As an extension of previous studies (Urbanczyk, Angel, & Kennelly, 1988) examining the effects of unimanual finger tapping on lateralized cognitive tasks, lateral body orienting was added to an established dual task paradigm to generate differential hemispheric activation and shifts of attention. One hundred twenty university students retained sequences of digits or spatial locations for 20 seconds either alone or during finger tapping. By turning both head and eyes left or right, the hemisphere congruent with the sequences (LH for digits, RH for locations) or incongruent (vice versa) was activated. Activation had little effect on retention means but greatly affected resource composition supporting task performance. Congruent orientation produced significantly higher positive correlations between digit and location tasks than incongruent orientation. Females showed higher sequence retention correlations than males across both orienting groups. For females, congruent activation enhanced tapping rates and retention-tapping correlations. For males, activation affected neither of these. Discussed in light of neuroanatomical research, these results suggest that congruent attentional orienting may integrate regions of the less activated hemisphere into networks of the more activated hemisphere. This unification may occur more readily across the female corpus callosum, producing a greater dependence upon a general attentional resource than for males, who appear to depend more upon hemispheric resources.

Purpose: To investigate the effects of speaker age, speaker gender, semantic context, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and a listener’s hearing status on speech recognition and listening effort in older adults. We examined the hypothesis that older adults would recognize less speech and exert greater listening effort when listening to the speech of younger versus older adult speakers. Method: Speech stimuli were recorded from 12 adult speakers classified as “younger” (three males and three females aged 18-31 years) and “older” (three males and three females aged 69-89) respectively. A computer-based subjective rating was conducted to confirm that the speakers were representative of younger and older speakers. Listeners included 20 older adults (aged 65 years and above), who were divided into two age-matched groups with and without hearing loss. All listening and speaking participants in the study were native speakers of New Zealand English. A dual-task paradigm was used to measure speech recognition and listening effort; the primary task involved recognition of target words in sentences containing either high or low contextual cues, while the secondary task required listeners to memorise the target words for later recall, following a set number of sentences. Listening tasks were performed with a variety of listening conditions (quiet, +5 dB SNR and 0dB SNR). Results: There were no overall differences in speech recognition scores or word recall scores for the 20 older listeners, when listening to the speech of the younger versus older speakers. However, differential effects of speaker group were observed in the two semantic context conditions (high versus low context). Older male speakers were the easiest to understand when semantic context was low; however, for sentences with high semantic context, the older male group were the most difficult to understand. Word recall scores were also significantly higher in the most challenging listening condition (low semantic context, 0 dB SNR), when the speaker was an older male. Conclusion: Differential effects of speaker group were observed in the two semantic context conditions (high versus low context) suggesting that different speech cues were used by listeners, as the level of context varied. The findings provide further evidence that, in challenging listening conditions, older listeners are able to use a wide range of cues, such as prosodic features and semantic context to compensate for a degraded signal. The availability of these cues depends on characteristics of the speaker, such as rate of speech and prosody, as well as characteristics of the listener and the listening environment. .

