Das Heilige ist ein Kernbegriff der Theologie. Es vermittelt die Konzepte von Welt und Religion. Diese Arbeit untersucht das Phänomen mit Hilfe der fundamentalontologischen Methodik Heideggers, um darin den Rahmen einer existentialen Annäherung zu begründen. / Holiness is an important aspect of theology. It relates the concepts of world and religion. This thesis explores the phenomena with help of the fundamental-ontology method of Heidegger.

Abstract: Emmanuel Levinas: Ethics, Justice and the Human beyond Being. Levinas finds the early twentieth century to be marked by a rejection of the concept of humanity, at the moment of its awakening to its own brutality. While accepting the anti-humanist position, insofar as it questions the primacy of free will, and an unquestionable security in its attachment to a pregiven, universal Reason, Levinas' work questions the value of rethinking the human in terms of being. This thesis traces Levinas' attempt to rehabilitate humanity from its devotion to ontology as first philosophy. It argues that Levinas offers a reinterpretation of the relation of being and the human, tracing the movement in Levinas' work from a critical attempt to rethink the human and being, to the notion of the human beyond being. The thesis begins with a critical engagement with Heideggerian ontology suggesting that Levinas' renewal of the question of being in his prewar essays reflects a concern for the meaning of subjective existence and its relation to the social and political totality. These concerns lie behind his reinterpretation of the relation of existence and the existent in his essays of the 1940's in which Levinas undertakes a critique of a Platonic social totality and introduces a notion of the alterity of eros which does not have its value determined in terms of a teleology of social production. From this basis, Levinas is shown to address the question of justice by articulating the essentially ambiguous relation between the subject and another in terms of the ambivalence of the face, and contrasting this with the alterity of love. The development of these ideas is traced across Levinas' major works. In Totality and Infinity, Levinas argues that the response to the singular other is conceived of as the event of the production of a universal which affirms the tertiality of the social totality, that is, attests to the whole of humanity. In Otherwise than Being, the relation of ethics and justice is discussed in different terms, those of the relation of the ethical Saying and the realm of the Said or being's justice. Levinas juxtaposes the ontological tertiality of the third, with the notion of an ethical tertiality, which he calls illeity. Illeity is found to not be reducible to the ontological tertiality of the third party, but to name the exceeding of subjectivity in terms of an absolute susceptibility to the Other, and is an excessive concept of a singular universal: the human beyond being.

After a chapter analyzing Heidegger's Dasein Analytik as it is delineated in Sein und Zeit, in using, in large measure, an author coming from the anglo-american tradition, the A begins a quasi-commentary analysis of the second chapter of Heidegger's Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie, heretofore GP or (The Basic Problems of Phenomenology). This quasi-commentary method of analysis is required due to the informal nature of presentation, insofar as this GP text is a transcription of Heidegger's 1927 summer course at Marburg. The A's chapter 3 analyzes the essence and existence distinction as it is found (or it's equivalent in Scotus's case) in Aquinas, Scotus and Suarez. In terms of inspiration it soon becomes clear – even on a vocabulary level - that Heidegger's views are heavily influenced by Suarez and his doctrines, particularly from his Disputationes Metaphysicae, DM. Whereas Heidegger pretends to analyze Aquinas, Scotus and Suarez, each in his own right, the reality is that Suarez is the 'guiding light' throughout these three central, chapter 2 subsection GP analyses, (Alpha = Aquinas, Beta = Scotus and Gamma = Suarez). An obvious sign of this is Heidegger's bringing Giles of Rome and his famous duae res version of the essence and existence distinction into the Aquinas analysis. Although he got the idea from Suarez, Heidegger is slightly more affirmative than Suarez himself in attributing this at first startling version to Aquinas. (In a word, holding to the real distinction means being an Aegidian and Aquinas is said to hold to the real distinction.) The A makes extensive use of contemporary Aquinas analysis to show that the essence and existence distinction doctrine that emerges from Aquinas's Aristotle commentaries is far from resembling Giles's. Via analysis of Metaphysics, V, 7, two Quodlibetal questions and Book II of the Posterior Analytics commentary (Lectios 1-10), a simpler doctrine emerges as to what we are doing when we predicate existence and essence of material substances. Not only is this not a duae res doctrine but one that can be explained without talking about real distinctions at all! (Heidegger's views on Scotus and Suarez are at once penetrating and much more predictable.) The A next presents a chapter on Heidegger and Luther, showing the centrality of the theme 'betrayal of the tradition' in both figures. In a final chapter, the A examines Heidegger's 1929 analysis of what the subject matter of metaphysics is, from his Die Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik (The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics). Heidegger claims that, for the medieval, ontotheological tradition, the oldest and most sacred, i.e., God, is the subject matter of metaphysics. (This includes Heidegger's accusation that medieval ontology is faith buttressed.) Using a contemporary phenomenologist's and a medievalist's analysis, the A tries to show that Aquinas's commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics reveals the subject matter of metaphysics not to be 'God', but ens commune. This philosophical conclusion is of course consequential for Heidegger's accusation that medieval ontology is faith supported. The A concludes that an examination of Aquinas's Aristotle commentaries would have led to other conclusions than Heidegger's on what the subject matter of metaphysics is as well as on Aquinas's views on predicating essence and existence.

none

Univ., Diss.--Freiburg, 2005.

Proefschrift--Universiteit Leiden, 2005. / Bibliogr. p. 219-231. Résumés en allemand et en anglais.

Texte remanié de: Diss.--Philosophische Fakultät--Freiburg--Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, 2006. / Bibliogr. p. 313-137.

Thèse de doctorat : Philosophie : Paris 12 : 2002. / Thèse soutenue en co-tutelle avec la Roumanie. Version électronique uniquement consultable au sein de l'Université Paris 12 (Intranet). Titre provenant de l'écran-titre. Bibliogr. 127 réf.

Zugl.: München, Hochsch. für Philosophie, Diss., 2008

Diss.--Bonn. / Bibliography: p. 302-306.