No description available.

In many drinking water systems in the United States, disinfectant is added to water as it leaves the plant to maintain a residual concentration in the distribution system. The disinfectant residual is maintained to inactivate contamination that enters the distribution system, to control biofilms, and to act as a sentinel for contamination in the distribution system. A model was developed to evaluate the potential effectiveness of the disinfectant residual at inactivating contamination. The model was used to examine contamination of a hypothetical distribution system through backpressure at a cross-connection under different operating conditions. The dilution and pathway of the hypothetical contaminant were examined as the contaminant moved through the system. Disinfection and inactivation kinetic relationships were used to model the inactivation of the contaminant in the system by the amount of disinfectant present. The model showed that both chlorine and chloramines in each decay and inactivation condition considered provided some benefit over no disinfectant at all when examining susceptible organisms. Chlorine, under medium and low decay conditions, provided the best inactivation. Where 29.8% of total node time steps received a contamination of concern in the absence of disinfectant residual, as low as 4.8% of total node time steps received a contamination of concern in the presence of disinfectant residual. Chloramines was found to persist longer in the distribution system, but resulted in much lower inactivation compared to chlorine. Disinfectant doses typical of common distribution system operation were able to reduce the impact of contamination once it entered the distribution system but, except for four cases, were unable to prevent contamination from spreading within the distribution system. Therefore, it was concluded that presence of a disinfectant residual will reduce the total number of exposure opportunities from a contamination event, but cannot be relied upon to eliminate the chance of exposure resulting from contamination. / Master of Science

Electrical connectors are the blocks that connect solar panels together. Whenever a photovoltaic plant commences, the main discussion goes around on solar panels, inverters, charge controllers, etc. But the topic of connectors is usually hardly discussed. Connectors in a photovoltaic system can definitely contribute to improve the overall performance of the system, provided that importance is given while selecting the connectors. The electrical connectors used in photovoltaic systems can be connected in two possible ways. Connectors can be connected either in a pure-connection or in a cross-connection. Male and female connectors from the same brand results a pure-connection (P-C). Male and female connectors from two different brands results in a cross-connection (C-C). There have been discussions in photovoltaic, electrical connector markets and international solar events regarding the risks involved, losses and consequences due to a cross-connection. The main reason behind cross-connections is the unawareness of the installers in knowing the difference between a pure-connection and a cross-connection. Even though the installers are aware of this difference, they are not aware of the consequences of cross-connections. Multi-Contact, a leading electrical connector manufacturer of MC4 photovoltaic connectors affected by the counterfeit products of MC4, due to the sudden boom in the solar market during 2011-12. With the help of TÜV Rheinland, Multi-Contact conducted couple of tests namely temperature increase test and accelerated stress tests to understand the disadvantages of cross-connections. This thesis tried to replicate the tests performed by Multi-Contact in an attempt to understand the test results by using connectors that are used in the Swedish market. Performing temperature increase test and accelerated stress tests on most commonly used connectors in the Swedish market is the main aim of this thesis. The first test, gives an understanding of the temperature variations across various connector sets (four connector sets from various manufacturers used in this thesis) and the latter tests helps to understand the quality of the contact resistance of these connector sets. The four connector set manufacturers used in this test were Multi-Contact (MC), Weidmüller (WM), Blussun solar (BSS) and PBM. The quality of contact resistance of a connector is directly related to the quality of the connector set. During the 20 minutes of the temperature increase test, the connector set from WM performed better than its competitors in the P-C. Whereas, the MC-BSS connector set had performed well in the C-C. The connector type of male MC and female BSS showed its dominance throughout the test. Unfortunately, no conclusions were able to be drawn from this test results due to insufficient information about the test procedure. From the results of accelerated stress tests, the C-C set from MC outperformed its P-C counterpart. All ten connector sets used in this project passed the standard and qualified as connectors with good quality contact resistance. Therefore the best results out of only a P-C connector set does not seems to be completely true. With the standard used in this thesis, it is quite difficult to judge the quality of connectors. Rather than saying a P-C is superior and a C-C is inferior in terms of quality, there is a need to come up with a new method to evaluate the quality of connectors. Matching the connectors based on their tolerances could be a potential solution to the mismatching problem in connectors.