• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Avaliação da dessaturação induzida pelo exercício em pacientes com bronquiectasia: testes de laboratório versus testes de campo / Evaluación desaturación inducidos por el ejercicio en pacientes con bronquiectasia: frente pruebas de laboratorio e pruebas de campo

Oliveira, Cristiane Helga Yamane de 13 December 2016 (has links)
Submitted by Nadir Basilio (nadirsb@uninove.br) on 2018-07-17T21:01:40Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Cristiane Helga Yamane de Oliveira.pdf: 734503 bytes, checksum: b1eff73874a975c200780b9676f447b3 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-17T21:01:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Cristiane Helga Yamane de Oliveira.pdf: 734503 bytes, checksum: b1eff73874a975c200780b9676f447b3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-12-13 / Introduction: Different modalities exercise lead to different magnitudes of pulse oxygen desaturation (DeSpO2) in lung diseases. Objective: To compare the exercise-induced DeSpO2 between incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test on a treadmill (TECPI-E) and the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) and between sub-maximum cardiopulmonary exercise test (TECPS-E) and endurance SWT (ESWT) in patients with bronchiectasis (BCT). Material and methods: 72 patients with BCT (28 men, 48 ± 15 years, FEV1:54 ± 23% of predicted) and not oxygen dependent were assessed. The order of the TECPI-E and SWTI was randomized, but not the TECPS-E and ESWT because they require that incremental tests be performed first. Treadmill and hallway tests were performed on two different visits. A reduction  4 was considered DeSpO2. Results: There was no difference in DeSpO2 between TECPI-E (-7.7% ± 6.3%) and ISWT (-6.3% ± 5.8%) and between TECPS-E (-6,8% ± 5,8%) and ESWT (-7.2% ± 6.3%). In the incremental and endurance tests, there was an agreement to DeSpO2 or not DeSpO2 in 56 and 55 patients, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in heart rate (percentage of the maximum predicted) between TECPI-E (87.0% ± 9.0%) and ISWT (78.9% ± 11.4%) and between TECPS-E (84.5% ± 9.9%) and ESWT (79.3% ± 11.8%). However, when comparing patients who reached 85% of predicted maximum heart rate or not, there was no difference in the magnitude of DeSpO2. Conclusion: In patients with BCT, our results show that field-based tests may replace the laboratory-based tests when the clinic question is the evaluation of exercise-induced DeSpO2. / Introdução: Diferentes modalidades de exercício físico determinam diferentes magnitudes de dessaturação de pulso de oxigênio (DeSpO2) em pneumopatias. Objetivo: Comparar a DeSpO2 induzida pelo exercício entre teste de exercício cardiopulmonar (TECP) incremental em esteira (TECPI-E) e o shuttle walk test (SWT) incremental (SWTI) e entre TECP submáximo em esteira (TECPS-E) e SWT endurance (SWTE) em pacientes com bronquiectasia (BCQ). Material e métodos: Foram avaliados 72 pacientes com BCQ (28 homens, 48  15 anos, VEF1: 54 ± 23 % previsto), não dependentes de oxigênio. A ordem de realização do TECPI-E e SWTI foi randomizada, mas não o TECPS-E e SWTE, pois esses necessitam dos testes anteriores. Os testes em esteira e em corredor foram realizados em duas visitas diferentes. Uma redução  4 foi considerada DeSpO2. Resultados: Não houve diferença na DeSpO2 entre TECPI-E (-7,7% ± 6,3%) e SWTI (-6,3% ± 5,8%) e entre TECPS-E (-6,8% ± 5,8%) e SWTE (-7,2% ± 6,3%). Nos testes incrementais e de endurance, houve concordância de DeSpO2 ou não DeSpO2 em 56 e 55 pacientes, respectivamente. Houve diferença significante na frequência cardíaca (FC, % da máxima prevista) entre TECPI-E (87,0% ± 9,0%) e SWTI (78,9% ± 11,4%) e entre TECPS-E (84,5% ± 9,9% previsto) e SWTE (79,3% ± 11,8% previsto). No entanto, ao comparar os pacientes que atingiram ou não 85% da FC máxima prevista, não houve diferença na magnitude de DeSpO2. Conclusão: Nossos resultados demonstram que, em pacientes com BCQ, os testes de campo podem substituir os testes de laboratório quando a questão clínica é a avaliação da DeSpO2 induzida pelo exercício.

Page generated in 0.0725 seconds