The strength model of self-control predicts that when people exert self-control, they should show performance decrements on subsequent self-control tasks. However, it is possible that this pattern of behaviour is confined to specific experimental procedures, which amplifies the effect. The aims of this thesis are to; 1) test the strength model predictions in sport; and 2) examine emotion as a mediator of self-control performance effects. Study 1 consisted of two experiments. Experiment 1 set out to demonstrate a pattern of resource depletion. Forty-three sport and exercise students performed either an incongruent (self-control depletion) or congruent (control) Stroop task before and after performing a virtual reality cycling task on an indoor cycling ergometer. Findings showed the depletion group performed worse on the second Stroop task than on their first task or than the control group. Experiment 2 sought to address some of the methodological concerns in Experiment 1, and examine emotion as a factor explaining performance. Forty-eight physically active participants followed the same experimental protocol, but with an additional iteration of both tasks. Results demonstrated that both cycling and Stroop task performance improved across time. In addition, participants reported feeling happier and more motivated during the second cycling task. Study 2 provided a conceptual replication of Study 1, using different tests of self-control. Twenty-six university-level male soccer players either performed the Loughborough Soccer Passing Test (LSPT) with (self-control depletion) or without (control) an audio file simulating crowd noise, and then performed the wall squat muscle endurance test. The self-control depletion group reported feeling more anxious during the LSPT and performed worse than the controls on the wall squat. III Next, in Study 3, nineteen well-trained competitive endurance runners performed a self-paced 1600 m running trial and then ran a second trial either self-paced or with a pacemaker. The pacemaker had no significant effect on actual performance time but participants reported feeling more anxious beforehand and adopted a fast start strategy, whereas the self-paced group had a conservative pacing pattern. Study 4 showed that, for females, consuming a sports drink—as opposed to plain water—associated with better physical (high-intensity track running) and cognitive self-control (Stroop) performance. In addition, they appeared to be happier drinking water, and more anxious drinking the sports drink—an effect that diverged over the six weeks. Study 5 examined the effects of three strategies—designed to increase or decrease the intensity of emotions—on emotion, pacing strategy and 1600 m performance. Results showed the intervention designed to decrease unpleasant emotions was associated with lower anxiety, higher calmness, a slower first 400 m, and more overall consistent pacing strategy. Study 6 examined the effects of imagery training on swimming tumble-turn performance. Findings showed no significant intervention effect, a result that goes against the proposed benefits of psychological skills training and runs counter to the predictions of the strength model. Collectively, the evidence in the thesis provides limited support for the strength model. It is concluded that self-control performance does not inevitably deteriorate across self-control tasks where the individual is well-versed with the task demands, or where tasks are not physically strenuous enough to tax mental resources. In contrast, the explanation for performance deterioration across a series of novel tasks is likely to extend beyond that of a self-control resources perspective. Future research might profitably test this proposal.

The primary goal of this research was to explore attentional factors contributing to normal balance control and to determine how age-related changes in these factors constrain balance in the aging adult. Though previous research has demonstrated attentional interference between postural control and performance of cognitive tasks in young (YA) and older adults (OA), the mechanisms contributing to interference have not been identified. This study utilized as a cognitive task, a visual working memory task (the change detection task), which identified the short term working memory (or attentional) capacity limits of participants. Participants were asked to perform the cognitive task (determining a change in the color of squares in a first vs. second memory array) either in isolation or with postural tasks of increasing complexity, including quiet sitting (control), quiet stance in isolation, quiet stance (but intermixed with support surface perturbations), and support surface perturbations. YA showed a significant decline in working memory capacity between the control and perturbation condition (p<0.01) but no change in postural performance between single and dual task conditions, as determined by increased steps in response to perturbations (p<0.33). In a second set of experiments, the performance of OA was compared to YA. Results showed that OA had reduced working memory capacity on the change detection task compared to YA even in the control condition (YA: 2.8±0.6 items; OA: 1.8±0.7; p<0.001). OA showed an even greater decline than YA in memory capacity in the dual task condition (p<0.001), along with difficulty regaining balance following perturbations, evidenced by significant increases in up on toes (p<0.05) and stepping strategies (p<0.05). These results suggest that visual working memory (for simple features) and postural control share a common attentional resource that is limited and that postural control is favored over the cognitive task in YA. In OA, attentional capacity was significantly reduced and both postural and cognitive tasks were impaired in the dual task condition, suggesting that with aging even simple cognitive tasks can negatively affect balance under challenging postural conditions.

