No description available.

Människor upplever ånger dagligen, och beroende på vilka beslut som fattas kan vissa beslut ångras mer än andra. Därför undersöktes skillnader i typer av ånger med hjälp av webbenkäter som delades via Facebooks PM funktion. 80 deltagare ingick där de fick beskriva två saker som de ångrade mest att de hade gjort samt två saker som de ångrade mest att de inte hade gjort. Dessa skattades sedan på hur mycket de ångrade det samt hur pass viktigt/allvarligt de upplevde det. En signifikant skillnad upptäcktes där saker som de ångrade att de inte hade gjort skattades som viktigare/allvarligare än det som de ångrade att de hade gjort. Inom kategorierna kärlek/sex/äktenskap och familj/vänskap ångrade deltagarna mest saker som de hade gjort respektive inte hade gjort. De omkringliggande faktorerna kan vara det som påverkar upplevelsen av ånger oavsett om det är pågrund av en handling eller icke-handling.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--UCLA, 2008. / Vita. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 341-357).

No description available.

No description available.

Thesis advisor: Richard Kearney / I propose and analyze moral emotions that are fittingly experienced when one is socially, institutionally, or structurally affiliated with a perpetrator without causally contributing to their harm. The project explores the nature, scope, and urgency of our reactive attitudes and concomitant responsibilities that arise on account of harms caused by social and political relations. Drawing from resources in phenomenology, social epistemology, moral psychology, and feminist ethics, I argue that affective experiences can direct attention towards the moral salience of our relations and open the way for taking accountability for others’ harm. / Thesis (PhD) — Boston College, 2022. / Submitted to: Boston College. Graduate School of Arts and Sciences. / Discipline: Philosophy.

Tableau d’honneur de la Faculté des études supérieures et postdoctorales, 2015-2016 / Afin d’estimer la fréquence du regret décisionnel de patients suite à une consultation médicale et d’en identifier les facteurs de risque, nous avons réalisé une analyse secondaire d’une banque de données portant sur 258 consultations en soins de première ligne. À l’aide de l’Échelle de Regret Décisionnel (ÉRD), nous avons observé que la moyenne ± écart-type et la médiane du score de regret décisionnel étaient respectivement de 11.7 ± 15.1 et de 5 (sur une échelle de 0 à 100). Au total 43% des participants n’éprouvaient aucun regret (score = 0), alors que 45% avaient un score compatible avec un faible regret (score = 5 – 25) et 12% avaient un regret plus élevé (score ≥ 30). Après ajustement pour l’âge et le niveau d’éducation des patients ainsi que pour le sexe et le statut des cliniciens, seul un niveau élevé de conflit décisionnel fut identifié comme facteur de risque du regret. La fréquence de regret décisionnel en première ligne justifie des approches ciblant la réduction du conflit décisionnel. / To estimate the frequency of decision regret and examine risk factors associated with regret, we conducted a secondary analysis of data collected from 258 primary care consultations. With the Decision Regret Scale, we observed that mean ± standard deviation and median decision regret scores were 11.7 ± 15.1 and 5 respectively (on a scale of 0 to 100). Overall, 43% of participants did not experience decision regret (score = 0), while 45% experienced mild regret (score = 5 – 25) and 12% experienced higher regret (score ≥ 30). After adjusting for patient age and education level as well as physician gender and status, a high level of decisional conflict was identified as the only risk factor of regret. The frequency of decision regret in primary care justifies approaches targeting the reduction of decisional conflict.

No description available.

No description available.

We examine the economic behavior of the regret-averse firm under price uncertainty. We show that the global and marginal effects of price uncertainty on production are both positive (negative) when regret aversion prevails if the random output price is positively (negatively) skewed. In this case, high (low) output prices are much more likely to be seen than low (high) output prices. To minimize regret, the firm is induced to raise (lower) its output optimal level. The skewness of the price distribution as such plays a pivotal role in determining the regret-averse firm\'s production decision.