本研究首先經由文獻探討瞭解學校行政組織結構的意涵、學校組織再造的相關概念及臺北縣國民中學行政組織的現況，復以臺北縣國民中學校長、現任行政人員及曾兼行政現為教師的候用校長爲研究對象，並以自編之「臺北縣國民中學行政組織再造調查問卷」進行問卷調查，以瞭解其對臺北縣國民中學組織再造之各種策略實施的意見，最後再訪問九十二學年度臺北縣四所試辦國中的校長或承辦主任，以明瞭其試辦動機、執行過程及遭遇之困境等。期能透過問卷調查及訪談方式蒐集相關資料，以提供有價值的資訊，作為主管教育行政機關對於國民中小學進行組織再造之法令修訂與制度規劃，或學者進行相關研究之參考。 本研究根據文獻探討、問卷調查與訪談結果，歸納以下結論： 壹、 對學校行政組織各處組及基本職掌之調整意見 一 建議於教務處增設「研究發展組」或「課研組」等。 二 認同訓導處之設置，但建議更名為「學生事務處」。 三 認同「維持」總務處之設處分組。 四 除有建議將輔導處更名為「諮商中心」、「學生諮商中心」、「輔導事務處」外，亦有建議將其廢除，而將所屬各組業務分別依業務性質轉移至相關處室或併入相關組。 貳、 五成以上的受試者認同設備組長、資訊組長、註冊組長可由「專任學校行政人員擔任」。 參、 七成以上受試者認同「各校在總員額不變的前提下，彈性調整專任、兼任、委外與聘僱人力」。 肆、 五成以上的受試者認同學校在實施組織再造時，可以「檢視工作項目、精簡行政流程」、「依據學校需求，調整行政組織」、「爭取社會資源，改善辦學環境」、「依照教學需要，聘用支援人員」、「善用資訊網路，建構網路平台」之策略為之。 伍、 大多數受試者認同「與教學無關的行政工作，採勞務外包處理」。 陸、 約七成六的受試者不認同主計、人事合署辦公。 柒、 約八成受試者認同遴聘兼任教師；約六成九的受試者不認同遴聘巡迴教師；約五成二的受試者不認同數校共聘教師。 最後，根據上述研究結論，提出具體建議，以供教育行政機關、學校行政及未來研究之參考。 / First all, this research adopts literature review to probe into the condition of school administrative structure, relevant concepts of school organizational reconstruction, and the current situation of administration of Taipei County junior high schools. Then research objects are school principal, incumbent administrators and people who were ever being concurrently administrative teachers before, and use author’s compilation, “Taipei County Administrative Organization Reconstruction Questionnaire” for survey to figure out relevant opinions of Taipei County junior high school organization reconstruction. Finally, visiting headmasters or directors of four testing Taipei County junior high schools in the academic year 2003 can try to understand the motivation of trial, the process of execution, and difficulties they have experienced etc. It expects that questionnaire and interview method of collecting the related data can provide valuable information to chief education administrative organization as a reference for revising regulation and system planning of junior high school organizational reconstruction, or scholar’s relevant research. According to literature review, questionnaire, the result of interview, conclusion are summarized as the followings: 1. Adjustment opinion for each location and section of school administrative organization and basic duty a. Suggest Dean's Office to add “Research Development Team” or “Course Research Team” etc. b. Recognize Education Guidance Section set up, but suggest changing name as “Student Affair Section”. c. Recognize to “keep” disciplinary section of general administration section. d. Besides suggestion of changing name as “Consultation Center”, “Student Consultation Center”, and “Guidance Affair Section”, it also suggests that abolishes it and transfers to the related section which bases on business character or merge into the related section. 2. There is more than 50% of interviewers cognize facility section director, information section director, registration office director that can replace by full-time school administrative personnel. 3. There is more than 70% of interviewers who think that “under the unchanged of total prescribed number in each school, it can be flexible to adjust as full time, part time, subcontracting, and hiring human resource”. 4. There is more than 50% of interviewers who recognize can “Evaluate task item, simplified administrative process”, “Adjust administrative organization according to school requirement”, “Get social resource and improve school establishment environment”, “Hire assistants according to teaching requirement”, “Cherish information network and set up network platform” etc policies when executing organizational reconstruction. 5. The majority interviewers recognize “Administrative task which is not related to teaching and apply labor service a process of contract”. 6. The majority interviewers don’t recognize that auditing department and human resource department shall be together in an office. 7. There is more than 80% of interviewers recognize to select or hire part-time teachers; around 69% of interviewers don’t think to select circulating teachers; and around 52% of interviewers don’t think to hire teachers together in several schools. In short, according to the above research result, it proposes concrete suggestions to provide education administrative organization, school administration, and the future research as a reference.