<p>Augmented reality (AR) allows people to view digital information overlaid on to real-world objects. While the technology is still new, it is currently being used in places such as the military and industrial assembly operations in the form of ocular devices worn on the head over the eyes. Head-mounted displays (HMDs) let people always see AR information in their field of view no matter where their head is positioned. Studies have shown that HMDs displaying information directly related to the immediate task can decreased cognitive workload and increase the speed and accuracy of task performance. However, task-irrelevant information has shown to decrease performance and accuracy of the primary task and also hinder the efficiency of processing the irrelevant information. This has been investigated in industry settings but less so in an everyday consumer context. This study proposes comparing two types of visual information (text and shapes) in AR displayed on an HMD to answer the following questions: 1) when content is of importance, which visual notification (text or shapes) is processed faster while degrading the performance of the primary task the least? And 2) When presence is of importance, which visual notification (text or shapes) is processed faster while degrading the performance of the primary task the least?</p>

Background and aims: The primary motor cortex (M1) controls voluntary motor behaviours. M1 has been identified to play a major role in the execution of voluntary corticospinal tasks as well as self-initiated corticobulbar tasks. However, the involvement of M1 in more complex corticubulbar tasks, such as swallowing, is not yet fully understood. Swallowing is quite different from other voluntary motor tasks as it has both voluntary and reflexive components. The degree of M1 involvement in the pharyngeal, or more reflexive, component of swallowing is unclear. Studies investigating the role of M1 in swallowing have yielded contradictory findings regarding the specific functional contribution of M1 to swallowing. Therefore, further investigation is warranted to clarify the role of M1 in pharyngeal swallowing. Discrete saliva or water swallowing has been utilized in most studies investigating neurophysiology of swallowing in health and disease. However, individuals most frequently complete multiple, consecutive swallows during the ingestion of liquid. Biomechanical differences between discrete and continuous water swallows have been identified using videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS). However, no studies have investigated the pharyngeal pressure differences between these two swallowing tasks. Additional insights into task differences may be revealed through evaluation of pharyngeal pressure utilizing pharyngeal manometry. This research programme sought to clarify the role of M1 in reflexively and volitionally initiated pharyngeal swallowing. In order to understand M1 involvement in the execution of swallowing, comparative tasks that require known dependence on M1 were also included in this research programme. This research programme addressed the biomechanical changes in motor behaviours as a result of neural disruption during the performance of a number of motor tasks. This neural disruption was intrinsically generated through application of dual task (DT) paradigm and extrinsically generated using single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). A secondary aim of this research programme was to identify the differences in pharyngeal pressure generation between discrete and continuous swallowing. Methods: Twenty-four right handed participants (12 males, average age= 24.4, SD= 6.3) were recruited to this research programme. A number of motor tasks that vary in complexity were tested. These tasks included: volitional swallowing, reflexive swallowing, eyebrow movement, jaw movement and finger tapping with right, left, or bilateral index fingers. Participants performed multiple trials of several tasks in each study. Repetitions of tasks during a single session may affect performance due to factors such as fatigue or practice. A baseline study was undertaken to determine within-participant variability of measures across repeated trials. Following the baseline study, the role of M1 in pharyngeal swallowing was investigated in two main studies in counter balanced order. The role of M1 in pharyngeal swallowing was evaluated by investigating swallowing parameters during neural disruption using a DT paradigm. Participants performed tasks in isolation (baseline) and with interference that consisted of pairing swallowing with comparative task that activates M1 (fingers tapping and eyebrow movement tasks). In the other study, single pulse TMS was utilized to create an electrophysiological disruption to the areas of M1 associated with muscular representation of a number of motor behaviours (swallowing tasks, jaw movement and fingers tapping tasks). Stimulation was provided to both hemispheres in random order to evaluate laterality effects. Swallowing parameters and the performance