Educators across the country are expected to be data literate. They must be able to systemically collect and analyze student data to make informed instructional decisions. However, many school leaders lack the knowledge about how to transform mountains of data on student achievement into an action plan that will improve instruction and increase student learning (Boudett, et al., 2007). In addition, time constraints make it difficult for educators to effectively and efficiently collaborate around student data consistently. Most of the research on data use describes the importance for educators to use data to improve student achievement. However, limited research has been documented on the role the campus leader employs when creating a culture of data-driven decision-making as it relates to student achievement. Furthermore, the research on data use in Title 1 schools is also limited. Therefore, it is imperative to examine and describe how a Title 1 middle school principal implemented Data Teams on a campus. Consequently, the goal of this research was to determine how school leaders improve student learning through teacher data teams. The four primary questions this research addressed in this single case study were: 1. What is the role of the principal in implementing successful Data Teams? 2. What campus structures foster the Data Team process? 3. What are the perceptions of teachers regarding the effectiveness of the Data Team? 4. What practices contribute to the sustainability of Data Teams? Data was gathered through semi-structured interviews, direct observations, and document reviews which informed the findings. This research study revealed that the principal played a key leadership role in creating a culture of collaboration and data inquiry by implementing teacher Data Teams. Such leadership role is enacted by: communicating a vision for Data Teams, providing for job-embedded professional development, and offering differentiated support. Structured time, structured meetings, student data system, and structured assessments are structures employed by the school. Student-focused collaboration, enhanced teacher trust, and increased student achievement illustrate evidence of Data Team effectiveness. Shared accountability, building school culture, and focused interventions serve to sustain Data Teams. In conclusion, it can be affirmed the principal has the most influence on what will be supported on a campus. Therefore, the leadership role performed by the principal when guiding a faculty through the implementation of Data Teams must be deliberate and thoughtful. The principal should include key stakeholders in the decision-making process and build capacity among teachers to ensure the sustainability of Data Teams. Furthermore, targeted professional development and structures that allow time for teachers to collaborate are necessary. Because the ultimate goal for schools is student learning, it is important that everyone within the school organization understand their role in the Data Team process. / text

Researchers have shown that effective use of student data by teachers can inform teaching practice, leading to improved outcomes on standardized tests. In order to improve declining test scores at the middle school under study, professional development on the use of data teams was implemented. However, a year after implementation, teachers were still not utilizing data within their professional learning communities (PLC) effectively or at all. This qualitative case study addressed the problem of the need for teachers to use data more effectively. The conceptual framework of the study was based on the models of PLCs by DuFour and of data teams by Love. The research questions addressed how teachers perceived and used data in their PLCs in order to improve instruction. Qualitative data were collected from individual interviews with 7 teachers, observations of 8 PLC meetings, and review of PLC documents. Triangulation and member checking were used to bolster trustworthiness of interpretations. The data analysis led to 4 common themes: teachers felt they were forced to use data, had excessive responsibilities within PLCs, were busy with other required tasks, and needed more training on data use. The findings led to the design of a 5-day professional development series on data teams to be implemented at the middle school. This study has the potential to increase teacher capacity in using student data to inform instruction and to improve student achievement at the local school and district levels.

This qualitative case study addressed the persistent achievement gaps in annual measurable objectives (AMO) data at a public rural elementary school in the Mideast United States. Response to intervention (RTI) data teams from 2010 did not produce expected student gains after 5 years of implementation in the school under study. Based on Mandinach and Jackson's data-driven decision making conceptual framework, the purpose of this study was to examine the work of the RTI data teams as they attempted to improve student learning and close achievement gaps. A purposeful sample of 13 staff members involved in the RTI implementation process was interviewed. In addition, the RTI data team and student documentation were content analyzed for process and outcomes. Open coping and thematic data analysis of the interview transcripts revealed themes of fidelity, consistency, professional development, and data use in isolation. Findings suggested that the RTI teams lack sufficient time, professional development, and the capacity to address student learning gaps adequately. As an outcome, a guiding model for designing, implementing, and evaluating ongoing blended professional development was proposed. The intent of the project is to eliminate implementation barriers and establish effective data-driven decision making practices that improve instructional practice and student learning. This study has could assist educators in their efforts to implement RTI and build organizational capacity for data-driven decision making to address persistent achievement gaps effectively.

The focus of this research was to investigate the use of a district created formative benchmark assessment in reading to predict student achievement for 10th-grade students on the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) in one county in north central Florida. The purpose of the study was to provide information to high school principals and teachers to better understand how students were performing and learning and to maximize use of the formative district benchmark assessment in order to modify instruction and positively impact student achievement. This study expanded a prior limited study which correlated district benchmark assessment scores to FCAT scores for students in grades three through five in five elementary schools in the targeted county. The high correlations suggested further study. This research focused on secondary reading, specifically in 10th grade where both state and targeted county FCAT scores were low in years preceding this research. Investigated were (a) the district formative assessment in reading as a predictor of FCAT Reading scores, (b) differences in strength of correlation and prediction among student subgroups and between high schools, and (c) any relationships between reading formative assessment scores and Mathematics FCAT scores. An additional focus of this study was to determine best leadership practices in schools where there were the highest correlations between the formative assessment and FCAT Reading scores. Research on best practices was reviewed, and principals were interviewed to determine trends and themes in practice. Tenth grade students in the seven Florida targeted district high schools were included in the study. The findings of the study supported the effective use of formative assessments both in instruction and as predictors of students' performance on the FCAT. The results of the study also showed a significant correlation between performance on the reading formative assessment and performance on FCAT Mathematics. The data indicated no significant differences in the strength of correlation between student subgroups or between the high schools included in the study. Additionally, the practices of effective principals in using formative assessment data to inform instruction, gathered through personal interviews, were documented and described.