Introdução: A automutilação é definida como qualquer comportamento intencional envolvendo agressão direta ao próprio corpo sem intenção consciente de suicídio. As formas mais frequentes de automutilação são cortar a própria pele, queimar-se, bater em si mesmo, morder-se e arranharse. Alguns pacientes apresentam rituais de automutilação e passam muito tempo pensando em como executá-la, lembrando sintomas compulsivos, porém com intenso componente de impulsividade. O DSM-IV classifica a automutilação como um dos critérios de diagnósticos para transtornos do controle dos impulsos não classificados em outro local ou Transtorno de Personalidade Borderline. O DSM-V propõe que a automutilação seja uma entidade diagnóstica à parte. A falta de homogeneidade na descrição da automutilação dificulta as pesquisas, tanto epidemiológicas como clínicas. A melhor caracterização clínica e psicopatológica da automutilação é fundamental para que intervenções terapêuticas mais efetivas possam ser desenvolvidas, incluindo novas abordagens psicofarmacológicas. Os objetivos deste estudo foram: fazer uma descrição clínica dos pacientes que procuram tratamento, tendo como principal queixa a automutilação e comparar estes com pacientes com Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo (TOC) quanto a características compulsivas e impulsivas. Métodos: 70 pacientes foram avaliados, sendo 40 pacientes com automutilação e 30 pacientes com TOC. Todos estes pacientes foram avaliados de forma direta com os instrumentos: Entrevista Clínica Estruturada para Transtornos de Eixo I do DSM-IV, versão clínica (SCID-I); Entrevista Clínica Estruturada para Transtornos de Eixo I do DSM-IV, versão clínica, adaptada para Transtornos de Controle de Impulsos; Entrevista Clínica Estruturada para Transtornos de Eixo II, versão clínica (SCID-II); Escala de Sintomas Obsessivo-Compulsivos de Yale-Brown (Y-BOCS); Escala Dimensional para Avaliação de Presença e Gravidade de Sintomas Obsessivo-Compulsivos (DY-BOCS); Escala para Avaliação da Presença e Gravidade de Fenômenos Sensoriais da Universidade de São Paulo (USP-SPS); Questionários de História de Traumas; Escala de Comportamento de Automutilação (FASM); e Barrat Impulsivity Scale (BIS-11). Para comparação das variáveis categóricas, foi utilizado o teste qui-quadrado e para variáveis contínuas, o test-t. Para análise multivariada, foram utilizados os testes ANCOVA ou Regressão Logística Linear. Foi considerado, para todos os testes, o nível de significância 5%. Resultados: A média de idade dos pacientes avaliados foi de 29 anos. Quanto às características clínicas dos pacientes com automutilação, estes iniciaram o comportamento em média aos 17 anos de idade, e apresentavam cinco tipos diferentes de automutilação em média. Os comportamentos mais frequentes foram: cortar a pele (90%), cutucar ferimentos (75%), bater em si mesmo (67,5%). Os motivos mais frequentemente relacionados à automutilação foram para: parar sentimentos ruins (75%), aliviar sensação de vazio (70%), se castigar (70%), sentir algo, mesmo que fosse dor (47,5%) e sentir-se relaxado (40%). Na comparação entre os grupos com automutilação e TOC, quanto às comorbidades do Eixo I, o grupo com automutilação apresentou mais comorbidades com depressão (92,5%, p=0,03) e bulimia (25%, p<0,001). O grupo com TOC apresentou mais fobia social (40%, p<0,001). Os pacientes do grupo com TOC tiveram maior gravidade em todas as medidas do Y-BOCS (média: 26, p<0,001) e DY-BOCS (média 23,1, p=0,01). No grupo com automutilação, 60% dos pacientes referiram a automutilação associada a fenômenos sensoriais. Este grupo teve mais relato de fenômenos sensoriais referente à \"sensação de incompletude\" (45%, p=0,007) e \"sensação de energia interna\" (57,5%, p=0,001). O transtorno de personalidade mais prevalente em ambos os grupos foi Transtorno de Personalidade Obsessivo-Compulsiva. O grupo com automutilação apresentou maior prevalência de Transtorno de Personalidade Histriônica (22,5 %, p=0,02) e Transtorno de Personalidade Borderline (15%, p=0,04). A gravidade da impulsividade foi maior no grupo com automutilação segundo as medidas da BIS-11 para características motoras (média 26,6, p=0,002) e dificuldade para planejamento (média 31, p=0,014). Conclusão: A automutilação e o TOC são transtornos heterogêneos que compartilham características compulsivas e impulsivas. Na automutilação, o componente impulsivo é maior e no TOC, a compulsividade é maior quando comparamos estes dois grupos. Entretanto, a automutilação esteve