in Chinese cross-border M&amp;A? I will search answers for these three questions in this paper.In order to answer these three questions, first, I drew on the results of previous studies to classify the different available payment forms in Chinese cross-border M&amp;A and detailed expound the characteristics and operate approaches of them. Then, Combined with my understanding of Chinese cross-border M&amp;A, I summarized some possible factors which determined the preference in cash-payment for Chinese cross-border M&amp;AAfter all of these done, I chose some important financial indexes as data in my empirical study to analyze the performance of different payment forms in applied of Chinese cross-border M&amp;A. And tested if cash payment have the best operational performance in Chinese cross-border M&amp;A.

<p>I en pågående globalisering, skapas fler och fler unioner eller liknande handelsavtal, där syftet är att främja den egna regionen och dess markand. Möjligheterna är enorma för företagen inom dessa regioner, då alla barriärer är borta och landsgränserna utsuddade. Detta skapar även hårdare konkurrens och aktörer från andra delar av världen vill komma in på dessa marknader och ta del av vinsterna. Det snabbaste och enklaste sättet att ta sig in på marknaderna är genom förvärv, då befintliga etablerade företag köps upp. Frågan är huruvida dessa regioners marknader reagerar, då ett företag som kommer utifrån regionen köper upp ett företag inom regionen eller om förvärvet sker inom regionen.</p><p>Syftet med denna uppsats är att undersöka om det finns någon mätbar skillnad i den abnormala avkastningen vid gränsöverskridande förvärv, som kan härledas till uppköparens ursprung. Fokus ligger på skillnaden mellan företag från den Europeiska Unionen och företag utanför gemenskapen. Vidare skall denna uppsats undersöka lönsamhetsutvecklingen efter genomfört uppköp.</p><p>Den metoden som har valts för att studera problemet är en eventstudie, som anses vara det mest lämpade vid undersökning av den abnormala avkastningen. En intervju har även genomförts, för att få mer djup i undersökningen och en lönsamhetsundersökning, för att utläsa effekterna hos budföretaget efter förvärvet. I lönsamhetsundersökningen har tre nyckeltal undersökts avkastning på eget kapital, P/E-talet och avkastning på totala tillgångar.</p><p>Resultatet utav studien visade på att avkastningen hos målföretagen som hade köpare från ett land utanför den Europeiska Unionen var störst. Detta betyder även att de förväntas generera högre lönsamhet enligt den effektiva markandshypotesen. En anledning till att gruppen med icke-EU företag genererade en större överavkastning kan vara att de ”delar med sig” av de förväntade framtida vinsterna i större utsträckning varpå deras budpremie var högre. Vid gränsöverskridande företagsförvärv konkurrerar fler potentiella köpare om företaget vilket driver upp budpremien. Att Sverige inte ingår i eurosamarbetet kan vara en anledning till att färre företag inom unionen konkurrerar om att köpa svenska företag varpå premien och därmed överavkastningen i denna grupp är lägre.</p><p>Lönsamhetsundersökningen visade på att gruppen med företag från den Europeiska Unionen upplever en minskning av alla de tre nyckeltalen efter det genomförda förvärvet. Gruppen med företag från utanför unionen å andra sidan upplever en ökning av både avkastning på eget kapital och avkastning på totala tillgångar i perioderna efter förvärvet, vilket visar på att förvärvet varit mer lönsamt för dem. Resultatet från lönsamhetsundersökningen stödjer resultatet från evenstudien då gruppen med företag utanför unionen lyckats generera den största lönsamheten varpå den högre premien från dessa företag var berättigad.</p>

<p>Among the challenges that companies may face during the post M&A phase, cultural integration can be seen as one of the trickiest tasks. Cultural differences which are inevitable in any deal are always there. The link between how people from autonomous groups live together and the deal result is an interesting topic that needs to be investigated. Since we have an interest in developing the understanding of cultural differences during integration process in cross-border M&As, the research question “How do cultural differences arise in cross-border M&As during the integration process and do they impact the deal result?” is formulated.</p><p>This thesis presents a model that demonstrates elements of cultural differences from three levels, national, organizational and personal. In this model, these levels can be seen as interrelated to each other in which the inner layer is impacted by the outer one. As a result, personal culture, as the most inner layer, is doubly impacted by the other two, national and organizational levels. Given that the scope of our thesis is for cross-border M&As, after investigating these three levels of culture, we found that organizational and personal differences are real in any M&As no matter domestic or cross-border deals. Differences at national level, on the contrary, are the first element that should be mentioned as a root of cultural differences in companies from different nationalities.</p><p>From the understanding about emergence of cultural differences, we further study to see if they leave any effect on the deal result. In the empirical section, from the cultural gap analysis of each case, it was surprising to see that the relationship between cultural gap and deal result of two of four cases, are opposite to Rankine´s theory. At this point, we can see that M&As between companies similar in culture is not always successful or that failure between organizations having significantly different cultures is not always true, and then the empirical study on the acculturation dynamics made the further explanation that cultural differences are not the critical factor leading to success or failure, but rather how participants in integration perceive and respond to the cultural differences will impact the deal result.</p>

