Diss. Uppsala : Uppsala universitet, 2006.

Diss. av båda förf. Luleå : Luleå tekn. univ., 1999. / Även tillg. med tryckår: 3. uppl. 1999.

Diss. Univ. Frankfurt am Main, 2007.

INTRODUÇÃO: O trabalho busca um melhor entendimento sobre a gestão estratégica de serviços de saúde. A literatura sobre esse tema é ainda incipiente, particularmente ao considerar o sistema de saúde brasileiro. A gestão estratégica de serviços de saúde é uma das atividades gerenciais mais complexas em função das particularidades do setor de saúde e da complexidade inerente às decisões estratégicas. MÉTODOS: O pesquisador realizou uma revisão da literatura e uma pesquisa de campo baseada no método de múltiplos estudos de casos. A pesquisa foi realizada em seis organizações privadas, com sede na região metropolitana de São Paulo, que atuam na prestação de serviços de saúde e são consideradas como referência em suas áreas de atuação. Foram entrevistados treze gestores com responsabilidade por decisões estratégicas; destes, onze são ou foram presidentes executivos (ou cargos equivalentes) ou presidentes do conselho de administração. RESULTADOS: O trabalho apresentou uma representação esquemática da cadeia de valor da saúde e um modelo de gestão estratégica para serviços de saúde. CONCLUSÕES: A estrutura básica do modelo proposto não é diferente da gestão estratégica apresentada pela literatura para empresas de outros setores. A saúde é um setor com elevada complexidade de gestão e importantes particularidades. Dessa forma, os prestadores de serviços de saúde devem adaptar o modelo proposto ao contexto do setor e da organização para uma efetiva gestão estratégica / INTRODUCTION: This dissertation aims to provide a better understanding about strategic management of health care services. The literature about it is still underdeveloped, particularly considering the Brazilian health care system. Strategic management of health care services is one of the most complex managerial tasks due to the specificities of the health care industry and the inherently complexity of strategic decisions. METHODS: The researcher accomplished a literature review and conducted a field research based on the multiple case study methodology. This study used a sample of six private health care service providers, located at the metropolitan area of São Paulo, and recognized as exceptional health care service organizations. Thirteen executives with strategic responsibilities were interviewed; among them, eleven were or had been Chief Executive Officers (or equivalent roles) or Presidents of the Executive Council. RESULTS: The dissertation presented a schematic representation of the health care value chain and a strategic management model for health care services providers. CONCLUSIONS: The basic structure of the proposed model is not different from the literature of strategic management for organizations in other industries. The health care industry is highly complex to be managed and has distinctive characteristics. Therefore, health care service providers should adapt the proposed model to the industry and organizational contexts in order to develop their strategic management capabilities

INTRODUÇÃO: O trabalho busca um melhor entendimento sobre a gestão estratégica de serviços de saúde. A literatura sobre esse tema é ainda incipiente, particularmente ao considerar o sistema de saúde brasileiro. A gestão estratégica de serviços de saúde é uma das atividades gerenciais mais complexas em função das particularidades do setor de saúde e da complexidade inerente às decisões estratégicas. MÉTODOS: O pesquisador realizou uma revisão da literatura e uma pesquisa de campo baseada no método de múltiplos estudos de casos. A pesquisa foi realizada em seis organizações privadas, com sede na região metropolitana de São Paulo, que atuam na prestação de serviços de saúde e são consideradas como referência em suas áreas de atuação. Foram entrevistados treze gestores com responsabilidade por decisões estratégicas; destes, onze são ou foram presidentes executivos (ou cargos equivalentes) ou presidentes do conselho de administração. RESULTADOS: O trabalho apresentou uma representação esquemática da cadeia de valor da saúde e um modelo de gestão estratégica para serviços de saúde. CONCLUSÕES: A estrutura básica do modelo proposto não é diferente da gestão estratégica apresentada pela literatura para empresas de outros setores. A saúde é um setor com elevada complexidade de gestão e importantes particularidades. Dessa forma, os prestadores de serviços de saúde devem adaptar o modelo proposto ao contexto do setor e da organização para uma efetiva gestão estratégica / INTRODUCTION: This dissertation aims to provide a better understanding about strategic management of health care services. The literature about it is still underdeveloped, particularly considering