of the other motor tasks were evaluated when performed with and without electrophysiological disruption. Differences in pharyngeal pressure generation between discrete and continuous swallowing were investigated using pharyngeal manometry. Pharyngeal pressures were recorded at three locations: upper pharynx, mid-pharynx and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) during four swallowing types: discrete saliva swallowing, discrete 10 ml swallowing, volitional continuous swallowing, and reflexive continuous swallowing. The research paradigm used in this research programme identified the effect of experimental conditions on the rate and regularity of task performance. In addition, pharyngeal manometry was utilised to measure the effect of experimental conditions on the pattern of the pharyngeal pressure generation during swallowing. Within subject differences from baseline were identified by means of Repeated Measures Analyses of Variance (RM-ANOVA). Results: Initial analysis of the data revealed that repetition of tasks within a session did not affect the rate and regularity of voluntary corticospinal tasks, voluntary corticiobulbar tasks nor swallowing tasks. In addition, repeating the swallowing tasks during a session did not affect pharyngeal pressure as measured by pharyngeal manometry. When motor tasks were performed concurrently in the DT paradigm, rate and regularity of eyebrow movements were significantly decreased when paired with swallowing tasks, whereas rate and regularity of swallowing were significantly decreased when paired with left finger tapping, but not right finger tapping. However, there was no significant effect of any task on the pattern of pharyngeal pressure generation. Extrinsically generated disruption using TMS significantly reduced rate and regularity of finger tapping tasks and regularity of jaw movement and swallowing tasks. In addition, interruption of pharyngeal M1 during the volitional swallowing task produced significant increase in the duration but not the amplitude of the pharyngeal pressure. Pharyngeal pressure generation differed between swallowing types and boluses types, in that saliva swallowing produced longer pharyngeal pressure duration and lower nadir pressure than water swallows. Discrete water bolus swallowing produced longer UES opening compared to both saliva swallowing or continuous water swallowing. Conclusion: The results of this research programme provided valuable methodological information regarding the effect of trials on task performance as well as identifying pharyngeal pressure differences between discrete and continuous swallowing. In addition to the methodological contribution, this research programme expanded on previous knowledge of neural control of swallowing, in that it extended the findings regarding potential role of M1 in pharyngeal swallowing. Given the absent effect of task repetition on the performance of corticospinal and corticobulbar motor tasks, it is speculated that outcomes of research investigating the effect of experimental manipulation on motor tasks performance is due to the experimental tasks, rather than natural variance in the data. The effect of swallowing on the rate and regularity of eyebrow movement, when performed concurrently using DT paradigm, suggest bilateral functional overlapping to a significant degree between neural substrates that control swallowing and orofacial muscles. These results offer partial support of bilateral representation of swallowing in the cortex. In addition, results further revealed potential involvement of right M1 in the regulation of pharyngeal swallowing as evidenced by a disruptive effect of left finger tapping on the rate and regularity of swallowing. The results from the hemispheric TMS disruption study support the active involvement M1 in the execution of voluntary corticospinal and corticobulbar motor tasks. In addition, the current findings extended previous knowledge of neural control of pharyngeal swallowing by documenting the effect of neural disruption on the regularity and pharyngeal pressure measures during volitional and reflexive swallowing. The current programme documented potential role of M1 in the control of pharyngeal swallowing possibly by modulating the motor plan at the swallowing CPG in the brainstem. This project is the first to document pharyngeal pressure differences between discrete and continuous swallowing. These findings contribute valuable information to the swallowing literature as limited number of studies investigated the biomechanical differences between discrete and continuous liquid ingestion. This knowledge will assist clinicians and researchers in identifying the pharyngeal pressure differences between normal and abnormal swallowing in different swallowing types and ultimately guide their rehabilitation decisions. Data from this research programme will add to the existing knowledge of neurophysiology of swallowing, thereby facilitating understanding of swallowing pathophysiology which is crucial for appropriate management of swallowing disorders.