Among the challenges that companies may face during the post M&amp;A phase, cultural integration can be seen as one of the trickiest tasks. Cultural differences which are inevitable in any deal are always there. The link between how people from autonomous groups live together and the deal result is an interesting topic that needs to be investigated. Since we have an interest in developing the understanding of cultural differences during integration process in cross-border M&amp;As, the research question “How do cultural differences arise in cross-border M&amp;As during the integration process and do they impact the deal result?” is formulated. This thesis presents a model that demonstrates elements of cultural differences from three levels, national, organizational and personal. In this model, these levels can be seen as interrelated to each other in which the inner layer is impacted by the outer one. As a result, personal culture, as the most inner layer, is doubly impacted by the other two, national and organizational levels. Given that the scope of our thesis is for cross-border M&amp;As, after investigating these three levels of culture, we found that organizational and personal differences are real in any M&amp;As no matter domestic or cross-border deals. Differences at national level, on the contrary, are the first element that should be mentioned as a root of cultural differences in companies from different nationalities. From the understanding about emergence of cultural differences, we further study to see if they leave any effect on the deal result. In the empirical section, from the cultural gap analysis of each case, it was surprising to see that the relationship between cultural gap and deal result of two of four cases, are opposite to Rankine´s theory. At this point, we can see that M&amp;As between companies similar in culture is not always successful or that failure between organizations having significantly different cultures is not always true, and then the empirical study on the acculturation dynamics made the further explanation that cultural differences are not the critical factor leading to success or failure, but rather how participants in integration perceive and respond to the cultural differences will impact the deal result.

I en pågående globalisering, skapas fler och fler unioner eller liknande handelsavtal, där syftet är att främja den egna regionen och dess markand. Möjligheterna är enorma för företagen inom dessa regioner, då alla barriärer är borta och landsgränserna utsuddade. Detta skapar även hårdare konkurrens och aktörer från andra delar av världen vill komma in på dessa marknader och ta del av vinsterna. Det snabbaste och enklaste sättet att ta sig in på marknaderna är genom förvärv, då befintliga etablerade företag köps upp. Frågan är huruvida dessa regioners marknader reagerar, då ett företag som kommer utifrån regionen köper upp ett företag inom regionen eller om förvärvet sker inom regionen. Syftet med denna uppsats är att undersöka om det finns någon mätbar skillnad i den abnormala avkastningen vid gränsöverskridande förvärv, som kan härledas till uppköparens ursprung. Fokus ligger på skillnaden mellan företag från den Europeiska Unionen och företag utanför gemenskapen. Vidare skall denna uppsats undersöka lönsamhetsutvecklingen efter genomfört uppköp. Den metoden som har valts för att studera problemet är en eventstudie, som anses vara det mest lämpade vid undersökning av den abnormala avkastningen. En intervju har även genomförts, för att få mer djup i undersökningen och en lönsamhetsundersökning, för att utläsa effekterna hos budföretaget efter förvärvet. I lönsamhetsundersökningen har tre nyckeltal undersökts avkastning på eget kapital, P/E-talet och avkastning på totala tillgångar. Resultatet utav studien visade på att avkastningen hos målföretagen som hade köpare från ett land utanför den Europeiska Unionen var störst. Detta betyder även att de förväntas generera högre lönsamhet enligt den effektiva markandshypotesen. En anledning till att gruppen med icke-EU företag genererade en större överavkastning kan vara att de ”delar med sig” av de förväntade framtida vinsterna i större utsträckning varpå deras budpremie var högre. Vid gränsöverskridande företagsförvärv konkurrerar fler potentiella köpare om företaget vilket driver upp budpremien. Att Sverige inte ingår i eurosamarbetet kan vara en anledning till att färre företag inom unionen konkurrerar om att köpa svenska företag varpå premien och därmed överavkastningen i denna grupp är lägre. Lönsamhetsundersökningen visade på att gruppen med företag från den Europeiska Unionen upplever en minskning av alla de tre nyckeltalen efter det genomförda förvärvet. Gruppen med företag från utanför unionen å andra sidan upplever en ökning av både avkastning på eget kapital och avkastning på totala tillgångar i perioderna efter förvärvet, vilket visar på att förvärvet varit mer lönsamt för dem. Resultatet från lönsamhetsundersökningen stödjer resultatet från evenstudien då gruppen med företag utanför unionen lyckats generera den största lönsamheten varpå den högre premien från dessa företag var berättigad.

It is a common method to use mergers and acquisitions to grow for enterprises. Cross-border mergers and acquisitions is one of the ways to expand the oversea marker share, besides mergers and acquisitions in domestic market itself. In the past, the enterprises from developed countries took the role to buy oversee targets. The enterprises from emerging markets gradually become the protagonist for the reason of the rise of emerging markets, especially after the Global Financial Crisis and European Debt Crisis. This study refers to literature presented to look deeply into the motivations of mergers and acquisitions from different acquirers. We classified the motivations we found in the secondary data, with year 2007 to May 2012 as the scope, expecting to figure out the differences between developed-country acquirers and emerging-market acquirers. The result shows that the main motivations for developed-country acquirers are seeking for the resources needed, entering local market and increasing the size of itself. On the other hand, going into international market, reaching economy of scale and seeking for the resources needed are the main motivations for emerging-market acquirers. Furthermore, the motivation of mergers and acquisition differs from one industry to another.