This is the first of 2 review papers on genetics and genomics appearing as part of the series on “omics.” Genomics pertains to all components of an organism’s genes, whereas genetics involves analysis of a specific gene(s) in the context of heredity. The paper provides introductory comments, describes the basis of human genetic diversity, and addresses the phenotypic consequences of genetic variants. Rare variants with large effect sizes are responsible for single gene disorders, whereas complex polygenic diseases are typically due to multiple genetic variants, each exerting a modest effect size. To illustrate the clinical implications of genetic variants with large effect sizes, 3 common forms of hereditary cardiomyopathies are discussed as prototypic examples of single-gene disorders, including their genetics, clinical manifestations, pathogenesis, and treatment. The genetic basis of complex traits is discussed in a separate paper.

Long ncRNAs (non-protein coding transcripts generally considered longer than 200 nucleotides to be distinguished from classes of small RNAs) are abundantly transcribed from the mammalian genome. Despite their abundance, little is known about these transcripts. Although several individual long ncRNAs have been well-characterised and ascribed important cellular functions, there remains considerable controversy as to whether long ncRNAs are, in the main, functional. Indeed, their abundance has prompted many people to argue that long ncRNAs are simply transcriptional ‘noise’ generated by spurious transcription initiation events resulting from low RNA polymerase II fidelity. This thesis demonstrates that large numbers of long ncRNAs are specifically expressed along both temporal and spatial axes of mouse development in a manner consistent with a biological function. Custom-designed microarrays were employed to analyse the expression profiles of large numbers of long ncRNAs, along with protein-coding genes, in two models of cellular differentiation; the differentiation of mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells from pluripotency to differentiation along a hemopoietic lineage; and the commitment and differentiation of neural stem cells to oligodendrocytes. The core networks that include gene expression, transcription factor binding sites and chromatin domains that regulate ES cell pluripotency and lineage specification have been the subject of considerable attention and provide a detailed context in which to analyse ncRNA expression. Of those ncRNAs examined, 945 (26% of total) ncRNAs were expressed during the differentiation of ES to embryoid body (EB), of which 174 were significantly differentially expressed. Many of these ncRNAs were transcribed from genomic locations that overlapped modified chromatin domains, and in two further studied cases directly engaged with epigenetic machinery. Similarly, 332 long ncRNAs (9% of those examined) were expressed during processes of neuronal-glial fate switching, neurogenesis and oligodendrocyte progressive differentiation and termination, of which around half were also significantly differentially expressed. Furthermore, many of these ncRNAs exhibited expression profiles that coincided with pivotal events during the commitment and differentiation of neural stem cells (NSC) to mature myelinating oligodendrocytes. Consideration of the genomic context revealed many long ncRNAs were expressed from diverse places including intergenic, intronic, and imprinted loci and may overlap with, or are transcribed antisense to, protein-coding genes with previously described roles in either ES or NSC pluripotency and differentiation. This association also extended to expression profiles, where a comparative analysis often showed complex relationships of expression between ncRNAs and associated protein coding genes, suggesting a potential role for ncRNAs in regulating the expression of associated gene loci. The complexity and specificity of the long ncRNAs expression was illustrated by analysis of the in situ hybridisation (ISH) data conducted in collaboration with the Allen Brain Atlas. Of 1328 long ncRNAs, 849 (64%) were expressed in the mouse brain, 623 (47%) of which exhibited specific expression profiles associated with distinct neuroanatomical regions, cell types, or subcellular compartments. Again, examination of their genomic context revealed long ncRNAs were often associated with protein-coding genes of neurological importance and this association often extended to include linked expression profiles in the mouse brain. The comparative analysis of protein-coding gene expression relative to associated noncoding transcription also revealed an additional level of complexity in gene structure and genomic architecture. Analysis of both microarray and ISH data show 3’UTRs can exhibit discordant expression profiles relative to their associated protein coding genes, often in a tissue- and developmentally-specific manner. Indeed, a genome-wide analysis showed that the independent expression of 3’UTR transcripts is prevalent throughout the mouse genome where they may function intrinsically as long ncRNAs during development. Together, these genome-wide analyses indicate a large proportion of long ncRNAs exhibit specific expression profiles that are inconsistent with the notion they are meaningless transcriptional noise. Taken together with numerous studies published in recent years, this thesis provides evidence to support the emergence of long ncRNAs as a major functional component of the regulatory network that underpins differentiation and development in mammals and other complex organisms.