L’objectif principal de cette thèse était de quantifier et comparer l’effort requis pour reconnaître la parole dans le bruit chez les jeunes adultes et les personnes aînées ayant une audition normale et une acuité visuelle normale (avec ou sans lentille de correction de la vue). L’effort associé à la perception de la parole est lié aux ressources attentionnelles et cognitives requises pour comprendre la parole. La première étude (Expérience 1) avait pour but d’évaluer l’effort associé à la reconnaissance auditive de la parole (entendre un locuteur), tandis que la deuxième étude (Expérience 2) avait comme but d’évaluer l’effort associé à la reconnaissance auditivo-visuelle de la parole (entendre et voir le visage d’un locuteur). L’effort fut mesuré de deux façons différentes. D’abord par une approche comportementale faisant appel à un paradigme expérimental nommé double tâche. Il s’agissait d’une tâche de reconnaissance de mot jumelée à une tâche de reconnaissance de patrons vibro-tactiles. De plus, l’effort fut quantifié à l’aide d’un questionnaire demandant aux participants de coter l’effort associé aux tâches comportementales. Les deux mesures d’effort furent utilisées dans deux conditions expérimentales différentes : 1) niveau équivalent – c'est-à-dire lorsque le niveau du bruit masquant la parole était le même pour tous les participants et, 2) performance équivalente – c'est-à-dire lorsque le niveau du bruit fut ajusté afin que les performances à la tâche de reconnaissance de mots soient identiques pour les deux groupes de participant. Les niveaux de performance obtenus pour la tâche vibro-tactile ont révélé que les personnes aînées fournissent plus d’effort que les jeunes adultes pour les deux conditions expérimentales, et ce, quelle que soit la modalité perceptuelle dans laquelle les stimuli de la parole sont présentés (c.-à.-d., auditive seulement ou auditivo-visuelle). Globalement, le ‘coût’ associé aux performances de la tâche vibro-tactile était au plus élevé pour les personnes aînées lorsque la parole était présentée en modalité auditivo-visuelle. Alors que les indices visuels peuvent améliorer la reconnaissance auditivo-visuelle de la parole, nos résultats suggèrent qu’ils peuvent aussi créer une charge additionnelle sur les ressources utilisées pour traiter l’information. Cette charge additionnelle a des conséquences néfastes sur les performances aux tâches de reconnaissance de mots et de patrons vibro-tactiles lorsque celles-ci sont effectuées sous des conditions de double tâche. Conformément aux études antérieures, les coefficients de corrélations effectuées à partir des données de l’Expérience 1 et de l’Expérience 2 soutiennent la notion que les mesures comportementales de double tâche et les réponses aux questionnaires évaluent différentes dimensions de l’effort associé à la reconnaissance de la parole. Comme l’effort associé à la perception de la parole repose sur des facteurs auditifs et cognitifs, une troisième étude fut complétée afin d’explorer si la mémoire auditive de travail contribue à expliquer la variance dans les données portant sur l’effort associé à la perception de la parole. De plus, ces analyses ont permis de comparer les patrons de réponses obtenues pour ces deux facteurs après des jeunes adultes et des personnes aînées. Pour les jeunes adultes, les résultats d’une analyse de régression séquentielle ont démontré qu’une mesure de la capacité auditive (taille de l’empan) était reliée à l’effort, tandis qu’une mesure du traitement auditif (rappel alphabétique) était reliée à la précision avec laquelle les mots étaient reconnus lorsqu’ils étaient présentés sous les conditions de double tâche. Cependant, ces mêmes relations n’étaient pas présentes dans les données obtenues pour le groupe de personnes aînées ni dans les données obtenues lorsque les tâches de reconnaissance de la parole étaient effectuées en modalité auditivo-visuelle. D’autres études sont nécessaires pour identifier les facteurs cognitifs qui sous-tendent l’effort associé à la perception de la parole, et ce, particulièrement chez les personnes aînées. / The primary objective of the current thesis was to quantify and compare the amount of listening effort that young and older, normal-hearing adults with normal (or corrected normal) vision expend when speech is presented in background noise. Listening effort refers to the attentional and cognitive resources required to understand speech. Study 1 was designed to determine the listening effort associated with auditory speech recognition (hearing a speaker) whereas Study 2 examined the listening effort involved with audiovisual speech recognition (hearing and seeing the face of a speaker). Listening effort was assessed behaviourally, using a dual task paradigm where a word recognition task was paired with a tactile pattern recognition task and, with self-reported ratings. Both measures of listening effort were assessed under two experimental conditions: 1) equated level - where the level of background noise was the same for all participants and, 2) equated performance - where single task word recognition performance did not differ between groups. The tactile task costs revealed that older adults expended more listening effort than young adults for both experimental conditions regardless of the perceptual modality in which the speech stimuli were presented (i.e., audio-only and audiovisual). Overall, the cost involved with tactile task performance was highest for older adults when speech was presented audiovisually. While visual cues can improve audiovisual speech recognition our results suggest they can also place an extra demand on processing resources with performance consequences for the word and tactile tasks under dual task conditions. Consistent with the literature, the correlation findings of Study 1 and Study 2 support the idea that dual task measures and self-reported ratings each assess different aspects of listening effort. As listening effort draws upon auditory and cognitive factors, the purpose of Study 3 was to determine to what extent the separate components of auditory working memory (capacity and processing) contribute towards the variance observed in listening effort and to determine if the pattern of working memory predictor variables changes with age. Results of a sequential regression analysis for young adults indicated that a measure of auditory capacity (span size) was related to listening effort whereas a measure of auditory processing (alphabetical recall) was related to the cost associated with word recognition accuracy performance under dual task conditions. However, these relationships did not extend to older adults or to the data obtained when the speech recognition tasks were performed audiovisually. Further research is required to determine what cognitive factors underlie listening effort – especially for older adults.

