Thesis title: Public interest, politics and developers The thesis deals with issues of public interest, politicians and developers. The aim of the thesis is to map the conditions for new buildings and determine what the public interest is in urban planning. The thesis is focuses mainly on the territory of Prague. For that purpose thesis analyze the relationships between terms and analysis of the legal framework and a description of practical experience in construction. The thesis is divided into three chapters. The first chapter is divided into two main parts and is dedicated to the term of public interest, first from the interdisciplinary and subsequently from the legally perspective. This chapter provides a better understanding and grasp of the term. In the first part thesis interprets the works of prominent thinkers who work with the term, especially the genesis of the words "public" and "interest". This is followed by a search for a corrective to the capitalist view of the public interest, as well as view of the public interest as the interest of certain groups, as well as modeling system to determine public interest in the decisions of politicians. The second part analyzes the term based on the analysis of case law and legislation. The second chapter focuses on the conditions for the placement...

New technology is a key to be able to evolve and be in thecutting edge in system development. System developmentteams within an organization, and the individuals within theteam, must adopt and accept new technology in a fast pace.Even though teamwork is a crucial part in the daily life of asystem developer, there is a lack of studies who has taken acloser look at teams in system development and theacceptance of new technology and working methods. Theauthors therefore saw the need to investigate the correlationbetween a system development team and the acceptance ofnew technology and working methods. The study hasexamined a government-controlled organization and theirwork with introducing development principles to the systemdevelopment teams. The aim of this study is “FromTechnology Acceptance Model 3 point of view identify criticalfactors who affects the acceptance of development principles for asystem development team.” To fulfill the aim a researchquestion has been constructed “What critical factors lie behindthe team´s acceptance of the development principles?”. Theresearch question has been answered on the basis of thequalitative research approach and semi-structuredinterviews. Where the analysis takes support of TAM3 toidentify the critical factors in TAM3. The analysis resulted infive critical factors which was considered to affect theacceptance of the development principles within a systemdevelopment team. The five identified factors wereExperience, Voluntariness, Output Quality, Job Relevance andResult Demonstrability. From the identified factors, Experiencewas considered as a factor who needs further studies wherefuture research can investigate different kinds of experienceand what role the different kinds of experience might havefor each individual factor that Experience influence / Inom systemutveckling är ny teknik en nyckel till att kunnautvecklas och ligga i framkant. Systemutvecklingsteam inomen organisation och individerna inom teamet behöver snabbtta till sig ny teknik och anpassa sina arbetsmetoder. Trots attteamarbete är en viktig del av en systemutvecklares arbetsdagså finns det få studier som tittat närmare på justsystemutvecklingsteam och acceptans av nya tekniker ocharbetsmetoder. Författarna såg därför behovet av att vidareundersöka korrelationen mellan systemutvecklingsteam och acceptansen av nya tekniker och arbetsmetoder. Studiengenomfördes hos en svensk myndighet där arbetet med attintroducera utvecklingsprinciper och hursystemutvecklingsteamen accepterat dessa undersöktes.Detta leder in på studiens syfte som är “Utifrån TechnologyAcceptance Model 3 identifiera kritiska faktorer som påverkar ettsystemutvecklingsteams acceptans av utvecklingsprinciper” För attuppfylla syftet har en forskningsfråga ställts: “Vilka kritiskafaktorer ligger bakom teamens acceptans avutvecklingsprinciperna?”. En kvalitativ ansats ochsemistrukturerade intervjuer har använts för att besvaraforskningsfrågan. Analysen genomfördes med stöd avTechnology Acceptance Model 3 vilket resulterade i fem kritiskafaktorer som ansågs påverka ett systemutvecklingsteamacceptans av utvecklingsprinciperna. De fem identifieradefaktorerna var: Experience, Voluntariness, Output Quality, JobRelevance och Result Demonstrability. Av dessa faktorer ansesExperience vara den faktor som behöver undersökasytterligare, där framtida forskning kan undersöka olika typerav erfarenheter och vilken roll de olika erfarenheterna spelarför respektive faktor som Experience i sin tur påverkar.