High levels of primary sequence conservation are observed in many noncoding regions of eukaryotic genomes. These conserved noncoding elements (CNEs) have shown to be robust indicators of functionally constrained elements. Nevertheless, the function of only a small fraction of such CNEs is known and their role in genome biology remains largely a mystery. Comparative genomics analysis in model organisms can shed light on CNE function and evolution of noncoding DNA in general. Recently, it has been reported that short CNEs in the Drosophila genome are typically very AT-rich but have unusually high levels of GC content in a much larger (~500 bp) window around them. To understand whether these "side effects" are dependent on their CNE definition or are a more general feature of the Drosophila genome, we analysed base composition of CNEs from two different CNE detection methods. We found side effects are real, but are restricted to a subset of CNEs in the genome. An alternative hypothesis to explain the existence of CNEs is the mutational cold spot hypothesis. Previous work using SNPs was shown evidence that CNEs are not mutational cold spots. Here, non-reference transposable elements (TEs) were used to test cold spot hypothesis. A significant reduction in levels of non-reference TEs was found in intronic and intergenic CNEs compared to the expected number of insertions. TEs in intergenic CNEs were also found at lower allele frequencies than TEs in intergenic spacers. Furthermore, we used simulation to explore the effects of insertion/deletion (indel) evolution on noncoding DNA sequences with and without constrained noncoding elements. We assessed several indel-capable simulators to test expected outcomes with no selectively constrained elements. Simulations with constrained elements show that sequences grow in length even when the deletion rate is exactly the same as the insertion rate. This result can be interpreted as being due to purifying selection on CNEs acting to remove an excess of deletion over insertions. Together, the results presented here provide insights into the evolution of noncoding DNA in one of the most important model organisms.

The nucleolus is a plurifunctional organelle in which structure and function are intimately linked. Though it is primarily known as the site of ribosomal biogenesis, the nucleolus is also capable of orchestrating the immobilization of a broad range of proteins under specific environmental conditions. This process, known as nucleolar sequestration, contributes to cell viability under stress. Despite the importance of this post-translational regulatory pathway, very little is known about the mechanisms that govern it. Here, we show that heat shock and acidosis, two physiological stimuli associated with nucleolar sequestration, induce the expression of long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) from stimulus-specific loci of the ribosomal intergenic spacer (IGS). These lncRNAs, in turn, immobilize proteins encoding a nucleolar detention sequence (NoDS) within a compartment of the nucleolus termed the detention centre (DC). The DC is a spatially and dynamically distinct region, characterized by an 8-anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonate (ANS)-positive hydrophobic signature. Its formation is accompanied by a redistribution of nucleolar factors and an arrest in ribosomal biogenesis. Silencing of regulatory IGS lncRNA prevents the creation of this structure and allows the nucleolus to retain its tripartite organization and transcriptional activity. Signal termination causes a decrease in IGS transcript levels and a return to the active nucleolar conformation. We propose that the induction of IGS lncRNA, by environmental signals, operates as a molecular switch that regulates the structure and function of the nucleolus.

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are being realized as important players in gene regulation and their misregulation has been considered as one of the underlying causes for tumor initiation and progression in many human pathologies. In the current thesis, I have addressed the functional role of lncRNAs in development and disease model systems. Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon by which subset of genes are expressed in a parent of origin-specific manner. The Kcnq1 imprinted locus is epigenetically regulated by Kcnq1ot1 lncRNA. Deletion of an 890bp region at the 5’ end of Kcnq1ot1 in mouse resulted in the loss of silencing of neighboring ubiqui-tously imprinted genes (UIGs). In addition, we observed loss of DNA methylation at the UIG promoters. We have shown that Kcnq1ot1 RNA establishes CpG methylation by interacting with DNMT1. To explore the stability of lncRNA mediated silencing pathways, we have conditionally deleted Kcnq1ot1 in the mouse in a stage and tissue-specific manner. We have shown that Kcnq1ot1 is continuously required for maintaining the silencing of UIGs, whereas the silencing of the placental im-printed genes is maintained in an RNA independent manner.   To identify chromatin-associated lncRNA (CARs) on a genome-wide scale, we purified RNA from the sucrose gradient fractionated chromatin and subjected it to RNA sequencing. Our study has identified 141 intronic and 74 long intergenic CARs. Characterization of one of the CARs revealed that it regulates the expression of neighboring genes in cis by modulating the chromatin structure.   We have explored the functional role of lncRNA in tumor progression and initiation by using pediatric neuroblastoma. By transcriptional profiling of low- and high-risk tumors, we have identified several lncRNAs differentially expressed between these subtypes. We report an uncharacterized RNA NBAT-1, expressed at lower levels in high-risk tumors relative to low-risk tumors.  Using neuroblastoma cell culture system, we demonstrated that NBAT-1 has anti-cell proliferative and anti-invasive properties. In addition, it promotes differentiation of neurons from undifferentiated neuroblastoma cell lines.   In summary, by employing mouse genetics, cell culture based model system and expression profiling in tumors, we have uncovered new roles of lncRNA in gene regulation.

