No description available.

Deux entités composent le centre de Saint-Denis : d’un côté, l’ensemble monumental de l’ancienne abbaye qui, comme haut lieu de l’histoire nationale et de l’art gothique, revêt un caractère sacré ; de l’autre, l’espace urbain, à la fois populaire et commerçant, dont la mutation est inéluctable à cause, en particulier, de son état d’insalubrité. L’État, émanation de la souveraineté nationale, et la municipalité, représentation du peuple de Saint-Denis, sont happés, après l’épisode vichyste, qui constitue une nouvelle crise politique dans l’histoire de France, par l’urgence de la Reconstruction. C’est à partir du milieu des années 1950 que la reconfiguration de la centralité dionysienne peut être envisagée. La rénovation des abords de la basilique impose un dialogue entre histoire et modernité. Il semble contenir les ferments d’un renouveau politique : une « modernité à la française ». Les débats qui animent les pouvoirs publics et les spécialistes de la ville en proposent une retranscription. Quelles sont les valeurs convoquées dans cette opération d’urbanisme ? Que nous enseigne-t-elle de la reconstruction du récit national depuis la Libération en 1944 ? / Saint-Denis’ city center is twofold: on the one hand stands the sacred monumental complex of the ancient abbey, Mecca of the French national history and Gothic art, while on the other hand, the urban area is both a working-class and commercial environment, which mutation is unavoidable, in particular due to its overall degradation. In the aftermath of the great political crisis of the Vichy period, both the State, as an emanation of national sovereignty, and the municipality, as the representation of the people of Saint-Denis, are confronted with the city’s urgent need for reconstruction. It is only as of the mid-1950s that the reorganization of the Dionysian centrality becomes possible. Yet, the renovation of the surroundings of the basilica calls for a dialogue between history and modernity. This debate appears as the catalyst for a political renewal: a modernity à la française, highlighted by the heated debates between public authorities and specialists of the city. What are the values at stake in this urban renewal process? What are the key lessons triggered by such a project with regards to the reconstruction of the French national narrative since France’s liberation in 1944?

Issued also as thesis, Heidelberg, 1966. / Bibliography: p. 185-191.

Diss.--Techn. Hochsch.--Aachen, 1993. / Sources et bibliogr. p. 375-415.

Th. 3e cycle--Hist. mod.--Paris--E.H.E.S.S., 1986.

Submitted by Fabio Sobreira Campos da Costa (fabio.sobreira@ufpe.br) on 2016-07-29T13:54:33Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 1232 bytes, checksum: 66e71c371cc565284e70f40736c94386 (MD5) Tese_RaulFerreira_BC.pdf: 1769138 bytes, checksum: fc9a08552e3536553423dbd602e17779 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-29T13:54:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 1232 bytes, checksum: 66e71c371cc565284e70f40736c94386 (MD5) Tese_RaulFerreira_BC.pdf: 1769138 bytes, checksum: fc9a08552e3536553423dbd602e17779 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-03-09 / Este trabalho oferece uma reflexão sobre o discurso produzido pela crítica literária que surge na primeira metade do século XIX e se desenvolve até as últimas décadas dos oitocentos. São considerados como seus marcos históricos duas publicações: o Resumé de l'histoire litteráire du Brèsil, de Ferdinand Denis, publicado em 1826, e a História da literatura Brasileira, de Sílvio Romero, publicada em 1888. Para certa historiografia recente da literatura brasileira, a crítica praticada no final do século XIX, a chamada crítica cientificista, diferiu radicalmente da que foi produzida durante o período romântico. Entre um e outro modelo haveria uma ruptura devida sobretudo à adoção das novas ideias científicas que vinham da Europa. Outras leituras, no entanto, preferiram enfatizar a continuidade da ideologia nacionalista e viram na passagem da crítica romântica para a crítica cientificista mais uma continuidade de ideias do que um rompimento traumático. A partir de uma reflexão sobre a teoria do discurso de linha francesa, a pesquisa que aqui é conduzida investiga as diversas possibilidades de dinâmica discursiva dos enunciados de forma a verificar o funcionamento dos discursos inerentes aos dois modelos de crítica literária. Isto permitiu avaliar a pertinência das leituras que alegam a ruptura e a continuidade e concluir que nenhuma das duas abordagens consegue dar conta da complexidade da questão. Ao invés de mera ruptura ou continuidade, conclui-se que as críticas romântica e cientificista constituem dois momentos distintos de uma mesma formação discursiva sobre a literatura. Elas constituem um discurso que se dinamiza em função das vicissitudes históricas e das transformações políticas atravessadas pela nação. / This research offers a reflection on the discourse produced by literary criticism that appears in the first half of the nineteenth century and develops until the last decades of the eight hundred. It is considered as its landmarks two publications: the Resumé de l'histoire litteraire du Bresil, by Ferdinand Denis, published in 1826, and the history of Brazilian literature, by Sílvio Romero, published in 1888. For some recent historiography of Brazilian literature, the criticism practiced in the late nineteenth century, the so called scientistic critical, radically differs from what was produced during the romantic period. Between one and another model there would be a break due mainly to the adoption of new scientific ideas coming from Europe. Other readings, however, preferred to emphasize the continuity of nationalist ideology and saw in the passage of the romantic critical to the scientistic criticism more a continuity of ideas than a traumatic breakup. From a reflection on the French theory of discourse, the research that is conducted here investigates the different possibilities of discursive dynamics of statements in order to verify the behavior of the discourses inherent in two models of literary criticism. This allowed to assess the relevance of the two hypotheses and to conclude that neither approach can account for the complexity of the issue. Rather than merely break or continuity, it is concluded that the romantic criticism and scientistic are two different moments of the same discourse on literature. A speech that oscillates depending on the historical events and political transformations crossed the nation.

