21 |
An exploratory study on moral education in secondary schools: implications for social work practiceChing, Sik-man, Sandie., 程式文. January 1986 (has links)
published_or_final_version / Social Work / Master / Master of Social Work
|
22 |
The Bible as a source for character education in public schoolsSmoker, Robert C. January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--Lancaster Bible College, Graduate School, 2001. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 79-90).
|
23 |
A study examining patterns of moral orientation with a group of adolescents at two high schools in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal.Gagadelis, Mona. January 2006 (has links)
Beginning with Piaget, literature has accumulated indicating that children's moral
judgments pass through a series of stages culminating in the application of high order
general principles to practical judgments. Principled moral reasoning, therefore, has come
to be seen as similar in principle to other abstract sciences where less formal, narrative
forms of thinking are seen to be less abstract and more immature. Kohlberg's research as
inspired by the work of Piaget who had tried to connect the development of a child's
moral judgment to its overall cognitive development. Kohlberg believed that as the whole
human personality matures, our thinking about right and wrong starts at a
preconventional level, then progresses to a conventional level, then finally arrives at
postconventional thinking. Each of these three levels has two specific stages. Kohlberg's
research included subjects from many cultures, and therefore, he believed that he was
uncovering a universal innate developmental structure of the human personality. Carol
Gilligan has posed a serious threat to this general scheme by suggesting that a more
narrative contextual approach to moral reasoning, what she calls an "ethic of care", which
far from applying abstract moral rules to particular cases, treats each case in terms of a
host of considerations any or all of which may have some role in arriving at a judgment
or an action. She argues that such moral reasoning is as valid an orientation of moral
thinking as that based on the application of general, abstract rules, and furthermore, that
the bias towards this orientation is, at base, a gender based. A rich body of data has now
been collected congruent with these claims.
In order to explore the relationship between this alternate proposal and Gilligan's
"justice" and "care" orientations, this study was designed to examine the moral
orientation with a group of adolescents, fifteen boys and fifteen girls, at two high schools
in Durban. The participants live in a working class, housing estate that has high levels of
crime and violence. The adolescences were requested to reflect upon two scenarios
depicting real life dilemmas, and then engage in moral judgments and decision-making in
response to probing questions put to them in an interview situation. Results have shown
that, contrary to Gilligan's view; across age and gender the adolescences responses
reflected a higher moral orientation to justice than care. 66% of boys' responses show
greater use of a justice orientation in their reasoning than care orientation 34%. A similar
pattern was evident with girls across the age ranges: 53% of girls' responses were justice
oriented as against to 47 % that were care oriented. An interesting finding was that girls'
use of a justice orientation increased with age, and the use of moral reasoning that
reflected a care orientation decreased with age. However, in line with Gilligan's theory,
boys' responses across age ranges reflected a higher orientation to justice than to care.
Based on previous research findings (Gilligan & Attanucci, 1988; Johnston, 1988), it was
hypothesized that female learners would demonstrate higher ethic of care scores than
men. The results from this study fell in line with this hypothesis. / Thesis (M.Ed.) - University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 2006.
|
24 |
An evaluation of the level of the moral judgment of behaviourally handicapped adolescent clinic school pupils of normal intelligence / Rowan Alexander JohnsonJohnson, Rowan Alexander January 1990 (has links)
This empirical study aimed at determining any
significant difference in level of moral judgment
between behaviourally handicapped adolescent clinic
school pupils of normal intelligence (experimental
group) and a matched sample of non-behaviourally
handicapped pupils (control group). Moral judgment
level was measured in terms of Global stage Scores and
Weighted Average Scores using Kohlberg's Moral Judgment
Interviews and standard Issue scoring. Secondary aims
were to determine whether the data obtained indicated
significant sex differences in level of moral judgment
and to compare the mean level of moral judgment of the
experimental and control groups with existing research.
A statement and motivation of the problem and clarification of concepts were followed by an evaluation of
applicable pre-Kohlbergian research, the philosophical
foundations of Kohlberg’s theory and the theory itself.
