Thesis (Ph.D.)--Aberdeen University, 2008. / Title from web page (viewed on Apr. 20, 2009.). Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1981. / Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 582-598).

The issues addressed in this thesis are: whether Kashmir was a State at any point in history; was the territory occupied in the war of 1947 by India; within international law, what implications do the constitutional incorporation of this territory and human rights violations attract; are Kashmiris entitled to restore their historical title through the exercise of self-determination; and can the Kashmir question be solved without the formation of international strategic alliances to curb the new dangers in Kashmir. From the strong historical standpoint and comprehensive archival research this thesis begins with an introduction to the Kashmir question, focusing on how the statehood of Kashmir was lost and in what circumstances.  This is followed by examining the substantive law of restoration of historical title, statehood, State continuity/identity, State extinction, occupation and self-determination.  The rest of the study first analyses the statehood and sovereignty of Kashmir from the perspective of archival documents.  The study also examines effect of the presence of an unrepresentative government and human rights violations in the occupied territory of Kashmir.  Finally, the international community’s foreign policy and legal position on Kashmir is discussed.  The study analyses the consequences of abandoning the Kashmir question and letting it fester in the face of danger of potential nuclear war and spread of terrorism.  This work concludes that the international community needs to rethink its foreign policy in the region in the face of emerging military-political dangers and revive its previously held legal position on the Kashmir question for its resolution.

No description available.

Thesis (S.T.M.)--Yale Divinity School, 2003. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 54-55).

Thesis (S.T.M.)--Yale Divinity School, 2003. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 54-55).

Thesis (S.T.M.)--Yale Divinity School, 2003. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 54-55).

Wikipedia is the product of thousands of editors working collaboratively to provide free and up-to-date encyclopedic information to the project's users. This article asks to what degree Wikipedia articles in three languages — Hindi, Urdu, and English — achieve Wikipedia's mission of making neutrally-presented, reliable information on a polarizing, controversial topic available to people around the globe. We chose the topic of the recent revocation of Article 370 of the Constitution of India, which, along with other recent events in and concerning the region of Jammu and Kashmir, has drawn attention to related articles on Wikipedia. This work focuses on the English Wikipedia, being the preeminent language edition of the project, as well as the Hindi and Urdu editions. Hindi and Urdu are the two standardized varieties of Hindustani, a lingua franca of Jammu and Kashmir. We analyzed page view and revision data for three Wikipedia articles to gauge popularity of the pages in our corpus, and responsiveness of editors to breaking news events and problematic edits. Additionally, we interviewed editors from all three language editions to learn about differences in editing processes and motivations, and we compared the text of the articles across languages as they appeared shortly after the revocation of Article 370. Across languages,we saw discrepancies in article tone, organization, and the information presented, as well as differences in how editors collaborate and communicate with one another. Nevertheless, in Hindi and Urdu, as well as English, editors predominantly try to adhere to the principle of neutral point of view (NPOV), and for the most part, the editors quash attempts by other editors to push political agendas. / Master of Science / Wikipedia aims to have articles fairly represent controversial topics. It's especially important that articles are updated quickly and malicious edits are caught as events warrant. In smaller language editions of the project, it's a challenge to keep articles both current and "neutral."We chose five articles related to the ongoing conflict in Jammu and Kashmir and compared them across three language editions of Wikipedia: English (often seen as the gold standard of the project, having been around the longest and having by far the most contributors of any language edition), Hindi, and Urdu. Hindi and Urdu are the two standardized varieties of Hindustani; both are widely spoken in and around Jammu and Kashmir, but particularly, Urdu is the national language of Pakistan and Hindi is most widely spoken in Northern India. With some exceptions, we found that across language editions, editors were quick to respond to breaking news events and problematic edits, and they strove to uphold Wikipedia's core tenet of neutral point of view (NPOV).

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Adelaide, Dept. of Animal Sciences, 1990. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 246-280) and index.

No description available.