the Brazilian health care system. Strategic management of health care services is one of the most complex managerial tasks due to the specificities of the health care industry and the inherently complexity of strategic decisions. METHODS: The researcher accomplished a literature review and conducted a field research based on the multiple case study methodology. This study used a sample of six private health care service providers, located at the metropolitan area of São Paulo, and recognized as exceptional health care service organizations. Thirteen executives with strategic responsibilities were interviewed; among them, eleven were or had been Chief Executive Officers (or equivalent roles) or Presidents of the Executive Council. RESULTS: The dissertation presented a schematic representation of the health care value chain and a strategic management model for health care services providers. CONCLUSIONS: The basic structure of the proposed model is not different from the literature of strategic management for organizations in other industries. The health care industry is highly complex to be managed and has distinctive characteristics. Therefore, health care service providers should adapt the proposed model to the industry and organizational contexts in order to develop their strategic management capabilities

Στη παρούσα μελέτη θα επιχειρήσουμε να παρουσιάσουμε, τα γενικά στοιχεία του κλάδου Υγείας στην Ελλάδα, πως διαμορφώνονται τα τελευταία χρόνια οι δαπάνες για υπηρεσίες υγείας, και πως κατανέμονται μεταξύ Δημόσιων και Ιδιωτικών. Θα παρουσιάσουμε αναλυτικά τις κινήσεις των μεγαλυτερων ιδιωτικων κλινικων και θα παραθέσουμε τα οικονομικά στοιχεία που δικαιώνουν τις επιλογές τους. Τέλος θα αναφερθούμε στις πρόσφατες εξελίξεις και στις προοπτικές της ιδιωτικής υγείας. / In the present study we will try to present, the common factors of Health care sector in Greece and how the expenses for services of health are distributed between Public and Private. We will present in detail the strategy of greatest private clinics and we will mention the Financial Data that indicate their choices. Finally we will report in the recent developments as well as the prospects of private health.

South African prescribers have a large choice of combination analgesic preparations available for prescribing. According to Desmeules et al. (2003:8) the advantages of combining analgesics include increasing the duration of analgesia, widening the spectrum of efficacy, improved patient compliance and reduced parenteral abuse potential. According to McMahon (1975:13) one of the principle arguments against fixed-dose combinations is that the physician surrenders flexibility in managing his patient. Combination analgesics may expose patients to ingredients not necessary for pain relief in their particular condition (Beaver, 1984). Rigas (1997:454) explains that the value of pharmaco-economics in providing cost-effective pharmacologic treatment for pain must not only be seen as a containment effort, but rather as a valuation effort. Meaningful economic analyses based on empiric information about cost and a range of subjective and objective outcomes are needed to minimise cost without compromising care. The objective of this study was to review and interpret the prescribing patterns of combination analgesics and the cost associated with their usage for the period 2001-2006 in a section of the private healthcare sector in South Africa. This research can be classified as a quantitative, retrospective drug utilisation review study. Data were obtained from a medicine claims database, and the study population consisted of all combination analgesic prescriptions (Mims® category 3.3) for the period 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2002 and 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2006. Prescribing Patterns of Combination Analgesics in the Private Health Care Sector. Firstly pain and the treatment thereof with combination analgesics were investigated from the literature to understand the disease and to determine the prevalence and treatment thereof. Secondly, managed health care, drug utilisation review, pharmacoeconomics and pharmaco-epidemiology were investigated from the literature to understand these concepts. The influence of the South African government on the medicine pricing regulations was discussed. Thirdly, through the empirical investigation the utilisation patterns of combination analgesics were reviewed, analysed and interpreted. It was determined that combination analgesic drugs represented 8.87% (n=261 907) of all medicine claimed during 2001 (N=2 951 326), decreased to 7.20% (n=381 809) during 2004 (N=5 305 846) after which it increased to 7.92% (n=187 745) in 2006 (N=2 370 572). Between 2001 (N=R379 708 489.00) and 2006 (N=R279 160 832.00) the cost percentage of the combination