Purpose: In patients with advanced oesophageal carcinoma palliation of dysphagia is important to maintaining a reasonable quality of life. The primary aim of this study was to determine the dysphagia progression-free survival (DPFS) in patients with advanced oesophageal carcinoma treated with palliative radiotherapy (RT). Methods: The medical records of all patients with oesophageal carcinoma presenting to Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town between January 2015-December 2016 were reviewed and patients who were not candidates for curative treatment and received palliative RT were selected. For these patients, the dysphagia score (DS) was recorded prior to RT, 6 weeks after RT and at each follow-up visit. The DPFS was calculated as the time from completion of RT to worsening in DS by ≥1 point or until death. Other outcomes measured were objective change in DS and survival post RT. Results: The study population comprised 84 patients. Squamous cell cancer was the primary histological subtype (93%). The median duration of DPFS after RT was 73 days, with approximately two-thirds of patients remaining able to swallow at least liquids and soft diet until death. The difference in median duration of DPFS was not statistically significant in stented versus non-stented patients (54 days vs 83 days; p =0.224). The mean change in DS was 0.45 ± 0.89 points following RT and the post RT survival was significantly shorter in patients with stent insertion (81 days vs 123 days; p=0.042). Conclusion: Palliative RT can be used successfully to prolong DPFS in patients with locally advanced and metastatic squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus.

Rectal cancer is the eight most common cancer diagnosis in Sweden in both men and women, with almost 2000 new cases per year. Radiotherapy, which is an important treatment modality for rectal cancer, has evolved during the past decades. Diagnostic tools have also improved, allowing better staging and offering information used to make well-founded decisions in multidisciplinary team conferences. In a retrospective study (n=46) with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients, unfit for chemoradiotherapy, patients were treated with short-course radiotherapy. Delayed surgery was done when possible. Radical surgery was possible in 89% of the patients who underwent surgery (80%). Grade IV diarrhoea affected three elderly patients. Target radiation volume should be reduced in elderly or metastatic patients. In a prospective study (n=68) with LARC patients, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 2-18F-fluoro-2-D-deoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) were used to determine if FDG-PET could provide extra treatment information. Information from FDG-PET changed the stage of 10 patients. Delineation with FDG-PET generally resulted in smaller target volumes than MRI only. Seven of the most advanced LARC patients in the above cohort were used for a methodological study to determine if dose escalation to peripheral, non-resectable regions was feasible. Simultaneous integrated boost plans with photons and protons were evaluated. While toxicity was acceptable in five patients with both protons and photons, two patients with very large tumours had unacceptable risk for intestinal toxicity regardless of modality. In the interim analysis of the Stockholm III Trial (n=303, studying radiotherapy-fractionation and timing of surgery in relation to radiotherapy) compliance was acceptable and severe acute toxicity was infrequent, irrespective of fractionation. Short-course radiotherapy with immediate surgery tended to give more postoperative complications, but only if surgery was delayed more than 10 days after the start of radiotherapy. Quality-of-life in the Stockholm III Trial was studied before, during and shortly after treatment using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and CR38 questionnaires. Surgery accounted for more adverse effects than radiotherapy in all groups. Postoperatively, the poorest quality-of-life was seen in patients given short-course radiotherapy followed by immediate surgery. No postoperative differences were seen between the two groups with delayed surgery.

Background: Breast cancer is the second most common cancer in adults and the most frequent cancer diagnosed in women. In South Africa, breast cancer accounts for 38.5% of cancers diagnosed in women. Since the presence, extent and location of distant metastases is one important prognostic factor in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), accurate staging at diagnosis is crucial to ensure patients receive the appropriate treatment. Increasing evidence shows that the use of 18F-FDG PET/CT for disease staging of LABC may improve diagnostic sensitivity. Aim: To prospectively assess the difference in diagnostic accuracy between whole-body PET/PET-CT and conventional imagine (CI) for staging LABC. Methods: A total of 42 participants with clinical stage III and a select few stage II breast cancer underwent both 18F-FDG PET/CT and CI. Results: 18F-FDG PET/CT found significantly more (p=0.0077) distant metastatic sites than CI (36% vs. 21%). 18F-FDG PET/CT upstaged 9 (21.4%) of patients from clinical stage IIIa to stage IIIc, and changed management of 54% of patients. Thirty-eight percent (38%) of the patients had their clinical stage unchanged. One of 5 suspected metastatic sites 18F FDG PET/CT was positive for malignancy on biopsy. Conclusion: The 18F-FDG PET/CT is useful for staging locally advanced non-inflammatory infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast. Use of 18F-FDG PET/CT was superior to conventional imaging in assessing metastatic mediastinal lymphadenopathy, but with a poor specificity. The use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in LABC is useful, with the biopsy of isolated suspicious lesions for metastasis increasing its accuracy.