associada à ocorrência de fenômenos sensoriais, apontando também para a presença de aspectos compulsivos nestes quadros. O Transtorno de Personalidade Borderline não é regra entre os pacientes com automutilação. Outros transtornos de personalidade, inclusive cluster C como o Transtorno de Personalidade Obsessivo-Compulsiva, também podem estar presentes entre pacientes com automutilação, assim como com TOC. Os pacientes adultos com automutilação apresentam este comportamento desde a adolescência e os tipos de automutilação apresentados por estes são de moderada a grave intensidade, além de associarem diferentes tipos de automutilação. Isto evidencia a necessidade de desenvolvimento de instrumentos diagnósticos mais precisos para identificação e tratamento precoce específico para estes quadros, evitando a cronicidade dos mesmos / Introduction: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is defined as a deliberate and voluntary physical self-injury without any conscious suicidal intent. Common forms of NSSI include cutting, burning, scratching, hitting, biting and interfering with wound healing. Some patients spend a lot of time thinking about how to perform their act doing it always the same way. They remember compulsive symptoms with intense component of impulsivity. The DSM-IV classifies NSSI as one diagnostic criteria for impulsive control disorders not elsewhere classified or as borderline personality disorder. The DSM-V proposes that the NSSI should be classified as a different disorder. The lack of a singular meaning for NSSI makes difficult the clinical and epidemiological researches about the subject. A better clinical and psychopathological definition for NSSI is crucial for the development of more effective therapeutic interventions, including new psychopharmacological treatment. The objective of this study is to describe the clinical features of patients seeking treatment for NSSI and compare their compulsive and impulsive features with patients with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Methods: 70 patients were interviewed, 40 patients who specifically sought treatment for NSSI and 30 patients who sought treatment for OCD. Standardized instruments were used: Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnosis of Axis I, according to DSM-IV and for impulse-control disorders, Structured Clinical Interview for Axis II Disorders (Clinical Version (SCID-II)), Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS); Dimensional Yale- Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DY-BOCS), University of São Paulo Sensory Phenomena Scale (USP-SPS); Trauma History Questionnaire; Functional Assessment of Self-Mutilation (FASM) and Barratt Impulsivity Scale, version-11 (BIS -11). To compare categorical variables the chi-square test was applied. For continuous variables, t-test was applied. For multivariate analysis, the ANCOVA test or Logistic Regression were applied when required. A significance level of 5% was applied for all statistical tests. Results: The mean age of patients was 29 years. The NSSI began at 17 years old, and had 5 different types of NSSI on average. The more common behaviors were: cutting the skin (90%), pick at a wound (75%), beat himself (67.5%). The most often reasons for NSSI were to: stop bad feelings (75%), relieve feeling numb or empty (70%), punish himself (70%), feel something, even if it was pain (47.5%) and feel relaxed (40%). In the comparison between NSSI and OCD groups, the NSSI group presented more axis I comorbidities with depression (92.5%, p = 0.03) and bulimia (25%, p <0.001). The OCD group showed more social phobia (40%, p <0.001). The OCD group had higher severity in all measures of the Y-BOCS (mean: 26, p <0.001) and DY-BOCS (mean 23.1, p = 0.01). In the NSSI group, 60% of the patients reported NSSI associated with sensory phenomena. This group had more reports of sensory phenomena related to the \"incompleteness\" (45%, p = 0.007) and \"internal energy\" (57.5%, p = 0.001). The most prevalent personality disorder in both groups was Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder. The NSSI group had higher prevalence of Histrionic Personality Disorder (22.5%, p = 0.02) and Borderline Personality Disorder (15%, p = 0.04). The severity of impulsivity was higher in the NSSI group according to the measures of the BIS-11 for motor impulsivity (mean 26.6, p = 0.002) and non-planning impulsivity (mean 31, p= 0.014). Conclusion: NSSI and OCD are heterogeneous disorders that share compulsive and