No description available.

No description available.

京都大学 / 新制・論文博士 / 博士(医学) / 乙第13435号 / 論医博第2234号 / 新制||医||1054(附属図書館) / (主査)教授 石見 拓, 教授 佐藤 俊哉, 教授 湊谷 謙司 / 学位規則第4条第2項該当 / Doctor of Medical Science / Kyoto University / DFAM

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the setting of failed surgical bioprosthesis (valve-in-valve) is a valuable option for patients with bioprosthetic aortic stenosis or regurgitation who are deemed high risk for repeat open heart surgery. Although the procedure is successful with proper preprocedural assessment, instances of left main (LM) coronary artery ostium obstruction have been documented. We present a case of LM coronary obstruction in the immediate postoperative period following implantation of a 20-mm Edwards Sapien 3 valve inside the degenerated 21-mm Mitroflow bioprosthesis stenosis, which was treated with double stenting alongside the Edwards Sapien 3 valve creating a channel (“neo left main”) that extended from mid-LM to the upper margin of the Edwards Sapien 3 valve. Although valve-in-valve in a Mitroflow degenerated bioprosthesis is a relatively safe procedure, 2 or more stents may be necessary to scaffold a channel to the coronary arteries between Edwards Sapien 3 prosthesis and aorta in the event of a coronary obstruction.

Purpose of Review: This article reviews the latest data on unprotected left main (ULM) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, with a focus on the NOBLE and EXCEL trials. Recent Findings: In EXCEL trial, the primary endpoint at 3 years was 15.4% in the PCI group and 14.7% in the CABG group (p = 0.02 for non-inferiority of PCI versus CABG). In NOBLE, the primary endpoint at 5 years was 28% and 18% for PCI and CABG, respectively (HR 1.51, CI 1.13–2.0, which did not meet the criteria for non-inferiority of PCI to CABG; p for superiority of CABG was 0.0044). Higher repeat revascularization and non-procedural myocardial infarction were noted in PCI group but there was no difference in all-cause or cardiac mortality between the two groups. Summary: A heart team approach with appropriate patient selection, careful assessment of LM lesions, and meticulous procedural technique makes PCI a valid alternative to CABG for ULM stenosis.

京都大学 / 0048 / 新制・論文博士 / 博士(医学) / 乙第13207号 / 論医博第2161号 / 新制||医||1031(附属図書館) / (主査)教授 福原 俊一, 教授 湊谷 謙司, 教授 小池 薫 / 学位規則第4条第2項該当 / Doctor of Medical Science / Kyoto University / DFAM

京都大学 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(医学) / 甲第24474号 / 医博第4916号 / 新制||医||1062(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院医学研究科医学専攻 / (主査)教授 石見 拓, 教授 永井 洋士, 教授 大鶴 繁 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Medical Science / Kyoto University / DFAM

Purpose of Review: To review the clinical evidence on the use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) revascularization options in left main (LM) disease in comparison with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Coronary artery disease (CAD) involving the LM is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Though CABG remains the gold standard for complex CAD involving the LM artery, recent trials have shown a trend towards non-inferiority of the LM PCI when compared with CABG in certain subset of patients. Recent Findings: Two recent major randomized trials compared the outcomes of PCI versus CABG in the LM and multi-vessel disease with LM involvement. The NOBLE trial included patients with all range of Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) scores and utilized biolimus drug-eluting stent (DES). The trial concluded that MACCE (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event) was significantly higher with PCI (28%) when compared with CABG (18%) but overall stroke and motility were not different. EXCEL trial evaluated the same treatment option in low to intermediate SYNTAX score population with third-generation everolimus DES platform as PCI option. Results showed no significant differences in the composite primary endpoints of death, stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI) at the end of 30 days (22% versus 19.2%, p = 0.13), although repeat revascularization was higher in PCI group (16.9% versus 10%). Summary: Recent evidence suggests that PCI is an acceptable alternative to treat symptomatic LM stenosis in select group of patients. In low to medium SYNTAX score, particularly in patients without diabetes mellitus, PCI remains a viable option. Future trials focusing on evaluating subset of patients who would benefit from one particular revascularization option in comparison with other is warranted.

Introdução – Pouco se publicou na literatura médica a respeito de projeções angiográficas dedicadas às anatomias especiais. Neste cenário, propomos uma projeção angiográfica para a exposição da bifurcação do tronco da artéria coronária esquerda (TCE) quando o conjunto de projeções rotineiras previamente utilizadas foi ineficaz para exibir com clareza essa região. Pacientes e Métodos – 84 pacientes foram submetidos à projeção Lateral Direita (90-120°) associada a Cranial (30-40°). Estudo de reprodutibilidade, realizado com a participação de dois observadores independentes, julgou a eficácia da projeção proposta. O índice kappa, ajustado para a prevalência e viés (PABAK) com IC de 95%, foi utilizado para demonstrar a intensidade da concordância inter e intraobservador: ≤ 0,20 = ruim, 0,21 – 0,40 = fraca, 0,41 – 0,60 = moderada, 0,61 – 0,80 = substancial e 0,81 – 1,0 = quase perfeita. Resultados – A projeção proposta foi eficaz em 79% dos angiografias com concordância de 0,76 (0,6 – 0,9; P ≤ 0,001). A origem e o segmento proximal da artéria coronária descendente anterior foram expostos em 89% com concordância de 0,86 (0,7 – 1,0; P ≤ 0,001), a origem e o segmento proximal da artéria circunflexa foram expostos em 83% com concordância de 0,72 (0,5 – 1,0; p ≤ 0,001) e a origem e o segmento proximal do ramo intermediário, quando presente, foram expostos em 89% com concordância de 0,79 (0,6 – 1,0; p ≤ 0,001). Conclusão – A projeção proposta é eficaz, segura e reproduzível. Em situações especiais, onde projeções rotineiras falham, essa poderá exibir detalhes importantes da anatomia da bifurcação do TCE à cinecoronariografia ou ser a projeção de trabalho durante a intervenção coronariana percutânea. / Objectives – We propose a 90 – 120° right lateral with 30-40° cranial angiographic view to expose the bifurcation of the left main coronary artery (LMCA) when previously used routine projections were inefficient at clearly showing this region. Background – Little has been published in the medical literature regarding angiographic projections dedicated to special anatomies. Methods – A total of 84 patients were subjected to the proposed projections. A reproducibility study, conducted with the participation of two independent observers, judged the effectiveness of the proposed projection. The Prevalence and Bias Adjusted Kappa (PABAK) index, with a 95% confidence interval (CI), was used to demonstrate the intensity of intra- and inter-observer agreement: ≤ 0.20 = poor, 0.21 – 0.40 = slight, 0.41 – 0.60 = moderate, 0.61 – 0.80 = substantial and 0.81 – 1.0 = almost perfect. Results – The proposed projection was efficient in 79% of the angiograms, with agreement of 0.76 (0.6 – 0.9; P ≤ 0.001). The origin and the proximal segment of the anterior descending coronary artery were exposed in 89% of the angiograms, with agreement of 0.86 (0.7 – 1.0; P ≤ 0.001); the origin and the proximal segment of the circumflex artery were exposed in 83% of the angiograms, with agreement of 0.72 (0.5 – 1.0; P ≤ 0.001); and the origin and the proximal segment of the intermediate branch, when present, were exposed in 89% of the angiograms, with agreement of 0.79 (0.6 – 1.0; P ≤ 0.001). Conclusion – The proposed projection is effective, safe and reproducible. In special situations where routine projections fail, this proposed projection can reveal important details of the anatomy of the bifurcation of the LMCA during conventional / Tese (Doutorado)