No description available.

Submitted by Odilio Hilario Moreira Júnior (odilio@espm.br) on 2016-11-29T13:38:15Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Gabriel Vouga Chueke.pdf: 825689 bytes, checksum: 64d1ae02b5330a8522c1bc2c76a53cd8 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Odilio Hilario Moreira Júnior (odilio@espm.br) on 2016-11-29T13:38:46Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Gabriel Vouga Chueke.pdf: 825689 bytes, checksum: 64d1ae02b5330a8522c1bc2c76a53cd8 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Debora Cristina Bonfim Aquarone (deborabonfim@espm.br) on 2016-11-29T13:51:55Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Gabriel Vouga Chueke.pdf: 825689 bytes, checksum: 64d1ae02b5330a8522c1bc2c76a53cd8 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-11-29T13:52:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Gabriel Vouga Chueke.pdf: 825689 bytes, checksum: 64d1ae02b5330a8522c1bc2c76a53cd8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-03-30 / The purpose of this master thesis is to identify the factors influencing Brazilian multinationals enterprises‟ choice between acquisition and Greenfield investment - establishment mode choice. To reach this goal, we proposed a multilevel framework to investigate the relationship of firm, industry and host country (formal and informal institutions) factors on the establishment mode choice. The concepts behind the framework come from the Transaction Cost Theory and Institutional Theory. The methodology adopted is quantitative with an exploratory approach. Different sources of information are used to compose the database. For the analysis, we used the multivariate technique of binomial logistic regression. The sample of the study is composed of 129 Brazilians subsidiaries in 30 countries. The results show that formal and informal institutions have a different relationship regarding the entry mode strategy. Moreover, the results suggest a possible association between entry by acquisition, and factors related to the firm-level and formal institution. The Greenfield investments should be related with informal institution and the industry-level factors. / O objetivo desta dissertação consiste em identificar os fatores que influenciam na escolha dos establishment mode choice - escolha entre ingressar no exterior por meio de aquisições e investimentos greenfield. Para o alcance deste objetivo foi elaborado um modelo analítico multinível, que buscou identificar a influência dos fatores associados à firma, à indústria e ao país-anfitrião nesse processo de escolha estratégica. A elaboração do modelo analítico teve como base a adoção de conceitos pertencentes à Teoria dos Custos de Transação e à Teoria Institucional. Como metodologia de pesquisa adotou-se a abordagem quantitativa-descritiva, de caráter exploratório. Os dados do estudo foram coletados através de diversas fontes secundárias e analisados através da técnica estatística multivariada de regressão binomial logística. A amostra do estudo foi composta por 129 subsidiárias de empresas brasileiras presentes em 30 países. Os resultados da investigação indicam que as instituições formais e informais poderiam estar relacionadas, de diferentes formas, com o modo de entrada escolhido pelas multinacionais brasileiras. Além disso, sugerem que existiria uma possível associação entre a entrada por meio de aquisição e os fatores relacionados à firma e às instituições formais. E, que os investimentos greenfield estariam associados às instituições informais e ao setor de atuação da firma.

La cession de créance est un mécanisme consacré tant en droit commun français qu’en droit commun colombien. Conformément à l’analyse classique dans ces deux systèmes juridiques, la cession de créance est un contrat translatif d’obligation envisagée activement. Ainsi, l’obligation passerait, telle qu’elle est, du patrimoine du cédant à celui du cessionnaire. Le débiteur de la créance cédée n’aurait donc rien à craindre, car l’obligation ne subirait aucune modification du fait de la cession. Il resterait tenu envers le cessionnaire dans les mêmes termes qu’il l’était envers son créancier initial : le cédant. La cession de créance opérerait donc un banal transfert d’un bien incorporel. Malgré le caractère ancré de cette conception, elle est critiquable. L’obligation reste avant toute chose un lien juridique de sorte que l’idée de sa transmissibilité, au moins par acte entre vifs, n’est pas convaincante. En réalité, on s’aperçoit que la cession de créance opère une modification de l’obligation par changement de créancier, et cela sans le consentement du débiteur, sujet passif du lien juridique. Le débiteur subit donc une telle modification, laquelle n’est jamais sans conséquence sur sa situation juridique, ce qui explique qu’il mérite une protection spéciale. C’est pourquoi les tentatives classiques de qualification du débiteur de partie ou de tiers à la cession et, par conséquent, la question de savoir si la cession produit à son égard un effet relatif ou un effet d’opposabilité se révèlent inopportunes.Cependant, cette analyse ne doit pas cacher une autre vérité : la cession de créance est également un acte translatif de créance, bien incorporel qui ne se confond pas avec l’obligation, même si les rapports entretenus entre la créance et l’obligation sont étroits. En tant qu’acte translatif de créance -bien incorporel-, la cession présente des spécificités qui empêchent de la cantonner à un acte juridique déterminé. En effet, la cession permet la réalisation de différentes opérations juridiques, ce qui explique sa nature polyvalente. En outre, la nature incorporelle de la créance explique la spécificité de certaines règles régissant le rapport entre les parties et la cession et celui concernant les tiers et la cession ; notamment celles relatives à l’étendue du transfert et à la garantie due par le cédant au cessionnaire, ainsi que celles portant sur l’opposabilité du transfert aux tiers. / The assignment of claims is a mechanism enshrined in both French ordinary law and Colombian ordinary law. According to the classical analysis in these two legal systems, the assignment of claims is a contract transferring the obligation considered active. Thus, the obligation would pass as it is from the patrimony of the assignor to that of the assignee. The debtor of the assigned claim would therefore have nothing to fear as the obligation would not be affected by the assignment. He would remain liable to the assignee in the same terms as he was to his original creditor: the assignor. The assignment of a claim would thus operate a mere transfer of an intangible property. Despite the anchored nature of this conception, it is open to criticism. The obligation remains above all a legal bond so that the idea of its transmissibility, at least by inter vivos transaction, is not convincing. In fact, we can notice that the assignment of claim creates a modification in the obligation by change of creditor, without the debtor's consent, the passive subject of the legal bond. The debtor thus undergoes such a modification, which is never without consequence on his legal situation, which explains why he deserves special protection. Hence the classical attempts to qualify the debtor of a party or third party in the assignment and, consequently, the question whether the assignment produces a relative effect or an enforceability effect in his regard is undesirable.However, this analysis must not hide this other truth: the assignment of a claim is also an act transferring of the claim, which is intangible property, not to be confused with the obligation, even if the relationship between the claim and the obligation is narrow. As an act transferring of the assignment, intangible property, the assignment presents specificities which prevent it from being framed in a particular legal act. Indeed, the assignment allows the realization of different legal operations, which explains its versatile nature. Moreover, the intangible nature of the claim explains the specificity of certain rules governing the relationship between the parties and the assignment and that relating to third parties and assignment, in particular, those relating to the extent of the transfer and the guarantee owed by the assignor to the assignee as well as those concerning the effectiveness of the transfer to third parties.