Thesis (M. Phil.)--University of Hong Kong, 2006. / Also available online.

The RCg2 promoter was identified in a search for root-specific genes to combat the rice water weevil (RWW) but expressed at low frequency (~10%). Spatial expression of RCg2 was investigated using two reporter constructs YXA (RCg2-gus-ocs) and YXB (RCg2-gus-RCg2) that included 1.6 kb of the RCg2 5' sequence fused to the ?-glucuronidase (gus) coding region. YXB plants were generated via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation but only 8 of 158 plants analyzed showed strong GUS activity despite the presence of an intact construct. Reactivation of RCg2 gene in rice was investigated by treatment of R0 and R1 of YXB transgenic plants with 5-azacytidine. Reactivation of RCg2-gus was observed in some transgenic plants indicating different mechanisms involved in the gene silencing of the YXB lines. DNA methylation analysis, northern blotting, RT-PCR and small RNA analysis supported the conclusion that PTGS and TGS are present in the silenced plants. Promoter analysis in silico and using promoter deletion assays predicted that the RCg2 promoter contains a complex region that includes miRNA homologs, MITEs and repetitive sequences. The high frequency of promoter-related silencing suggests functional interactions of these elements of the transgene and the homologous endogenous gene. To identify key elements contributing to the root-preferential expression of RCg2 and the high frequency of silencing observed in transgenic (YXB) lines, several RCg2 promoter deletion constructs were designed. These include 5' deletions MC1, MC2, MC4, MC7 and MC8 and internal deletions MC5, MC11, MC12 and MC13. The frequency with which silencing was encountered in populations of the deletion mutants was used to characterize the effects of various promoter elements. Deletion of the region from -406 to -208 (compared MC11 to YXB, and MC13 to MC1) revealed that region contains a negative element. Among 36 independent transformants, 33% with MC11 expressed GUS and 85% with MC13 showed GUS expression. Comparing MC7 transgenic plants to MC1 revealed that the region ?888 to ?729 is another negative regulatory element, and comparing MC11 to MC12, the proportion of expression of transgenic plants indicated the region ?729 to ?406 is a positive regulatory element.

A chaque instant notre organisme est confronté à des agents pathogènes de nature très variable. Pourtant, malgré toutes les agressions rencontrées, il maintient une certaine intégrité. Cette dernière résulte de la mise en place d’un système de défense perfectionné, fruit de la collaboration étroite de diverses cellules : le système immunitaire. Parmi toutes les cellules qui le composent, les cellules dendritiques jouent un rôle prépondérant. Disséminées dans la plupart de nos organes et tissus, elles surveillent, en alerte du moindre danger. Elles orchestrent la réponse immune : elles sont capables d'initier et polariser une réponse immune ou d'instaurer la tolérance. De nombreux traitements thérapeutiques tentent d’exploiter leurs capacités intrinsèques. Ces cellules présentent en effet un grand potentiel dans la vaccination anti-tumorale et antivirale, dans l’acceptation de greffes et le contrôle de maladies auto-immunes. Toutefois, de nombreux éclaircissements restent encore à apporter que ce soit sur l’ontogénie des cellules dendritiques, leur rôle ou leur propre biologie. Aussi, le dessein de ce travail était d’approfondir nos connaissances fondamentales sur les propriétés moléculaires et la biologie des cellules dendritiques afin de mieux appréhender la nature et l’amplitude des réponses qu’elles induisent. A cette fin, nous avons identifié deux nouveaux gènes qu’elles expriment préférentiellement et nous avons essayé de caractériser leur fonction. L’avènement de l’utilisation de la technique d’ARN interférence dans les systèmes de mammifères et le développement des vecteurs lentiviraux nous sont apparus comme des outils présentant un réel potentiel pour répondre à nos questions. Nous avons donc généré des souris qui sur- ou sous- expriment le gène d’intérêt, par infection lentivirale d’embryons, pour tenter de cerner son rôle in vivo. Cette méthode de transgénèse était très prometteuse car rapide, efficace, peu onéreuse et sollicitait peu de compétences pour la manipulation des embryons. Cependant, l’approche s’est révélée plus laborieuse que prévu. Nous avons en effet rencontré de nombreux phénomènes de variégation et de « silencing » qui a rendu plus ardue l’utilisation des souris transgéniques. Néanmoins, nous pensons aujourd’hui être à même d’élaborer une stratégie de sélection des souris générées par transgénèse lentivirale qui ne développeraient probablement pas les problèmes rencontrés. Au cours de l’étude, nous avons également observé une fluctuation de l’activité du promoteur CAG pendant le développement thymique, pointant l’importance du choix d’un promoteur optimal en fonction du projet de recherche. Enfin, l’analyse des souris, bien que préliminaire, suggère un rôle potentiel d’un des gènes examinés dans la différenciation, la mobilisation ou la survie des cellules dendritiques, des macrophages et des lymphocytes B.

