1 |
The harmonious constitution : judges and the protection of libertyVerde, Rui Alexandre de Almeida dos Santos January 2000 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
Die Stellung der Judikative im englischen Verfassungsgefüge nach dem Human Rights Act 1998 /Verbeet, Markus. January 2004 (has links) (PDF)
Univ., Diss.--Mannheim, 2003. / Literaturverz. S. 13 - 25. Literaturangaben. Text in Appendices in engl. Sprache.
|
3 |
Campaign finance regulation and expressive rights : a comparative studyMarriott, Jane Elizabeth Clare January 2000 (has links)
No description available.
|
4 |
The Human Rights Act 1998 in constitutional context : the common law, the rule of law, and human rightsFairclough, Thomas January 2019 (has links)
The Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) is seen as a landmark piece of constitutional legislation that brought about many legal and political changes in the United Kingdom's human rights architecture. Yet the HRA is vulnerable to repeal; successive governments have promised to repeal or otherwise alter the HRA. In this climate, the Supreme Court has instructed counsel to argue common law rights first, with the HRA there to supplement and fill the gap on the occasions where the common law does not go as far as the HRA. The logical conclusion of this is that the Supreme Court, or at least some Justices, think that the common law adequately protects rights to a level near, if not the same as, the HRA does; the results of arguing the common law will often be the same as those resulting from reliance on the HRA. The academic commentary regarding these judicial statements has been far from enthusiastic. The consensus is that common law rights do not go as far as the HRA in terms of their width, that the enforcement mechanisms lack rigour compared to s 3 HRA and the proportionality principle, and that they are vulnerable to legislative override. Therefore, a loss of the HRA would be a loss for the legal protection of rights. This thesis disputes the conclusion stated in the foregoing paragraph. It argues that one has to view the vectors against which one can measure the potency of common law rights through the lens of the rule of law. This principle, the controlling factor in the constitution, promises protection against arbitrary behaviour by state actors because it embodies the value of equality of concern. Once this is appreciated, an entirely new dimension of common law rights becomes apparent; the reach of rights, their rigour of protection, and their constitutional resilience are revealed to be much stronger than orthodoxy suggests.
|
5 |
The Human Rights Act 1998: Failure in a Post 9/11 WorldChan, Kristan 21 November 2012 (has links)
In 1997 the Labour Party introduced the White Paper Rights Brought Home: The Human Rights Bill. Bringing rights home was considered necessary to significantly influence rights conception in the UK and internationally. Rights Brought Home argued that incorporation would allow human rights to become a more prominent feature of society. The Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) was brought into force with optimism and expectations. However, the war of terror has significantly impacted the way in which rights have been understood and appreciated. National security issues have clashed with Convention rights. There is mounting concern that British judges must blindly follow the rulings established by the European Court of Human Rights. There have been problems of public disengagement and hostility. The HRA is characterized by a story of failure. Understanding the relationship between the war on terror and the HRA is central to human rights development.
|
6 |
The Human Rights Act 1998: Failure in a Post 9/11 WorldChan, Kristan 21 November 2012 (has links)
In 1997 the Labour Party introduced the White Paper Rights Brought Home: The Human Rights Bill. Bringing rights home was considered necessary to significantly influence rights conception in the UK and internationally. Rights Brought Home argued that incorporation would allow human rights to become a more prominent feature of society. The Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) was brought into force with optimism and expectations. However, the war of terror has significantly impacted the way in which rights have been understood and appreciated. National security issues have clashed with Convention rights. There is mounting concern that British judges must blindly follow the rulings established by the European Court of Human Rights. There have been problems of public disengagement and hostility. The HRA is characterized by a story of failure. Understanding the relationship between the war on terror and the HRA is central to human rights development.
|
7 |
Manifesting religious belief : a matter of religious freedom, religious discrimination, or freedom of expression?Maher, Julie January 2014 (has links)
This thesis asks how manifestation of religious belief by religious individuals can best be protected in English law. It is particularly concerned with the protection available to religious individuals in the public sphere. This thesis assesses the current state of protection under religious freedom and religious discrimination models, before considering the potential for increasing protection by reconceptualising the right to manifest religious belief as an aspect of freedom of expression. This thesis asks whether the practical and conceptual limitations of a religious freedom model, and Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in particular, can be overcome by reliance on alternative modes of protection, namely religious discrimination protections in domestic, Convention, and EU law, or through litigating religious manifestation claims as freedom of expression cases under Article 10 of the ECHR. The difficulty of communicating the harm in being denied the ability to manifest religious beliefs publicly is a key limitation of both religious freedom and religious discrimination models. Similarly, this thesis highlights the difficulty in assessing what weight should be attributed to such religious harm within a proportionality exercise balancing the rights of religious individuals with the rights and interests of other parties. The analysis in this thesis draws primarily upon the sources of law which shape domestic English law in this area, namely the ECHR and European Union law. However, this thesis also considers foreign precedent and case law from the United States in particular. This thesis contends that no one model can address the range of cases where manifestation of religious beliefs arise, and that litigants should be able to draw from religious freedom, religious discrimination, and freedom of expression protections depending on the nature of their case.
