No description available.

No description available.

<p>Loosening of implants is a frequent complication in orthopaedic surgery. The aim of this thesis was to evaluate hydroxyapatite coating of pedicle screws with mechanical and histological methods and to correlate the results with the radiological findings.</p><p>Hydroxyapatite (HA) coating of pedicle screws was investigated in experimental studies in sheep. Nine sheep were operated on with destabilising laminectomies at L2-L3 and L4-L5 and stabilised with pedicle screw instrumentations, where HA coated and uncoated screws were used in a randomised fashion. After both 6 and 12 weeks of implantation, the HA coated screws demonstrated a higher bone-to-implant contact and a higher amount of bone in the area close to the screw. The pull-out resistance, stiffness and total energy to failure was higher for the HA coated screws after 12 weeks of implantation.</p><p>HA coating of pedicle screws was examined in two clinical studies. In the first series, the patients were stabilised with pedicle screw instrumentations, where HA coated screws were used in either the upper or lower instrumented level in a randomised fashion. After 10-22 months of implantation, the extraction torque was markedly higher for the HA coated screws. In the second series, instrumentations with uncoated, partly HA coated or fully HA coated screws were used. After 11-16 months implantation, the extraction torques were recorded. There were significant differences between all three groups, with the lowest extraction torques for the uncoated screws and the highest torques for the fully HA coated screws. The frequency of radiolucent zones surrounding the screws was higher for the uncoated screws than for the HA coated screws.</p><p>Radiographs from both experimental and clinical studies were examined. Screws demonstrating radiolucent zones were compared to screws without zones with respect to pull-out resistance, extraction torque, bone-to-implant contact and amount of bone surrounding the screws. All these variables demonstrated higher values for the screws without radiolucent zones. The frequency of radiolucent zones surrounding uncoated screws in the clinical study was 53%.</p><p>Conclusions: Radiolucent zones are good predictors of screw loosening. The frequency of radiolucent zones is higher than previously described. Hydroxyapatite coating improves the purchase of pedicle screws and reduces the frequency of screw loosening.</p>

Loosening of implants is a frequent complication in orthopaedic surgery. The aim of this thesis was to evaluate hydroxyapatite coating of pedicle screws with mechanical and histological methods and to correlate the results with the radiological findings. Hydroxyapatite (HA) coating of pedicle screws was investigated in experimental studies in sheep. Nine sheep were operated on with destabilising laminectomies at L2-L3 and L4-L5 and stabilised with pedicle screw instrumentations, where HA coated and uncoated screws were used in a randomised fashion. After both 6 and 12 weeks of implantation, the HA coated screws demonstrated a higher bone-to-implant contact and a higher amount of bone in the area close to the screw. The pull-out resistance, stiffness and total energy to failure was higher for the HA coated screws after 12 weeks of implantation. HA coating of pedicle screws was examined in two clinical studies. In the first series, the patients were stabilised with pedicle screw instrumentations, where HA coated screws were used in either the upper or lower instrumented level in a randomised fashion. After 10-22 months of implantation, the extraction torque was markedly higher for the HA coated screws. In the second series, instrumentations with uncoated, partly HA coated or fully HA coated screws were used. After 11-16 months implantation, the extraction torques were recorded. There were significant differences between all three groups, with the lowest extraction torques for the uncoated screws and the highest torques for the fully HA coated screws. The frequency of radiolucent zones surrounding the screws was higher for the uncoated screws than for the HA coated screws. Radiographs from both experimental and clinical studies were examined. Screws demonstrating radiolucent zones were compared to screws without zones with respect to pull-out resistance, extraction torque, bone-to-implant contact and amount of bone surrounding the screws. All these variables demonstrated higher values for the screws without radiolucent zones. The frequency of radiolucent zones surrounding uncoated screws in the clinical study was 53%. Conclusions: Radiolucent zones are good predictors of screw loosening. The frequency of radiolucent zones is higher than previously described. Hydroxyapatite coating improves the purchase of pedicle screws and reduces the frequency of screw loosening.

The following work presents the design of a haptic training simulator for pedicle screw insertions in pediatric scoliosis surgery. In particular, the haptic simulator simulates the haptic sensations associated with probe channeling through the pedicle using the free-hand technique. The design includes 1 DOF custom haptic device, haptic model, and controller. The design is tested and evaluated for feasibility through a small pilot studying involving 5 expert surgeons. Significant agreement across expert surgeons was obtained regarding the feasibility and potential for the simulator to be a useful training tool.

