Thesis (Ph. D.)--York University, 2000. / Typescript. Includes bibliographical references (leaves [328]-346). Also available on the Internet. MODE OF ACCESS via web browser by entering the following URL: http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/yorku/fullcit?pNQ59150.

Thesis (M.A.)--Georgia State University, 2007. / Title from file title page. Andrew Altman, committee chair; Peter Lindsay, Timothy Renick, committee members. Electronic text (55 p.) : digital, PDF file. Description based on contents viewed Oct. 29, 2007. Includes bibliographical references (p. 52-55).

Thesis (doctoral) - Universität, Greifswald, 2001. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 243-289).

Thesis (doctoral) - Universität, Greifswald, 2001. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 243-289).

Contribution for book symposium on Andrea Sangiovanni’s Humanity without Dignity.

This thesis provides a framework to understand and apply the philosophical principles of paternalism to determine the most reasonable actions states can take in regard to marijuana legalization. As matters currently stand in U.S. policy, states must decide whether they will prohibit, decriminalize, or legalize marijuana. First, I will give a brief history of marijuana regulations and societal perceptions in the United States. Second, I will define and differentiate concepts of illegalization, decriminalization, and legalization from one another. Third, I will summarize and analyze Joel Feinberg and Sarah Conly's arguments against and for paternalism, respectively. I will conclude by applying the strengths of each philosopher's arguments with respect to the marijuana debate to offer a policy that is both just and effective.

This thesis focuses on the issue of whether or not the government is ever justified in prohibiting the actions of an individual who is harming herself but not others. I first analyze some of the key historical figures in the paternalism debate and argue that these accounts fail to adequately meet the needs of a modern, pluralistic society. Then, I analyze and critique the nuanced, soft-paternalist strategy put forth by Joel Feinberg. Finally, I defend a version of hard paternalism, arguing that a balancing strategy that examines each action on a case-by-case basis shows all citizens equal, and adequate concern and respect.

Thesis (Th. M.)--Trinity International University, 2000. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 141-144).

Thesis (M.A.)--Trinity International University, 2003. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 105-110).

Thesis (Th. M.)--Trinity International University, 2000. / Abstract. This is an electronic reproduction of TREN, #006-1209. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 141-144).