impulsive features. In NSSI, the impulsive component is stronger and in OCD the compulsive is stronger when comparing both groups. However, NSSI was associated with the occurrence of sensory phenomena which evidence the presence of compulsive aspects. The borderline personality disorder is not a rule among patients with NSSI. Other personality disorders, including cluster C personality disorders, may also be present among patients with NSSI and OCD, as well. Adult patients with NSSI started this behavior during adolescence. The NSSI symptoms presented were moderate to severe, different types of NSSI were also involved. These results highlights the needs for development of more accurate diagnostic tools for early identification and specific treatment of the NSSI, avoiding chronicity

Young adults of college age are at particular risk for psychopathology, non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and consequent suicidal behavior, perhaps in a continuum of increasing severity. However, not all persons who experience psychopathological symptoms, or who self-harm, go on to engage in suicidal behavior, perhaps due to protective factors such as self-compassion that buffer this progression. We examined the mediating effect of NSSI on the relation between anxiety/depressive symptoms and suicide risk, and the moderating role of self-compassion on these linkages. Our collegiate sample (N=338) completed: Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Self-Harm Inventory, Suicidal Behavior Questionnaire-Revised, and the Self-Compassion Scale. Students with greater psychopathology reported more engagement in NSSI and, consequently, more suicide risk; self-compassion weakened the psychopathology-NSSI linkage. Therapeutically addressing risk factors for suicidal behavior (e.g., psychopathology, NSSI), and promoting self-compassion, may halt progression from symptomology to self-harm, thereby ultimately reducing suicide risk in college students.

Adults of college age are at particular risk for psychopathology, non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), and suicidal behavior, but protective factors (e.g., self-compassion) may buffer risk. We examined the mediating effect of NSSI on the relation between anxiety/depressive symptoms and suicide risk, and the moderating role of self-compassion. Students (N = 338) with greater psychopathology reported more engagement in NSSI and, consequently, more suicide risk; self-compassion weakened the psychopathology-NSSI linkage. Therapeutically addressing psychopathology and NSSI, perhaps via Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, and promoting self-compassion via compassion-focused and mindful self-compassion therapy, may halt progression from symptomology to self-harm, ultimately reducing suicide risk in college students.

Research that explores the relationship between suicide and self-injury is limited, and the lack of clarity surrounding this topic can present challenges for professional counselors. Although persons who self-injure are at an increased risk for suicide (e.g., Toprak, Cetin, Guven, Can, & Demircan, 2011; Chapman & Dixon-Gordon, 2007), not all individuals who engage in self-injurious behaviors attempt or complete suicide (e.g., Hawton & Harriss, 2008; Howson, Yates, & Hatcher, 2008). Research on common and distinct risk factors for suicide and self-injury (e.g., Andover, Primack, Gibb, & Pepper, 2010; Brausch & Gutierrez, 2010; Greydanus & Apple, 2011; Hawton & James, 2005; Lloyd-Richardson, Perrine, Dierker, & Kelley, 2007; Toprak et al., 2011; Wichstrom, 2009), as well as emotional antecedents and consequences for suicide and self-injury (e.g., Chapman & Dixon-Gordon, 2007), has contributed to our understanding of this complex relationship. However, the specific nature of the relationship remains unclear. This study serves to help fill the gap in the literature by examining advanced professional counselors’, as measured by the Supervisee Levels Questionnaire-Revised, conceptualizations of the relationship between suicide and self-injury and by exploring how the presence of self-injury impacts clinical assessment and interventions. Data was collected by means of an online survey. Analysis was conducted by a research team using qualitative content analysis. Seven categories emerged, including: relationship between suicide and self-injury, functions of self-injury, associated risk, suicide risk assessment, treatment planning and goals, intervention, and identification of self-injury.