High throughput transcriptomic analyses have realized us with the fact that eukaryotic genome encodes thousands of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) with unknown function. In my thesis, I sought to address epigenetic regulation of transcription by ncRNA using the Kcnq1 imprinted cluster as a model system. Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon whereby one of the parental alleles is silenced by epigenetic mechanism in a parent of origin-specific manner. A long ncRNA Kcnq1ot1 regulates imprinting of nearly 8 protein coding genes in the Kcnq1 imprinted cluster. Expression of Kcnq1ot1 is restricted to the paternal chromosome while that of protein-coding genes to the maternal chromosome. Kcnq1ot1 is a 91kb long, moderately stable, nuclear localized and RNAPII encoded transcript. We demonstrated that Kcnq1ot1 RNA itself mediates lineage specific silencing on the paternal chromosome by interacting with chromatin and recruiting the repressive chromatin modifiers to the imprinted gene promoters. Previously we identified an 890bp silencing domain (SD) at the 5´end of the Kcnq1ot1 RNA which is responsible for gene silencing. Targeted deletion of the 890SD in mouse resulted in specific loss of silencing of ubiquitously imprinted genes. We have further shown that Kcnq1ot1 interacts with Dnmt1 and recruit Dnmt1 at the somatic DMRs flanking some of the ubiquitously imprinted genes. We next addressed the stability of the Kcnq1ot1 mediated epigenetic silencing using transgenic mouse where we have conditionally deleted the Kcnq1ot1 RNA at different developmental stages and we found that Kcnq1ot1 RNA is required to maintain the silencing of the ubiquitously imprinted genes. In addition, DNA methylation, which controls imprinting of the ubiquitous genes require Kcnq1ot1 for its maintenance. To characterize the ncRNAs that mediate gene regulation through chromatin interaction we have isolated chromatin associated RNAs (CARs) from sucrose gradient fractioned chromatin. High-throughput sequencing of the CARs resulted in the identification of the 141 intronic and 74 intergenic regions harboring CARs. We characterized one of the intergenic CARs which regulate the transcription of the two neighboring genes by modulating the chromatin marks. In summary current thesis has uncovered unprecedented role of ncRNAs in gene expression via chromatin level regulation.

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / The human genome generates a vast number of functionally and structurally diverse noncoding transcripts, incorporated into complex networks which modulate the activity of classic pathways. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNA) have been shown to exhibit diverse regulatory roles in various physiological and pathological processes. Hypoxia, a key feature of the tumor microenvironment, triggers adaptive responses in cancer cells that involve hundreds of genes. While the coding component of hypoxia signaling has been extensively studied, much less information is available regarding its noncoding arm. My doctoral work identified and functionally characterized a novel hypoxia-inducible lncRNAs encoded from the miR193b-host gene (MIR193BHG) locus, on chromosome 16. In the pursuit of understanding how MIR193BHG responds to hypoxia, we discovered a more complex transcriptional control of MIR193BHG by hypoxia. Ectopic expression of MIR193BHG in breast cancer cell lines in vitro and in xenografts significantly represses cell invasion, as well as the metastasis to lung and liver. Conversely, inhibition of MIR193BHG promotes cancer cell invasiveness and metastasis. RNAseq followed by pathway analysis revealed that MIR193BHG is a negative modulator of cholesterol biosynthesis pathway. MIR193BHG exerts a highly coordinated effect on the expression of cholesterol biosynthetic genes which leads to a measurable impact on the total cellular cholesterol content. The role of MIR193BHG in cholesterol metabolism also provided a mechanistic explanation for the sex maturation associated SNPs located in vicinity of this gene locus. Our work also provided preliminary insights into the functional mechanism of MIR193BHG by showing that its modulation of genes in cholesterol synthesis is predominantly at transcriptional level. Overall, my dissertation project identified a non-canonical hypoxia-inducible lncRNA, MIR193BHG, which modulates breast cancer invasion and metastasis via finetuning of cholesterol synthesis.