Introduction: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. In Canada, in 2021 alone, an estimated 21,000 patients have died from this disease. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constitutes 85% of all lung cancer cases diagnosed. Over the past 30 years, treatment of unresected locally advanced (LA)-NSCLC evolved from treatment with chest radiotherapy (RT) alone to the current standard of care (SOC) of concurrent chemo-radiation (cCRT), followed by consolidative immunotherapy. Modern RT has influenced the survival of LA-NSCLC patients. In this work we analyzed data from provincial and local institutional databases to evaluate whether, i) the use of modern imaging with 18F-deoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET), ii) dose of chest RT to tumors and iii) unintentional irradiation of normal tissues during treatment for lung cancer, influence outcomes of patients managed with RT. Methodology: Ontario provincial databases were searched through the Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences (IC/ES) for stage III NSCLC patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2017. Surgical patients were excluded, and all patients that received RT with or without chemotherapy were selected. Patients were divided into groups of different RT doses (<40Gy, 40-55.9Gy, and ≥56Gy) and whether they underwent diagnostic FDG-PET. For the next study phase (the institutional level), we retrospectively identified and reviewed LA-NSCLC patients treated at local health integration network area 4 (LHIN4) cancer centres (Juravinski and Walker Family Cancer Centres) from 2009 to 2019. We selected patients treated in that period with chest RT > 40Gy with or without chemotherapy. Patients’ data were reviewed individually for disease characteristics, staging investigations, RT treatment parameters and survival outcomes. Dosimetric analysis was performed on both groups of patients (RT alone group and cCRT group). Results: The provincial analysis included 5,577 stage III patients who had received chest RT without surgery between January 2007 and March 2017. Within this group, 39.8% (2,225) received RT alone, 47.4% (2,645) received concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (cCRT), and 12.6% (707) received sequential chemo-radiotherapy (sCRT). Median overall survival (OS) with RT alone in three dose groups <40Gy, 40-55.9Gy, ≥ 56Gy was 7.2, 8.5 and 13.3 months compared to 16.5, 15.8 and 22 months for cCRT patients. Higher RT dose and PET utilization were independently associated with improved survival in multivariate analysis. At the institutional analysis, 84 patients were treated with RT alone, 184 with cCRT and patients with sequential CRT were excluded. In the RT alone group, the median, 1- and 3-year overall survival were 18.1 months, 64.4% and 24.3%, respectively. In comparison, the median, 1- and 3-year survival outcomes in the cCRT group were 36.3 months, 82.5%, and 50.4%, respectively. Additionally, 79.8% of patients in the radiation alone group and 95.1% in cCRT group had PET staging. In univariate analysis, the RT dose prescribed to the tumor and RT dose delivered to the heart were significantly associated with survival, while multivariate analysis only showed the significant association between RT dose to heart and overall survival. Conclusions: Our population-based analysis confirmed that radiation monotherapy remains a widely used treatment modality in LA-NSCLC. Higher RT doses and utilization of FDG-PET imaging are associated with improved survival in patients with unresected LA-NSCLC managed with RT. The institutional analysis suggests that in well-staged patients with LA-NSCLC, chest RT of ≥40Gy is associated with improved survival outcomes that compare favorably with historical results of definitive RT alone treatment. Further, survival of patients staged well with FDG-PET and treated with SOC cCRT was higher than historical reports. Importantly, in this study we found that RT dose delivered to the heart associates negatively with patient survival. These findings can help improve clinical decision-making in the management of unresected LA-NSCLC and can serve as basis for future clinical trials. / Thesis / Master of Science (MSc) / Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in Canada and worldwide. These tumors are present as two main histological types, small cell and non-small cell lung cancer, the latter of which consists the majority of the cases diagnosed. Although treatments with surgery or radiotherapy provide reasonable outcomes in lung cancer cases detected early, a high proportion of patients present with localized but advanced disease that is inoperable. Over the last three decades, treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer has evolved from radiation alone to chemoradiation and immunotherapy. These developments have increased the survival of these patients. In this thesis, we tried to dissect the elements that play roles in the survival of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients. To do this, we evaluated such patients at two levels. First, at the provincial level, we evaluated the type of treatments, and we explored the association of metabolic imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) and the use of high-dose chest radiotherapy with patient survival. Second, at the institutional level, we assessed patients’ outcomes with a more detailed approach. We analyzed the type of treatment along with a detailed dosimetric analysis. The results of our analysis suggest that the use of PET scans and curative radiotherapy is associated with improved survival. On the other hand, the unintentional treatment of the heart with increasing doses of radiotherapy, taking place during chest radiation for lung cancer, is associated with poor outcomes. These results provide a basis for further investigation to improve outcomes of radiotherapy in this disease.