Research that explores the relationship between suicide and self-injury is limited, and the lack of clarity surrounding this topic can present challenges for professional counselors. Although persons who self-injure are at an increased risk for suicide (e.g., Toprak, Cetin, Guven, Can, & Demircan, 2011; Chapman & Dixon-Gordon, 2007), not all individuals who engage in self-injurious behaviors attempt or complete suicide (e.g., Hawton & Harriss, 2008; Howson, Yates, & Hatcher, 2008). Research on common and distinct risk factors for suicide and self-injury (e.g., Andover, Primack, Gibb, & Pepper, 2010; Brausch & Gutierrez, 2010; Greydanus & Apple, 2011; Hawton & James, 2005; Lloyd-Richardson, Perrine, Dierker, & Kelley, 2007; Toprak et al., 2011; Wichstrom, 2009), as well as emotional antecedents and consequences for suicide and self-injury (e.g., Chapman & Dixon-Gordon, 2007), has contributed to our understanding of this complex relationship. However, the specific nature of the relationship remains unclear. This study serves to help fill the gap in the literature by examining advanced professional counselors’, as measured by the Supervisee Levels Questionnaire-Revised, conceptualizations of the relationship between suicide and self-injury and by exploring how the presence of self-injury impacts clinical assessment and interventions. Data was collected by means of an online survey. Analysis was conducted by a research team using qualitative content analysis. Seven categories emerged, including: relationship between suicide and self-injury, functions of self-injury, associated risk, suicide risk assessment, treatment planning and goals, intervention, and identification of self-injury.

The following thesis outlines a study assessing the levels of perfectionism, self-injurious behaviour, and functions of anorexia nervosa (AN) through use of a cross-sectional online survey, among English speaking participants 15 years or older, self-reporting a current, previous, or suspected diagnosis of AN. Three distinct clusters were found using self-report measures from individuals with a current or suspected diagnosis, with each cluster corresponding to a unique theoretical understanding of AN. The three clusters can be distinguished by high asceticism, appearance, and avoidance of fertility/sexuality functions for AN respectively. Two distinct clusters were found for participants with a previous diagnosis of AN. These clusters can be differentiated by lingering sentiments held for the condition, as the first cluster viewed AN negatively, and the second cluster continued to see some benefits of the condition. Possible implications for understanding etiology, mechanisms, and treatment of AN are discussed. / Canadian Institute of Health Research

Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) is the self-inflicted damage to one’s bodily tissues without the intent to die. Previous research has sought to discover the motivation of an individual to perform such behavior and differences in the experience of pain among those who self-injure. The goals for the current study were to reveal any relationships between the function of NSSI, the subjective experience of pain, and an objective measurement of pressure pain threshold. Participants completed the Inventory of Statements About Self- Injury (ISAS; Klonsky & Glenn, 2009), which measures the functions that NSSI serves, and a measure assessing subjective pain experience, specifically frequency and severity of pain. Pain thresholds were also induced and recorded using a pressure algometer. The findings suggest that pain frequency significantly predicted pain threshold, whereas subjective pain severity did not. Furthermore, marking distress, the function of NSSI which serves as creating a tangible representation of emotional distress, was significantly associated with pain frequency, such that as marking distress increases in relevance, the less often one would be expected to experience pain. Therefore, the current study has implications relevant to both future research and the clinical setting.