<p>In <italic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</italic>, proper maintenance of haploid cell identity requires the SIR complex to mediate the silenced chromatin found at the cryptic mating-type loci, <italic>HML</italic> and <itaic>HMR</italic>. This complex consists of Sir2, a histone deacetylase and the histone binding proteins Sir3 and Sir4. Interestingly, both Sir2 and Sir3 have paralogs from a genome duplication that occurred after the divergence of <italic>Saccharomyces</italic> and <italic>Kluyveromyces species</italic>. The histone deacetylase <italic>HST1</italic> is the paralog of <italic>SIR2</italic> and works with the promoter-specific SUM1 complex to repress sporulation and alpha-specific genes. <italic>ORC1</italic> is the paralog of <italic>SIR3</italic> and is an essential subunit of the Origin Recognition Complex and also recruits SIR proteins to the <italic>HM</italic> loci. I have investigated the functions of these proteins in the non-duplicated species <italic>Kluyveromyces lactis</italic> and compared these functions to those found in <italic>S. cerevisiae</italic>. </p> <p>I have shown that <italic>SIR2</italic> and <italic>HST1</italic> subfunctionalized post-duplication via the duplication, degeneration and complementation mechanism. In <italic>S. cerevisiae</italic>, Sir2 has retained the ability to function like Hst1 when in an <italic>hst1&#916;</italic> strain. I have also shown, with a chimeric Sir2-Hst1 protein, that there are distinct specificity domains for Sir2 interaction with the SIR complex and Hst1 interaction with the SUM1 complex that have diverged between Sir2 and Hst1. Trans-species complementation assays show that the non-duplicated Sir2 from <italic>K. lactis</italic> can interact with both SIR and SUM1 complexes in <italic>S. cerevisiae</italic>.</p> <p>Further analysis into the non-duplicated experimental system of <italic>K. lactis</italic> has revealed that deletion of KlSir2 de-represses the HM loci as well as sporulation and cell-type specific genes. A physical interaction between KlSir2 and the histone binding protein KlSir4 is conserved in <italic>K. lactis</italic>, and both proteins spread across the <italic>HML</italic> locus and associate with telomeres in a manner similar to <italic>S. cerevisiae</italic>. KlSir2 also physically interacts with the DNA-binding protein, KlSum1, to repress sporulation and cell-type specific genes in a promoter-specific manner and recruitment of KlSir2 to these loci is dependent on KlSum1. Surprisingly, deletion of <italic>KlSUM1</italic> also de-represses <italic>HML</italic> and <italic>HMR</italic>, a phenotype not observed in <italic>S. cerevisiae</italic>. I show by chromatin immunoprecipitation that KlSum1 directly regulates the <italic>HM</italic> loci by spreading across these regions in a mechanism that is distinct from its role in repressing sporulation-specific genes. This result indicates that KlSum1 is a key regulator of not only meiotic, but also mating-type transcriptional programming. </p> <p>The <italic>SIR3-ORC1</italic> gene pair has previously been used as an example of neofunctionalization based on accelerated rates of evolution. However, my studies of KlOrc1 show it is distributed across <italic>HML</italic> and associates with Sir2 and Sir4 at telomeres, indicative of it having Sir3-like capabilities to spread across chromatin. This ability of KlOrc1 to spread is distinct from its functions with ORC, and is entirely dependent on its BAH domain. These findings demonstrate that prior to the genome duplication there was a silencing complex that contained both KlSir2 and KlOrc1. In addition to their functions at <italic>HML</italic> and the telomeres, KlOrc1 associates with replication origins and KlSir2 and KlSum1 work in complex to repress sporulation genes in a promoter-specific manner. The multiple functions of both KlOrc1 and KlSir2 in K. lactis indicate that after duplication, these properties were divided among paralogs and subsequently specialized to perform the functions that have been characterized in <italic>S. cerevisiae</italic>.</p> / Dissertation