The following work presents the design of a haptic training simulator for pedicle screw insertions in pediatric scoliosis surgery. In particular, the haptic simulator simulates the haptic sensations associated with probe channeling through the pedicle using the free-hand technique. The design includes 1 DOF custom haptic device, haptic model, and controller. The design is tested and evaluated for feasibility through a small pilot studying involving 5 expert surgeons. Significant agreement across expert surgeons was obtained regarding the feasibility and potential for the simulator to be a useful training tool.

A cirurgia da coluna vertebral tem se desenvolvido muito nos últimos anos em decorrência da evolução dos sistemas de fixação. O comportamento da interface do parafuso com o osso continua sendo um aspecto não muito dominado. Como o parafuso é a âncora de sustentação, o trabalho procura investigar as técnicas de introdução do parafuso pedicular. Para atingir esse objetivo desenvolvemos o trabalho por meio de estudo com ensaios mecânicos de arrancamento e estudo histológico. Dois tipos de parafusos pediculares foram utilizados: parafuso pedicular do sistema USIS (Ulrich) e parafuso pedicular do sistema USS (Synthes). Os ensaios de arrancamento foram realizados em corpos de prova de madeira e poliuretano. O estudo histológico foi realizado em vértebras lombares de cadáver humano. No estudo envolvendo o parafuso USIS, foram testados os seguintes parâmetros: orifícios feitos com sonda e orifícios feitos com broca, todos do mesmo diâmetro do diâmetro interno do parafuso. Também foi testado o efeito do macheamento em relação ao não macheamento, nos orifícios feitos com broca. No estudo com os parafusos USS foram testados o efeito do diâmetro do orifício piloto tanto no estudo histológico como no arrancamento. No arrancamento destes parafusos também foi testado o efeito do tipo de orifício feito com sonda e com broca. O trabalho foi dividido em etapas: Primeira etapa foi o estudo de arrancamento do parafuso USIS; segunda etapa, estudo histológico de vértebra instrumentada com parafuso USIS, esta parte do trabalho foi constituída por análise de microscopia de luz e microscopia eletrônica de varredura; terceira etapa foi o arrancamento do parafuso USS; e quarta etapa foi o estudo histológico de vértebra instrumentada com parafuso USS. Os resultados da primeira etapa demonstraram que sonda teve efeito melhor do que broca, porque o resultado dos ensaios de arrancamento nos orifícios feitos com sondas teve maior força de arrancamento do que nos orifícios feitos por brocas. Na segunda etapa, análise histológica, verificou-se que os orifícios feitos por sonda apresentaram-se menores e com menor índice de fragmentação ao redor dos orifícios. Esses feitos tiveram diferença estatística significante, tanto na primeira, quanto na segunda etapa. Com relação ao macheamento não foi constatada diferença entre o não macheamento, em nenhuma das duas etapas. Na terceira etapa foi observado que, quando o orifício piloto ultrapassa o diâmetro interno do parafuso, ocorre tendência de queda na força de arrancamento de modo significativo, enquanto que orifício menor que o orifício piloto não tende a causar muita diferença na força de arrancamento em relação ao orifício correspondente ao diâmetro interno do parafuso. Também foi observado que o orifício feito com sonda oferece melhor força de ancoragem do que orifício feito com broca. Na quarta etapa foi constatado que quanto menor a broca para abrir o orifício piloto, menor o diâmetro do orifício, e não houve diferença significativa quanto ao índice de fragmentação ao redor do orifício entre os diferentes tamanhos de broca. Como conclusão pode-se dizer que sonda é melhor para se fazer o orifício piloto, uma vez que alarga menos o orifício, lesa menos as trabéculas ao redor do orifício e proporciona maior força de ancoragem do que broca. Também se pode concluir que o instrumental de menor diâmetro para abertura do orifício piloto é melhor, e o ponto crítico seria o diâmetro interno do parafuso. Não se deve fazer orifício piloto com instrumento de diâmetro maior que o diâmetro interno do parafuso. Não se constatou vantagem em relação ao fato de realizar ou deixar de realizar o macheamento. / Spine surgery has developed a lot in the last years because of the evolution of the fixation system. The behavior of a screw in the bone is still unknown in many ways. Because the screw is the anchor of sustentation, this work tries to find the answers involving the pedicle screw fixation. To reach this objective we developed this work based on mechanical and histological studies. Two kinds of pedicle screws were used: pedicle screw of the USIS (Ulrich) and pedicle screw of the USS system (Synthes). The pullout tests were made in wood and polyurethane. The histological study was done in lumbar vertebra of humans. In the study about the USIS screw, the follow parameters were tested: hole done with probe and hole done with drill, all of the same inner diameter of the screw. The effect of tapping and not tapping the hole done with drill was tested. In the USS screw study, the effect of the diameter pilot hole in the pullout tests and its historical analysis was seen. In the pullout tests of these screws, both kind of holes done with probes and a drill were tested. The work was divided into stages; first stage was the study of the pullout of the USIS screw; second stage was two studies, a light-microscopic one and a sweeping-electronic-microscope one of the slides of the instrumented vertebra with USIS screws; third stage was the study of the USS screws pullout comparing the relationship between the diameter of the holes and the inner diameter of the screw together with the type of hole (drill and probe); fourth stage was light-microscopic histological study of the instrumented vertebras which had had USIS screws. Results of the first stage showed that probes were more efficient than drills because the mechanical tests of pullouts from probe-made-holes showed the need of the use of a stronger force. In the second stage, a light-microscopic analysis showed that probe-made-holes had a lesser minimum diameter and a lower index of fragmentation than drill-made holes. With relation to the tapping, there was no difference between the holes. Under electronic microscope sweeping, it was seen that probes betters compact the bone around the screw. In the third stage, it was seen that when 9 the pilot orifice was greater than the screws internal diameter a significantly lower force was needed for pullout, while when the pilot orifice was smaller it did not significantly increase the force needed. It was also seen that probe-made-holes had a better anchorage than the drill-made-holes. In the fourth stage, the histological analysis of the slides done with light-microscopy showed that the smaller the diameter of the drill the smaller minimum diameter; there was no significant difference between fragmentation indexes. Conclusion: Probes are better than drills to make a pilot hole because they cause less damage to the surrounding bone and give a stronger anchorage for the screw; the smaller the instrument used to make the pilot hole, better will be the strength of the screws anchorage; the critical point which the hole must not exceed is the internal diameter of the screw. Tapping, or not, makes no difference to the anchorage.

