No description available.

No description available.

Obesity is one of the major risk factors for neonate low birthweight among reproductive women. The purpose of this quantitative study was to examine the association between 3 categories of obese status (moderate, severe, and very severe) and low neonate birthweight and preterm birth among women ages 18 to 39 years at all socioeconomic levels. Secondary data were obtained from 141,859 women ages 18-39 years living in the United States who had participated in the 2012-2015 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. Social-ecological theory was used to guide the study, and binary logistic regression was used for the analyses adjusting for age, education, ethnicity, income, marital status, and race confounders. Without accounting for the confounders, moderate, severe, and very severe obesity were associated with preterm birth. However, after adjusting for confounders, the obese categories were no longer associated with preterm birth. The estimated prevalence of preterm birth was higher among moderate, severe, and very severe obesity categories combined (56 preterm births per 1,000 live births) than among normal weight women (43 preterm births per 1,000 live births). Women of moderate obesity had a 10% statistically significant higher odds (p = .046, OR = 1.095) of neonate low birthweight when compared with very severely obese women. Severely obese women were not associated with neonate low birthweight when compared to women with very severe obese status (p = 0.159, OR = 1.056). Findings may be used to promote healthy lifestyle changes that could reduce the prevalence of preterm birth among obese women.

No description available.

Technological advances in neonatal care have dramatically improved the survival and disability rates among low birthweight infants (LBW). One common factor associated with later problems among these babies is intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). A meta-analysis was conducted among LBW infants with and without IVH to determine developmental outcome. More than 450 studies were located. Only 125 studies met inclusion criteria. Mean effect sizes were computed by comparing the LBW group to either a fullterm children, LBW children scored worse in all areas except gross motor skills. Cognitive assessment was done commonly up to 6 years of age. LBW infants scored about 1/2 standard deviation below their comparison group. A positive linear trend was found for severity of IVH: those children without an IVH scored comparably to fullterm children, while those with severe bleeds were about one standard deviation behind. Assessment of academic skills was done with the 8- to 11-year olds. There was no information given on presence/severity of IVH. Very few assessments were done. On general academic measures, the LBW children scored about 1/2 standard deviation behind the comparison group. Over 80% of the language assessments were done at 15- to 38-months of age. LBW children tended to score 1/2 to 3/4 of a standard deviation below the comparison group. The severity of hemorrhage did not mediate these results. Fine motor assessments were performed on children 9 months to 11 years old. LBW children were about 2/3 of a standard deviation behind the comparison group. These skills were not affected by severity of IVH. Gross motor abilities were typically measured before the children were 24 months old. LBW children showed more deficits in this area than in any other: almost 90% of a standard deviation behind. Gross motor skills appear to be strongly impacted both by being low birthweight and by the severity of IVH. Results indicate that IVH is a mediating factor in outcome among LBW infants. More research needs to be conducted on these children when they are school age, so long-term effects of low birthweight can be determined.

Advances in medical technology have provided the mechanisms for sustaining life in premature and low-birthweight infants, resulting in the survival of more of these infants. Low-birthweight (LBW) and preterm infants are placed at risk by a number of medical complications, including intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). The outcome of low-birthweight infants with intraventricular hemorrhage has been the subject of a great deal of research and continues to be a much-discussed topic in the medical and psychological communities. As more data become available, it appears that more questions arise concerning the later neuodevelopmental and neuropsychological outcome of these infants. For this reason, research concerning the later status of infants born with intraventricular hemorrhage is needed. The purpose of this study was to determine if there are differences in cognitive and motor functioning among infants with intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), infants who were low birthweight (LBW), and normal-birthweight (NBW) infants. Forty-four subjects (10 with mild IVH, 9 with severe IVH, 12 LBW, and 13 NBW), who were born between January 1, 1984, and June 1, 1985, and were either patients in the neonatal intensive care unit at University of Utah Medical Center (the IVH and LBW infants) or were residents of the well-baby nursery (the NBW infants) at University of Utah Medical Center, served as the sample population. The subjects were tested at 3 to 4.5 years of age using the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales (Fourth Edition) and the motor section of the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities. In addition, infant medical data were obtained from medical records, and demographic data were collected including mother's age at time of birth, family income, mother's and father's education level, and birth order of the infant. The MIVH, SIVH, and LBW groups had significantly lower gestational ages and birthweights and significantly more medical complications than did the NBW group. The MIVH and SIVH groups also had significantly lower birthweight and gestational ages than did the LBW group, but approximately equivalent numbers of medical complications. Significant group differences were found only between the MIVH and NBW groups on the McCarthy motor score, with the MIVH group appearing to outperform the NBW group following statistical manipulation with analysis of covariance. No other significant group differences were found. Further research with a larger sample is recommended in order to more fully understand the later outcome following LBW and IVH.

