Thesis (M.Tech.: Chiropractic)-Durban University of Technology, 2008 / To evaluate the lumbar lordosis, lumbosacral angle, lumbosacral disc angle, lumbosacral lordosis angle, intervertebral disc angles and heights, interpedicular distances, sagittal canal diameters and the lumbar gravity line (selected radiographic parameters) in young to middle aged Indian females in Durban. To determine any association between the selected radiographic parameters and the age of the subjects, weight, height and body mass index of the subjects, occupation, smoking, previous pregnancy and leg length inequality (selected anthropometric and demographic factors). Methods: Sixty healthy, asymptomatic, young to middle aged, Indian females were recruited for this study. All subjects underwent a case history, a physical examination and radiographic evaluation (AP and lateral views) of the lumbar spine. SPSS version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill, USA) was used to analyze the data. Results: The mean (± SD) of the lumbar lordosis, lumbosacral angle, lumbosacral disc angle and lumbosacral lordosis angle was 49º (± 6º), 39º (± 8º), 12º (± 5º) and 143.2º (± 5º) respectively. For the lumbar intervertebral disc angles at L1-L2, L2-L3, L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5- S1 levels, the mean (± SD) was 6º (± 2º), 8º (± 2º), 10º (± 3º), 12º (± 4º) and 12º (± 5º) respectively. The anterior and posterior intervertebral disc heights at the respective vertebral levels were: L1-L2: anterior: 8 mm (± 2), posterior 5 mm (± 2); L2-L3: anterior: 10 mm (± 2), posterior 5 mm (± 2); L3-L4: anterior: 12 mm (± 2), posterior 5 mm (± 2); L4-L5: anterior: 14 mm (± 3), posterior 5 mm (± 2) and L5-S1: anterior: 13 mm (± 4), posterior 6 mm (± 2). The mean (± SD) of the interpedicular distance at the L1, L2, L3, L4 and L5 vertebral levels was 23 mm (± 2), 24 mm (± 2), 25 mm (± 2), 27 mm (± 2) and 31 mm (± 3) respectively. For the sagittal canal diameter at the L1, L2, L3, L4 and L5 vertebral levels, the mean (± SD) was 20 mm (± 5), 21 mm (± 3), 21 mm (± 3), 21 mm (± 3) and 19 mm (± 3) respectively. The lumbar gravity line intersected the sacrum in 67.3% of the subjects. In 29.1% of the subjects, the lumbar gravity line passed anterior to the sacrum while in 3.6% of the subjects, it passed posterior to the sacrum. iv A significant association was found between lumbar lordosis and the height of the subjects in this study (p = 0.004). A decrease in the intervertebral disc height at L5-S1 was associated with smoking (p = 0.005). A decrease in the intervertebral disc height at L4-L5 was associated with previous pregnancy (p = 0.016). Body mass index of 26–30 kg.m-2 was significantly associated with an increase in the intervertebral disc angles at L3-L4 (p = 0.028) and L4-L5 (p = 0.031). A decrease in the L5-S1 intervertebral disc angle was also significantly associated with smoking (p = 0.023). There was a significant association between previous pregnancy and an increase in the intervertebral disc angle at L3-L4 (p = 0.016). A significant association was found between the age of the subjects and the L5-S1 intervertebral disc angle (p = 0.007). Specifically it was the 23–27 year group and 33–37 year group who were significantly different from each other (p = 0.033). Conclusion: Similarities and differences were found in the mean values of the radiographic parameters measured in this study and those reported in the literature. A number of the selected anthropometric and demographic factors were associated with some of the lumbar radiographic parameters. Further studies are required to establish the clinical significance of these findings.

[Truncated abstract] There have been few studies into the effects of rehabilitation following lumbar microdiscectomy and consequently little evidence of its effect, if any, on outcome. Most studies cited fall into one of two categories: research involving a spinal surgery procedure without rehabilitation, or research involving spinal surgery with a nonspecific generic 'rehabilitation' or 'physical therapy'. In an era of evidence based medicine the efficacy of specific rehabilitation protocols following defined lumbar spine surgical procedures needs to be established for surgeons, therapists and patients to have confidence that the rehabilitation is appropriate and effective. The study was proposed to investigate the outcome of a specific and novel rehabilitation protocol commenced immediately after lumbar microdiscectomy. Data collected from the research cohort were compared to data collected from a contrast group who underwent standard rehabilitation at a distant site. A retrospective study (Phase One) was carried out with a cohort of post-operative microdiscectomy patients between February 2000 and December 2002. The outcome of surgery followed by the rehabilitation protocol was assessed using validated outcome instruments. A contrast or control group was not included. After reviewing the data limitations with the design and implementation of the study were identified. A prospective study (Phase Two) was proposed and changes made in the principal outcome measure used, in the demographic data to be retrieved, the addition of pain scales, and in the exclusion of compensable patients. A contrast group was included for the prospective study. ... The study group commenced exercise and posture correction the day following surgery. There were restrictions placed on activity involving bending. The contrast group followed the advice of the surgeon in Queensland and attended rehabilitation at local physiotherapy facilities. Both groups were followed for 12 months using outcome instruments. Strict comparison between WA and QLD cohorts were limited due to sample size, however trends were observed. Data of the prospective study showed that there was greater reduction in back pain with the early rehabilitation protocol (P<.0001) compared to standard rehabilitation (P=.09), while there was no difference between groups in leg pain. There was a significant improvement in the level of functional disability between time-points for the WA cohort, and overall change from pre-operative RMQ measures to 12 months in both groups were statistically significant. The WA group was less reliant on pain medication and was more satisfied with the results of their surgery. The primary hypothesis of this study that there would be a difference in outcome following lumbar microdiscectomy in patients who receive early specific rehabilitation compared to those who receive standard rehabilitation at another centre, was supported in both primary and secondary outcome data. The key finding of this study was that commencing the early exercise protocol resulted in significantly less back pain over the 12 month time period of the study. Other major findings were that the WA cohort demonstrated significant improvement in function at all time-points and between all time-points except six to 12 months, took less pain medication and were more satisfied with the outcome of their surgery than the QLD cohort.

