Submitted by Celso Magalhaes (celsomagalhaes@ufrrj.br) on 2018-08-15T12:28:03Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2017 - Daniel Delatin Rodrigues.pdf: 2033524 bytes, checksum: 9fb78d209b631253006de85fe5778f97 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-15T12:28:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2017 - Daniel Delatin Rodrigues.pdf: 2033524 bytes, checksum: 9fb78d209b631253006de85fe5778f97 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-06-01 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico - CNPq / The aim of the thesis was analyse the theory and practice of ecological restoration. Formed as a scientific field in the 1980s, ecological restoration proposed a new type of engagement with biodiversity which differed considerably from the strategies taken by preservationism and conservationism in the last century. More than protecting or conserving, the practice of ecological restoration seeks to create ecosystems. Numerous controversies on how it is possible to create new ecosystems will involve ecological restoration?s specialists. Starting from a dialogue with sociology and anthropology of science, the thesis explores the formation process of this field and aims to highlight what horizons of action are constituted by the ecological restoration?s practices. The work was done following three main lines. First it analyses two specialized journals editorials - written between 1981 and 2016 - to identify the most problematic issues defined by the scientists. Later the thesis explores the configuration of the field in Brazil and, finally, it discusses the relations between ecological restoration, ruralities and agriculture in Brazil. The aim is to circumscribe the emergence of different forms of ecological restoration. We will show that the theory and practice of this field of study are indissolubly linked to three aspects: the type of science which is considered by scientists able to define actions; the definition of a reference system that should guide scientists in the creation process of ecosystems and the different understanding of human-nonhuman relations. Ecological restoration works by projecting potential relationships among a multiplicity of agents. In this work ecological restoration will be considered as an (eco) political technology which involves the creation and modulation of socio-ecological relations and not only ecologica / O objetivo desta tese foi analisar a teoria e a pr?tica da restaura??o ecol?gica. Formada como campo cient?fico na d?cada de 1980 a restaura??o ecol?gica prop?s um novo tipo de compromisso com a biodiversidade que se diferenciava muito das estrat?gias assumidas pelo preservacionismo e conservacionismo no s?culo passado. Mais do que proteger ou conservar, a pr?tica de restaura??o ecol?gica busca criar ecossistemas. In?meras controv?rsias envolver?o os especialistas da ?rea a respeito de como isso pode ou deve ser feito. Essa tese ir? acompanhar o processo de forma??o desse campo buscando ressaltar, a partir dos instrumentos te?ricos vindo da sociologia e antropologia da ci?ncia, quais horizontes de a??o s?o constitu?dos pela pr?tica. O trabalho foi realizado a partir de tr?s linhas principais: an?lise dos editoriais de duas revistas especializadas na ?rea entre os anos de 1981 e 2016, para identificar o campo problem?tico dos cientistas; an?lise da forma??o do campo no Brasil e, por fim, a discuss?o sobre as rela??es entre restaura??o ecol?gica, ruralidades e agriculturas no Brasil. O objetivo foi delimitar a emerg?ncia de diferentes formas de restaura??o ecol?gica. Veremos que a teoria e a pr?tica do campo est?o indissoluvelmente ligadas a tr?s aspectos: ao tipo de ci?ncia considerada apta pelos cientistas para definir as a??es; ? defini??o de um sistema de refer?ncia que deve orientar os cientistas na cria??o dos ecossistemas e ao modo como ser?o definidas as rela??es entre humanos e n?o-humanos. Ela ir? trabalhar projetando rela??es potenciais de uma multiplicidade de agentes. Nesse trabalho a restaura??o ecol?gica ser? considerada como uma tecnologia (eco)pol?tica que concerne ? cria??o e modula??o de rela??es socioecol?gicas e n?o apenas ecol?gicas

Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-01-27T12:51:53Z No. of bitstreams: 1 CatarinaDaSilvaSouza_TESE.pdf: 1454198 bytes, checksum: 66b3687b350a3db98a55ec20db74fb6a (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-01-30T15:12:53Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 CatarinaDaSilvaSouza_TESE.pdf: 1454198 bytes, checksum: 66b3687b350a3db98a55ec20db74fb6a (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-01-30T15:12:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 CatarinaDaSilvaSouza_TESE.pdf: 1454198 bytes, checksum: 66b3687b350a3db98a55ec20db74fb6a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-04-29 / ministra??o, que recebe sobremodo influ?ncias de uma colonialidade do pensamento, que subjaz a outras possibilidades de vis?es, numa perspectiva mais cr?tica e reflexiva acerca das quest?es organizacionais e suas implica??es no contexto sociocultural, expressas tanto nos itiner?rios das ideias, como na l?gica produtivista do pensamento linear, bem como na forma??o utilitarista dos cursos das escolas superiores. T?m-se como objetivo elaborar uma cartografia simb?lica das ideias do conhecimento em administra??o na tentativa de identificar aproxima??es com o conhecimento regula??o, mas tamb?m pistas de aproxima??es com o conhecimento emancipa??o. Prop?e-se mapear as perspectivas epistemol?gicas do conhecimento em Administra??o no Brasil, tendo como aporte te?ricoepistemol?gico autores cl?ssicos e contempor?neos que discutem a descoloniza??o do pensamento, destacando-se a proposta de Boaventura de Sousa Santos ao trabalhar como contraponto a esse colonialismo hegem?nico a ?epistemologia do sul?, complementada por outros referentes epist?micos de Santos, quais sejam os conceitos de Sociologia das Aus?ncias, Sociologia das Emerg?ncias, Ecologia dos saberes, e Tradu??o, al?m de referentes de outros autores do movimento Modernidade/Colonialidade. Para compreender a constitui??o desse conhecimento, examinam-se, como campo emp?rico, as experi?ncias encontradas no Col?quio Internacional de Epistemologia e Sociologia da Ci?ncia da Administra??o (2011- 2015). Enquanto estrat?gia de pesquisa configuram-se os dados da pesquisa emp?rica em uma cartografia simb?lica, conforme proposta por Santos (2009a), por ela permitir a demonstra??o das ?[...] virtualidades anal?ticas e te?ricas de uma abordagem sociol?gica que tome por matriz de refer?ncia a constru??o e a representa??o do espa?o?. Constata-se uma atualiza??o das perspectivas epistemol?gicas do conhecimento em administra??o, no sentido de buscar as bases epist?micas que fomentam sua constitui??o, bem como; compress?o e dialogo com outras ?reas do conhecimento e suas estrat?gias metodol?gicas. Destaque para tem?ticas como gest?o p?blica, economia solid?ria, racionalidade e dom?nios espec?ficos da administra??o, como finan?as, empreendedorismo e estrat?gia. Verifica-se o alinhamento ao conhecimento regula??o, todavia; h? aproxima??es ao conhecimento emancipa??o iminente ?s reflex?es do pensamento cr?tico em administra??o. / We study the epistemological perspectives of knowledge production Administration, which seems to receive greatly influences a coloniality of thought which underlies other possibilities visions in a more critical and reflective perspective on organizational issues and their implications for the socio-cultural context, expressed both on the routes of ideas, as in the productivist logic of linear thinking and the utilitarian training courses of higher education. There have as objective to elaborate a symbolic mapping of knowledge management ideas in an attempt to identify approaches with knowledge regulation, but also approaches slopes with knowledge emancipation. It is proposed to map the epistemological perspectives of knowledge in Administration in Brazil, with the theoretical and epistemological contribution classic and contemporary authors propose the decolonization of thought, especially the proposal of Boaventura de Sousa Santos to work as opposed to this colonialism hegemonic the "southern epistemology", complemented by other epistemic referents of Santos, namely the concepts of Sociology of Absences, Sociology of Emergencies, ecology of knowledge, and translation, as well as regarding other authors of Modernity / Coloniality movement. To understand the constitution of this knowledge, it looks as empirical field, the experiences found in the International Colloquium on Epistemology and Sociology of Management Science (2011-2015). While research strategy configure the data of empirical research in a symbolic cartography, as proposed by Santos (2009a), for it allows the demonstration of "[...] analytical and theoretical virtues of a sociological approach to take for matrix reference to construction and representation of space?. There has been an update to the epistemological perspectives of knowledge in administration, in order to seek the epistemic bases that promote their constitution, as well as; compression and dialogue with other areas of knowledge and methodologies strategies. Highlighting issues such as public management, solidarity economy, rationality and specific areas of management such as finance, entrepreneurship and strategy. Check the alignment knowledge regulation, however; There are approaches to knowledge imminent emancipation to the reflections of critical thinking in management.