Foi realizado estudo experimental com a finalidade de avaliar a participação do osso cortical e osso esponjoso dos pedículos vertebrais, na fixação dos parafusos pediculares. Foram utilizados 10 segmentos de coluna lombar de adultos, retirados durante autópsia. O diâmetro dos pedículos das vértebras de L1 a L5 foram avaliados, considerando o diâmetro total e o diâmetyro do osso esponjoso, tendo sido realizadas essas medidas por meio de tomografia computadorizada e medida direta. Os segmentos da coluna vertebral foram divididos em dois grupos para o estudo, sendo que cada grupo era formado por 5 conjuntos de segmentos da coluna lombar. No primeiro grupo a perfuração era realizada segundo os pontos de orientação utilizados nos procedimentos cirúrgicos ( faceta articular e processo transverso). No segundo grupo foi realizado corte transversal na porção média do pedículo, de modo que a perfuração e introdução dos parafusos no seu interior foram efetuados sob visão diereta. Após a perfuração dos pedículos utilizando-se broca de 3 mm, os parafusos eram introduzidos no interior do pedículo vertebral em ordem crescente de seus diâmetros, até que fosse observada alteração estrutural do pedículo, que eram avaliados por meio de medidas sucessivas, utilizando-se paquímetro e observação direta. Foram utilizados parafusos com diâmetro que variou de 3 a 12,5 mm, com progressão de 0,5 mm. Quando o diâmetro do parafuso excedia a resistência estrutural do pedículo, duas lesões foram observadas, a deformação plástica e o rompimento. No grupo I houve um número maior de deformação plástica, mas pelos cálculos estatísticos não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos. Os diâmetro tomográficos obtidos pela medida tomográfica e medida direta apresentaram-se diferentes e sem correlação entre si. No grupo II, como os parafuos foram introduzidos de modo mais centralizado, houve maior número de parafusos com diâmetro maior que o diâmetro do osso esponjoso, mas também não apresentou diferença entre os grupos, segundo avaliações estatísticas. Análise dos valores do diâmetro pedicular, diâmetro do osso esponjoso e do parafuso de maior diâmetro introduzido sem lesar o pedículo permitiu observar que a camada de osso cortical do pedículo foi pouco ocupada pelo parafuso em ambos os grupos. O valor médio da porcentagem do diâmetro do pedículo ocupado pelo parafuso no grupo I foi de 70,7% e no grupo II 75,34%. Foi observado que os parafusos, de um modo geral, apresentaram ancoragem principalmente na porção de osso esponjoso do pedículo vertebral, tendo sido pequena a porcentagem de osso cortical do pedículo vertebral utilizado para a sua ancoragem. / Spine surgery has developed a lot in the last years because of the evolution of the fixation system. The behavior of a screw in the bone is still unknown in many ways. Because the screw is the anchor of sustentation, this work tries to find the answers involving the pedicle screw fixation. To reach this objective we developed this work based on mechanical and histological studies. Two kinds of pedicle screws were used: pedicle screw of the USIS (Ulrich) and pedicle screw of the USS system (Synthes). The pullout tests were made in wood and polyurethane. The histological study was done in lumbar vertebra of humans. In the study about the USIS screw, the follow parameters were tested: hole done with probe and hole done with drill, all of the same inner diameter of the screw. The effect of tapping and not tapping the hole done with drill was tested. In the USS screw study, the effect of the diameter pilot hole in the pullout tests and its historical analysis was seen. In the pullout tests of these screws, both kind of holes done with probes and a drill were tested. The work was divided into stages; first stage was the study of the pullout of the USIS screw; second stage was two studies, a light-microscopic one and a sweeping-electronic-microscope one of the slides of the instrumented vertebra with USIS screws; third stage was the study of the USS screws pullout comparing the relationship between the diameter of the holes and the inner diameter of the screw together with the type of hole (drill and probe); fourth stage was light-microscopic histological study of the instrumented vertebras which had had USIS screws. Results of the first stage showed that probes were more efficient than drills because the mechanical tests of pullouts from probe-made-holes showed the need of the use of a stronger force. In the second stage, a light-microscopic analysis showed that probe-made-holes had a lesser minimum diameter and a lower index of fragmentation than drill-made holes. With relation to the tapping, there was no difference between the holes. Under electronic microscope sweeping, it was seen that probes betters compact the bone around the screw. In the third stage, it was seen that when the pilot orifice was greater than the screws internal diameter a significantly lower force was needed for pullout, while when the pilot orifice was smaller it did not significantly increase the force needed. It was also seen that probe-made-holes had a better anchorage than the drill-made-holes. In the fourth stage, the histological analysis of the slides done with light-microscopy showed that the smaller the diameter of the drill the smaller minimum diameter; there was no significant difference between fragmentation indexes. Conclusion: Probes are better than drills to make a pilot hole because they cause less damage to the surrounding bone and give a stronger anchorage for the screw; the smaller the instrument used to make the pilot hole, better will be the strength of the screw\'s anchorage; the critical point which the hole must not exceed is the internal diameter of the screw. Tapping, or not, makes no difference to the anchorage.