L’objectif principal de cette thèse était de quantifier et comparer l’effort requis pour reconnaître la parole dans le bruit chez les jeunes adultes et les personnes aînées ayant une audition normale et une acuité visuelle normale (avec ou sans lentille de correction de la vue). L’effort associé à la perception de la parole est lié aux ressources attentionnelles et cognitives requises pour comprendre la parole. La première étude (Expérience 1) avait pour but d’évaluer l’effort associé à la reconnaissance auditive de la parole (entendre un locuteur), tandis que la deuxième étude (Expérience 2) avait comme but d’évaluer l’effort associé à la reconnaissance auditivo-visuelle de la parole (entendre et voir le visage d’un locuteur). L’effort fut mesuré de deux façons différentes. D’abord par une approche comportementale faisant appel à un paradigme expérimental nommé double tâche. Il s’agissait d’une tâche de reconnaissance de mot jumelée à une tâche de reconnaissance de patrons vibro-tactiles. De plus, l’effort fut quantifié à l’aide d’un questionnaire demandant aux participants de coter l’effort associé aux tâches comportementales. Les deux mesures d’effort furent utilisées dans deux conditions expérimentales différentes : 1) niveau équivalent – c'est-à-dire lorsque le niveau du bruit masquant la parole était le même pour tous les participants et, 2) performance équivalente – c'est-à-dire lorsque le niveau du bruit fut ajusté afin que les performances à la tâche de reconnaissance de mots soient identiques pour les deux groupes de participant. Les niveaux de performance obtenus pour la tâche vibro-tactile ont révélé que les personnes aînées fournissent plus d’effort que les jeunes adultes pour les deux conditions expérimentales, et ce, quelle que soit la modalité perceptuelle dans laquelle les stimuli de la parole sont présentés (c.-à.-d., auditive seulement ou auditivo-visuelle). Globalement, le ‘coût’ associé aux performances de la tâche vibro-tactile était au plus élevé pour les personnes aînées lorsque la parole était présentée en modalité auditivo-visuelle. Alors que les indices visuels peuvent améliorer la reconnaissance auditivo-visuelle de la parole, nos résultats suggèrent qu’ils peuvent aussi créer une charge additionnelle sur les ressources utilisées pour traiter l’information. Cette charge additionnelle a des conséquences néfastes sur les performances aux tâches de reconnaissance de mots et de patrons vibro-tactiles lorsque celles-ci sont effectuées sous des conditions de double tâche. Conformément aux études antérieures, les coefficients de corrélations effectuées à partir des données de l’Expérience 1 et de l’Expérience 2 soutiennent la notion que les mesures comportementales de double tâche et les réponses aux questionnaires évaluent différentes dimensions de l’effort associé à la reconnaissance de la parole. Comme l’effort associé à la perception de la parole repose sur des facteurs auditifs et cognitifs, une troisième étude fut complétée afin d’explorer si la mémoire auditive de travail contribue à expliquer la variance dans les données portant sur l’effort associé à la perception de la parole. De plus, ces analyses ont permis de comparer les patrons de réponses obtenues pour ces deux facteurs après des jeunes adultes et des personnes aînées. Pour les jeunes adultes, les résultats d’une analyse de régression séquentielle ont démontré qu’une mesure de la capacité auditive (taille de l’empan) était reliée à l’effort, tandis qu’une mesure du traitement auditif (rappel alphabétique) était reliée à la précision avec laquelle les mots étaient reconnus lorsqu’ils étaient présentés sous les conditions de double tâche. Cependant, ces mêmes relations n’étaient pas présentes dans les données obtenues pour le groupe de personnes aînées ni dans les données obtenues lorsque les tâches de reconnaissance de la parole étaient effectuées en modalité auditivo-visuelle. D’autres études sont nécessaires pour identifier les facteurs cognitifs qui sous-tendent l’effort associé à la perception de la parole, et ce, particulièrement chez les personnes aînées. / The primary objective of the current thesis was to quantify and compare the amount of listening effort that young and older, normal-hearing adults with normal (or corrected normal) vision expend when speech is presented in background noise. Listening effort refers to the attentional and cognitive resources