<p>Purpose; Purpose of this thesis is to review the implementation process of SOX in one company to be able to estimate which factors that are significant for individuals when it comes to accepting SOX as a tool to improving processes.</p><p>Method: Our approach in attacking the reality has been the golden middle-way, which means we have went into the reality with already constructed theories but along as the study went on we have refined theories, thus shifting between inductive and deductive approach.</p><p>Results/conclusions; Important obstacles that prevented adoption of the innovation had to do the characteristic of the innovation and the size and complexity of the organization; however we believed that the most significant blockade against change was the non-existing communication between the three different parties, namely consultants, managers and end-users.</p>

Purpose; Purpose of this thesis is to review the implementation process of SOX in one company to be able to estimate which factors that are significant for individuals when it comes to accepting SOX as a tool to improving processes. Method: Our approach in attacking the reality has been the golden middle-way, which means we have went into the reality with already constructed theories but along as the study went on we have refined theories, thus shifting between inductive and deductive approach. Results/conclusions; Important obstacles that prevented adoption of the innovation had to do the characteristic of the innovation and the size and complexity of the organization; however we believed that the most significant blockade against change was the non-existing communication between the three different parties, namely consultants, managers and end-users.

Several tools and practices have been developed in the innovation management field to support individuals and organizations in their innovation journeys. It is of high interest to understand how the actions and decisions of people affect the innovation process, both on a micro and macro level. The actions of individuals, teams, and upper management in organizations directly or indirectly affect innovation. It becomes interesting to understand such behaviors. The aim of this master’s thesis is to explore and compile a list of human behaviors that drive innovation on three levels: individual, team, and organization. This qualitative study was conducted in Sweden using semi-structured interviews with experienced professionals in the innovation management field. The research also includes defining and understanding key terms that are necessary for exploring and identifying innovation behaviors and offers analogies to support this understanding. An extensive literature review is used to find the initial set of innovation behaviors, and the analysis is developed. The key findings of this research reveal innovation behaviors in 11 categories of individual innovation behaviors, 5 categories of team innovation behaviors, and 6 categories of organizational innovation behaviors. Each category is developed in detail and a list of innovation behaviors is prepared. The implications of this thesis are twofold. Firstly, an extensive theoretical base is developed to understand innovation behaviors in a unified framework. Several new innovation behaviors are identified in empirical results that were not found in the scientific literature. This thesis also provides an actionable base for ‘how to innovate’ questions. Secondly, the results can be used by professionals on a practical level. Individuals, teams, and organizations can educate themselves about innovation behaviors and adopt them during their innovation projects. The upper management in companies can use these innovation behaviors to develop a culture that is supportive of innovation and take innovation-abling actions for their organizations. Innovation professionals can use these behaviors as a tool to support their teams in taking better actions for innovation. Furthermore, researchers can advance the understanding of factors influencing innovation and develop advanced tools and practices as a guide to innovation. / Flera verktyg och metoder för innovation har utvecklats för att stödja individer och organisationer. Det är av stort intresse att förstå hur människors handlingar och beslut påverkar innovationsprocessen. Handlingar från individer, team och högsta ledning i organisationer påverkar direkt eller indirekt innovation. Det är av intresse att förstå sådana beteenden. Syftet med detta examensarbete är att utforska och sammanställa en lista över mänskliga beteenden som driver innovation på tre nivåer: individ, team och organisation. En kvalitativ studie genomfördes i Sverige med hjälp av semistrukturerade intervjuer med erfarna praktiker inom innovationsledningsområdet. Forskningen inkluderar också att definiera och förstå nyckeltermer som är nödvändiga för att utforska och identifiera innovationsbeteenden och erbjuder analogier för att stödja denna förståelse. En omfattande litteraturgenomgång har genomförts för att hitta den initiala uppsättningen av innovationsbeteenden, och analysen av de empiriska resultaten har vidare utvecklat denna. De viktigaste resultaten av denna forskning visar på innovationsbeteenden i 11 kategorier av individuella innovationsbeteenden, 5 kategorier av teaminnovationsbeteenden och 6 kategorier av organisatoriska innovationsbeteenden. Varje kategori har redogjorts för i detalj och en lista över innovationsbeteenden presenterats. Implikationerna av detta examensarbete är tvåfaldiga. För det första utvecklas en omfattande teoretisk bas för att förstå innovationsbeteenden i ett enhetligt ramverk. Flera nya innovationsbeteenden identifierades i de empiriska resultaten som inte återfanns i den vetenskapliga litteraturen. Resultaten ger också en handlingsbar bas för "hur man innoverar"-frågor. För det andra kan resultaten användas i praktiken. Individer, team och organisationer kan utbilda sig själva om innovationsbeteenden och anamma dem i sina innovationsprojekt. Den högsta ledningen i företag kan använda dessa innovationsbeteenden för att utveckla en kultur som stödjer innovation och vidta innovationsfrämjande åtgärder för sina organisationer. Innovationsledare kan använda listan med innovationbeteenden som ett verktyg för att stödja sina team i att vidta bättre åtgärder för innovation. Dessutom kan forskare främja förståelsen av faktorer som påverkar innovation och utveckla avancerade vertyg och metoder som vägledning för innovation.