Pervasive transcription is widespread amongst eukaryotic genomes, and produces long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) in addition to classically annotated transcripts such as messenger RNAs (mRNAs). LncRNAs are heterogeneous in length and map to intergenic regions or overlap with annotated genes. Analogous to mRNAs, lncRNAs are transcribed by RNA polymerase II, regulated by common transcription factors, and possess 5’ caps and perhaps 3’ poly(A) tails. However, lncRNAs perform distinct functions, acting as scaffolds for ribonucleoprotein complexes or directing proteins to nucleic acid targets. The act of transcribing a lncRNA can also affect the local chromatin environment. Furthermore, whereas mRNAs are predominantly turned over in the cytoplasm, both nuclear and cytoplasmic pathways reportedly participate in lncRNA degradation. In this study, I address the question of when and how lncRNAs and mRNAs are distinguished in the cell. Messenger RNAs interact with a defined series of protein factors governing their production, processing and decay, and I hypothesised that lncRNAs might be similarly regulated. I therefore sought to determine which mRNA-binding proteins, if any, also bind lncRNAs. I reasoned that this would reveal the point at which lncRNAs and mRNAs diverge, and how differences in their biogenesis and turnover equip them for different roles. I selected factors from key stages of mRNA metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and identified their transcriptome-wide targets using CRAC (crosslinking and analysis of cDNAs). CRAC can detect interactions with low abundance transcripts under physiological conditions, and reveal where within each transcript a protein is bound. Analyses of binding sites in mature mRNAs and intron-containing pre-mRNAs revealed the order in which the tested factors interact with mRNAs, and which region they bind. The poly(A)-binding protein Nab2 bound throughout mRNAs, consistent with an architectural role, whereas the cytoplasmic decay factors Xrn1 and Ski2 bound to poly(A) tails, which might act as hubs to coordinate turnover. The RNA packaging factors Tho2 and Gbp2, and nuclear surveillance factors Mtr4 and Trf4 bound abundantly to intron-containing premRNAs, indicating that they act during or shortly after transcription. The tested factors bound lncRNAs to various extents. LncRNA binding was most abundant for Mtr4 and Trf4, moderate for Tho2, Gbp2, the cap binding complex component Sto1, and the 3’ end processing factors Nab2, Hrp1 and Pab1, and lowest for Xrn1, Ski2 and the export receptor Mex67. This suggests that early events in lncRNA and mRNA biogenesis are similar, but unlike mRNAs, most lncRNAs are retained and degraded in the nucleus. Analyses of two documented classes of lncRNA, cryptic unstable transcripts (CUTs) and stable unannotated transcripts (SUTs), revealed some differences. SUTs were most similar to mRNAs, with canonical cleavage and polyadenylation signals flanking their 3’ ends, and poly(A) tails bound by the poly(A)-binding protein Pab1. CUTs lacked these characteristics, and in comparison to SUTs bound more abundantly to Mtr4 and Trf4 and less so to Ski2, Xrn1 and Mex67. Furthermore, CUTs accumulated upon Hrp1 depletion, suggesting that Hrp1 functions non-canonically to promote CUT turnover. Mtr4, Trf4 and Nab2 also bound abundantly to promoter-proximal RNA fragments generated from ~1000 protein coding genes. These fragments possessed short oligo(A) tails (hallmarks of nuclear surveillance substrates), were not bound to cytoplasmic factors, and apparently correspond to a population of ~150-200 nt promoter-proximal lncRNAs. Notably, CRAC analyses of Mtr4 and Sto1 targets in yeast subjected to a media shift revealed widespread changes in the abundance and surveillance of mRNAs, promoter-proximal transcripts and CUTs, which at many loci were arranged in a complex transcriptional architecture. Overall, the transcriptome-wide binding analyses presented here reveal that lncRNAs diverge from mRNAs prior to export, and are predominantly retained in the nucleus. Transcript fate is apparently determined during 3’ end processing, with CUTs diverging from mRNAs early in transcription via a distinct termination pathway coupled to rapid turnover, and SUTs diverging during or shortly after cleavage and polyadenylation, making them more stable and perhaps prone to escape to the cytoplasm. Promoter-proximal transcripts might arise from termination associated with an early checkpoint in Pol II transcription. The diverse behaviours of lncRNAs arise from their association with distinct subsets of RNA binding proteins, some of which perform different roles when bound to different types of transcript. In conclusion, my results provide the foundation for a mechanistic understanding of how distinct classes of non-coding Pol II transcripts are produced, and how they can perform diverse functions throughout the nucleus.