analgesic drugs decreased from 4.95% (n=R18 798 202.42) to 3.15% (n=R8 791 228.57). The average cost per combination analgesic drugs decreased from R71.77 ± 61.67 to R46.83 ± 43.41 between 2001 and 2006. This decrease was of no practical significance (d<0.8). The average number of combination analgesics per prescription stayed relatively constant varying between 1.01 ± 0.11 in 2001 and 1.02 ± 0.13 in 2006. The percentage generic combination analgesic drugs claimed increased from 29.63% (n=77 608) in 2001 to 66.37% (n=124 600) in 2006 (N=261 907 for 2001 and N=187 745 for 2006) even though generic medicine items claimed by the total database only increased from 26.79% (n=790 548) in 2001 to 40.27% (n=954 561) during 2006 (N=2 951 326 for 2001 and N=2 370 572 for 2006). The combination of ibuprofen 200mg, paracetamol 250mg and codeine phosphate 10mg (e.g. Myprodol® capsules, Mybulen® capsules, Gen-payne® capsules and Ibupain Forte® capsules) represented the active ingredient combination with the highest prevalence for the entire study period, increasing from 28.44% (n=74 483) in 2001 to 33.08% (n=62 100) in 2006 of all combination analgesics prescribed (N=261 907 for 2001 and N=187 745 for 2006). Generic substitution influenced the prevalence of the innovator medicine item, Myprodol® Capsules dramatically, causing a decrease from 23.16% (n=60 631) in 2001 to 3.77% (n=7 084) in 2006 representation of all combination analgesic prescribed. In 2006, the generics of Myprodol® Capsules e.g. Dentopain Forte®, Mybulen® Capsules, Gen-payne® and Ibupain Forte® represented 23.79% (n=44651) of all combination analgesics claimed. Recommendations were derived regarding certain aspects of the clinical and economical management of pain e.g. the implication of generic substitution with regard to cost and prescribing patterns, and the decreasing cost of combination analgesics which might encourage abuse, needs further investigation. South African prescribers have a large choice of combination analgesic preparations available for prescribing. According to Desmeules et al. (2003:8) the advantages of combining analgesics include increasing the duration of analgesia, widening the spectrum of efficacy, improved patient compliance and reduced parenteral abuse potential. According to McMahon (1975:13) one of the principle arguments against fixed-dose combinations is that the physician surrenders flexibility in managing his patient. Combination analgesics may expose patients to ingredients not necessary for pain relief in their particular condition (Beaver, 1984). Rigas (1997:454) explains that the value of pharmaco-economics in providing cost-effective pharmacologic treatment for pain must not only be seen as a containment effort, but rather as a valuation effort. Meaningful economic analyses based on empiric information about cost and a range of subjective and objective outcomes are needed to minimise cost without compromising care. The objective of this study was to review and interpret the prescribing patterns of combination analgesics and the cost associated with their usage for the period 2001-2006 in a section of the private healthcare sector in South Africa. This research can be classified as a quantitative, retrospective drug utilisation review study. Data were obtained from a medicine claims database, and the study population consisted of all combination analgesic prescriptions (Mims® category 3.3) for the period 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2002 and 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2006. Prescribing Patterns of Combination Analgesics in the Private Health Care Sector. Firstly pain and the treatment thereof with combination analgesics were investigated from the literature to understand the disease and to determine the prevalence and treatment thereof. Secondly, managed health care, drug utilisation review, pharmacoeconomics and pharmaco-epidemiology were investigated from the literature to understand these concepts. The influence of the South African government on the medicine pricing regulations was discussed. Thirdly, through the empirical investigation the utilisation patterns of combination analgesics were reviewed, analysed and interpreted. It was determined that combination analgesic drugs represented 8.87% (n=261 907) of all medicine claimed during 2001 (N=2 951 326), decreased to 7.20% (n=381 809) during 2004 (N=5 305 846) after which it increased to 7.92% (n=187 745) in 2006 (N=2 370 572). Between 2001 (N=R379 708 489.00) and 2006 (N=R279 160 832.00) the cost percentage of the combination analgesic drugs decreased from 4.95% (n=R18 798 202.42) to 3.15% (n=R8 791 228.57). The average cost per combination analgesic drugs decreased from R71.77 ± 61.67 to R46.83 ± 43.41 between 2001 and 2006. This decrease was of no practical significance (d<0.8). The