第一個由政府主導的創業競賽－科技部創新創業激勵計畫始於2013年。邁入第三年，已舉辦了六個梯次。根據科技新報指出，截至2015年4月，其中真正走向新事業發展的僅有38間。因此，本研究欲瞄準獲得優勝的參賽團隊，研究其在創業的歷程中面臨到什麼樣的改變因素，使得參賽團隊改變其方向。 本研究採用個案研究的方式，從FITI計畫歷屆獲得前十名優勝隊伍中挑選出四組作為研究個案，並搭配Timmons Model中所提到的「機會」「團隊」、「資源」及「動態關係」，透過這些面向來探討個案後續新創企業發展的改變因素，及如何與此理論相呼應。 研究結果發現，參與FITI計畫的創業團隊，其後續改變最主要的兩大原因為對未來機會拿捏的不確定性及團隊之間的不協調性；參照Timmons Model，可以很清楚地界定出創業團隊後續改變的因素為何；創業者對「機會」的可控程度為Timmons Model尚未考慮進的因素。 另外，針對研究結果亦提出建議給予未來參賽隊伍，及如何給予FITI計畫政策上的建議。對於參賽團隊而言，一切的因素如合作模式、股權分配等都應在事前談妥。而針對FITI計畫亦提出評審機制、白皮書、技轉三點未來可改進之建議。 / The first entrepreneurial contest held by government was the From IP to IPO (FITI) in 2013. FITI contest had held over two years, nearly 160 entrepreneurial teams, but only 38 of them established companies. Thus, this study aims to explore the reasons why these winning entrepreneurial teams change after the FITI contest. With the method of case study used in this study, four of the top ten winning entrepreneurial teams from over the past years had been chosen as case studies. And by the support of “Opportunity”, “Teams”, “Resources” and “Dynamic Relationships” from Timmons Model, this study aims to explore the reasons why these entrepreneurial team’s changing reasons, also to see how it fits in Timmons Model, and how it interacts with each other. This study finds out that the entrepreneurial teams change because of two reasons, which is the uncertainty to opportunity and the incoherence between team members. Next, the changing reasons can be clearly defined by the use of Timmons Model. Lastly, how much of the controlling power the team held to the opportunity, is one of the factors that Timmons Model had not been considered yet. Last but not least, this study also gave suggestions to the entrepreneurial teams that wanted to attend to FITI contest that everything like division of work should be negotiated at the very first place. On the other hand, three suggestions are also given out to FITI.