Rationale: Prescription drug abuse and misuse (PDA/M) is a significant problem in Central Appalachia and continues to grow. Since 2000, Tennessee has seen a 250% increase in prescription overdose deaths. Nationally, most prescription painkillers are prescribed by primary care doctors and dentists, rather than specialists. Objective: To develop and test a survey instrument aimed at understanding family physician knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about opioid therapy prescribing. Design: Survey development. Setting: Survey questions were developed based on results of five focus groups held in primary care clinics in Northeast Tennessee and Southwest Virginia. Surveys were validated and tested by faculty and residents in three family medicine residency clinics in Northeast Tennessee. Participants: Survey questions were face validated for clarity and relevance by family physician attendings and third year residents (N=29). All faculty attendings and residents (N≈85) at the same family medicine residency clinics will be invited to complete the survey for psychometric testing. Main and Secondary Outcome Measures: Survey questions have been face validated for clarity and relevance. Data from the psychometric testing phase will be analyzed for internal consistency and inter-item correlations. Exploratory factor analysis will be used to identify underlying constructs. Results: Based on the results of the focus groups and physician expertise, a 51-item instrument was developed. Following face validation, wording was clarified on 25 questions, 3 questions were removed, and 5 questions were added, resulting in a 53-item instrument. Psychometric testing has not been completed at this time, but will be completed at the time of presentation. Conclusions: Researchers intend to use the findings to improve policies and practice guidelines for primary care clinics in the Appalachian region. Results will be used to design CME activities to decrease PDA/M and to help foster more effective and responsible prescribing of pain medication.

It is estimated that the divorce rate for marriages in which at least one party is a physician is 10-20% higher than the general population. Predicting the variables that contribute to marital satisfaction, identifying the skills associated with those behaviors and developing a residency curriculum to teach the skills to resident physicians is the focus of this study. Intimacy, conflict resolution and emotional expressiveness have all been identified as important aspects of marital satisfaction. We will determine how each of these variables contributes to marital satisfaction using multilevel logistic regression. The results will be used to develop a skills based training curriculum for residency to improve the lives and well-being of physicians and their families.

No description available.

BACKGROUND: Audit and feedback interventions have the potential to improve clinical care. Electronically captured administrative and clinical data routinely collected in Canadian hospitals may be used to provide feedback to physicians in general medicine in-patient care. The computation of appropriate quality indicator requires patient care to be attributed to individual physician(s). The appropriate attribution method in contexts where multiple physicians are involved in the care with varying degree of responsibilities that change over time is not straight forward. There has so far been little guidance in the literature of how to best accomplish this. The objective of this study is to identify trade-offs of different physician attribution methods by applying them to the same large clinical dataset. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the GEMINI dataset consisting of administrative and clinical data of hospitalized patients discharged from General Medicine service between April 1, 2010 and October 31, 2017 extracted from electronic systems at 7 hospitals in the Greater Toronto Area. A set of four quality indicators (length of stay, 30-day re-admission, in-patient mortality, use of advanced imaging) used in an audit and feedback intervention was calculated for each physician using 5 different physician attribution methods: STRICT (only patients with the same admitting, discharging, and most responsible physician with length of stay less than 14 days were included to capture those patients whose care was provided by only 1 physician), ADMIT (attribute care to admitting physician), DISCHARGE (attribute care to discharging physician), MRP (attribute care to most responsible physician), and ANY (attribute care to admitting, discharging, and most responsible physicians). The comprehensiveness and comparability of each attribution method were calculated. The actual differences of the indicator value and physician ranking for each indicator was compared between each pair of attribution methods. RESULTS: 222,490 hospitalization cared for by 203 physicians were included. STRICT attribution method was least comprehensive, capturing only 40% of patients cared for by a physician), while ADMIT, DISCHARGE, and MRP captured 70% of patients. All attribution methods produced patient populations for individual physicians that were comparable to those seen at each hospital. STRICT attribution method resulted in length of stay values 4.7 to 6.8 days shorter than other attribution methods and had poor rank correlation of physicians when compared to other attribution methods (spearman rank correlation 0.27 to 0.52). Absolute differences for the other 3 indicators were small between all attribution methods, and relative ranking of physicians were reasonably preserved (strong or very strong rank correlation). INTERPRETATION: Different attribution methods have different comprehensiveness, but all produced mostly comparable patient populations for physicians. Certain attribution method can affect apparent physician performance for some quality indicators but not others. The impact of physician attribution methods deserve consideration during the design of audit and feedback interventions. / Graduate

Bombarded by constant and rapid change, healthcare organizations feel a sense of urgency to meet their needs for leaders. They rely on physicians to lead at all levels in their healthcare organizations. For them to successfully navigate today's healthcare environment, they require more than a medical education. To address this need, healthcare organizations are developing in-house leadership development programs.In this paper, I conduct a case study of physicians transitioning into leadership and their self-efficacy facilitated through an in-house leadership development program. Documentation, semi-structured interviews, and observations are examined to explore how physicians think about their leadership experiences following their participation in a six-month leadership development program.The study also explores at a high-level how these experiences influenced physician's self-efficacy as a first step in developing a theory of physician leadership and self-efficacy.