average number of combination analgesics per prescription stayed relatively constant varying between 1.01 ± 0.11 in 2001 and 1.02 ± 0.13 in 2006. The percentage generic combination analgesic drugs claimed increased from 29.63% (n=77 608) in 2001 to 66.37% (n=124 600) in 2006 (N=261 907 for 2001 and N=187 745 for 2006) even though generic medicine items claimed by the total database only increased from 26.79% (n=790 548) in 2001 to 40.27% (n=954 561) during 2006 (N=2 951 326 for 2001 and N=2 370 572 for 2006). The combination of ibuprofen 200mg, paracetamol 250mg and codeine phosphate 10mg (e.g. Myprodol® capsules, Mybulen® capsules, Gen-payne® capsules and Ibupain Forte® capsules) represented the active ingredient combination with the highest prevalence for the entire study period, increasing from 28.44% (n=74 483) in 2001 to 33.08% (n=62 100) in 2006 of all combination analgesics prescribed (N=261 907 for 2001 and N=187 745 for 2006). Generic substitution influenced the prevalence of the innovator medicine item, Myprodol® Capsules dramatically, causing a decrease from 23.16% (n=60 631) in 2001 to 3.77% (n=7 084) in 2006 representation of all combination analgesic prescribed. In 2006, the generics of Myprodol® Capsules e.g. Dentopain Forte®, Mybulen® Capsules, Gen-payne® and Ibupain Forte® represented 23.79% (n=44651) of all combination analgesics claimed. Recommendations were derived regarding certain aspects of the clinical and economical management of pain e.g. the implication of generic substitution with regard to cost and prescribing patterns, and the decreasing cost of combination analgesics which might encourage abuse, needs further investigation. / Thesis (M.Pharm. (Pharmacy Practice))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2008.

The general aim of this study was to investigate the prescribing patterns of products that contain methylphenidate or atomoxetine in a section of the private health care sector of South Africa. A quantitative, retrospective drug uitilisation review was performed according to data obtained from the database of a South African medicine claims pharmacy benefit management company's for three consecutive study years (Le. 2005 to 2007). The results indicated that a total of 7,990 patients had been prescribed products that contained methylphenidate or atomoxetine in 2005. The total for 2006 was 8,575 and it decreased to a total of 7,828 in 2007. Of all the patients who received the mentioned products, the percentage for females increased from 27.75% (N = 7,990) in 2005 to 29.06% (N =7,828) in 2007. With regard to the same products the percentage for males decreased from 72.03% (N = 7,990) in 2005 to 70.89% (N = 7,828) in 2007. The ratio for the gender-related prescribing patterns of medicine items that contained methylphenidate or atomoxetine in this section of the private health care sector of South Africa was ± 2.55:1 for males to females in comparison with the international male:female ratio of 3:1. According to the medicine claims on the database for 2005 the total number of prescriptions that indicated products containing methylphenidate or atomoxetine was calculated as 8,522, 798 (i.e. N = 8, 522,798) or as a percentage of 0.32% prescriptions. The percentage showed an increase to 0.41 % in 2007 (N = 8,015,538). Of all the medicine items containing methylphenidate or atomoxetine those products that contained atomoxetine represented 4.69% and those that contained methylphenidate represented 95.31%. In 2005 the average cost per prescription that indicated items containing methylphenidate or atomoxetine amounted to R318.29 ± R162.09. In 2007 the amount increased to R358.91 ± R208.10. The percentage of children younger than five years of age, and who had been prescribed products containing methylphenidate or atomoxetine, increased from 0.91 % in 2005 (N = 7,990) to 1.11 % in 2007 (N =7,828). The percentage for children aged 5 to 12 years decreased from 53.62% in 2005 to 49.23% in 2007. For adolescents the percentage increased from 26.32% in 2005 to 27.35% in 2007. The same pattern repeated itself in the case of adults (age 18+ years). Among the top trade name products prescribed were Ritalin LA 20mg®, Ritalin 20mg®, Concerta 36mg®, Ritalin LA 30mg® and Concerta 18mg®. Possible drug-drug interactions were found between products containing methylphenidate or atomoxetine and products containing imipramine, amitriptyline and carbamazepine. Findings indicated that the number of products containing methylphenidate or atomoxetine increased from 2005 to 2007, while also revealing that those products containing methylphenidate remained in the majority. The average costs of products containing methylphenidate or atomoxetine increased from 2005 to 2007. / Thesis (M.Pharm. (Pharmacy Practice))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2010.