A cirurgia da coluna vertebral tem se desenvolvido muito nos últimos anos em decorrência da evolução dos sistemas de fixação. O comportamento da interface do parafuso com o osso continua sendo um aspecto não muito dominado. Como o parafuso é a âncora de sustentação, o trabalho procura investigar as técnicas de introdução do parafuso pedicular. Para atingir esse objetivo desenvolvemos o trabalho por meio de estudo com ensaios mecânicos de arrancamento e estudo histológico. Dois tipos de parafusos pediculares foram utilizados: parafuso pedicular do sistema USIS (Ulrich) e parafuso pedicular do sistema USS (Synthes). Os ensaios de arrancamento foram realizados em corpos de prova de madeira e poliuretano. O estudo histológico foi realizado em vértebras lombares de cadáver humano. No estudo envolvendo o parafuso USIS, foram testados os seguintes parâmetros: orifícios feitos com sonda e orifícios feitos com broca, todos do mesmo diâmetro do diâmetro interno do parafuso. Também foi testado o efeito do macheamento em relação ao não macheamento, nos orifícios feitos com broca. No estudo com os parafusos USS foram testados o efeito do diâmetro do orifício piloto tanto no estudo histológico como no arrancamento. No arrancamento destes parafusos também foi testado o efeito do tipo de orifício feito com sonda e com broca. O trabalho foi dividido em etapas: Primeira etapa foi o estudo de arrancamento do parafuso USIS; segunda etapa, estudo histológico de vértebra instrumentada com parafuso USIS, esta parte do trabalho foi constituída por análise de microscopia de luz e microscopia eletrônica de varredura; terceira etapa foi o arrancamento do parafuso USS; e quarta etapa foi o estudo histológico de vértebra instrumentada com parafuso USS. Os resultados da primeira etapa demonstraram que sonda teve efeito melhor do que broca, porque o resultado dos ensaios de arrancamento nos orifícios feitos com sondas teve maior força de arrancamento do que nos orifícios feitos por brocas. Na segunda etapa, análise histológica, verificou-se que os orifícios feitos por sonda apresentaram-se menores e com menor índice de fragmentação ao redor dos orifícios. Esses feitos tiveram diferença estatística significante, tanto na primeira, quanto na segunda etapa. Com relação ao macheamento não foi constatada diferença entre o não macheamento, em nenhuma das duas etapas. Na terceira etapa foi observado que, quando o orifício piloto ultrapassa o diâmetro interno do parafuso, ocorre tendência de queda na força de arrancamento de modo significativo, enquanto que orifício menor que o orifício piloto não tende a causar muita diferença na força de arrancamento em relação ao orifício correspondente ao diâmetro interno do parafuso. Também foi observado que o orifício feito com sonda oferece melhor força de ancoragem do que orifício feito com broca. Na quarta etapa foi constatado que quanto menor a broca para abrir o orifício piloto, menor o diâmetro do orifício, e não houve diferença significativa quanto ao índice de fragmentação ao redor do orifício entre os diferentes tamanhos de broca. Como conclusão pode-se dizer que sonda é melhor para se fazer o orifício piloto, uma vez que alarga menos o orifício, lesa menos as trabéculas ao redor do orifício e proporciona maior força de ancoragem do que broca. Também se pode concluir que o instrumental de menor diâmetro para abertura do orifício piloto é melhor, e o ponto crítico seria o diâmetro interno do parafuso. Não se deve fazer orifício piloto com instrumento de diâmetro maior que o diâmetro interno do parafuso. Não se constatou vantagem em relação ao fato de realizar ou deixar de realizar o macheamento. / Spine surgery has developed a lot in the last years because of the evolution of the fixation system. The behavior of a screw in the bone is still unknown in many ways. Because the screw is the anchor of sustentation, this work tries to find the answers involving the pedicle screw fixation. To