Submitted by Celso Magalhaes (celsomagalhaes@ufrrj.br) on 2018-03-14T12:18:08Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2017 - Gisele Lopes dos Santos.pdf: 3827549 bytes, checksum: bb5ae05f3998cf1fc3f662ddc86731d0 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-03-14T12:18:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2017 - Gisele Lopes dos Santos.pdf: 3827549 bytes, checksum: bb5ae05f3998cf1fc3f662ddc86731d0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-06-01 / This work has as objective reflect on the emergence and implementation of the Minimum Curriculum (CM) in the State Education Network, specifically in the Biology discipline, in 2012, presented by the State Department of Education of the State of Rio de Janeiro (SEEDUC). From the socio-historical studies of the curriculum, it is sought to understand the elements that supported the emergence and implantation of the CM and how this proposal refines the external evaluations in the state, ENEM (National High School Exam) and SAERJ (Evaluation of Education in the State of Rio de Janeiro). This work constitutes a qualitative research, based on theoretical and methodological, based on the curricular studies dialoguing with the empirical sources constituted by the documents related to the emergence and implantation of the curriculum (information of the SEEDUC website, Resolution 4.866 of February 14, 2013, Minimum Curriculum of Biology, Earnings by Results SEEDUC) and by published articles on the subject. The initial objective is that through the interbreeding of these written sources one can construct a narrative about the minimal curriculum of the biology curricular component. From the analysis of the official documents regarding the CM, with regard to the concept of skills and competences, it is possible to note its proximity to the external evaluations, since the curriculum and other strategies created by SEEDUC aim to corroborate with the increase of the index Of State education in external evaluations such as IDEB (Indicator and Development of Basic Education). The CM of Biology presents skills and competences, which SEEDUC claims to be organized progressively in the official document - from the simplest or most concrete, towards a more complex or abstract one. However, analyzing this document, the two-month course distributed in the CM of biology, it is possible to sustain that this progression of contents does not always happen, it presents in a sparse and irregular form. In this sense, it was possible to perceive when analyzing the document of the CM of Biology that the teaching continues to be presented in a fragmented way; Hindering the student to associate what he / she learns in school with his daily life. After analyzing the CM of Biology, the idea that the meanings of the concepts of competences and abilities, although approaching the cognitive-constructivist side of Perrenoud, is also moved towards Tyler's compartamentalism, when he centralizes his questions in External evaluations, the accountability curriculum and performativity / Este trabalho tem como objetivo refletir sobre o surgimento e implanta??o do Curr?culo M?nimo (CM) na rede Estadual de Educa??o, especificamente na disciplina Biologia, em 2012, apresentado pela Secretaria de Estado de Educa??o do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SEEDUC). A partir dos estudos s?cio-hist?ricos do curr?culo, busca-se compreender os elementos que sustentaram o surgimento e implanta??o do CM e como esta proposta se afina as avalia??es externas presentes no estado, ENEM (Exame Nacional do Ensino M?dio) e SAERJ (Sistema de Avalia??o da Educa??o do Estado do Rio de Janeiro). Este trabalho constitui uma pesquisa qualitativa, a base te?rico-metodol?gica, apoiou-se nos estudos curriculares dialogando com as fontes emp?ricas constitu?das pelos documentos relativos ao surgimento e implanta??o do curr?culo (informa??es do site da SEEDUC, Resolu??o 4.866 de 14 de fevereiro de 2013, Curr?culo M?nimo de Biologia, Bonifica??o por Resultados SEEDUC) e por artigos publicados a respeito do tema. O objetivo inicial ? que se possa atrav?s do intercruzamento destas fontes escritas construir uma narrativa a respeito do curr?culo m?nimo da componente curricular biologia. A partir da an?lise dos documentos oficiais a respeito do CM, no que se refere ao conceito de habilidades e compet?ncias, nota-se sua proximidade com as avalia??es externas, visto que o curr?culo e outras estrat?gias criadas pela SEEDUC almejam corroborar com a eleva??o do ?ndice da educa??o do Estado em avalia??es externas como o IDEB (Indicador e Desenvolvimento da Educa??o B?sica). O CM de Biologia apresenta habilidades e compet?ncias, as quais a SEEDUC argumenta estar organizada de forma progressiva no documento oficial ? da mais simples ou concreta, em dire??o a uma mais complexa ou abstrata. Todavia, analisando este documento, os bimestres letivos distribu?dos no CM de biologia, ? poss?vel sustentar que esta progress?o de conte?dos nem sempre acontece, apresenta-se de forma esparsa e irregular. Neste sentido, foi poss?vel perceber ao analisar o documento do CM de Biologia que o ensino continua a ser apresentado de forma fragmentada; obstaculizando o estudante associar o que aprende na escola com seu cotidiano. Ap?s an?lise do CM de Biologia, sustenta-se a ideia de que os sentidos dos conceitos de compet?ncias e habilidades embora se aproximem da vertente cognitivoconstrutivista, de Perrenoud, tamb?m se movimenta em dire??o ao compartamentalismo de Tyler, quando centraliza suas quest?es em avalia??es externas, no curr?culo do accountability e na performatividade.