Determinar o valor prognóstico e preditivo do VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) e do HIF-1? (Hypoxia-inducible factor-1) em relação à sobrevida livre de doença (SLD) e sobrevida global (SG) em pacientes com carcinoma de mama localmente avançado (CMLA) tratadas primariamente pela quimioterapia neoadjuvante. MATERIAIS E METODOS: VEGF e HIF foram quantificados consecutivamente em plasma de 36 pacientes com CMLA pelo método de ELISA (enzyme labeling immunoassay absorbant) para o VEGF165 e o HIF-1?. O tratamento neoadjuvante foi realizado em todas as pacientes com docetaxel e epirrubicina. O tempo médio de seguimento foi de 56 meses. RESULTADOS: Uma análise univariada demonstrou que o HIF-1? está significantemente relacionado à SLD (P =.0238) e à SG (P = .0121) com as pacientes HER-2 positivas. Não houve diferença significante para a SLD ou SG no que diz respeito aos receptores de hormônio, comprometimento axilar ou grau tumoral. Os valores de VEGF foram maiores no grupo de pacientes RE+ do que no grupo RE negativo (P =.01). Inversamente os valores de HIF-1? foram menores no grupo RE+ comparados ao grupo RE - (P =.02). Pacientes com recorrência óssea apresentaram uma tendência a apresentarem valores de VEGF menores (media, 175.7 pg/ml) do que aquelas com recorrência visceral (441 pg/ml). Uma análise multivariada demonstrou o comprometimento axilar (P =.0004), receptores de estrógeno (ER) (P < .0001), e tamanho do tumor (P = .0085) como fatores independentes de SLD. O HIF-1? foi tido como um fator independente preditivo de SG (P =.0180). Não houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre os valores plasmáticos de HIF-1? ou VEGF nos períodos pré e pós quimioterapia. CONCLUSÕES: Os resultados sugerem que o nível plasmático do HIF-1? é preditivo de SLD e SG nas pacientes com CMLA apresentando uma sobreposição as pacientes HER-2 positivas. As dosagens de VEGF podem ser preditivas de resposta e prognóstico no tratamento neoadjuvante, mas são necessários novos estudos prospectivos comparados ao HIF-1? para conclusões mais consistentes. / To determine the predictive and prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1?) for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) primarily submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: VEGF and HIF were quantitatively measured in plasma sample from 36 consecutive patients with LABC using an enzyme immunoassay for human VEGF165 and HIF-1?. Neoadjuvant treatment was given to all patients as docetaxel and epirrubicin. The follow-up median time was 56 months. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that HIF-1? is a significant predictor of RFS ( P = .0238) and OS (P = 0121) in HER-2 positive patients. No significant difference was seen in RFS or OS related to hormonal receptor, axillary status or tumoral grade. The VEGF level was higher in the group of patients who ER was positive than ER negative (P = .01). On the other hand, the HIF-1? level is higher in ER negative patients than ER positive ( P=.02). Patients with bone recurrences tended to have lower VEGF plasma level (median, 175.7 pg/ml) than patients with visceral metastasis (441 pg/ml). Multivariate analysis showed nodal status (P = .0004), estrogen receptor (ER) status (P < .0001), and tumor size (P = .0085) to be independent predictors of RFS. HIF-1? was found to be an independent predictor of OS (P = .0180). No statistically differences were observed related to pre and post chemotherapy period in HIF-1? or VEGF measurements. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that high level of plasma HIF-1? is associated to HER-2 over expression and they are major predictive factors of RFS and OS in LABC. VEGF content might also predict outcome after neoadjuvant treatment, however further studies in a prospective setting with HIF-1? homologous treatments are required.