South African prescribers have a large choice of combination analgesic preparations available for prescribing. According to Desmeules et al. (2003:8) the advantages of combining analgesics include increasing the duration of analgesia, widening the spectrum of efficacy, improved patient compliance and reduced parenteral abuse potential. According to McMahon (1975:13) one of the principle arguments against fixed-dose combinations is that the physician surrenders flexibility in managing his patient. Combination analgesics may expose patients to ingredients not necessary for pain relief in their particular condition (Beaver, 1984). Rigas (1997:454) explains that the value of pharmaco-economics in providing cost-effective pharmacologic treatment for pain must not only be seen as a containment effort, but rather as a valuation effort. Meaningful economic analyses based on empiric information about cost and a range of subjective and objective outcomes are needed to minimise cost without compromising care. The objective of this study was to review and interpret the prescribing patterns of combination analgesics and the cost associated with their usage for the period 2001-2006 in a section of the private healthcare sector in South Africa. This research can be classified as a quantitative, retrospective drug utilisation review study. Data were obtained from a medicine claims database, and the study population consisted of all combination analgesic prescriptions (Mims® category 3.3) for the period 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2002 and 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2006. Prescribing Patterns of Combination Analgesics in the Private Health Care Sector. Firstly pain and the treatment thereof with combination analgesics were investigated from the literature to understand the disease and to determine the prevalence and treatment thereof. Secondly, managed health care, drug utilisation review, pharmacoeconomics and pharmaco-epidemiology were investigated from the literature to understand these concepts. The influence of the South African government on the medicine pricing regulations was discussed. Thirdly, through the empirical investigation the utilisation patterns of combination analgesics were reviewed, analysed and interpreted. It was determined that combination analgesic drugs represented 8.87% (n=261 907) of all medicine claimed during 2001 (N=2 951 326), decreased to 7.20% (n=381 809) during 2004 (N=5 305 846) after which it increased to 7.92% (n=187 745) in 2006 (N=2 370 572). Between 2001 (N=R379 708 489.00) and 2006 (N=R279 160 832.00) the cost percentage of the combination analgesic drugs decreased from 4.95% (n=R18 798 202.42) to 3.15% (n=R8 791 228.57). The average cost per combination analgesic drugs decreased from R71.77 ± 61.67 to R46.83 ± 43.41 between 2001 and 2006. This decrease was of no practical significance (d<0.8). The average number of combination analgesics per prescription stayed relatively constant varying between 1.01 ± 0.11 in 2001 and 1.02 ± 0.13 in 2006. The percentage generic combination analgesic drugs claimed increased from 29.63% (n=77 608) in 2001 to 66.37% (n=124 600) in 2006 (N=261 907 for 2001 and N=187 745 for 2006) even though generic medicine items claimed by the total database only increased from 26.79% (n=790 548) in 2001 to 40.27% (n=954 561) during 2006 (N=2 951 326 for 2001 and N=2 370 572 for 2006). The combination of ibuprofen 200mg, paracetamol 250mg and codeine phosphate 10mg (e.g. Myprodol® capsules, Mybulen® capsules, Gen-payne® capsules and Ibupain Forte® capsules) represented the active ingredient combination with the highest prevalence for the entire study period, increasing from 28.44% (n=74 483) in 2001 to 33.08% (n=62 100) in 2006 of all combination analgesics prescribed (N=261 907 for 2001 and N=187 745 for 2006). Generic substitution influenced the prevalence of the innovator medicine item, Myprodol® Capsules dramatically, causing a decrease from 23.16% (n=60 631) in 2001 to 3.77% (n=7 084) in 2006 representation of all combination analgesic prescribed. In 2006, the