This was followed by an examination of the methods of
research and the empirical study. The data generated
indicated a significant difference in mean level of
moral judgment between the research groups in favour of
the control group when controlling for age, gender and
socio-economic status. This difference was highlighted
by comparisons with existing research. No significant
gender differences in moral judgment were found.
Important conclusions reached were: - Experimental group pupils were retarded in level
of' moral judgment and, unlike the pupils in the
control group, most had not yet reached stage 3
moral reasoning. - Sex differences in moral judgment were not found
as is predicted in Kohlbergian theory (Colby & Kohlberg, 1987: 130). - Sub-group comparisons indicated chronological age to be an important factor in the measurement of
moral judgment. The research findings imply that: - Attempts should be made to raise the level of moral judgment of pupils like those in the experimental group specifically, but also that of all pupils. - Planned moral education programmes can ignore sex differences, but not chronological age. - Varied research into moral judgment is necessary. / Dissertation (MEd)--PU for CHO, 1990
|
25 |
An evaluation of the level of the moral judgment of behaviourally handicapped adolescent clinic school pupils of normal intelligence / Rowan Alexander JohnsonJohnson, Rowan Alexander January 1990 (has links)
This empirical study aimed at determining any
significant difference in level of moral judgment
between behaviourally handicapped adolescent clinic
school pupils of normal intelligence (experimental
group) and a matched sample of non-behaviourally
handicapped pupils (control group). Moral judgment
level was measured in terms of Global stage Scores and
Weighted Average Scores using Kohlberg's Moral Judgment
Interviews and standard Issue scoring. Secondary aims
were to determine whether the data obtained indicated
significant sex differences in level of moral judgment
and to compare the mean level of moral judgment of the
experimental and control groups with existing research.
A statement and motivation of the problem and clarification of concepts were followed by an evaluation of
applicable pre-Kohlbergian research, the philosophical
foundations of Kohlberg’s theory and the theory itself.
This was followed by an examination of the methods of
research and the empirical study. The data generated
indicated a significant difference in mean level of
moral judgment between the research groups in favour of
the control group when controlling for age, gender and
socio-economic status. This difference was highlighted
by comparisons with existing research. No significant
gender differences in moral judgment were found.
Important conclusions reached were: - Experimental group pupils were retarded in level
of' moral judgment and, unlike the pupils in the
control group, most had not yet reached stage 3
moral reasoning. - Sex differences in moral judgment were not found
as is predicted in Kohlbergian theory (Colby & Kohlberg, 1987: 130). - Sub-group comparisons indicated chronological age to be an important factor in the measurement of
moral judgment. The research findings imply that: - Attempts should be made to raise the level of moral judgment of pupils like those in the experimental group specifically, but also that of all pupils. - Planned moral education programmes can ignore sex differences, but not chronological age. - Varied research into moral judgment is necessary. / Dissertation (MEd)--PU for CHO, 1990
|
26 |
Value orientations in senior secondary English language education in Hong Kong /Chan, Wai-fun. January 1999 (has links)
Thesis (M. Ed.)--University of Hong Kong, 1999. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 103-109).
|
27 |
Values and values teaching of the english language subject for the junior forms (F.1-3) in a middle school /Li, Suk-fong. January 1996 (has links)
Thesis (M. Ed.)--University of Hong Kong, 1996. / Includes bibliographical references (leaf 119-125).
|
28 |
Values teaching in Hong Kong junior secondary mathematics /Lau, Yin-har. January 1996 (has links)
Thesis (M. Ed.)--University of Hong Kong, 1996. / Includes bibliographical references (leaf 122-126).
|
29 |
Value orientations in senior secondary (S4-S5) Chinese language curriculum of Hong Kong and perceptions of teachers on values education /Leung, Shuk-kwan. January 1996 (has links)
Thesis (M. Ed.)--University of Hong Kong, 1996. / Includes bibliographical references (leaf 156-163).
|
30 |
The Bible as a source for character education in public schoolsSmoker, Robert C. January 2001 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (M.A.)--Lancaster Bible College, Graduate School, 2001. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 79-90).
|
Page generated in 0.0873 seconds