Safety-shaped median barriers have long been employed to keep misguided vehicles on the roadway. In recent years there has been a growing national desire for more aesthetically pleasing roadside safety systems. Adding surface texture is one of the most popular ways to make a more aesthetically pleasing barrier. This practice of adding surface texture can potentially reduce the safety performance of the barrier. The purpose of this research was to develop guidelines for the aesthetic surface treatment of safety-shaped median barriers. Numerical simulation was utilized to develop these guidelines. This was done by first validating the vehicle model that was used in this research, which was the National Crash Analysis Center (NCAC) 2000P Detailed Pickup Truck model. The validity of the vehicle model could be determined by comparing the vehicle dynamics of the simulation to the actual crash test data for the smooth surfaced Single Slope and New Jersey Safety-Shaped barriers. Crash tests involving concrete median barriers most commonly fail crash testing criteria given by the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350 by excessive Occupant Compartment Deformation (OCD). OCD is excessive deformation of the occupant compartment that would cause severe harm to the occupant. Current simulation vehicle models do not give reliable direct measurement of OCD. To take the place of direct measurement, several parameters were measured to find the best surrogate measure of OCD. The internal energy of the floorboard in the NCAC 2000P Detailed Pickup Truck model gave the best correlation to OCD. By simulating several different past crash tests with passing and failing OCD, limits of internal energy in the floorboard could determine if a simulation had passing, marginal, or failing amounts of OCD. Using the surrogate measure of OCD a parametric study was then evaluated by NCHRP Report 350 standards. The parametric study of 29 simulations varied width and depth of recess between asperities for two different angles of asperities. Guidelines were determined for the 45? and 90? angles of asperities as a curve on depth vs. width of recess between asperities from the results of this parametric study.

No description available.

Sedan år 1998 har det i Nollvisionens fotspår startats ett utvecklingsprogram i Sverige som syftar till att omvandla gamla 13 meters landsvägar och motortrafikleder till mötesfria. Implementeringen var tänkt att påtagligt reducera antalet mötes- och omkörningsolyckor samt singelolyckor med svåra konsekvenser i form av svårt skadade och dödade utan att försämra trafiksäkerheten i övrigt. Syftet med denna studie är att göra en effektmätning av de mötesfria vägarnas införande i Karlstadsregionen samt att göra en sammanställning av de olycksrisker mötesfria vägar omfattas av. Frågeställningarna som används i studien är: - Har det blivit säkrare på vägarna sedan implementeringen av mötesfria vägar i Karlstadsregionen? - Hur sker olyckor på mötesfria vägar inom Karlstadsregionen?  För att beskriva hur olyckor sker på mötesfria vägar inom Karlstadsregionen har en deskriptiv analys tillämpats som grundats på de beskrivningar av händelseförlopp som dokumenterats i STRADA och CORE, mellan åren 2010-2013. För att avgöra huruvida vägarna blivit säkrare sedan implementering tillämpades en segmenterad linjär regressionsanalys där antalet personskadeolyckor studerats, tre år innan och tre år efter ombyggnad för respektive vägavsnitt. Singel- och upphinnandeolyckor var de dominerande olyckstyperna på mötesfria vägar i Karlstadsregionen mellan åren 2010-2013 då de sammanlagt stod för 72,3% av samtliga olyckor som medfört skada. Vid kategoriseringen av huvudorsak till olycka framgick det att 42% av alla olyckor kan spåras till brister i samspel mellan trafikanter och väderförhållanden bedömdes i 24,1% av fallen vara huvudorsak till olycka. Den statistiska analysen var inte signifikant, men gav indikation på att vägarna blivit säkrare sedan implementering då trenden för samtliga skadade minskat. / In the footsteps of Vision Zero, a development program in Sweden was initiated in 1998. The program aimed to increase road safety on existing 13-meter roads and express roads by implementing median barriers. The purpose of this study is to measure the impact of the transformed roadways in the Karlstad region and to examine the different types of accident risks the roadways are covered by. The research questions used are: - Has the implementation of median barriers in the Karlstad region contributed to safer roads? - How do accidents occur on roads with median barriers? To describe how accidents occur on roads with median barriers in Karlstad region a descriptive analysis was made by the description of event that is documented in STRADA and CORE, between the years 2010-2013. To determine whether the roads became safer after implementation a segmented linear regression analysis was applied. Accidents resulting in injury were examined, three years before and three years after reconstruction for each road section. Single-vehicle accidents and rear-end collisions were the dominating accident types on roadways with median barriers in the Karlstad region between the years 2010-2013. They together accounted for 72,3% of all accidents that resulted in injury. When the main cause of accident was examined, it emerged that 42% of all accidents could be traced to deficiencies in the interaction between road users. Weather conditions were estimated to be the main cause of accident in 24,1% of all the studied cases. The statistical analysis was not significant, but indicated that the roads became safer after the implementation since the observed trend for all types of injured decreased.