Survey´s purpose is to illustrate why and how the process happened, when the seferades had to move from Spain in the last years of 15th century to the Ottoman Empire and how the authors have discussed this. How the seferades were treated by the Turks and the sultan, how teh Jews taught the people in the empire, to use the new innovations. The different results showed that the ottomans also gave great chances to the Jews and they became a powerful group of the palace in the empire. The results also showed that the authors are divided into two groups, one group defending the sultans act, and the others are not. The main reason for the ottomans to open their doors for the seferades was to take advantage of their konwledge. The reason for the attack by the western authors on the sultan´s decisions, are more complex and needs to be explained. The study´s methodology is qualitative and describes the events chronologically

Diss. Luleå : Luleå tekniska univ., 2007. / Härtill 6 uppsatser.

Lic.-avh. Västerås : Mälardalens högskola, 2008. S. 109-117: Bibliografi.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Stockholm : Kungliga Tekniska högskolan, 2005. / Härtill 6 uppsatser.

Diss. Stockholm : Handelshögsk.

Diss. Umeå : Umeå universitet, 2004.

Diss. Uppsala : Univ., 2004.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Uppsala : Uppsala universitet, 2009.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Uppsala : Univ., 2007. / Härtill 4 uppsatser.

The aim of this thesis has been to describe a public actor’s ideas about governance in relation to enhancing public innovation. Through a qualitative textual idea analysis, using theoretical ideal types of governance, the thesis found that ideas of several modes of governance are co-existing in the studied texts. Moreover, the idea analysis also discerned three general patterns which constitutes possible descriptions of how this hybrid of governance ideas exist. The results support some previous empirical studies also showing that modes of governance are co-existing while public actors aim to enhance public innovation. This indicates that future research should consider the existence of several modes of governance instead of focusing and prescribing only one, which they have tended to do so far. The proposed descriptions should moreover be considered as a first step of depicting how a hybrid of ideas of governance can appear when a public actor steers and organises the public sector in order to enhance public innovation – a first step that ought to be followed up by futures studies.