Dynamic managerial capabilities are frequently viewed as a source of influence among decision-making managers within environments of volatility. Conversely, managers postulate that decision-making in rapidly changing environments is never perfect and faces a variety of influencing factors. In addition, industries represent a collection of firms that produce similar goods or services for a particular market. This recipe is often recognized by all industry related firms and adapted accordingly. Similarly, firms comprised as “incumbents” and “challengers” are firms that are well established in the industry and firms that seek to change the industry. Recognizing which influencers affect the managerial decision-making process is necessary to adapt and evolve a firm’s decision-making logic. This thesis presents a detailed study of the Hollywood Film Industry Recipe as it relates to the influencing factors within the green lighting process of feature films among incumbent and challenger studios. An inductive research approach is used to investigate four case studies throughout the Hollywood Film Industry. Two case studies are recognized as industry incumbents while the other two are recognized as industry challengers. The analysis identifies an industry recipe, firm adopted industry and adaptations, and dynamic managerial capabilities utilized through the influence of the process. In addition, an illustration of the industry recipes influence dynamic managerial capabilities adopted by firms. Findings suggest that dynamic managerial capabilities is an output of industry recipes adopted amongst firms, and that refinement of those capabilities is a circular renewal process between managerial judgement and firm/managerial dominant logics. In addition, industry recipes influence the way in which dynamic managerial capabilities are acquired, processed, and absorbed. This study contributes to the field of strategy as it suggests a coherent framework that illustrates how industry recipes influence incumbent and challenger studios within a given industry. Additionally, it also demonstrates how dynamic managerial capabilities are formed and structured based on the adopted industry recipe. Finally, it outlines how decisions are made by managers within incumbent and challenger firms, highlighting a circular process of decision-making with regards to the creation an distribution of an industry related product.

Les micro-entreprises domestiques constituent une part importante, si ce n'est dominante, de toutes les économies en développement. C’est aussi le cas au Vietnam où le poids du secteur informel diminue peu malgré une croissance économique rapide. Les quatre chapitres de ce travail posent quatre questions fondamentales pour informer les politiques publiques. Leur originalité est d'adopter le point de vue des entreprises informelles elles-mêmes. Quels bénéfices y a-t-il à rejoindre le secteur formel (chapitre 1)? Quelle est la vulnérabilité de ces unités de production, dont le budget est souvent confondu avec celui du ménages, aux chocs de santé (chapitre 2) ? L’assurance santé permet-elle de réduire efficacement cette vulnérabilité (chapitre 3) ? Enfin, quelle est l’importance du mode de gestion de ces micro-entreprises (chapitre 4) ? Tous les chapitres s’appuient en premier lieu sur des données d’enquêtes quantitatives, de première ou seconde main. L’approche quantitative est complétée par des enquêtes qualitatives. Les résultats dressent le portrait d’un secteur dynamique, dont la persistance ne peut être ignorée, et suggèrent des mécanismes pour améliorer la productivité de ces entreprises qui opèrent dans des conditions largement précaires. / This PhD dissertation is built around four main chapters. Their topic shall sound familiar to policy makers, and to all empirical economists working on microenterprises, as they quesion the common mottos to deal with the informal sector: “formalize them”, “protect them”, and “train them”. Little of these recommendations rely on actual evidence, in particular regarding their effects for the firms themselves. Chapter one starts by questioning the relevance of formalization: what exactly do these production units have to gain from registration? The second chapter investigates the vulnerability of microenterprises to health problems: how much do they suffer from the consequences of health shocks within the household? The third chapter deals with the complementary question of the protection mechanisms, and questions the mitigating potential of health insurance. The fourth chapter finally deals with their managerial capital: do the business skills that are considered standard among larger firms have any meaning for informal micro enterprises?