required to understand speech. Study 1 was designed to determine the listening effort associated with auditory speech recognition (hearing a speaker) whereas Study 2 examined the listening effort involved with audiovisual speech recognition (hearing and seeing the face of a speaker). Listening effort was assessed behaviourally, using a dual task paradigm where a word recognition task was paired with a tactile pattern recognition task and, with self-reported ratings. Both measures of listening effort were assessed under two experimental conditions: 1) equated level - where the level of background noise was the same for all participants and, 2) equated performance - where single task word recognition performance did not differ between groups. The tactile task costs revealed that older adults expended more listening effort than young adults for both experimental conditions regardless of the perceptual modality in which the speech stimuli were presented (i.e., audio-only and audiovisual). Overall, the cost involved with tactile task performance was highest for older adults when speech was presented audiovisually. While visual cues can improve audiovisual speech recognition our results suggest they can also place an extra demand on processing resources with performance consequences for the word and tactile tasks under dual task conditions. Consistent with the literature, the correlation findings of Study 1 and Study 2 support the idea that dual task measures and self-reported ratings each assess different aspects of listening effort. As listening effort draws upon auditory and cognitive factors, the purpose of Study 3 was to determine to what extent the separate components of auditory working memory (capacity and processing) contribute towards the variance observed in listening effort and to determine if the pattern of working memory predictor variables changes with age. Results of a sequential regression analysis for young adults indicated that a measure of auditory capacity (span size) was related to listening effort whereas a measure of auditory processing (alphabetical recall) was related to the cost associated with word recognition accuracy performance under dual task conditions. However, these relationships did not extend to older adults or to the data obtained when the speech recognition tasks were performed audiovisually. Further research is required to determine what cognitive factors underlie listening effort – especially for older adults.

Les aides auditives (AA) sont les principaux outils d’intervention de réadaptation recommandés aux personnes âgées ayant une perte auditive, car elles offrent un large éventail d’avantages. Cependant, beaucoup de personnes qui possèdent des AA ne les utilisent pas ou les sous-utilisent. La raison la plus récurrente exprimée par ces non-utilisateurs d’AA est la difficulté persistante à comprendre les conversations dans des environnements bruyants. Il n’est pas mentionné si ces personnes ont essayé de porter leurs AA pendant un certain temps avant de décider de ne plus les porter. Dans l’éventualité où elles auraient abandonné peu de temps après l’obtention de leurs AA, il est possible que ces individus n’aient pas bénéficié d’une adaptation optimale à l’environnement sonore, appelée acclimatation auditive. L’objectif principal de cette thèse est d’évaluer l’apport de l’expérience avec les AA sur l’acclimatation auditive. La première étude visait à déterminer, au moyen d'une revue systématique, si un effet d’acclimatation se produit après l’utilisation d’AA et, le cas échéant, à établir l’amplitude et l’évolution dans le temps de cet effet. Quatorze articles évaluant l’acclimatation via des mesures comportementales, d’auto-évaluation et électrophysiologiques répondaient aux critères d’inclusion et d’exclusion. Bien que leur qualité scientifique générale soit faible ou très faible, les résultats de la revue systématique appuient l’hypothèse qu’un effet d'acclimatation est présent, tel que documenté par les trois types de mesures. Pour la reconnaissance de la parole dans le bruit, l’amélioration varie entre 2 et 3 dB en termes de rapport signal sur bruit (RSB) sur une période minimale d'un mois. Cette étude met en évidence l'importance d’utiliser les AA après l’appareillage afin d’optimiser les bénéfices que celles-ci peuvent procurer. L’objectif du deuxième article était de rapporter les résultats d’une étude longitudinale