Spelling suggestions: "subject:"duas trace system""
1 |
Contemporary Women's Employment in Japan: The Effects of State-Mandated Gender Roles, Wars, and Japan, Inc.Levonian, Megan 01 January 2013 (has links)
My research is centered around the questions: How can such a modernized country, considered by many to be the cleanest, friendliest, most welcoming place to visit (certainly surpassing the United States on such standards), not be more welcoming of women in employment? Further, what are the main problems hindering women in employment today, and from where do these problems originate? That is, how did the present situation for women’s employment in Japan come to light? I endeavor to answer these questions, beginning by uncovering the major issues in women’s employment and then tracing their origins back in history to discover when and why they developed into what they are today.
|
2 |
Les mesures de sûreté : étude comparative des droits pénaux français et allemand / security measures : comparative study ot the German and French criminal lawFrinchaboy, Jenny 20 November 2015 (has links)
Les mesures de sûreté sont au cœur de la politique pénale actuelle, bien qu’elles soulèvent un grand nombre d’interrogations. Leur place est très incertaine en droit français qui, dans un souci de simplification, a opté pour un système de sanctions pénales à voie unique ne comportant que des peines. Pour autant, aux côtés des peines, il est un certain nombre de mesures de sûreté qui ne sont pas toujours reconnues comme telles, au détriment de la cohérence du droit positif. Le droit allemand, au contraire, a adopté le système « de la double voie », faisant coexister les peines et les mesures de sûreté au sein du code pénal. Ce système présente l’avantage de reconnaître la spécificité des mesures de sûreté, lesquelles reposent non sur la culpabilité du délinquant mais sur sa dangerosité. Bien que la distinction entre les deux catégories de sanctions pénales ne soit pas aisée en raison des nombreux points de convergence, une assimilation pure et simple entre les deux concepts s’avère impossible. Cette étude comparative de l’émergence et de l’autonomie des mesures de sûreté permet de conclure à la nécessité d’introduire un dualisme des sanctions pénales au sein du Code pénal français, avec un régime juridique complet et propre aux mesures de sûreté, distinct de celui des peines, mais s’inscrivant dans le respect des principes fondamentaux du droit pénal. / Security measures are at the heart of the current criminal policy, even though they raise a number of questions. Their place is very uncertain in French law, which has opted for a "single-track system", comprising only penalties, in the interest of simplification. Though, alongside the penalties, there are some security measures that are not always recognised as such, to the detriment of the coherence of the positive law. German law, on the contrary, has adopted a “dual-track system”, where penalties and security measures coexist within the criminal code. This system offers the advantage of recognizing the specificities of the security measures, which are not based on the guilt of the offender, but on his degree of danger. Although the distinction between the two categories of criminal sanctions is not an easy one, because of the areas of convergence, the two concepts cannot simply be treated as being the same. This comparative study of the emergence and the autonomy of the security measures concludes that a dualism of criminal sanctions should be introduced to the French criminal code with a complete own legal regime for the security measures, separate from the penalties’ regime, but in accordance with the basic principles of the criminal law.
|
Page generated in 0.087 seconds