<p>The aim of this study is to explore how the people with a mental functional disorder experience living support. This studies research questions are; What kind of help do the clients receive from living support? Do they feel that they need more help or do they receive more help then they fell that they need? What does the relationship look like between the clients and the supporter? To answer these questions a qualitative research approach was used. Four clients where interviewed. The results are presented using themes and quotations. The themes that are used are; Activities done together with living support, the experience of social control, the experience of taking part in the planning and the experience of time limitation, and finally the relationship to the supporter. The results are analyzed using symbolic interactionism and normalization perspective. The results show that the clients receive help with housekeeping and other ordinary chores. The clients also experience that the support is a kind of social control, which they experience as positive. The clients feel that the supporter feels like a friend, even though most of the clients feel that there are limits to the friendship.</p>

The aim of this study is to explore how the people with a mental functional disorder experience living support. This studies research questions are; What kind of help do the clients receive from living support? Do they feel that they need more help or do they receive more help then they fell that they need? What does the relationship look like between the clients and the supporter? To answer these questions a qualitative research approach was used. Four clients where interviewed. The results are presented using themes and quotations. The themes that are used are; Activities done together with living support, the experience of social control, the experience of taking part in the planning and the experience of time limitation, and finally the relationship to the supporter. The results are analyzed using symbolic interactionism and normalization perspective. The results show that the clients receive help with housekeeping and other ordinary chores. The clients also experience that the support is a kind of social control, which they experience as positive. The clients feel that the supporter feels like a friend, even though most of the clients feel that there are limits to the friendship.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a fast-paced technology which can be found in different organizations, including the public sector of Sweden. This advanced tool implies many new work processes and an executive of sufficient basic information for such implementation. While finding a usage within the public sector, a problem occurs around how to and what is needed regarding the integration and processes for a complete normalization of the AI usage. Based on the following research question “What are the main challenges for public sector organizations when it comes to normalizing the use of AI in daily tasks?”, the aim of this thesis is therefore to investigate the key obstacles hindering the integration of AI tools into routine tasks. Through eight semi-structured interviews grounded in the Normalization Process Theory (NPT), the study explores theoretical frameworks surrounding AI, which includes generative AI, and an examination of AI implementations within the public sector context. The conclusion of this thesis reveals several obstacles preventing a complete normalization of AI within the public sector. These include the absence of clear guidelines regarding AI usage, lack of legitimacy for AI tools in current workflows, insufficient competence and development opportunities, and limited resources for AI advancement and utilization. These insights show the many challenges the public sector encounters in embracing AI, and furthermore a need for comprehensive strategies to address these obstacles to facilitate the seamless integration of AI technologies into daily operations.