No description available.

This study proposes to analyze the phenomenon of tax treaty abuse and the use of tax treaties as tools to avoid or minimize the taxation by residents doing business in a foreign jurisdiction. This study analyses a particular strategy using tax treaties known as "treaty shopping." This paper will argue that treaty shopping constitutes an abuse of the tax treaty regime. However, this study rejects the traditional arguments against treaty shopping and proposes a different basis to challenge the legitimacy of this practice and to explain why this strategy constitutes an improper use of tax treaties.

"Mémoire présenté à la Faculté des études supérieures En vue de l'obtention du grade de maîtrise en droit" / Un auteur a dit: «L'association d'idée avec la girafe se présente immédiatement à l'esprit, en donner une définition est difficile, mais chacun reconnaît l'animal». Tel est le cas pour la notion de contrat international qui apparaît souvent comme évidente, mais lorsqu'il est question de donner une définition précise la tâche s'avére complexe. L'internationalité du contrat a fait l'objet de plusieurs études et recherches dans le but de délimiter cette notion. La doctrine et la jurisprudence ont élaboré deux méthodes de qualification: économique et juridique; sans pour autant définir le contrat international de façon nette, claire et précise. Le but visé par cette étude est d'essayer d'établir le lien entre la possibilité de fraude à la loi et la problématique de la définition du contrat international; par le biais d'une étude comparative entre le droit civil (français, québécois, tunisien), la common law (Royaume-Uni, Canada, États-Unis), le droit dans les pays à commerce d'État et le droit conventionel. / One author said : «L'association d'idée avec la girafe se présente immédiatement l'esprit, en donner une définition est difficile mais chacun reconnaît l'animal». This is the case for the notion of international contract, whose definition is often presumed to be self-evident, but in reality constructing a precise definition is a very complicated task. The international nature of a contract has been the subject of many studies and much research has been dedicated to this topic, aIl with the goal of formulating a clear definition. Legal doctrine and jurisprudence have succeeded in qualifying international contract as legal or economic without actually defining it in any constant, clear or precise manner. The aim of this study is to make an attempt at establishing a link between possible evasion of the law and the problem of defining international contract; this will b e a chieved v ia a comparative s tudy of c ivill aw (France, Quebec, Tunisia), common law (United Kingdom, Canada, United States) law in countries where the economy is state-run and international treaty law.

Un auteur a dit: «L'association d'idée avec la girafe se présente immédiatement à l'esprit, en donner une définition est difficile, mais chacun reconnaît l'animal». Tel est le cas pour la notion de contrat international qui apparaît souvent comme évidente, mais lorsqu'il est question de donner une définition précise la tâche s'avére complexe. L'internationalité du contrat a fait l'objet de plusieurs études et recherches dans le but de délimiter cette notion. La doctrine et la jurisprudence ont élaboré deux méthodes de qualification: économique et juridique; sans pour autant définir le contrat international de façon nette, claire et précise. Le but visé par cette étude est d'essayer d'établir le lien entre la possibilité de fraude à la loi et la problématique de la définition du contrat international; par le biais d'une étude comparative entre le droit civil (français, québécois, tunisien), la common law (Royaume-Uni, Canada, États-Unis), le droit dans les pays à commerce d'État et le droit conventionel. / One author said : «L'association d'idée avec la girafe se présente immédiatement l'esprit, en donner une définition est difficile mais chacun reconnaît l'animal». This is the case for the notion of international contract, whose definition is often presumed to be self-evident, but in reality constructing a precise definition is a very complicated task. The international nature of a contract has been the subject of many studies and much research has been dedicated to this topic, aIl with the goal of formulating a clear definition. Legal doctrine and jurisprudence have succeeded in qualifying international contract as legal or economic without actually defining it in any constant, clear or precise manner. The aim of this study is to make an attempt at establishing a link between possible evasion of the law and the problem of defining international contract; this will b e a chieved v ia a comparative s tudy of c ivill aw (France, Quebec, Tunisia), common law (United Kingdom, Canada, United States) law in countries where the economy is state-run and international treaty law. / "Mémoire présenté à la Faculté des études supérieures En vue de l'obtention du grade de maîtrise en droit"

<p>The legal conception of contra legem derives from Roman law and is translated into "against the law". A decision contra legem arises when the text of law and the legislators purpose of law are disregarded. A paradoxal consequence is that there will always be a decision contra legem, when the text of lawand the legislators purpose of law are contradictory. It is therefore important that decisions contra legem are based on legitimate motives to ensure law and order. In fraudem legis is another legal conception from Roman law and is translated into "evasion of law". Eventhough both Swedish and German law in theory wants to separate in fraudem legis from legal acts made up for apperence, Swedish Supreme Court (HD) often treats them more or less the same. In practise it has often been regarded as too difficult to separate the parties intentions from the actual performed legal act.</p>

The legal conception of contra legem derives from Roman law and is translated into "against the law". A decision contra legem arises when the text of law and the legislators purpose of law are disregarded. A paradoxal consequence is that there will always be a decision contra legem, when the text of lawand the legislators purpose of law are contradictory. It is therefore important that decisions contra legem are based on legitimate motives to ensure law and order. In fraudem legis is another legal conception from Roman law and is translated into "evasion of law". Eventhough both Swedish and German law in theory wants to separate in fraudem legis from legal acts made up for apperence, Swedish Supreme Court (HD) often treats them more or less the same. In practise it has often been regarded as too difficult to separate the parties intentions from the actual performed legal act.