Submitted by Fabio Sobreira Campos da Costa (fabio.sobreira@ufpe.br) on 2016-08-03T12:33:19Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 1232 bytes, checksum: 66e71c371cc565284e70f40736c94386 (MD5) Tese_RaulFerreira_BC.pdf: 1769138 bytes, checksum: fc9a08552e3536553423dbd602e17779 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-03T12:33:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 1232 bytes, checksum: 66e71c371cc565284e70f40736c94386 (MD5) Tese_RaulFerreira_BC.pdf: 1769138 bytes, checksum: fc9a08552e3536553423dbd602e17779 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-03-09 / Este trabalho oferece uma reflexão sobre o discurso produzido pela crítica literária que surge na primeira metade do século XIX e se desenvolve até as últimas décadas dos oitocentos. São considerados como seus marcos históricos duas publicações: o Resumé de l'histoire litteráire du Brèsil, de Ferdinand Denis, publicado em 1826, e a História da literatura Brasileira, de Sílvio Romero, publicada em 1888. Para certa historiografia recente da literatura brasileira, a crítica praticada no final do século XIX, a chamada crítica cientificista, diferiu radicalmente da que foi produzida durante o período romântico. Entre um e outro modelo haveria uma ruptura devida sobretudo à adoção das novas ideias científicas que vinham da Europa. Outras leituras, no entanto, preferiram enfatizar a continuidade da ideologia nacionalista e viram na passagem da crítica romântica para a crítica cientificista mais uma continuidade de ideias do que um rompimento traumático. A partir de uma reflexão sobre a teoria do discurso de linha francesa, a pesquisa que aqui é conduzida investiga as diversas possibilidades de dinâmica discursiva dos enunciados de forma a verificar o funcionamento dos discursos inerentes aos dois modelos de crítica literária. Isto permitiu avaliar a pertinência das leituras que alegam a ruptura e a continuidade e concluir que nenhuma das duas abordagens consegue dar conta da complexidade da questão. Ao invés de mera ruptura ou continuidade, conclui-se que as críticas romântica e cientificista constituem dois momentos distintos de uma mesma formação discursiva sobre a literatura. Elas constituem um discurso que se dinamiza em função das vicissitudes históricas e das transformações políticas atravessadas pela nação. / This research offers a reflection on the discourse produced by literary criticism that appears in the first half of the nineteenth century and develops until the last decades of the eight hundred. It is considered as its landmarks two publications: the Resumé de l'histoire litteraire du Bresil, by Ferdinand Denis, published in 1826, and the history of Brazilian literature, by Sílvio Romero, published in 1888. For some recent historiography of Brazilian literature, the criticism practiced in the late nineteenth century, the so called scientistic critical, radically differs from what was produced during the romantic period. Between one and another model there would be a break due mainly to the adoption of new scientific ideas coming from Europe. Other readings, however, preferred to emphasize the continuity of nationalist ideology and saw in the passage of the romantic critical to the scientistic criticism more a continuity of ideas than a traumatic breakup. From a reflection on the French theory of discourse, the research that is conducted here investigates the different possibilities of discursive dynamics of statements in order to verify the behavior of the discourses inherent in two models of literary criticism. This allowed to assess the relevance of the two hypotheses and to conclude that neither approach can account for the complexity of the issue. Rather than merely break or continuity, it is concluded that the romantic criticism and scientistic are two different moments of the same discourse on literature. A speech that oscillates depending on the historical events and political transformations crossed the nation.

The thesis focuses on Denis Dutton's cluster definition of art, its critique and possible defence in the context of evolutionary aesthetics. The main theme that accompanies the thesis is the connection between the evolutionary origins of art and its definition today. After an introductory presentation of evolutionary aesthetics' approaches to the search for the origin and definition of art, the central section is devoted to Dutton's cluster theory. This is presented from two perspectives - against the background of his understanding of the Darwinian-inspired concept of art, that is, based on natural and sexual selection, and against the background of Berys Gaut's original cluster theory. Dutton's theory has faced criticisms of the normative universalism that his evolutionary theory has the potential to set up, the subjectivity regarding antipathy to modern art, and the over-openness of the cluster. The thesis will attempt to evaluate the critique and to clarify whether Dutton succeeds in advocating a link between the origins of art and its modern definition. Keywords: Denis Dutton, evolutionary aesthetics, darwinism, adaptation, cluster theory, definition of art.

Mémoire numérisé par la Direction des bibliothèques de l'Université de Montréal.

Québec Université Laval, Bibliothèque 2018