|
8 |
L'équilibre des pouvoirs législatif et juridictionnel à l'épreuve des systèmes de protection des droits et libertés : étude comparée : États-Unis, Canada, Royaume-Uni / Separation of powers between courts and legislatures : the impact of human rights protectionBachert, Audrey 01 July 2017 (has links)
Alors que la protection effective des droits et libertés est souvent conçue comme dépendante de leur garantie juridictionnelle, cette dernière implique une transformation de l'équilibre qui s'établit entre le juge, non élu, et le législateur, représentant du peuple souverain. À travers une analyse pratique des effets du travail juridictionnel sur l'activité législative, tels qu'ils se sont déployés aux États-Unis, au Canada et au Royaume-Uni sur les quinze dernières années, il est possible d'évaluer les conséquences de la consécration de certains droits dans un catalogue opposable par le juge au législateur, en matière d'équilibre entre les pouvoirs législatif et juridictionnel. Si ces trois systèmes, aux traditions constitutionnelles éloignées, disposent chacun de mécanismes spécifiques pour assurer le respect des droits consacrés, plusieurs points de convergence peuvent être mis en lumière. Leur étude sera alors l'occasion d'appréhender dans une perspective renouvelée l'équilibre qui s'établit entre les deux institutions. Elle fera progressivement apparaitre l'idée d'une véritable collaboration du législateur et du juge en matière de protection des droits et libertés dans les démocraties contemporaines / Effective human rights protection is often perceived as being dependent upon their judicial enforcement. However, such a mechanism transforms the relationship between unelected judges and electorally accountable legislators. Through an empirical analysis of the effects of judicial review on legislation and legislative decision-making, in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, during the last fifteen years, the actual impact of the entrenchment of human rights in a written bill of rights will be assessed and evaluated. Even though these three countries have different processes to guarantee the respect of entrenched rights, and despite their long-settled and contrasting traditions, their systems are not as conflicting as it is often thought. This study finally leads to a better understanding of the relationship between judges and legislators in contemporary democracies and underlines the idea of a genuine collaboration of powers
|
9 |
Rights to property, rights to buy, and land law reform : applying Article 1 of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human RightsMaxwell, Douglas January 2018 (has links)
This dissertation examines the application and effect of Article 1 of the First Protocol to the ECHR in relation to Scots land law reform. Chapter one will reflect on why existing rights to property have come to be challenged. Chapter two sets out the human rights paradigm and scrutinises what rights and whose rights are engaged. Chapter three traces the development of A1P1. Chapter four applies the human rights paradigm to contemporary reforms. Chapter five considers the broader effect A1P1 has had on domestic property law. This dissertation submits that the problem to be overcome is that, in many instances, Scots land law reform has been reduced into a simplistic struggle. A1P1 has been held up as either a citadel protecting landowners or as an ineffective and unjustified right to be ignored. At the core of this debate are competing claims between liberal individualist rights to property and socially democratic, egalitarian goals. This dissertation argues that it is important to move beyond this binary debate. This is not about finding some mysterious "red card" or eureka moment that conclusively shows compatibility or incompatibility. Instead, compatibility will be determined by following a rule-based approach that values rational decision-making and the best available evidence, as well as the importance of democratic institutions. As such, it will be illustrated how future challenges are likely to focus not on the underlying purpose of land law reform but on the macro or micro granularity of Ministerial discretion. In coming to this conclusion, it will be argued that A1P1 has a pervasive influence on the entire workings of all public bodies and, like a dye, permeates the legislative process.
|
10 |
Formas interpretativas de decisión en el juicio de constitucionalidad de las leyesLópez Bofill, Hèctor 14 June 2002 (has links)
La tesi té per objecte l'estudi de les decisions d'una jurisdicció constitucional en les quals, com a alternativa a la declaració d'invalidesa, es condiciona la constitucionalitat dels preceptes legals que s'examinen a una determinada interpretació fixada pel Tribunal Constitucional. La investigació analitza els fonaments d'aquesta tècnica i els exemples del seu us en dret comparat. L'autor rebutja una aproximació a aquest fenomen de caràcter tipològic (que ha estat l'habitual en les aportacions fins ara publicades sobre la matèria) per endinsar-se a analitzar les raons materials i institucionals que porten a una jurisdicció constitucional a dictar aquesta mena de pronunciaments. / La tesis tiene por objeto el estudio de aquellas decisiones de una jurisdicción constitucional en las que, como alternativa a la declaración de invalidez, la constitucionalidad de los preceptos legales examinados quedan condicionados a una interpretación establecida por el propio Tribunal Constitucional. La investigación analiza los fundamentos de dicha técnica y los ejemplos de su uso en derecho comparado. El autor rechaza una aproximación a este fenómeno de carácter tipológico (habitual en las aportaciones hasta la fecha publicadas) y se centra en el análisis de las razones materiales e institucionales que impulsan a la jurisdicción constitucional a dictar esta especie de pronunciamientos. / The dissertation examines those constitutional court decisions in which the controlled statute is not set aside but constitutional under some conditions fixed by the Constitutional Court. The research analyzes the foundations of these decisions and their use by the Constitutional Courts in comparative law. The author rejects an approach of such decisions based upon their classification and argues for a position concerning the institutional and material background in which these decisions are invoked.
|
Page generated in 0.0736 seconds