generics of Myprodol® Capsules e.g. Dentopain Forte®, Mybulen® Capsules, Gen-payne® and Ibupain Forte® represented 23.79% (n=44651) of all combination analgesics claimed. Recommendations were derived regarding certain aspects of the clinical and economical management of pain e.g. the implication of generic substitution with regard to cost and prescribing patterns, and the decreasing cost of combination analgesics which might encourage abuse, needs further investigation. South African prescribers have a large choice of combination analgesic preparations available for prescribing. According to Desmeules et al. (2003:8) the advantages of combining analgesics include increasing the duration of analgesia, widening the spectrum of efficacy, improved patient compliance and reduced parenteral abuse potential. According to McMahon (1975:13) one of the principle arguments against fixed-dose combinations is that the physician surrenders flexibility in managing his patient. Combination analgesics may expose patients to ingredients not necessary for pain relief in their particular condition (Beaver, 1984). Rigas (1997:454) explains that the value of pharmaco-economics in providing cost-effective pharmacologic treatment for pain must not only be seen as a containment effort, but rather as a valuation effort. Meaningful economic analyses based on empiric information about cost and a range of subjective and objective outcomes are needed to minimise cost without compromising care. The objective of this study was to review and interpret the prescribing patterns of combination analgesics and the cost associated with their usage for the period 2001-2006 in a section of the private healthcare sector in South Africa. This research can be classified as a quantitative, retrospective drug utilisation review study. Data were obtained from a medicine claims database, and the study population consisted of all combination analgesic prescriptions (Mims® category 3.3) for the period 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2002 and 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2006. Prescribing Patterns of Combination Analgesics in the Private Health Care Sector. Firstly pain and the treatment thereof with combination analgesics were investigated from the literature to understand the disease and to determine the prevalence and treatment thereof. Secondly, managed health care, drug utilisation review, pharmacoeconomics and pharmaco-epidemiology were investigated from the literature to understand these concepts. The influence of the South African government on the medicine pricing regulations was discussed. Thirdly, through the empirical investigation the utilisation patterns of combination analgesics were reviewed, analysed and interpreted. It was determined that combination analgesic drugs represented 8.87% (n=261 907) of all medicine claimed during 2001 (N=2 951 326), decreased to 7.20% (n=381 809) during 2004 (N=5 305 846) after which it increased to 7.92% (n=187 745) in 2006 (N=2 370 572). Between 2001 (N=R379 708 489.00) and 2006 (N=R279 160 832.00) the cost percentage of the combination analgesic drugs decreased from 4.95% (n=R18 798 202.42) to 3.15% (n=R8 791 228.57). The average cost per combination analgesic drugs decreased from R71.77 ± 61.67 to R46.83 ± 43.41 between 2001 and 2006. This decrease was of no practical significance (d<0.8). The average number of combination analgesics per prescription stayed relatively constant varying between 1.01 ± 0.11 in 2001 and 1.02 ± 0.13 in 2006. The percentage generic combination analgesic drugs claimed increased from 29.63% (n=77 608) in 2001 to 66.37% (n=124 600) in 2006 (N=261 907 for 2001 and N=187 745 for 2006) even though generic medicine items claimed by the total database only increased from 26.79% (n=790 548) in 2001 to 40.27% (n=954 561) during 2006 (N=2 951 326 for 2001 and N=2 370 572 for 2006). The combination of ibuprofen 200mg, paracetamol 250mg and codeine phosphate 10mg (e.g. Myprodol® capsules, Mybulen® capsules, Gen-payne® capsules and Ibupain Forte® capsules) represented the active ingredient combination