從理論而言，本論文企圖從生態演化的觀點，針對組織與組織間，或事業體與事業體間，觀察組織是否具有同生物物種間共同演化的現象，並從組織知識與學習的觀點，探討組織與組織間知識共同演化的行為機制與其對創新績效的關係。過去的文獻中，針對組織或事業體間之策略與績效間的關係，多數均從多角化的觀點出發，探討組織、市場或產品間的相關度，來預測績效的成果，但從資源基礎的角度觀察實務的現象，組織間的資源基礎，並非均可在組織間自由的流動或轉移，組織亦非只單純依賴於相關度高的其他事業組織才足以創造績效。因此，組織如何與其他的事業體組織進行資源的移轉以創造策略績效，特別是對於創新績效相關的知識資源，在現今的理論及文獻中，並沒有特別的加以探討。本研究針對此一研究的缺口，乃試圖利用生態學說之共同演化的觀點，奠基於Eisenhardt and Galunic(2000)之共同演化策略的文獻作出發點，來探討組織與組織間知識共同演化的行為機制，以及其對組織創新績效的影響。 經由文獻的探討與先導個案的觀察，本研究提出了主要的研究架構，在資源基礎構面上，本研究觀察了自我組織與其他對偶組織間三種資源：實體設備資源、技術知識資源、網絡關係資源；而在知識屬性構面上，本研究提出了領域相似性及功能互補性二個子構面，而在應變數創新績效上，本研究則觀察組織的創新件數、創新件數變動率及創新產業競爭力；創新績效類別上則觀察組織四種創新類型：產品創新、製程創新、技術創新以及市場創新等四個組織績效。而針對調節變數上，本研究則著由文獻歸納及個案觀察發展出組織間知識共同演化的四個行為構面：交互學習吸收、自我學習強化、相關變異適應與共有例規保留。藉由此四個構面所發展出的行為子構面題項問卷，本研究可以觀察組織與組織間知識共同演化行為的強度，以作為影響組織間資源基礎與組織創新績效關係的調節變數。 本研究藉由質性之個案研究法之先導個案─長興化工的觀察，發展出量化之問卷調查法之研究問卷，並針對潤泰企業集團之營建事業體與紡織事業體共十四個事業組織，二十八位受訪者進行實證研究，調查此十四個事業組織間所構成之364個對偶關係之組織關係，一一進行問卷調查及記錄。並依據此十四個事業組織受訪者問卷，進行數值分析及多變量分析工作。本研究係採用SPSS統計分析工具。 經由問卷統計分析的結果，本研究得到研究成果及結論如下： 1. 從資源基礎論的觀點，對於組織的創新績效，除自我組織的實體設備、技術知識及網絡關係資源有正向助益效果外，組織的資源亦可跨越組織疆界的概念，延伸至組織生態系統中其他對偶組織之資源基礎的層次。 2. 組織與其生態系統中其他對偶組織間的知識共同演化行為活動愈強，對偶組織之實體設備資源、技術知識資源及網絡關係資源，愈有助於組織之創新績效表現 2-1.自我組織與其他對偶組織間的交互學習吸收行為愈強，對偶組織之資源基礎愈有助於組織創新績效表現。 2-2.自我組織與其他對偶組織間的自我學習強化行為愈強，對偶組織之資源基礎愈有助於組織創新績效表現。 2-3.自我組織與其他對偶組織間的相關變異適應行為愈強，對偶組織之資源基礎愈有助於組織創新績效表現。 3. 組織與對偶組織間之知識屬性不同，其彼此間之知識共同演化行為的強度亦有所不同。知識領域相似性愈高，功能互補性愈高的組織，其知識共同演化的四個構面(交互學習吸收、自我學習強化、相關變異適應及共有例規保留)行為強度均較強。 4. 具有深度知識共同演化行為的事業部組織，其在創新的件數及創新的產業競爭力上，表現均會較其他中度知識共同演化或低度知識共同演化的事業部組織來得佳，且在新產品創新、新製程創新及新技術創新等方向上，與其他事業部具有深度知識共同演化的事業部組織，其創新績效較佳。 / The research, based on the evolutionary theory, tries to find is there any kind of the co-evolution relationship between organizations or business-units. Starting from the organization knowledge management and organizational learning, the research studies the co-evolution behavior mechanism between dyad organizations and also studies the impact of the knowledge co-evolution behavior on innovation performance. Reviewing the research which study the strategy and performance mechanism between organizations or business units, lot of them use the diversification point of view to propose the market relatedness or the product relatedness are important on estimating the performance of organization, especially the new market that organization will enter. The researcher finds there is a theatrical gap between the resource transferability of dyad organizations and innovation performance creating. However, based on the research of Eisenhardt and Galunic (2000), the research will use the evolutionary theory to study how organization adopting the knowledge resource from another organization to create organization innovation performance. The research concept structure proposed by the research will have four constructs. The first one, in resource based construct, this research propose three kinds of resource in self-organization and dyad organization: (1) tangible resource and asset in practice facility; (2) intangible resource and asset in technical knowledge; (3) network resource and asset between organizations. The second construct is the knowledge attribute. This research proposes two kind of attribute between organizations, (1)similarity of field knowledge and (2) complementarity of functional knowledge. In the dependent construct, the research proposes innovation performance in innovation success cases, innovation growth and competence of product innovation, technical innovation, process innovation and market innovation. In the final construct of moderator variable, the research propose four dimensions of the knowledge co-evolutionary mechanism: (1) knowledge learning and absorbing; (2) knowledge combining and creating; (3) knowledge adapting on relative variance; (4) practicing on mutual organization routine. The methodologies of the research are case study and questionnaire interview and analyze. We review 14 organizations of textile division and civil engineering divisions of Ruentex Group. After analyzing the questionnaire of 28 interviewers, the research generates four conclusions as below: (1) From the resource-based view, not only the resource of self-organization could have positive benefit on the performance of organization innovation, but also the resource from dyad organization could contribute on innovation performance. The concept of organization resource could break through the organization boundary and extend to the dyad organization in the same organizational environment. (2) The more knowledge co-evolutionary behavior, the more benefit of inter-organizational resource will have on innovation performance. A. The more knowledge learning and absorbing on co-evolutionary behavior, the more benefit of inter-organizational resource will have on innovation performance. B. The more knowledge combining and creating on co-evolutionary behavior, the more benefit of inter-organizational resource will have on innovation performance. C. The more knowledge adapting on relative variance on co-evolutionary behavior, the more benefit of inter-organizational resource will have on innovation performance. (3) The knowledge attribute of the two dyad organizations will effect on the degree of the knowledge co-evolutionary behavior. The higher the similarity of field knowledge and complementarity of functional knowledge, the heavier the inter-organizational knowledge co-evolutionary behavior. (4) The innovation performance of the organization which have heavier knowledge co-evolutionary behavior will better then the ones have medium or lighter knowledge co-evolutionary behavior, especially on the product innovation, process innovation and technical innovation performance.