BACKGROUND: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) occurs in 13% to 20% of adolescents, and is often indicative of deeper internal or social problems. A close review of current explanatory models of NSSI suggested that underlying individual sensory preferences may contribute substantial explanations for the self-regulatory functions of NSSI, as well as have implications for treatment approaches. In the context of integrating sensory processing models with prominent functional NSSI models, this dissertation research compared sensory preferences in youth who engaged in NSSI to sensory preferences of youth who did not engage in NSSI. OBJECTIVE: NSSI-engaging youth were hypothesized to have lower threshold sensory preferences (sensation avoiding and sensory sensitive), and higher sensitivity (low threshold) in touch processing, auditory processing, and modulation of sensory input affecting emotional response. Sensory preferences were hypothesized to predict NSSI functionality, and trauma history and symptomology were hypothesized to predict NSSI and sensory preferences. METHODS: Youth (n = 108; 56% female; 43% Hispanic) aged 8-14 completed self-report items regarding knowledge, thoughts, and engagement in NSSI, the Functional Assessment of Self-Mutilation (FASM) to evaluate type and functionality of NSSI, and the Adolescent / Adult Sensory Profile to evaluate sensory preferences (low registration, sensation seeking, sensory sensitive, sensation avoiding). Parents (90% female; Mage = 39.4 (SD = 6.9)) completed the Sensory Profile as a secondary measure of youth sensory preferences and the UCLA post- traumatic stress disorder reaction index (PTSD-RI) to evaluate youth trauma history and symptomology. RESULTS: NSSI-engaging youth (N = 14) scored significantly higher than Non-NSSI-engaging youth (N = 85) in the sensation avoiding (Cohen's d = .83) and low registration (Cohen's d = .66) domains. Auditory sensitivity (youth-reported) significantly predicted NSSI after controlling for age. While parent-reported sensory preferences and trauma history and symptomology were not predictive of NSSI, auditory sensitivity (parent-reported) predicted PTSD symptomology in youth with trauma history. CONCLUSIONS: Results provide preliminary insight into better understanding the self-regulatory role of NSSI, and offer insight into specific sensory preferences of young adolescents who engage in NSSI. In combination with future research, findings contribute to existing comprehensive models of NSSI, and provide evidence for sensory considerations in NSSI treatment.

Introdução: A automutilação é definida como qualquer comportamento intencional envolvendo agressão direta ao próprio corpo sem intenção consciente de suicídio. As formas mais frequentes de automutilação são cortar a própria pele, queimar-se, bater em si mesmo, morder-se e arranharse. Alguns pacientes apresentam rituais de automutilação e passam muito tempo pensando em como executá-la, lembrando sintomas compulsivos, porém com intenso componente de impulsividade. O DSM-IV classifica a automutilação como um dos critérios de diagnósticos para transtornos do controle dos impulsos não classificados em outro local ou Transtorno de Personalidade Borderline. O DSM-V propõe que a automutilação seja uma entidade diagnóstica à parte. A falta de homogeneidade na descrição da automutilação dificulta as pesquisas, tanto epidemiológicas como clínicas. A melhor caracterização clínica e psicopatológica da automutilação é fundamental para que intervenções terapêuticas mais efetivas possam ser desenvolvidas, incluindo novas abordagens psicofarmacológicas. Os objetivos deste estudo foram: fazer uma descrição clínica dos pacientes que procuram tratamento, tendo como principal queixa a automutilação e comparar estes com pacientes com Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo (TOC) quanto a características compulsivas e impulsivas. Métodos: 70 pacientes foram avaliados, sendo 40 pacientes com automutilação e 30 pacientes com TOC. Todos estes pacientes foram avaliados de forma direta com os instrumentos: Entrevista Clínica Estruturada para Transtornos de Eixo I do DSM-IV, versão clínica (SCID-I); Entrevista Clínica Estruturada para Transtornos de Eixo I do DSM-IV, versão clínica, adaptada para Transtornos de Controle de Impulsos; Entrevista Clínica Estruturada para Transtornos de Eixo II, versão clínica (SCID-II); Escala de Sintomas Obsessivo-Compulsivos de Yale-Brown (Y-BOCS); Escala Dimensional para Avaliação de Presença e Gravidade de Sintomas Obsessivo-Compulsivos (DY-BOCS); Escala para Avaliação da Presença e Gravidade