The role of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in stroke was debated for decades. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have shown fewer recurrent events after PFO closure in patients with cryptogenic stroke (CS). However, in clinical practice, treating stroke patients with coexisting PFO raises some questions. This brief review summarizes current knowledge and challenges in handling stroke patients with PFO and identifies issues for future research. The rationale for PFO closure was initially based on the concept of paradoxical embolism from deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, RCTs did not consider such details, limiting their impact from a pathophysiological perspective. Only a few studies explored the coexistence of PFO and DVT in CS with varying results. Consequently, the PFO itself might play a role as a prothrombotic structure. Transesophageal echocardiography thus appears most appropriate for PFO detection, while a large shunt size or an associated atrial septum aneurysm qualify for a high-risk PFO. For drug-based treatment alone, studies did not find a definite superiority of oral anticoagulation over antiplatelet therapy. Remarkably, drug-based treatment in addition to PFO closure was not standardized in RCTs. The available literature rarely considers patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA), over 60 years of age, and competing etiologies like atrial fibrillation. In summary, RCTs suggest efficacy for closure of high-risk PFO only in a small subgroup of stroke patients. However, research is also needed to reevaluate the pathophysiological concept of PFO-related stroke and establish strategies for older and TIA patients and those with competing risk factors or low-risk PFO.

Background: Stroke is a leading cause of significant physical, cognitive, and psychiatric morbidity. One risk factor for stroke is paradoxical embolization through a patent foramen ovale (PFO). In cardiac clinical practice, power M-mode Transcranial Doppler (TCD) evaluation is the gold standard for diagnosis of PFO, or right-to-left cardiac shunt (RLS). Brain micro-embolization due to diagnostic bubble contrast echocardiography may cause neurological symptoms in patients with PFO. However, the neurocognitive effects of TCD have not been studied. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate cognitive outcomes in patients who undergo routine diagnostic bubble contrast TCD. The aims of the study were (1) to determine if cognitive function declines pre- to post-TCD evaluation and, (2) to assess the relationship between cognitive function and severity of the RLS measured using the Spencer Grading System. Methods: One hundred and four participants referred to Sorensen Cardiovascular Group for diagnosis of RLS were evaluated for changes in cognitive functioning at three time points. A dual baseline (pre-test and baseline test) was administered to mitigate practice effects between the first and second administrations. All pre and post-TCD comparisons were analyzed using the baseline test and post-TCD test, controlling for the effects of practice, if present. Results: Practice effects were observed for the working memory task, with significant improvement in working memory scores occurring between the first (pre-test) and second (baseline) administrations. The main effect for shunt group (no shunt vs. moderate-to-severe shunt) and the shunt group by time interactions were not significant for processing speed, attention, or working memory, adjusting for practice effects, age, and education. Migraine did not predict group status for mood or shunt variables. Conclusion: Cardiac patients with both small and large RLS did not experience a decline in processing speed, attention, or working memory ability following TCD, suggesting that TCD-induced microemboli do not result in immediate cognitive deficits in these domains. These findings support the use of TCD for routine evaluation of PFO, even in patients with severe RLS, although findings are limited to young (30s), medically healthy, predominately Caucasian individuals assessed immediately following TCD. Results do not exclude the possibility of cognitive impairment at follow-up, on other cognitive tests, or in other cognitive domains.

Introduction: Au moins 30% des AVC ischémiques chez les jeunes demeurent inexpliqués malgré une investigation extensive. Le rôle de certains états prothrombotiques (ÉP) dans la thrombose artérielle reste incertain, possiblement à cause du petit nombre de patients, de populations hétérogènes ou d’ÉP analysés individuellement dans les études antérieures, alors que leur prévalence est basse. Méthodologie : Étude cas-témoins sur une cohorte rétrospective (2002-2011). Les patients âgés de ≤50ans lors d’un AVC ischémique furent identifiés sur une base de données hospitalière. Après exclusion des individus ayant une investigation étiologique incomplète, un syndrome antiphospholipide ou aucun ÉP testé, la cohorte fut divisée en groupes cas (AVC idiopathique) et témoins (étiologie identifiée). La prevalence de chaque ÉP fut comparée entre les groupe, ainsi que la présence de ≥2 ÉP (analyse primaire), sans et avec ajustement pour les facteurs de risque non-prothrombotiques (régression logistique). En analyse de sous-groupe, la présence de ≥1 ÉP fut comparée entre les cas avec versus sans foramen ovale perméable (FOP), entre les cas ou contrôles porteurs d’un FOP avec versus sans migraine, de même qu’entre les cas versus témoins de sexe féminin en incluant la contraception orale parmi les ÉP. Résultats : 502 jeunes avec AVC ischémique furent identifiés. Après exclusion de 108 patients, 184 cas et 210 témoins furent comparés, (âge moyen : 39,2 ans, 51% hommes). La prévalence des ÉP ne différait pas entre les cas et contrôles : déficits en protéine S (0,6%), protéine C (3,4%), antithrombine (1,2%), mutation de la prothrombine (2,5%), facteur V Leiden (4,6%), et anticardiolipines (titre 15-40 unités GPL ou MPL; 3,3%). La présence de ≥2 ÉP n’était pas associée à l’AVC idiopathique, avant (p=0,48) ou après ajustement (p=0,74). La présence de ≥1 ÉP ne différait pas entre les sous-groupes étudiés. Conclusion: Il n’y a pas d’association entre les ÉP, isolés ou en association, avec l’AVC ischémique idiopathique chez les jeunes, même en presence de FOP ou de migraine. / Background: Despite extensive workup, more than 30% of ischemic strokes in young adults remain idiopathic. The role of some prothrombotic factors (PF) in arterial thrombosis remains unclear in previous studies. This may be due to small sample sizes, heterogeneous characteristics of populations studied, or analyzing individual PF with low prevalence. Methods: We conducted a case-control study using a retrospective cohort (2002-2011). From a hospital database, we identified patients with ischemic stroke at age ≤50 years. We excluded patients with incomplete baseline investigation or antiphospholipid syndrome, and those without prothrombotic testing. We compared the prevalence of each PF, as well as the presence of ≥2 PF (primary analysis) between cases with idiopathic stroke and controls with defined stroke etiology, before and after adjusting for non-prothrombotic risk factors. By subgroup analysis, we compared the presence of ≥1 PF between cases with versus without patent foramen ovale (PFO), between cases or controls with PFO with versus without migraine, as well as between women (cases versus controls), including oral contraceptives among PF. Results: 502 young ischemic stroke patients were identified. We excluded 108 patients. We analyzed 184 cases and 210 controls (Mean age : 39.2 y-o, 51% male). Prevalence of individual PF did not differ between cases and controls : protein S (0.6%), protein C (3.4%), antithrombin (1.2%) deficiencies, mutant prothrombin (2.5%), factor V Leiden (4.6%), and total anticardiolipin (titers 15-40 units GPL or MPL; 3,3%). There was no association between the presence of ≥2 PF and idiopathic stroke, before (p=0,48) and after adjusting for non-prothrombotic risk factors (p= 0,74). No differences were observed between subgroups for the presence of ≥1 PF. Conclusion: There is no association between prothrombotic risk factors (analyzed individually or as a group) and idiopathic ischemic stroke in the young, even in those with a PFO or with migraine.