pour déterminer si l’acclimatation aux AA des personnes âgées peut être évaluée par leurs performances à des tâches de reconnaissance de la parole dans le bruit ainsi que par des mesures d’effort auditif. Trente-deux nouveaux utilisateurs d’AA et 15 utilisateurs expérimentés ont été évalués sur une période de 38 semaines en utilisant un paradigme de double tâche. Pour les nouveaux utilisateurs, les résultats ont révélé une amélioration significative de 2 dB RSB sur un test de reconnaissance de la parole dans le bruit après quatre semaines d’utilisation des AA, et aucune diminution de l’effort auditif, tel que mesuré par le coût proportionnel de la double tâche et par le temps de réponse à la tâche secondaire. Chez les utilisateurs expérimentés, les résultats n’ont dévoilé aucune amélioration de leur performance de reconnaissance de la parole dans le bruit suite à l’utilisation des AA. En conclusion, les résultats confirment la présence d’un effet d’acclimatation tel qu’évalué par des mesures comportementales, d’auto-évaluation et électrophysiologiques suite à une utilisation régulière d’AA. Plus précisément, les nouveaux utilisateurs présentaient une amélioration cliniquement significative de 2 à 3 dB en termes de RSB après une utilisation régulière de leurs AA. Par conséquent, les nouveaux utilisateurs d’AA devraient être informés de cette possible amélioration au fil du temps, car cela pourrait les inciter à continuer de s’adapter à leurs AA plus longtemps avant de décider de les utiliser ou non. / Hearing aids (HAs) are the primary rehabilitation intervention recommended for older adults with hearing loss, as they provide a wide range of benefits. However, a large proportion of individuals who own HAs does not use or underuse them. The most recurring reason reported by non-HA users is their difficulty to understand conversations in noisy environments even when they use HAs. It is unclear if these individuals tried to use their HAs for an extended period of time before abandoning their use. If they gave up too soon after being fitted with their HAs they may not have benefited from an auditory adaptation to the new auditory stimulation, referred to as auditory acclimatization. The main objective of this thesis is to evaluate the contribution of HA experience on auditory acclimatization. The first study aimed to determine, by means of a systematic review, if an acclimatization effect occurs after HA use and if so, to establish the magnitude and time-course of this effect. Fourteen articles that assessed acclimatization through behavioural, self-reported and physiological outcomes met the inclusion and the exclusion criteria. Although their general scientific quality was low or very low, the results of systematic review support the existence of an acclimatization effect as calculated by all three types of outcome measures. For speechrecognition- in-noise performance, improvement ranged from 2 to 3 dB in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) over a minimum period of 1-month. This study highlights the importance of using the HAs on a regular basis after being fitted with HAs. The goal of the second study was to conduct a longitudinal investigation in order to determine whether acclimatization to HAs by older adults can be assessed data obtained on a speech-recognition-in-noise task and by measures of listening effort. Thirty-two new HA users and 15 experienced HA users were tested over a 38-week period using a dual-task paradigm. For new HA users, the results showed a significant improvement of 2 dB SNR on a speech-recognitionin- noise task after 4 weeks of using the HAs post fitting. Based on the proportional dual-task cost data and by the response time measures recorded on the secondary task. No improvement of speech perception performance in noise was observed for the experienced HA users. 8 The general findings from this thesis support the presence of an acclimatization effect as measured by behavioural, self-reported and physiological measures following regular HA use. Specifically, new HA users show a clinically significant change of 2 and 3 dB SNR on speechrecognition- in noise tasks following their initial fitting. Therefore, new HA users should be informed of the possible improvement in speech recognition over time, as it could entice them to pursue the use of their HAs for a longer period of time before deciding to abandon them.