The purpose of this study has been to exam how sports professors interpret the term "friluftsliv" and in which way sports professors treat "friluftsliv" and staying outside in elementary school. The paper stems from the reasons to why sports professors believe that "friluftsliv" is hard to pursue in elementary school. In order to carry out the purpose, five professors from four different schools have been interviewed. The choice of method been semi structured, qualitative, and individual interviewing. The theoretical starting points are habitus- and ramfaktor theory. The conclusion of how sports professors find the term "friluftsliv", is that it is viewed differently depending on each ones individual background. The research showed that all five professors believed that Lgr11 has made the new curriculum much more clear and structured, also that "friluftsliv" is portrayed in a much more positive light. My study showed that these five professors aren't limited by the problems with "friluftsliv". Instead all five of them find it that the conditions for "friluftsliv" are good, and that the woods are in direct connection with the woods.