No description available.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Illinois State University, 1985. / Title from title page screen, viewed June 7, 2005. Dissertation Committee: David F. Weber (chair), Herman Brockman, Tsan Iang Chuang, Alan Katz, Derek McCracken. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 118-142) and abstract. Also available in print.

Thesis (M.A. in International Security and Civil-Military Relations)--Naval Postgraduate School, December 2002. / Thesis advisor(s): Robert Looney, Lois Roberts. Includes bibliographical references (p. 71-75). Also available online.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Lehigh University, 2005. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 98-112).

No description available.

A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, for the degree of Master of Science (Medicine). / Objective: To determine the relationship between asbestos exposure and chromosome damage, as depicted by sister chromatid exchange frequency. Design: Descriptive, cross-sectional study. Setting: Asbestos-products factory Subjects: 31 asbestos-exposed subjects and 21 unexposed subjects Main outcome measure: Mean sister chromatid exchange (SCE) frequency per metaphase cell. Results: The control group had a slightly higher mean SCE frequency per cell than the exposed group (3.4%) but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.5935). Smoking contributed significantly to SCE frequencies in both the exposed and unexposed groups. The mean SCE frequencies per cell in the exposed group were 10.49 for smokers and 8.59 for non-smokers (p = 0.0078). The frequencies for smokers and non-smokers in the unexposed group were 10.83 and 8.58, respectively (p = 0.0257). Conclusions: The failure to observe an increase in SCE frequency does not rule out asbestos exposure as a genotoxic agent. Rather, it may help to resolve the limitations of this method for detecting genetic damage. Alternatively, the fibre levels to which this group was exposed may have been too low to cause chromosome damage. / WHSLYP2016

No description available.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 1998. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves [181]-185).

No description available.

The purpose of this study was to examine privilege in families and uncover the complexities of sibling relationships in adulthood. Through interviewing 13 adult siblings and 3 mothers from 4 families my goal was to gain a clearer picture of what privilege in families means. The sample consisted of a family with 3 sisters, a family with 3 brothers and a sister, a family with 4 brothers, and a family with 2 brothers and a sister. The adult siblings ranged in age from 30 to 60, with an average age of 42. The mothers ranged in age from 62 to 70, with an average age of 67. The study was guided by three theoretical frameworks: a life course, a phenomenological, and a feminist perspective. I conducted this study utilizing an integration of qualitative and feminist methodologies. I used a snowball sampling technique to recruit participants. Data were collected through the use of qualitative in-depth interviews. The interview guides were developed based on the research questions, the review of literature, and the theories guiding the study. I draw 5 conclusions from this study. First, there is a sense of devotion to family that is both expected and fulfilled by simply spending time together, being there for each other in times of need, and at times compromising personal needs or wants. Second, there is an overarching sense of justice that is discussed in everyday language, but at the same time referred to as "something we don't ever think about." Third, descriptions of having a continuous bond among siblings is verbalized as "being the same but different" or just feeling "something in the air," while at the same time mourning the absense of something that is "gone forever." Fourth, interviewing multiple family members extends the understanding of the difficulty of taking different stories heard by each family member and fitting them together into a "family photo." Finally, maintaining an awareness of what it is like to try to "speak for your family" has a different meaning when you also hold the knowledge that everyone else is doing the same thing--but different. / Ph. D.