de Fenômenos Sensoriais da Universidade de São Paulo (USP-SPS); Questionários de História de Traumas; Escala de Comportamento de Automutilação (FASM); e Barrat Impulsivity Scale (BIS-11). Para comparação das variáveis categóricas, foi utilizado o teste qui-quadrado e para variáveis contínuas, o test-t. Para análise multivariada, foram utilizados os testes ANCOVA ou Regressão Logística Linear. Foi considerado, para todos os testes, o nível de significância 5%. Resultados: A média de idade dos pacientes avaliados foi de 29 anos. Quanto às características clínicas dos pacientes com automutilação, estes iniciaram o comportamento em média aos 17 anos de idade, e apresentavam cinco tipos diferentes de automutilação em média. Os comportamentos mais frequentes foram: cortar a pele (90%), cutucar ferimentos (75%), bater em si mesmo (67,5%). Os motivos mais frequentemente relacionados à automutilação foram para: parar sentimentos ruins (75%), aliviar sensação de vazio (70%), se castigar (70%), sentir algo, mesmo que fosse dor (47,5%) e sentir-se relaxado (40%). Na comparação entre os grupos com automutilação e TOC, quanto às comorbidades do Eixo I, o grupo com automutilação apresentou mais comorbidades com depressão (92,5%, p=0,03) e bulimia (25%, p<0,001). O grupo com TOC apresentou mais fobia social (40%, p<0,001). Os pacientes do grupo com TOC tiveram maior gravidade em todas as medidas do Y-BOCS (média: 26, p<0,001) e DY-BOCS (média 23,1, p=0,01). No grupo com automutilação, 60% dos pacientes referiram a automutilação associada a fenômenos sensoriais. Este grupo teve mais relato de fenômenos sensoriais referente à \"sensação de incompletude\" (45%, p=0,007) e \"sensação de energia interna\" (57,5%, p=0,001). O transtorno de personalidade mais prevalente em ambos os grupos foi Transtorno de Personalidade Obsessivo-Compulsiva. O grupo com automutilação apresentou maior prevalência de Transtorno de Personalidade Histriônica (22,5 %, p=0,02) e Transtorno de Personalidade Borderline (15%, p=0,04). A gravidade da impulsividade foi maior no grupo com automutilação segundo as medidas da BIS-11 para características motoras (média 26,6, p=0,002) e dificuldade para planejamento (média 31, p=0,014). Conclusão: A automutilação e o TOC são transtornos heterogêneos que compartilham características compulsivas e impulsivas. Na automutilação, o componente impulsivo é maior e no TOC, a compulsividade é maior quando comparamos estes dois grupos. Entretanto, a automutilação esteve associada à ocorrência de fenômenos sensoriais, apontando também para a presença de aspectos compulsivos nestes quadros. O Transtorno de Personalidade Borderline não é regra entre os pacientes com automutilação. Outros transtornos de personalidade, inclusive cluster C como o Transtorno de Personalidade Obsessivo-Compulsiva, também podem estar presentes entre pacientes com automutilação, assim como com TOC. Os pacientes adultos com automutilação apresentam este comportamento desde a adolescência e os tipos de automutilação apresentados por estes são de moderada a grave intensidade, além de associarem diferentes tipos de automutilação. Isto evidencia a necessidade de desenvolvimento de instrumentos diagnósticos mais precisos para identificação e tratamento precoce específico para estes quadros, evitando a cronicidade dos mesmos / Introduction: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is defined as a deliberate and voluntary physical self-injury without any conscious suicidal intent. Common forms of NSSI include cutting, burning, scratching, hitting, biting and interfering with wound healing. Some patients spend a lot of time thinking about how to perform their act doing it always the same way. They remember compulsive symptoms with intense component of impulsivity. The DSM-IV classifies NSSI as one diagnostic criteria for impulsive control disorders not elsewhere classified or as borderline personality disorder. The DSM-V proposes that the NSSI should be classified as a different disorder. The lack of a singular meaning for NSSI makes difficult the clinical and epidemiological researches about the subject. A better clinical and psychopathological definition for NSSI is crucial for the development of more effective therapeutic interventions, including new psychopharmacological treatment. The objective of this study is to describe the clinical features of patients seeking treatment for NSSI and compare their compulsive and impulsive features with patients with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Methods: 70 patients were interviewed, 40 patients who specifically sought treatment for