with the highest prevalence for the entire study period, increasing from 28.44% (n=74 483) in 2001 to 33.08% (n=62 100) in 2006 of all combination analgesics prescribed (N=261 907 for 2001 and N=187 745 for 2006). Generic substitution influenced the prevalence of the innovator medicine item, Myprodol® Capsules dramatically, causing a decrease from 23.16% (n=60 631) in 2001 to 3.77% (n=7 084) in 2006 representation of all combination analgesic prescribed. In 2006, the generics of Myprodol® Capsules e.g. Dentopain Forte®, Mybulen® Capsules, Gen-payne® and Ibupain Forte® represented 23.79% (n=44651) of all combination analgesics claimed. Recommendations were derived regarding certain aspects of the clinical and economical management of pain e.g. the implication of generic substitution with regard to cost and prescribing patterns, and the decreasing cost of combination analgesics which might encourage abuse, needs further investigation. / Thesis (M.Pharm. (Pharmacy Practice))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2008.

The general aim of this study was to investigate the prescribing patterns of products that contain methylphenidate or atomoxetine in a section of the private health care sector of South Africa. A quantitative, retrospective drug uitilisation review was performed according to data obtained from the database of a South African medicine claims pharmacy benefit management company's for three consecutive study years (Le. 2005 to 2007). The results indicated that a total of 7,990 patients had been prescribed products that contained methylphenidate or atomoxetine in 2005. The total for 2006 was 8,575 and it decreased to a total of 7,828 in 2007. Of all the patients who received the mentioned products, the percentage for females increased from 27.75% (N = 7,990) in 2005 to 29.06% (N =7,828) in 2007. With regard to the same products the percentage for males decreased from 72.03% (N = 7,990) in 2005 to 70.89% (N = 7,828) in 2007. The ratio for the gender-related prescribing patterns of medicine items that contained methylphenidate or atomoxetine in this section of the private health care sector of South Africa was ± 2.55:1 for males to females in comparison with the international male:female ratio of 3:1. According to the medicine claims on the database for 2005 the total number of prescriptions that indicated products containing methylphenidate or atomoxetine was calculated as 8,522, 798 (i.e. N = 8, 522,798) or as a percentage of 0.32% prescriptions. The percentage showed an increase to 0.41 % in 2007 (N = 8,015,538). Of all the medicine items containing methylphenidate or atomoxetine those products that contained atomoxetine represented 4.69% and those that contained methylphenidate represented 95.31%. In 2005 the average cost per prescription that indicated items containing methylphenidate or atomoxetine amounted to R318.29 ± R162.09. In 2007 the amount increased to R358.91 ± R208.10. The percentage of children younger than five years of age, and who had been prescribed products containing methylphenidate or atomoxetine, increased from 0.91 % in 2005 (N = 7,990) to 1.11 % in 2007 (N =7,828). The percentage for children aged 5 to 12 years decreased from 53.62% in 2005 to 49.23% in 2007. For adolescents the percentage increased from 26.32% in 2005 to 27.35% in 2007. The same pattern repeated itself in the case of adults (age 18+ years). Among the top trade name products prescribed were Ritalin LA 20mg®, Ritalin 20mg®, Concerta 36mg®, Ritalin LA 30mg® and Concerta 18mg®. Possible drug-drug interactions were found between products containing methylphenidate or atomoxetine and products containing imipramine, amitriptyline and carbamazepine. Findings indicated that the number of products containing methylphenidate or atomoxetine increased from 2005 to 2007, while also revealing that those products containing methylphenidate remained in the majority. The average costs of products containing methylphenidate or atomoxetine increased from 2005 to 2007. / Thesis (M.Pharm. (Pharmacy Practice))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2010.