The aim of this study is to examine the role of the Church of Sweden in the context of migrant integration in Sweden, drawing insights from its official website, www.svenskakyrkan.se, and the publication Framtiden bor hos oss: metoder och förhållningssätt i urbana mångfaldsförsamlingar i Svenska kyrkan. Employing qualitative content analysis and Håkon Lorentzen's four perceptions of integration, the investigation aims to elucidate the Church's stance on integration as reflected in the examined materials. The analysis reveals a multifaceted manifestation of the Church of Sweden's involvement in migrant integration, delineating five pivotal roles: an open church, a cooperating church, a conflict-bearing and conflict-resolving church, a supporting church, and a bridge-building church. Collectively, these roles signify the Church of Sweden's self-conceptualization regarding its primary function in the realm of migrant integration, characterized as a welfare church. Furthermore, the research indicates a substantial alignment between the Church of Sweden's perspective and Håkon Lorentzen's dual views on integration, namely "Integration through differentiation" and "Integration through social networks." The objective of this essay has been to contribute to the expansion of perspectives within the Church of Sweden and the field of integration. Despite its acknowledged limitations and restricted generalizability, the study aims to stimulate interest in the imperative continuation of research within this subject area.

The purpose of this essay is to show that what defines a hero is far more complicated than the prolific author and mythological expert Joseph Campbell would have one believe – in his view, heroic qualities stem from a certain type of chosen individual and reoccurring narrative motifs without taking social structures and masculinity into account. By analyzing the characters Beowulf and Odysseus through a filter, consisting of Campbells model of the “hero’s journey” along with perspectives provided by studies in the masculinity field done by Raewyn Connell and Jørgen Lorentzen together with Claes Ekenstam, this essay concludes, in short, the following: applying Campbells model of the hero does reveal several similarities between the two characters, though it ultimately fails to prove any deeper connection. The aspects brought into focus by utilizing different concepts of masculinity however, proved to be more enlightening, with the most notable conclusion that the various tests forced upon both Beowulf and Odysseus mirror Raewyn Connells concept of “the hegemonic masculinity”, which in essence means that the most elevated masculine qualities existing in the context of the book are also the same ones being targeted by the antagonistic forces present in the story.

This thesis is a queer masculinity reading of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s short story collection The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes (1894). The analysis focuses on the dissonances, tensions and queerness that reside within the text itself. This has been done from my problem statement: How is Sherlock Holmes and John Watson’s sexuality and masculinity portrayed within the boundary of the text? What is being said, what is hidden, and what is dealt with silently? To reveal these queer parts this analysis has been focused around five themes: the late Victorian male, the Woman, countertypes and decadence, the homosocial sphere and sexuality. The thesis has two major theoretical perspectives: masculinity theory, and queer theory. For the masculine analysis I have used Jørgen Lorentzen and Claes Ekenstam’s concept of manly/unmanly, character, and the citizen from the book Män i Norden: Manlighet och modernitet 1840-1940 and George L. Mosse’s countertype. For the queer theoretical I have used a queer resistant reading combined with Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick’s concept of homosexual panic, and Judith Butler’s gender melancholia. Professor Joseph A. Kestner’s Sherlock’s Men has guided the reading of the short story collection. This thesis aims at showing that the improbable might well reside within the text, not least in the relationship between the two main characters Holmes and Watson. At first glimpse this world of Holmes’s seems devoid of desire, but in a closer reading cracks appear. There are silences, and unnecessary explanations, which have little to do with the adventures themselves, not to mention silent looks, and the association with the domestic. These threaten to effeminize their masculinity, especially Holmes who is a bachelor and suffers from repeated nervousness. Disease of the nerves was associated with effeminacy and homosexuality during the Victorian era. Also, the relationship between Holmes and Watson do at times parody the heterosexual. It’s hard however to find any conclusive evidence of any sexuality in the text, least of all homoerotic, which is hardly surprising considering the forbidding laws that were in place.