No description available.

Despite their relevance to self-concept, naïve dialecticism (ND) and self-complexity (SC) have not been applied to the study of personality disorders. In personality pathology research, disturbances in personality functioning are operationalized in terms of problems in self-conception and interpersonal affiliation (as assessed in Criterion A of the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorder). Thus, exploring the influence of ND and SC on personality functioning would contribute to the understanding of self-concept in personality pathology, especially in the context of Eastern versus Western cultures. The current study recruited participants from both of these cultural groups and the results showed preliminary support for the predictive effects of ND and SC on personality functioning impairment, respectively, and for the partial mediating effect of SC on the association between dialecticism and personality functioning in each cultural group. Implications for the future conceptualization of personality pathology across cultures and the study limitations are also discussed.

This study will embrace certain features of postmodern experience so as to underline subjective embodiment as the condition, corollary, and appropriate focus of textual, rhetorical, and sociopolitical criticism. It will theorize somantics as a conceptual toolkit for mapping the structural correspondence of embodiment to the symbolic order, each thus emerging as the other’s non-foundational “efficient reason.” This study will argue that the flesh mediates the theoretic divisions of structuralism, deconstruction, psychoanalysis, and existentialism, although not in a priori or essentialist ways. It will draw from their vocabularies, combining them into a vocabulary of its own while retexturing their relation to one another. It thus aspires to reduce all rhetorics and metaphysics to the somantic, so as to sabotage conservative fundamentalisms and to establish the terms for an argument with enthusiasts of transhumanism. Moreover, this study will suggest that theoretic systems, cultural messages, and sociopolitical speech-acts inattentive to the condition of embodiment—whether that of their agents, interlocutors, or material mediums of expression— must then seem at once suspicious, maladaptive to the sense contingencies of the moment, and deserving of somantic reduction. In correcting these faults, it will also resist systematizing or universalizing sense-experience; it will function rather as a corpus of maps that rechart the volatile, moment-to-moment interimplication of the somatic and the symbolic. Thus this study takes axiomatically Frederic Jameson’s claim that intertextuality replaces history in the era of transnational capital, seeing in this argument the strategic advantage of taking a theoretic standpoint against diachronic modalities of time. Arguing for the reconstruction of certain narratives as distortions, if not outright falsifications, of the simultaneation of needs, impressions, and changes in a subject’s sense-experience, this study will redirect attention to the relation of certain discourses to the bodies of their interlocutors.