Meiosis, the core engine of sexual reproduction, is a complex process that results in the production of recombinant haploid genomes. In the meioses of Neurospora, worms and mice, gene expression from DNA that lacks a pairing partner is silenced. We posit that this is a two-step process. First, a process called meiotic trans-sensing compares the chromosomes from each parent and identifies significant differences as unpaired DNA. Second, if unpaired DNA is identified, a process called meiotic silencing inhibits expression of genes within the unpaired region and regions sharing sequence identity. Meiotic silencing is mechanistically most likely related to RNAi in other eukaryotes. We used a combination of forward and reverse genetic strategies aimed at understanding the mechanisms of meiotic trans-sensing and meiotic silencing. Here, we present genetic evidence that arguably differentiates the meiotic transsensing step from meiotic silencing, by demonstrating that DNA methylation affects sensing of specific allele-types without interfering with silencing in general. We also determined that DNA sequence is an important parameter scrutinized during meiotic trans-sensing. This, and other observations, led us to hypothesize meiotic recombination as the mechanism for meiotic trans-sensing. However, we find that mutants of key genes required for recombination and chromosome pairing are not required for locus-specific meiotic silencing. We conclude that two interesting possibilities remain: meiotic trans-sensing occurs through a previously uncharacterized recombination pathway or chromosomal regions are carefully compared in the absence of recombination. Finally, forward genetics revealed a novel component of meiotic silencing, Sms-4, encoding the Neurospora ortholog of mammalian mRNP component ELG protein. Unlike previous loss-of-function mutants that abate meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA, Sms-4 is not required for successful meiosis, showing that meiosis and meiotic silencing are distinct, yet overlapping, phenomena. Intriguingly, SMS-4 is the first component to be localized with bulk chromatin in the nucleus, presumably the site of trans-sensing. Finally, we carried out a critical examination of the current evidence in the field and present alternative models for meiotic trans-sensing and meiotic silencing in Neurospora.

The RCg2 promoter was identified in a search for root-specific genes to combat the rice water weevil (RWW) but expressed at low frequency (~10%). Spatial expression of RCg2 was investigated using two reporter constructs YXA (RCg2-gus-ocs) and YXB (RCg2-gus-RCg2) that included 1.6 kb of the RCg2 5' sequence fused to the ?-glucuronidase (gus) coding region. YXB plants were generated via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation but only 8 of 158 plants analyzed showed strong GUS activity despite the presence of an intact construct. Reactivation of RCg2 gene in rice was investigated by treatment of R0 and R1 of YXB transgenic plants with 5-azacytidine. Reactivation of RCg2-gus was observed in some transgenic plants indicating different mechanisms involved in the gene silencing of the YXB lines. DNA methylation analysis, northern blotting, RT-PCR and small RNA analysis supported the conclusion that PTGS and TGS are present in the silenced plants. Promoter analysis in silico and using promoter deletion assays predicted that the RCg2 promoter contains a complex region that includes miRNA homologs, MITEs and repetitive sequences. The high frequency of promoter-related silencing suggests functional interactions of these elements of the transgene and the homologous endogenous gene. To identify key elements contributing to the root-preferential expression of RCg2 and the high frequency of silencing observed in transgenic (YXB) lines, several RCg2 promoter deletion constructs were designed. These include 5' deletions MC1, MC2, MC4, MC7 and MC8 and internal deletions MC5, MC11, MC12 and MC13. The frequency with which silencing was encountered in populations of the deletion mutants was used to characterize the effects of various promoter elements. Deletion of the region from -406 to -208 (compared MC11 to YXB, and MC13 to MC1) revealed that region contains a negative element. Among 36 independent transformants, 33% with MC11 expressed GUS and 85% with MC13 showed GUS expression. Comparing MC7 transgenic plants to MC1 revealed that the region ?888 to ?729 is another negative regulatory element, and comparing MC11 to MC12, the proportion of expression of transgenic plants indicated the region ?729 to ?406 is a positive regulatory element.

No description available.

The mop2 gene is required for epigenetic silencing; it was originally defined as a mutation, Mop2-1, which when dominant prevented paramutation at b1. Paramutation is an allele communication that causes a mitotically and meiotically heritable change in gene expression. Mop2-1 was subsequently shown to be involved in maintaining the silenced paramutant state and to prevent dsRNA-mediated transcriptional gene silencing (activities revealed only when the mutation is homozygous). Understanding the product encoded by mop2 will help dissect the underlying mechanisms involved in paramutation and dsRNA-mediated transcriptional silencing. This dissertation describes map-based cloning and candidate gene approaches directed toward the eventual goal of identification of mop2.Initial mapping of mop2 placed it within a region delineated by the markers umc1823 and eks1. On the maize physical map this region contains 21 BAC (Bacteria Artificial Chromosome) clones, representing 2.9 Mb. Skim sequencing identified additional markers for mapping and revealed the gene content. Extensive candidate gene examinations, including gene sequencing, expression profiling with microarrays and RT-PCR, and complementation tests with mutant alleles did not identify any of the four chromatin and RNAi-related genes as mop2.The new markers developed from the skim sequence enabled further mapping and molecular genotyping, which revealed that the Mop2-1 mutation was unstable. Approxi¬mately 10% of phenotypic heterozygous plants were actually genotypic homozygous. Further mapping using only Mop2-1 homozygous plants reduced the mop2 interval to a region of nine BACs, containing 57 genes.The mop2 region is highly syntenic to a rice region of 1.25 Mb on chromosome 4. The gene alignment and repetitive sequence analyses between the syntenic regions in these two species revealed both syntenic and non-syntenic blocks of sequences. Analyses suggested several potential mechanisms for the collinearity breakage, including, but not limited to, tandem duplications of genes in one species but not the other and the presence of gene fragments in maize, but not in rice.The research described herein provides the basis for continued efforts to clone mop2. Fine-structure mapping with new markers and a larger population, as well as candidate gene sequencing in the Mop2-1 BAC library, should be pursued to clone mop2.

Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons account for approximately 10% of mouse and 8% of human genomes and may play a role in modifying gene expression. Many species harbor retrotransposon families encompassing both autonomous and non-autonomous members. Specifically, the mouse Early Transposon (ETn) family members lack all retroviral genes but are transcriptionally and retrotranspositionally active, causing over 20 known insertional germline mutations. ETns owe their retrotransposition potential to proteins encoded by structurally intact MusD retrotransposons with whom they share LTRs. ETn elements are transcribed at a much higher level than MusD retrotransposons in embryos and undifferentiated cells, suggesting their evasion of host restriction mechanisms. However, mechanisms responsible for the replicative success of non-autonomous retrotransposon subfamilies over their coding-competent relatives are poorly understood. In the first stage of my research, I analyzed regulatory sequences in an ETn LTR responsible for its high promoter activity in the undifferentiated cell line P19. I found that three GC-boxes that may function as Sp1/Sp3 binding sites act synergistically and are indispensable for undifferentiated cell-specific promoter activity of the LTR. Sp1 binding partners may be responsible for the restricted ETn expression. Moreover, I have shown that unlike many retroviruses, ETn elements possess multiple transcription initiation sites and that they have amplified via intracellular retrotransposition in the P19 teratocarcinoma cell line. In the next step of my research, I performed analysis of epigenetic mechanisms as a means of ERV suppression. Specifically, I showed that in embryonic stem cells, autonomous MusD retrotransposons are epigenetically suppressed to a greater degree than non-autonomous ETn retrotransposons, illustrated by a higher level of DNA methylation and a lower level of active histone modifications. I hypothesize that MusD elements may be silenced by DNA methylation and repressive chromatin spreading into the LTR from the CpG-rich internal retroviral sequence absent in ETn elements. I propose that internal structure largely devoid of high CG content enables ETn elements to evade host-imposed transcriptional repression, contributing to their high mutagenic activity in the mouse germline.

Transgenic organisms are a valuable tool for studying epigenetics, as they provide significant insight into the evolutionary conservation of epigenetic control sequences, the interacting proteins, and the underlying molecular mechanisms. Paramutation is an epigenetic phenomenon in which the epigenetic status and expression level of one allele is heritably altered after pairing with another. At the b1 locus in maize, a control region consisting of seven 853 bp tandem repeats is required for paramutation. To study the conservation of the epigenetic mechanisms underlying maize b1 paramutation, I created transgenic Drosophila carrying the maize b1 control region flanked by FRT sites and adjacent to the Drosophila white reporter gene. The maize b1 tandem repeats caused epigenetic silencing in Drosophila, as white expression consistently increased following repeat removal. A single copy of the tandem repeat sequence was sufficient to cause silencing, and silencing strength increased as the number of repeats increased. Trans interactions, such as pairing-sensitive silencing, were also observed and appear to require a threshold number of b1 tandem repeats, similar to paramutation in maize. Analysis of transcription from the repeats showed that the b1 tandem repeats are transcribed from both strands in Drosophila, as they are in maize. Bidirectional transcription was found to extend to the regions flanking the repeats, and persisted in “repeats-out” transgenes following repeat removal. However, aberrant transcription was lost when a zero-repeat transgene was moved to a new genomic position, suggesting that it may be due to an epigenetic mark that is retained from the previous silenced state. A search for modifiers of b1 repeat-mediated silencing demonstrated that Polycomb group proteins are involved. Together, these results indicate considerable conservation of an epigenetic silencing process between the plant and animal kingdoms. Genomic imprinting is a related epigenetic process in which parent-specific epigenetic states are inherited and maintained in progeny. The conservation of epigenetic mechanisms was further explored via an in-depth review of the molecular mechanisms underlying genomic imprinting in plants, mammals and insects, and identification of potentially imprinted genes in Drosophila by microarray analysis.