Bibliography: leaves 102-116. / 116, [43] leaves, [51] leaves of plates : ill. (some col.) ; 30 cm. / Title page, contents and abstract only. The complete thesis in print form is available from the University Library. / Analyses the characteristics and relative incidence of annular defects in the human lumbar spine and investigates their role in the pathogenesis of invertebral disc degeneration. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Adelaide, Dept. of Pathology, 1992

Submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master’s Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, 2017. / Radiographs are the most commonly used modalities for the purpose of diagnosing skeletal disorders. Radiographs are important for chiropractors to exclude any contra-indications prior to spinal manipulative therapy. If contra-indications are found treatment is modified to what best suits each patient. There is a gap in the literature regarding chiropractors reading the same set of radiographs and agreeing on findings. Objectives The study investigated inter- and intra-examiner reliability of lumbar spine radiograph analysis by chiropractors and its impact on clinical management. Methods Inter- and intra-examiner examination of radiographs occurred in two rounds separated by two weeks. Six chiropractors read the same 30 radiographs and clinical history was only available in the second round. Results Inter-observer agreement for categorisation for Round One was 96.78% and Round Two 89.49%. Inter-observer agreement in management was 96.45% in round one and 96.00% in Round two. Agreement between chiropractors had no statistically significant difference. Identification average improved from 0.09 to 0.89 kappa. Overall specificity was relatively high and sensitivity was relatively low. Conclusion Reliability/Agreement between chiropractors was strong in both rounds. Categorising of the diagnosis improved from poor to substantial from Round One to Round Two. Case history improved the accuracy of interpreting the radiographs although this change was not statistically significant. / M

No description available.

No description available.

Thesis (M.Tech.: Chiropractic) -Dept. of Chiropractic, Technikon Natal, 2002 1 v. (various pagings) / The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of wearing a scuba diving cylinder on static lumbar spine posture, in terms of clinical objective findings, namely radiographic changes in the lumbar lordosis, lumbosacral angle, lumbosacral disc angle, and the lumbar gravity line, during upright standing on land.

Thesis (M.Tech.: Chiropractic)- Dept. of Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, 2008. x, 52 leaves, Appendices A-E, [25] leaves. / To determine whether a relationship exists between core stability and bowling speed in Action Cricket bowlers. Methods: Thirty asymptomatic indoor Action Cricket fast and fast-medium bowlers were divided into two groups of 15 each, with Group A having well-developed core stability and group B having poorly-developed core stability. The concept of matched pairs was used for age and cricket experience in order to maintain homogeneity between the groups. The core stability and bowling speed of each participant was measured using a pressure biofeedback unit (PBU) and speed sports radar respectively. SPSS version 15.0 was used to analyse the data.