Establishment of risk factors, and mechanisms involved in preterm (premature) birth is important for society. Despite efforts to find the cause(s), a significant proportion of preterm birth is of unknown aetiology. Maternal infection has been implicated and oral infection in the form of periodontal (gum) disease has also been suggested as a risk factor for preterm birth (OPenbacher et at, 1996). The aim of this study was to examine the possible relationship between maternal periodontal disease and the delivery of preterm infants with associated low birthweight in East London. This was an unmatched case-control study with 187 cases (mothers whose infant weighed < 2500g, gestational age < 37 weeks (preterm low birthwieght (PLBW)), and 532 controls (mothers whose infant weighed z 2500g, gestational age z 37 weeks). Risk factor information for prematurity and low birthweight were collected from Maternity notes and a structured questionnaire. Maternal periodontal disease levels were measured by: Community Periodontal Index, periodontal probing pocket depths and a bleeding index. Analysis was by logistic regression. The study population was derived from a multiethnic inner city population the predominant groups being Bangladeshi (51.9%) and white Caucasian (25.9%). No differences were found between the periodontal status of the case and control mothers for any of the periodontal indices. The risk for PLBW decreased significantly (p=0.02) with increasing mean periodontal probing pocket depth (crude OR 0.83[95% CI 0.68, 1.00]). After controlling for pre-pregnancy hypertension, smoking, alcohol consumption, maternal age, ethnic group and mother's education this risk decreased further (OR 0.78[95% CI 0.63, 0.96]). No evidence was found for increased risk of PLBW with maternal periodontal disease as measured in this study population. Promotion of oral health by healthcare workers is important, but these results did not support a specific drive to improve the periodontal health of pregnant women as a means of decreasing adverse pregnancy outcomes.

<p>Adverse birth outcomes like preterm birth and infant mortality are unevenly distributed across socio-economic groups. Risks are usually lowest in groups with high socio-economic status and increase with decreasing status.</p><p>The general aim of this thesis was to contribute to the understanding of the relation between socio-economic status and birth outcomes, focussing on maternal education and class, studying a range of birth outcomes. More specific aims were to investigate the relation between maternal education and infant health, to study the combined influence of maternal childhood and adult social class on inequalities in infant health and to explore the contribution of maternal working conditions to class inequalities in birth outcomes. The studies are population based, focussing on singletons births 1973-1990. During the period under study, educational differences in birth outcomes increased, especially between those with the lowest and highest education. The low birth weight paradox emerged, suggesting that the distribution of determinants for low birthweight infants differs for these groups.</p><p>Further, an independent association was found between maternal childhood social class and low birthweight and neonatal mortality, but not for postneonatal mortality. Since this was found for the two outcomes closest to birth, this indicates that the association is mediated through the maternal body.</p><p>Finally, there is a contribution of maternal working conditions to class inequalities in birth outcome. Lower job control, higher job hazards and higher physical demands were all to some degree related to increased risk of the following adverse birth outcomes: infant mortality, low birthweight, very low birthweight, foetal growth, preterm birth, very and extremely preterm birth. Working conditions demonstrated disparate associations with the birth outcomes, indicating a high complexity in these relationships.</p>

Adverse birth outcomes like preterm birth and infant mortality are unevenly distributed across socio-economic groups. Risks are usually lowest in groups with high socio-economic status and increase with decreasing status. The general aim of this thesis was to contribute to the understanding of the relation between socio-economic status and birth outcomes, focussing on maternal education and class, studying a range of birth outcomes. More specific aims were to investigate the relation between maternal education and infant health, to study the combined influence of maternal childhood and adult social class on inequalities in infant health and to explore the contribution of maternal working conditions to class inequalities in birth outcomes. The studies are population based, focussing on singletons births 1973-1990. During the period under study, educational differences in birth outcomes increased, especially between those with the lowest and highest education. The low birth weight paradox emerged, suggesting that the distribution of determinants for low birthweight infants differs for these groups. Further, an independent association was found between maternal childhood social class and low birthweight and neonatal mortality, but not for postneonatal mortality. Since this was found for the two outcomes closest to birth, this indicates that the association is mediated through the maternal body. Finally, there is a contribution of maternal working conditions to class inequalities in birth outcome. Lower job control, higher job hazards and higher physical demands were all to some degree related to increased risk of the following adverse birth outcomes: infant mortality, low birthweight, very low birthweight, foetal growth, preterm birth, very and extremely preterm birth. Working conditions demonstrated disparate associations with the birth outcomes, indicating a high complexity in these relationships.

Background: Some studies have suggested that the risk of preeclampsia in HIV positive pregnant women has increased since the use of HAART became routine. There is also a concern that HIV positive women on HAART have a higher risk of adverse fetal outcomes compared to HIV negative women. Methods: In this matched retrospective cohort study, the risk of preeclampsia and adverse fetal outcomes was examined in 91 HIV positive pregnant women receiving HAART and 273 HIV negative pregnant women. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to adjust for confounding factors. Results: The risk of preeclampsia and preterm birth did not differ significantly between HIV positive and HIV negative women. HIV treated with HAART was an independent predictor for giving birth to a low birthweight baby. Conclusions: HIV positive women on HAART do not have a higher risk of preeclampsia. They do however have a higher risk for lower birthweight infants.