Comparative genomic studies have identified noncoding regions of the genome which are often more highly conserved between species than protein-coding sequences. One possible explanation for this conservation of non-coding sequences is some form of selective constraint since sequence conservation at great evolutionary depths is a preliminary indication of functional constraint. Here, I consider nearly 2500 putative regulatory elements, termed Conserved Noncoding Elements (CNEs), that are conserved across seven vertebrate species (human, macaque, mouse, chicken, frog, zebrafish and fugu). I distinguish between CNEs that show accelerated rates of evolution and those that have remained more constrained throughout evolution, and identify CNEs that show higher than expected substitution rates in the human lineage that may be potential candidates of adaptive evolution. However, it is not trivial to demonstrate the action of selection on such sequences. It is relatively easier in the case of protein-coding DNA, since selection would be predicted to result in different rates of substitution for synonymous and non-synonymous sites. Hence, I use the same seven species to define phylogenetically invariant positions in CNEs in contrast to those that have at least one substitution and analyse them independently to determine if there is a positive correlation between evolutionary conservation and the strength of purifying selection at individual sites. In the 1000 Genomes, but not the HapMap, data I find a significant excess of rare derived alleles in CNEs relative to coding sequences. This excess of rare alleles can be best explained if selection is relatively consistent across sites, with most mutations resulting in a similar reduction in fitness. Finally, I explore patterns of variation in the allele-frequencies within human populations, however do not detect any significant differences in the underlying distribution of negatively selected variants among human populations.

Evidências sugerem que somente cerca de 2% do genoma codifica proteínas, mas que a maior parte dos 80% restante possui atividade transcricional. Por não ser codificadora de proteínas, essa fração do genoma foi considerada como \'DNA lixo\'. Entretanto, estudos mais recentes e análises pós-ENCODE vem demonstrando que parte significativa destes RNAs não-codificantes desempenham papéis importantes em processos biológicos essenciais e também em doenças. Os RNAs longos não codificadores (lncRNAs) embora tradicionalmente conhecidos pelo imprintinggenômico, vem demonstrando diversos mecanismos de regulação da expressão gênica, principalmente emnível pós transcricional. Um destes lncRNAs que está envolvido principalmente com a metastase em câncer é o HOTAIR. O melanoma tem sido utilizado como modelo de progressao do câncer por suas etapas bem definidas e por isso já tem apresentado alguns lncRNAs envolvidos na melanomagenese e progressão do melanoma, tal como o HOTAIR. Assim, neste trabalho foi analisado a expressão de lncRNAs de amostras de melanócito e melanoma, sendo que as amostras malignas representam as principais fases de progressão deste tipo de câncer. Foram analisados os níveis de expressão relativa. Além disso, foi realizado a expressão diferencial dos grupos representativos do melanoma. Foram encontrados lncRNAs com valores de expressão e significância (p-ajustado <0,01 e fold change >1) que podem ser indicativos de expressão associada a progressão do melanoma. Os lncRNAs mais diferencialmente expressos foram avaliados quanto a sua capacidade de interação proteína-RNA e literatura científica disponível e então foram selecionados para posteriores ensaios funcionais. / Evidence suggests that only about 2% of the genome encodes protein, but most remaining 80% has transcriptional activity. Since they do not coding for proteins, this fraction of the genome was considered \'junk DNA\', However, recent studies and post-ENCODE analisys has shown that significant part of these non-coding RNAs play important roles in essential biological processes and in disease. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) although traditionally known for genomic imprinting, has demonstrated several mechanisms of regulation of gene expression, especially at the post transcriptional level. One of these lncRNAs that is involved primarily with metastasis in câncer is HOTAIR. Melanoma has been used as a model of câncer progression by its well-defined steps, and so it has been presented some lncRNAs involved in melanoma progression and melanomagenese, as HOTAIR was demonstrated. In this work it was analyzed the expression of lncRNAs of melanocyte and melanoma samples, and malignant samples represent the main stages of progression of this type of câncer. Relative expression levels were analyzed. Furthermore, it was performed differential expression of representative melanoma groups. lncRNAs found with expression values and significance (p-adjusted <0.01 and fold change> 1) may be indicative of expression associated with melanoma progression. The lncRNAs more differentially expressed were evaluated for their ability to interact protein-RNA and available scientific literature and then were selected for further functional assays.