reach this objective we developed this work based on mechanical and histological studies. Two kinds of pedicle screws were used: pedicle screw of the USIS (Ulrich) and pedicle screw of the USS system (Synthes). The pullout tests were made in wood and polyurethane. The histological study was done in lumbar vertebra of humans. In the study about the USIS screw, the follow parameters were tested: hole done with probe and hole done with drill, all of the same inner diameter of the screw. The effect of tapping and not tapping the hole done with drill was tested. In the USS screw study, the effect of the diameter pilot hole in the pullout tests and its historical analysis was seen. In the pullout tests of these screws, both kind of holes done with probes and a drill were tested. The work was divided into stages; first stage was the study of the pullout of the USIS screw; second stage was two studies, a light-microscopic one and a sweeping-electronic-microscope one of the slides of the instrumented vertebra with USIS screws; third stage was the study of the USS screws pullout comparing the relationship between the diameter of the holes and the inner diameter of the screw together with the type of hole (drill and probe); fourth stage was light-microscopic histological study of the instrumented vertebras which had had USIS screws. Results of the first stage showed that probes were more efficient than drills because the mechanical tests of pullouts from probe-made-holes showed the need of the use of a stronger force. In the second stage, a light-microscopic analysis showed that probe-made-holes had a lesser minimum diameter and a lower index of fragmentation than drill-made holes. With relation to the tapping, there was no difference between the holes. Under electronic microscope sweeping, it was seen that probes betters compact the bone around the screw. In the third stage, it was seen that when 9 the pilot orifice was greater than the screws internal diameter a significantly lower force was needed for pullout, while when the pilot orifice was smaller it did not significantly increase the force needed. It was also seen that probe-made-holes had a better anchorage than the drill-made-holes. In the fourth stage, the histological analysis of the slides done with light-microscopy showed that the smaller the diameter of the drill the smaller minimum diameter; there was no significant difference between fragmentation indexes. Conclusion: Probes are better than drills to make a pilot hole because they cause less damage to the surrounding bone and give a stronger anchorage for the screw; the smaller the instrument used to make the pilot hole, better will be the strength of the screws anchorage; the critical point which the hole must not exceed is the internal diameter of the screw. Tapping, or not, makes no difference to the anchorage.

INTRODUCTION: Computer aided navigation is an important tool which has the capability to enhance surgical accuracy, while reducing negative outcomes. However, it is a relatively new technology and has not yet been accepted as the standard of care in all settings. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present study is to present the development and current state of technologies in computer aided navigation in Orthopedic Spine Surgery, specifically in navigated placement of pedicle screws, to examine the clinical need for navigation, it's effect on surgical accuracy and clinical outcome and to determine whether the benefits justify the costs, and make recommendations for future use and enhancements. CONCLUSION: Computer aided navigation in pedicle screw placement enhances accuracy, reduces the probability of negative outcomes, reduces the exposure of the patient and staff to radiation, reduces operative time, and provides cost-savings. Future investigations may potentially enhance this effect further with the use of innovative augmented reality type displays.