El Síndrome de Dolor Lumbar (SDL) es actualmente uno de los síndromes más prevalentes en la población mundial. La Hernia del Núcleo Pulposo lumbar, una de las causas específicas de este síndrome, ha sido incluida dentro del Régimen de Garantías Explícitas en Salud (GES) en nuestro país. Esta investigación tuvo como objetivo describir el estado del dolor, la funcionalidad y la calidad de vida en pacientes beneficiarios del plan GES que reciben tratamiento quirúrgico para Hernia del Núcleo Pulposo lumbar en relación al estado previo a la cirugía. En este estudio, de tipo longitudinal panel, se evaluaron 31 pacientes, 18 hombres y 13 mujeres, operados en el Instituto Traumatológico durante el año 2011, un día previo a la cirugía, y 6 a 7 semanas posterior a ésta. La medición de las variables dolor, funcionalidad y calidad de vida se realizó a través de los instrumentos Escala Visual Análoga (EVA), Cuestionario de discapacidad de Oswestry, y Cuestionario de salud SF-36 v.2, respectivamente. Las variables fueron analizadas mediante estadística descriptiva entre ellas mínimo, máximo, media y porcentaje. Dentro de los resultados obtenidos en calidad de vida se encontró una variación de 49,9% para el Componente de Salud de Física y de 40,3% para el Componente de Salud Mental. En relación al dolor, este tuvo un promedio de disminución de 52,2%. En cuanto a la funcionalidad, el porcentaje de incapacidad tuvo una variación promedio de 64,2%. Después de la intervención quirúrgica, un 90,3% de la población presentó una disminución del dolor; un 84% presentó aumento de la funcionalidad y un 77% de los pacientes presentó aumento de la calidad de vida, con incremento de ambos componentes. El porcentaje de éxito de la cirugía en relación a la resolución de la sintomatología dolorosa registrado en la investigación coincidió con los datos mostrados por la literatura. / Lumbar Pain Syndrome (SDL) is currently one of the most prevalent syndromes in the global population. The herniated lumbar Nucleus Pulposus, one of the specific causes of this syndrome, has been included in the Regime of Explicit Guarantees in Health (GES) in our country. This study aimed to describe the condition of pain, function and quality of life in patients beneficiaries of GES plan receiving surgical treatment for lumbar herniated Nucleus Pulposus regarding the status prior to surgery. In this study, longitudinal panel type, 31 patients were evaluated, 18 men and 13 women who were operated at the Trauma Institute during the year 2011. They were assessed one day prior to the surgery and 6 to 7 weeks after this. The variables measuring pain, function and quality of life was performed using the instruments Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, and Health Questionnaire SF-36 v.2, respectively. The variables were analyzed through descriptive statistics including minimum, maximum, mean and percentage. Among the results of quality of life a variation of 49.9% was found for the Physical Health Component and 40.3% for the Mental Health Component. In relation to pain, an average of 52.2% decreased. In terms of functionality, the percentage of disability had an average variation of 64.2%. After surgery, 90.3% of the population showed a decrease in pain, a 84% increased functionality and 77% of patients improved the quality of life with an increase of both components. The success rate of surgery in relation to resolution of pain symptoms reported in the research coincided with the data shown in the literature.

Esta pesquisa teve como principal objetivo, validar o teste de flexibilidade da coluna lombar (Testprop), utilizando-se da radiografia como teste critério e o teste flexibilidade da coluna lombar de ADRICHEM e KORST (1973) para o sexo feminino e masculino. Participaram 19 mulheres (média de idade= 23,2 anos e desvio padrão= 1,3) e 18 homens (média de idade= 22,3 anos e desvio padrão= 1,4), universitários, saudáveis e ativos do Curso de Educação Física e Ciências do Esporte da Universidade Estadual de Londrina - PR. Inicialmente, verificou-se a fidedignidade e objetividade dos testes de flexibilidade da coluna lombar (Testprop e Testeips). O coeficiente de correlação intraclasse mostrou que o teste de flexibilidade Testprop apresenta fidedignidade elevada para o sexo feminino (R= 0,86) e elevada para o sexo masculino (R=0,85), e demonstrou haver objetividade moderada (R= 0,73) para o sexo feminino e elevada (R= 0,96) para o sexo masculino. Quanto ao teste de flexibilidade Testeips, a fidedignidade foi elevada (R= 0,85) e (R= 0,86) para o sexo feminino e masculino, respectivamente. A objetividade do teste de flexibilidade Testeips foi moderada (R= 0,62) para o sexo feminino e elevada para o sexo masculino (R= 0,91). Em relação à validade, o coeficiente de correlação de Pearson mostrou correlação baixa para o teste de flexibilidade Testprop (r= 0,11) para o sexo feminino e correlação moderada (r= 0,52) para o sexo masculino. No que diz respeito ao teste de flexibilidade Testeips, o coeficiente de correlação de Pearson foi baixo para o sexo feminino (r= 0,24) e moderado para o sexo masculino (r= 0,50). Concluiu-se que os testes de flexibilidade da coluna lombar Testprop e Testeips foram fidedignos e objetivos, mas não foram considerados válidos. / The main goal was to validate the flexibility test for the lumbar spine (Testprop), using x-ray as a criteria and the flexibility test of the lumbar spine designed by ADRICHEM and KORST (1973) for females and males, 19 women participated (mean age= 23,2 years old; standard deviation= 1,3 year old) and 18 men (mean= 22,3 year old and standard deviation = 1,4) healthy and active students from the Physical Education and Sport Science Course at the Universidade Estadual de Londrina-PR. Initially, it was verified reliability and objectivity (Testprop and Testeips) the lumbar spine flexibility. The intraclass correlation coefficient showed that the reliability of test of flexibility Testprop was high for woman (R= 0.86) and high for men (R= 0.85), there was a moderate objectivity (R= 0.73) for women and high (R= 0.96) for men. Concerning the flexibility test Testeips, the reliability was high (R= 0.85) and (R= 0.86) for woman and men, respectively. The objectivity for the flexibility test Testeips was moderate (R= 0.62) for women and high for men (R= 0.91). Concerning the validity, Pearson correlation coeficient demonstrated a low correlation for the flexibility test Testprop (r= 0.11) for women and moderate for men (r= 0.52). About the flexibility test, Testeips, Pearson correlation coefficient was low for woman (r= 0.24) and moderate for men (r= 0.50). It was concluded that the flexibility tests of the lumbar spine Testprop and Testeips were reliable and objective, but they were not considered valid.