Context: Over a decade ago, leaders in rural medical education established the Rural Medical Educators (RME) Group, an interest group within the National Rural Health Association, to support faculty in rural medical education programs. This group has convened an annual RME conclave since 2006. In 2008, this conclave convened 15 national leaders in rural medical education at The University of Alabama. Methods: In preparation for the conclave, potential participants were e-mailed a set of questions regarding their respective medical education program's initiating motivation, support, resistance, resources, accomplishments, and continuation plans. Analysis of participants' responses resulted in a question guide that was used at a focus group conducted at the conclave. Purpose: The purpose of the focus group was to explore the experiences of established rural medical educators related to program development and maintenance. The focus group was recorded and transcribed, and then analyzed using the constant comparative method. Findings: Five essential elements for rural medical education programs emerged from the analysis. The elements were: admit the right student, include curricular elements that occur and are required in rural training sites, establish a cadre of rural physicians who are dedicated to education of their successors, secure financial and relational support for the program, and evaluate program progress. Discussion and Conclusions: Discussion about these 5 elements can provide program guidance to neophyte rural medical education programs. Five recommendations are presented in an effort to continue discussion about the essential elements and identify actions that rural medical educators can take to further assist developing programs.

Patients with the same underlying concern express this with different styles that predict preference for physician responses. One hundred primary care patients imagined having chest pain and selected from a videotape, the most likely response which they would tell their physician: (1) symptoms only - no disclosure of underlying concern; (2) symptoms and a "Clue" to an underlying concern; or (3) symptom with an explicit concern. Depending on their preferred expression, they were presented videotaped doctors responses to that disclosure and ranked their response preferences. Patients stating they would present with symptoms only (17%) preferred a biomedical question response; patients selecting a symptom and a clue (43%) were equally comfortable with a biomedical question, facilitation or, an exploration of the clue. Of patients presenting with an explicit concern (40%), most wanted the physician to acknowledge and explore the origins of that concern.

Academic tenure, introduced by the American Association of University Professors in 1915, is a status that protects employed faculty members from summary dismissal and, thereby, intends to preserve their academic freedom. Initially tied to financial security through salary guarantees, academic tenure has evolved into a concept associated less with monetary support and strict scholarly productivity than at its inception, primarily owing to the growing number of clinician educators with highly competitive salaries at university-affiliated academic health centers. Achievement of tenure continues to require significant additional time and effort, but modifications in the requisite probationary period and the allowance at some institutions of tenure for part-time faculty have offset some costs, while still maintaining leadership opportunities for the individual and academic benefits for both the individual and the institution. How institutions balance their own financial risk and the demands on faculty members is likely to determine the future of tenure.

Palliative care has become an integral part of healthcare throughout the United States. The goals of this discipline are focused on improving patient quality of life during times of illness. These goals are universal throughout medicine and apply to all practicing providers. An interdisciplinary council developed core competencies for this discipline which includes pain assessment and management as a key component. Throughout healthcare, the assessment and management of pain continues to be a challenge for providers. A review of the literature has demonstrated that untreated pain has become an increasing burden on the patient population. Many providers feel training during their medical education is insufficient and they entered the workforce unprepared. An evaluation of current standards put forth by educational governing bodies has shown the regulations regarding palliative care, pain assessment in particular, to be scattered and non-specific. It is apparent a more concise curriculum, dedicated to palliative care and pain assessment is needed for all future medical providers to hone the essential tools needed to properly evaluate and treat pain. The proposed intervention consists of an educational module which combines a didactic session and student role playing module focused on pain assessment. This intervention will focus on Physician Assistant students in particular, as this profession will continue to play a large role in healthcare. Didactic sessions focused on pain assessment, a core competency of palliative care, will be presented to the students. A role playing exercise following these didactics will allow students to practice such pain assessment skills and also explore what it may be like to be a patient in pain and provide them with insight on the importance of adequately assessing related symptoms. The current model of education regarding palliative care has proven to be ineffective, especially regarding pain assessment. A more concise, dedicated module for this essential skill is needed for students to become more efficient, effective providers. With the ability to assess patients more effectively, providers will be able to manage patients’ pain and decrease the burden untreated pain has put on the population as a whole.

Abstract There is limited information regarding physician satisfaction as it relates to the presence of a surgical pathology department in rural hospitals. Physician satisfaction directly influences the quality of patient care. The theoretical frameworks that informed this study included institutional theory and population ecology. The research questions addressed differences in levels of physician satisfaction between physicians who have access to an on-site surgical pathology department and physicians who do not have such access. The research also examined differences in satisfaction between physician specialties that have or do not have access to an on-site surgical pathology department services. A quantitative, cross-sectional study was employed utilizing three primary instruments: the Henry Ford Hospital Survey, Standardized (Synoptic) Pathology Reports, and PAR Medical Colleague Questionnaire. Statistical analyses including ANOVA, linear regression, and t tests were used to examine the relationships between the study's variables. The results revealed that there is statistically significant evidence to support that on-site surgical pathology department services influence physician satisfaction. Potential implications for positive social change from this study include a better understanding and awareness of the relationship between physician satisfaction and utilization of on-site pathology services, which may ultimately benefit healthcare facilities by more intently addressing quality of care and patient satisfaction.