NSSI and 30 patients who sought treatment for OCD. Standardized instruments were used: Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnosis of Axis I, according to DSM-IV and for impulse-control disorders, Structured Clinical Interview for Axis II Disorders (Clinical Version (SCID-II)), Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS); Dimensional Yale- Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DY-BOCS), University of São Paulo Sensory Phenomena Scale (USP-SPS); Trauma History Questionnaire; Functional Assessment of Self-Mutilation (FASM) and Barratt Impulsivity Scale, version-11 (BIS -11). To compare categorical variables the chi-square test was applied. For continuous variables, t-test was applied. For multivariate analysis, the ANCOVA test or Logistic Regression were applied when required. A significance level of 5% was applied for all statistical tests. Results: The mean age of patients was 29 years. The NSSI began at 17 years old, and had 5 different types of NSSI on average. The more common behaviors were: cutting the skin (90%), pick at a wound (75%), beat himself (67.5%). The most often reasons for NSSI were to: stop bad feelings (75%), relieve feeling numb or empty (70%), punish himself (70%), feel something, even if it was pain (47.5%) and feel relaxed (40%). In the comparison between NSSI and OCD groups, the NSSI group presented more axis I comorbidities with depression (92.5%, p = 0.03) and bulimia (25%, p <0.001). The OCD group showed more social phobia (40%, p <0.001). The OCD group had higher severity in all measures of the Y-BOCS (mean: 26, p <0.001) and DY-BOCS (mean 23.1, p = 0.01). In the NSSI group, 60% of the patients reported NSSI associated with sensory phenomena. This group had more reports of sensory phenomena related to the \"incompleteness\" (45%, p = 0.007) and \"internal energy\" (57.5%, p = 0.001). The most prevalent personality disorder in both groups was Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder. The NSSI group had higher prevalence of Histrionic Personality Disorder (22.5%, p = 0.02) and Borderline Personality Disorder (15%, p = 0.04). The severity of impulsivity was higher in the NSSI group according to the measures of the BIS-11 for motor impulsivity (mean 26.6, p = 0.002) and non-planning impulsivity (mean 31, p= 0.014). Conclusion: NSSI and OCD are heterogeneous disorders that share compulsive and impulsive features. In NSSI, the impulsive component is stronger and in OCD the compulsive is stronger when comparing both groups. However, NSSI was associated with the occurrence of sensory phenomena which evidence the presence of compulsive aspects. The borderline personality disorder is not a rule among patients with NSSI. Other personality disorders, including cluster C personality disorders, may also be present among patients with NSSI and OCD, as well. Adult patients with NSSI started this behavior during adolescence. The NSSI symptoms presented were moderate to severe, different types of NSSI were also involved. These results highlights the needs for development of more accurate diagnostic tools for early identification and specific treatment of the NSSI, avoiding chronicity

Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is the intentional destruction of bodily tissue in the absence of suicidal motives. NSSI is strongly associated with self-criticism (Gilbert et al., 2010) and individuals who self-injure often report doing so to punish themselves. Conversely, self-compassion, or the tendency to be caring with oneself, is associated with psychological well-being (Neff et al., 2007). The aim of the present study was to determine whether experimentally inducing self-criticism or self-compassion would lead to changes in implicit identification with NSSI. The Self-Injury Implicit Association Test (SI-IAT; Nock & Banaji, 2007) is an assessment of the strength of the automatic associations that a person holds between themselves and NSSI. Participants were randomly assigned to a self-criticism induction, a self-compassion induction, or a neutral condition and completed the SI-IAT before and after the induction. Results showed that participants in the self-criticism induction experienced an increase in their implicit associations with NSSI while implicit associations in the self-compassion and control conditions generally did not change. Results were not significantly different for those with or without a history of NSSI and highlight the importance of self-criticism in NSSI. Future research should examine increases in self-criticism as a potential precursor of NSSI in longitudinal samples.