Determinar o valor prognóstico e preditivo do VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) e do HIF-1? (Hypoxia-inducible factor-1) em relação à sobrevida livre de doença (SLD) e sobrevida global (SG) em pacientes com carcinoma de mama localmente avançado (CMLA) tratadas primariamente pela quimioterapia neoadjuvante. MATERIAIS E METODOS: VEGF e HIF foram quantificados consecutivamente em plasma de 36 pacientes com CMLA pelo método de ELISA (enzyme labeling immunoassay absorbant) para o VEGF165 e o HIF-1?. O tratamento neoadjuvante foi realizado em todas as pacientes com docetaxel e epirrubicina. O tempo médio de seguimento foi de 56 meses. RESULTADOS: Uma análise univariada demonstrou que o HIF-1? está significantemente relacionado à SLD (P =.0238) e à SG (P = .0121) com as pacientes HER-2 positivas. Não houve diferença significante para a SLD ou SG no que diz respeito aos receptores de hormônio, comprometimento axilar ou grau tumoral. Os valores de VEGF foram maiores no grupo de pacientes RE+ do que no grupo RE negativo (P =.01). Inversamente os valores de HIF-1? foram menores no grupo RE+ comparados ao grupo RE - (P =.02). Pacientes com recorrência óssea apresentaram uma tendência a apresentarem valores de VEGF menores (media, 175.7 pg/ml) do que aquelas com recorrência visceral (441 pg/ml). Uma análise multivariada demonstrou o comprometimento axilar (P =.0004), receptores de estrógeno (ER) (P < .0001), e tamanho do tumor (P = .0085) como fatores independentes de SLD. O HIF-1? foi tido como um fator independente preditivo de SG (P =.0180). Não houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre os valores plasmáticos de HIF-1? ou VEGF nos períodos pré e pós quimioterapia. CONCLUSÕES: Os resultados sugerem que o nível plasmático do HIF-1? é preditivo de SLD e SG nas pacientes com CMLA apresentando uma sobreposição as pacientes HER-2 positivas. As dosagens de VEGF podem ser preditivas de resposta e prognóstico no tratamento neoadjuvante, mas são necessários novos estudos prospectivos comparados ao HIF-1? para conclusões mais consistentes. / To determine the predictive and prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1?) for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) primarily submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: VEGF and HIF were quantitatively measured in plasma sample from 36 consecutive patients with LABC using an enzyme immunoassay for human VEGF165 and HIF-1?. Neoadjuvant treatment was given to all patients as docetaxel and epirrubicin. The follow-up median time was 56 months. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that HIF-1? is a significant predictor of RFS ( P = .0238) and OS (P = 0121) in HER-2 positive patients. No significant difference was seen in RFS or OS related to hormonal receptor, axillary status or tumoral grade. The VEGF level was higher in the group of patients who ER was positive than ER negative (P = .01). On the other hand, the HIF-1? level is higher in ER negative patients than ER positive ( P=.02). Patients with bone recurrences tended to have lower VEGF plasma level (median, 175.7 pg/ml) than patients with visceral metastasis (441 pg/ml). Multivariate analysis showed nodal status (P = .0004), estrogen receptor (ER) status (P < .0001), and tumor size (P = .0085) to be independent predictors of RFS. HIF-1? was found to be an independent predictor of OS (P = .0180). No statistically differences were observed related to pre and post chemotherapy period in HIF-1? or VEGF measurements. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that high level of plasma HIF-1? is associated to HER-2 over expression and they are major predictive factors of RFS and OS in LABC. VEGF content might also predict outcome after neoadjuvant treatment, however further studies in a prospective setting with HIF-1? homologous treatments are required.

Personalized treatment strategies for oncological patient management can improve outcomes of patient populations with heterogeneous treatment response. The implementation of such a concept requires the identification of biomarkers that can precisely predict treatment outcome. In the context of this thesis, we develop and validate biomarkers from multimodal imaging data for the outcome prediction after treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), using conventional feature-based radiomics and deep-learning (DL) based radiomics. For LARC patients, we identify promising radiomics signatures combining computed tomography (CT) and T2-weighted (T2-w) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with clinical parameters to predict tumour response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Further, the analyses of externally available radiomics models for LARC reveal a lack of reproducibility and the need for standardization of the radiomics process. For patients with GBM, we use postoperative [11C] methionine positron emission tomography (MET-PET) and gadolinium-enhanced T1-w MRI for the detection of the residual tumour status and to prognosticate time-to-recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS). We show that DL models built on MET-PET have an improved diagnostic and prognostic value as compared to MRI.

Background: Early efficacy outcome measures in rectal cancer after total neoadjuvant treatment are increasingly investigated. We examined the prognostic role of pathological complete response (pCR), tumor regression grading (TRG) and neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score for disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with rectal carcinoma treated within the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 randomized phase 2 trial. Methods: Distribution of pCR, TRG and NAR score was analyzed using the Pearson’s chi-squared test. Univariable analyses were performed using the log-rank test, stratified by treatment arm. Discrimination ability of non-pCR for DFS was assessed by analyzing the ROC curve as a function of time. Results: Of the 311 patients enrolled, 306 patients were evaluable (Arm A:156, ArmB:150). After a median follow-up of 43 months, the 3-year DFS was 73% in both groups (HR, 0.95, 95% CI, 0.63–1.45, p = 0.82). pCR tended to be higher in Arm B (17% vs. 25%, p = 0.086). In both treatment arms, pCR, TRG and NAR were significant prognostic factors for DFS, whereas survival in subgroups defined by pCR, TRG or NAR did not significantly differ between the treatment arms. The discrimination ability of non-pCR for DFS remained constant over time (C-Index 0.58) but was slightly better in Arm B (0.61 vs. 0.56). Conclusion: Although pCR, TRG and NAR were strong prognostic factors for DFS in the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial, their value in selecting one TNT approach over another could not be confirmed. Hence, the conclusion of a long-term survival benefit of one treatment arm based on early surrogate endpoints should be stated with caution.

No description available.

No description available.