Spelling suggestions: "subject:"finalismo"" "subject:"finalist""
1 |
Probabilistic foundations of teleology and content /Abrams, Marshall David. January 2002 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Chicago, Dept. of Philosophy, 2002. / Includes bibliographical references. Also available on the Internet.
|
2 |
Finalismo em Thomas HobbesOliveira, José Edelberto Araújo de January 2009 (has links)
102f. / Submitted by Suelen Reis (suziy.ellen@gmail.com) on 2013-04-16T18:10:20Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
Dissertacao Jose Oliveiraseg.pdf: 1086859 bytes, checksum: 33b75e312d3bd70020af4c8a00271593 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Rodrigo Meirelles(rodrigomei@ufba.br) on 2013-05-29T14:42:20Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
Dissertacao Jose Oliveiraseg.pdf: 1086859 bytes, checksum: 33b75e312d3bd70020af4c8a00271593 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2013-05-29T14:42:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Dissertacao Jose Oliveiraseg.pdf: 1086859 bytes, checksum: 33b75e312d3bd70020af4c8a00271593 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2009 / Para Thomas Hobbes, a Filosofia é um exercício voltado para a obtenção de conhecimento que permita mudar a vida das pessoas. Averiguar os rudimentos das relações do homem com o corpo natural e do homem com o corpo moral significa, nesta medida, para Hobbes, buscar um projeto cientificista confiável, tendo o homem e o Estado como objetos, identificando-se com o espírito galileano do século 17. Tal projeto, a soma das filosofias natural e moral, foca o movimento quantificável dos corpos, naturais ou políticos. Contudo, Hobbes admite propósitos ou fins como causa da organização da natureza. Esta dissertação trata da relação entre a fundamentação mecanicista e as concessões ao finalismo em Hobbes, com o intuito de compreender como o sistema filosófico do autor permanece coeso. / Salvador
|
3 |
Le corps selon Nietzsche / The body in NietzscheSokologorsky, Claude 23 November 2012 (has links)
La conception nietzschéenne du corps s’oppose à la conception mécaniste qui domine la science de son temps : le corps n’est pas composé d’atomes en mouvement ; il forme une hiérarchie de volontés de puissances. En même temps, le corps constitue mon moi véritable : l’existence d’un principe intellectuel extérieur au corps est une illusion. Dans la mesure où l’essence du corps est l’essence même du monde, c’est-à-dire la volonté de puissance, et que le corps constitue également le lieu de mon expérience la plus intime, il est l’authentique fil conducteur de la connaissance. Pourtant, le corps ne se révèle pas à lui-même immédiatement : en tant que volonté de puissance, il interprète, c’est-à-dire transforme et falsifie ; et une telle transformation s’opère également au sein de la conscience intime. Aussi, le corps, fil conducteur de la connaissance, est également principe d’erreur. La connaissance, qui n’est pas possible en dehors du corps, ne saurait donc pourtant être gagnée que contre le corps, c’est-à-dire au terme d’un effort ascétique. / Nietzsche’s comprehension of the body is opposed to the mechanistic conception which dominates the science of his time: the body is not composed of atoms in motion; it forms a hierarchy of wills to power. At the same time, the body is my authentic self: the existence of an intellectual principle outside the body is an illusion. Insofar as the essence of the body is the essence of the world, that is to say, the will to power, and the body also is the place of my most intimate experience, it forms the true way to knowledge. However, the body does not reveal itself to itself immediately: As will to power, he interprets, that is to say, transforms and falsifies; and such a transformation also takes place in the inner consciousness. Therefore, the body, only way to knowledge, is also principle of error. Knowledge, which is not possible outside the body, can though be won only against the body, that is to say, as result of an ascetic effort
|
4 |
O funcionalismo penal como tentativa de aprimoramento da dogmática finalista: das proposições teóricas à prática jurisdicional brasileiraLinhares, Raul Marques 10 January 2017 (has links)
Submitted by Silvana Teresinha Dornelles Studzinski (sstudzinski) on 2017-04-12T12:40:32Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
Raul Marques Linhares_.pdf: 1527626 bytes, checksum: 45bf0c33e585cda133e945d2e2514f14 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-04-12T12:40:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Raul Marques Linhares_.pdf: 1527626 bytes, checksum: 45bf0c33e585cda133e945d2e2514f14 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-01-10 / CAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / Esta pesquisa está centrada no estudo dos principais paradigmas metodológicos empregados ao longo da história da teoria geral do delito, bem como do contemporâneo paradigma funcionalista nas propostas de Claus Roxin e de Günther Jakobs, concluindo-se pela verificação de que essa nova corrente dogmática já se faz presente na prática jurisdicional brasileira. Para a realização desse trabalho, os primeiros capítulos são construídos por meio de pesquisa bibliográfica, para viabilizar a construção teórica dos principais pontos dos paradigmas causalismo, neokantismo, finalismo e funcionalismo da dogmática penal, fazendo-se referência aos autores clássicos de cada paradigma, tendo se elegido como vertentes do funcionalismo a serem examinadas as propostas de Claus Roxin e Günther Jakobs, considerados os principais representantes dessa corrente de pensamento. Após isso, finaliza-se a pesquisa com a análise de julgados do Superior Tribunal de Justiça, selecionados unicamente com a finalidade de se demonstrar que o funcionalismo penal já se faz presente na aplicação da teoria geral do delito no Brasil. Dessa forma, mesmo que diante da recente prevalência do finalismo na dogmática jurídico-penal nacional (ou que se afirme ser esse paradigma ainda absolutamente vigente na teoria do delito), se está já diante da adoção de pontos específicos da proposta funcionalista, o que pode significar a existência de uma fase de transição de paradigmas dogmáticos. / This research is focused on the study of the main methodological paradigms employed throughout history of the general theory of crime, as well as the contemporary functionalist paradigm in the proposals of Claus Roxin and Günther Jakobs, concluding by the verification that this new dogma chain is already present in the Brazilian jurisdictional practice. In order to accomplish this work, the first couple chapters are constructed through bibliographic research, to enable the theoretical construction of the main points of the causalism, Neo-Kantianism, finalism, and functionalism paradigms of criminal dogmatic, making reference to the classical authors of each paradigm, having been elected as strands of functionalism to be examined the proposals of Claus Roxin and Günther Jakobs, considered the key representatives of this school of thought. After that, we conclude the research with the analysis of trials of the Superior Court of Justice, selected solely with the purpose of demonstrating that the criminal functionalism is already present in the application of the general theory of crime in Brazil. This way, even before the recent prevalence of finalism in the national Criminal Law dogmatic (or else that one might claim that this paradigm is still absolutely valid in the theory of crime), we are already before the adoption of specific points of the functionalist proposal, which can mean the existence of a transitional phase between dogmatic paradigms.
|
Page generated in 0.0319 seconds