Estudos sobre a orientação da atenção que utilizam o procedimento de Posner têm demonstrado dois efeitos: uma facilitação inicial no processamento do estímulo que aparece no lugar para onde dirigiu-se a atenção e subsequentemente um prejuízo no processamento deste estímulo, neste local. Em um trabalho anterior não evidenciamos o efeito facilitador da orientação da atenção em uma tarefa de tempo de reação simples. Levantamos algumas hipóteses para explicar este efeito oposto. Para testarmos tais hipóteses realizamos 6 experimentos. Nos dois primeiros, examinamos em que medida a presença de tentativas de pegada influenciava a expressão do efeito negativo do estímulo precedente. No terceiro examinamos a possibilidade do estímulo precedente ser capaz de reduzir a responsividade. No quarto equalizamos a intensidade efetiva do estímulo alvo nas duas posições em que ele podia ser apresentado (mesma e oposta). No quinto e no sexto avaliamos a evolução temporal do efeito negativo do estímulo precedente, na tentativa de determinar até que ponto ela teria alguma relação com a evolução temporal esperada para um mascaramento anterógrado. O sexto experimento poderia adicionalmente fornecer alguma pista de uma contribuição de uma inibição de retorno, neste caso precoce, para o efeito negativo encontrado. Em todos esses casos a influência atencional do estímulo precedente presumivelmente continuaria a ocorrer, mas seria suplantada pela influência contrária coexistente. Em conjunto, nossos resultados sugerem que o efeito negativo do estímulo precedente em uma tarefa de tempo de reação simples, se deve a uma interferência com o processamento do estímulo alvo, caracterizando uma inibição de natureza sensorial. / Studies about attention orienting that use Posner?s procedure have demonstrated two effects: an initial facilitation of responsivit when the target stimulus appears in the same location as the prime stimulus and a subsequent inhibition of this responsvity. In a previous work we could not find the early facilitatory effect of attention orienting in a simple reaction time task. The hypotheses that we raised to explain this unexpected finding were tested in six experiments. In the first two ones, we examined whether the presence of catch trials influenced the expression of the negative effect of the prime stimulus. In the third experiment we examined the possibility that the prime stimulus reduced responsivity. In the fourth experiment we equalized the intensity of the target stimulus in the two locations where it could be presented (same and opposite). In the fifth and in sixth experiments we evaluated the time course of the negative effect of the prime stimulus, as an attempt to verify whether it would be compatible with a forward masking process. The sixth experiment could additionally give some clue about a contribution of inhibition of return, in this case precocious, to the found negative effect. In all these cases the attentional influence of the prime stimulus would presumably continue to occur, but would be supplanted by the contrary negative of this stimulus influence. Overall, our results suggest that the negative effect of the prime stimulus in a simple reaction time task is due to an interference with the processing of the target stimulus, characterizing a kind of sensory inhibition.

Bien que l’inhibition soit souvent considérée comme un concept uniforme, les habiletés d’inhibition se divisent en plusieurs types : l’inhibition spatiale et l’inhibition de réponse. L’inhibition spatiale réfère à l’atténuation de l’interférence de localisations contenant des stimuli saillants et non pertinents. Par exemple, l’inhibition spatiale guide la recherche visuelle de sorte à limiter la visite répétée de localisations déjà explorées. À l’opposé, l’inhibition de réponse est un processus de type moteur et permet l’adaptation du comportement à un contexte changeant lorsqu’un mouvement doit être altéré ou arrêté. Bien qu’il soit admis que les habiletés d’inhibition se subdivisent en plusieurs types, tel que l’inhibition spatiale et l’inhibition de réponse, les différents mécanismes les sous-tendant demeurent mal compris et sous explorés. L’objectif principal de la présente thèse était d’explorer les mécanismes communs et différents de l’inhibition spatiale et l’inhibition de réponse. Particulièrement, les mécanismes de suppression et de facilitation lors de la sélection de la cible furent décrits pour l’inhibition spatiale. De même, la perturbation des habiletés de l’inhibition spatiale et la préservation relative des habiletés d’inhibition de réponse à la suite à de lésions du cortex pariétal postérieur dorsal furent exemplifiées. Finalement, les apports spécifiques du cortex pariétal postérieur dorsal pour l’inhibition spatiale et l’inhibition de réponse furent définis. / While inhibition is often considered a uniform concept, inhibition abilities can be divided in many types: spatial inhibition and response inhibition. Spatial inhibition refers to the attenuation of the interference from locations containing salient and non-pertinent stimuli. For example, spatial inhibition guides visual search to limit the repeated visit of already explored locations. In contrast, response inhibition is motor-based and allows the adaptability of behaviour in a changing context when a movement must be prevented or altered. Although it is widely accepted that inhibition abilities can be divided in many types, such as spatial or response inhibition, the different mechanisms underlying them remain poorly understood and under-explored. The main aim of the present thesis was to explore the common and different mechanisms of spatial and response inhibition. Precisely, the mechanisms of suppression and enhancement during target selection were described during spatial inhibition. The alteration of spatial inhibition processes and the relative preservation of response inhibition abilities in patients with dorsal posterior parietal cortex lesions were also underlined. Finally, the specific contributions of the dorsal posterior parietal cortex for spatial and response inhibition were defined.